Bankless:EigenLayer能否不负众望?

Odaily星球日报Pubblicato 2024-04-25Pubblicato ultima volta 2024-04-25

Introduzione

虽然EigenLayer所追求的概念当然值得称赞,但再质押是否真正是下一个伟大的加密创新,还是只是另一个依赖于加密白日梦的,还有待观察。

原文作者:Jack Inabinet,Bankless

原文编译:白水,金色财经

EigenLayer 无疑是加密货币历史上最受期待的空投机会,但对于 EIGEN 和更广泛的以太坊生态系统来说,空投之后的代币下跌是不可避免的吗?

EigenLayer 处于再质押的最前沿,创建了一个共享安全市场,允许寻求创建分散网络的开发人员规避与引导和运营自己的信任网络相关的困难,降低了创建这些网络的进入门槛,并赋予了加密安全应用程序的长尾。

仅 EIGEN 空投就有望跻身加密货币有史以来最大的空投行列,存款人可以轻松地从流动性再质押 (LRT) 协议和主动验证的服务 (AVS) 中获得增加的分配!

由于预计这些即将到来的空投,近 500 万 ETH( 价值约 155 亿美元 ) 已被重新分配给 EigenLayer,但越来越多的人担心,协议的 AVS 产生的收益将无法满足后 EIGEN 空投世界的存款人。

Bankless:EigenLayer能否不负众望?

市场参与者存入 EigenLayer 并不是出于自己内心的慷慨,而是因为他们相信这样做会产生超过其机会成本的财务回报,或者通过替代策略(例如,为 去中心化交易所)。

虽然 EigenLayer 目前支持对 AVS 的委托,但它们尚未产生收益,这意味着储户只是猜测未来的空投将补偿他们。

在没有实际收入的情况下,在预测估值时,想象力可能会变得疯狂,但它们不可避免的到来可能会给「EigenLayer 轻而易举地价值数百亿美元」的集体错觉泼冷水; 如果 AVS 收益率令人失望,协议将发现越来越难以证明高估值的合理性。

许多 AVS 不存在直接可比性,但是,Celestia(提供与 EigenDA 类似的数据可用性服务的区块链)每年仅产生几千美元的收入,对于一个价值 120 亿美元的网络来说,这只是零头,要依靠高水平的代币通胀来吸引投资者保护其网络。

AVS 必须采用自己的通胀代币经济学来提供安全保障,这只会让市场近几周来难以消化的替代品供应过剩状况进一步恶化。

Bankless:EigenLayer能否不负众望?

为了避免在 AVS 收益率不足的情况下发生 TVL 的大规模外流,EigenLayer 可能只会在第一轮中分发其打算空投的代币总数的一小部分,从而实现未来 EIGEN 奖励的承诺作为激励储户的胡萝卜。

不幸的是,如果市场开始审视这种可持续性,它可能会认为 EigenLayer 被高估,从而对未来空投的感知价值产生负面影响,并导致 TVL 从协议中流失,直到达到平衡,剩余的存款人觉得他们的资本机会成本得到了充分的补偿。

寻求最大限度地利用 EigenLayer 机会的投机者通常会利用高杠杆进行操作,从而刺激对从普通货币市场到收益分割协议等各种加密应用程序的需求。

尽管高收益的 EigenLayer 机会使整个以太坊 DeFi 生态系统受益,但储户对隐含回报的不满可能会平仓,从而削弱收益率,并对依赖于再质押成功的项目引发负面的后果。

此外,自 12 月以来,EigenLayer 一直是 ETH 的主要吸收地,存款在不到 5 个月的时间里增长了 6, 100% 。如果寻求空投的 EigenLayer 用户流入 ETH 的边际资金转为销售,同时放弃促进投机活动的 DeFi 协议,那么以太坊和其他相关加密资产的价格将受到不利影响。

通过瞄准伟大并催化加密经济安全的革命,EigenLayer 使其空投抢先交易成为一种明显的策略,但加密货币的回报不会没有风险,而且 EigenLayer 目前的存款水平是否可持续值得怀疑。

虽然协议可以自由铸造和膨胀其代币,但市场参与者必须购买不断增加的供应量,否则代币价格将会下跌。

虽然 EigenLayer 所追求的概念当然值得称赞,但再质押是否真正是下一个伟大的加密创新,还是只是另一个依赖于加密白日梦的,还有待观察。代币通胀不可持续,几乎没有产生实际收入。

如果后一种情况被证明是真实的,EigenLayer 将被归入「坏主意」箱,对以太坊生态系统造成重大打击,失去关键的共享叙述。

Letture associate

Giants Wage the Context War, Reconstructing AI Moats

The article "Giants Launch the Context War, Reconstructing AI's Moat" discusses how leading AI companies—OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google—are shifting their competitive focus from model size to acquiring, managing, and utilizing user context (Context). Initially, Context referred to the length of text a model could process, leading to a "arms race" for longer context windows. However, the competition has evolved through three key phases: expanding text capacity (long context windows), enabling memory across sessions, and finally, integrating AI into real user environments like browsers and desktops to capture dynamic task states. Each company is pursuing a distinct strategy. OpenAI is building Context around the ChatGPT account, turning it into a central hub that accumulates user understanding across various integrated applications and tools. Anthropic, lacking a major user base, focuses on high-value verticals like coding, empowering its Claude model to actively gather Context through GUI interaction (Computer Use) and system connections (MCP protocol). Google, with vast existing user data from products like Search and Gmail, faces the challenge of restructuring this data into actionable, AI-understandable Context for its Gemini model within its ecosystem. The core argument is that the nature of competitive advantage in AI is changing. The internet era prized network effects—connecting more users. The AI era values "individual depth": the ability to build deep, task-specific understanding of a user. This creates a new moat through 1) the compounding value of accumulated Context, 2) deep integration with user tools and permissions, and 3) the establishment of trust for complex tasks. Therefore, the battle for Context is fundamentally about capturing "task entry points" and converting existing digital ecosystems into environments where AI can effectively understand and act, rather than merely scaling user numbers.

marsbit18 min fa

Giants Wage the Context War, Reconstructing AI Moats

marsbit18 min fa

Foundation Steps Back, Ethlabs Steps Forward: Ethereum Undergoes Its Largest Restructuring in History

On June 23rd, the Ethereum ecosystem witnessed two major shifts, signaling a significant governance realignment. First, former Ethereum Foundation researchers established Ethlabs, a new independent non-profit. Backed by major ETH holders like Bitmine and SharpLink, Ethlabs aims to address practical needs for institutional adoption, including faster settlement, native asset issuance, cross-chain transactions, and mainnet scaling. Secondly, the Ethereum Foundation announced a major restructuring, laying off 54 employees (20% of its staff) to become a leaner entity focused on protocol governance and maintenance rather than being the primary builder. This move represents a pivotal correction. Criticisms had mounted over the Foundation's perceived slowness, lack of clear strategy, and over-reliance on Vitalik Buterin's influence. Ethlabs emerges as a more execution-oriented, "industrialized" layer focused on market adoption—bridging the gap between research and real-world use. Notably, Vitalik Buterin is absent from its list of supporters, interpreted as an intentional step to avoid excessive personal endorsement and allow the organization to build independent credibility. The Ethereum Foundation's downsizing and redefinition mark a retreat from its former central coordinating role. It now aims to share the "privilege of stewarding Ethereum" with other emerging groups like Ethlabs, the Ethereum Applications Guild, and The Ethereum Economic Zone. Analysts frame this dual shift as the Foundation ensuring Ethereum remains "correct" (credibly neutral), while Ethlabs must prove it remains "effective" (competitive and attractive for capital and adoption). This addresses community "shareholder-like anxiety" about ETH's market performance. While risks exist—such as concerns over shifting from Foundation centrality to large-holder influence—the consensus is that the greater risk for Ethereum was inaction, caught between technical idealism and organizational inertia. These steps aim to create a more multi-stakeholder, execution-driven future for the network.

链捕手7 h fa

Foundation Steps Back, Ethlabs Steps Forward: Ethereum Undergoes Its Largest Restructuring in History

链捕手7 h fa

Second Half of U.S. Crypto Policy: The Clarity Act Aims for 60 Votes, CFTC's "One-Person Commission" Becomes Biggest Variable

In a pivotal year for US crypto policy, the "CLARITY Act" is advancing in the Senate but faces a high hurdle, needing 60 votes to pass. Key challenges include bridging partisan divides on ethics and swaying undecided Republican senators within a tight legislative calendar of only about 40 working days. The policy "second half" involves intense negotiations on a broader framework for Web3 and DeFi, including crypto tax reforms and the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act. A significant uncertainty is the understaffed CFTC, operating with four commissioner vacancies, which complicates regulatory clarity. Meanwhile, the departure of key "crypto champions"—SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce and Senator Cynthia Lummis—will impact ongoing policy efforts. Industry experts are cautiously optimistic but realistic. Sara K. Weed notes that while progress is being made, CLARITY is unlikely to pass this Congress, pushing agencies like the SEC and CFTC to provide more guidance. Sulolit Mukherjee suggests meaningful crypto tax legislation is more likely to be attached to larger must-pass bills. Rashan Colbert discusses the jurisdictional debate over prediction markets, emphasizing the need for a regulatory framework that fosters their development as financial tools rather than treating them broadly as gambling. The clock is ticking, but opportunities remain for substantive progress through continued bipartisan dialogue and pragmatic efforts.

marsbit10 h fa

Second Half of U.S. Crypto Policy: The Clarity Act Aims for 60 Votes, CFTC's "One-Person Commission" Becomes Biggest Variable

marsbit10 h fa

Dan Koe's New Essay: Escaping the Fate of the Wage Slave, How to Survive the AI Replacement Wave?

Dan Koe argues that the true threat in the AI era isn't technology itself, but a reliance on others for one's livelihood and happiness. The core problem is "wage slavery"—spending life on unfulfilling work. To survive and thrive, one must escape this by building their own enterprise. The key is developing five elements: Agency (initiative), Taste (discernment), Persuasion, Persistence, and Iteration. These boil down to problem-solving skills and experiential knowledge, which cannot be learned passively but only through doing your own projects. The solution is to become "unemployable" by shifting your identity. This requires: 1) Radically changing your environment to force growth, 2) Choosing a medium (like content creation) that provides real feedback through trial and error, and 3) Mastering either code or, preferably, media (content). Content creation is more valuable because its subjective nature and need for human perspective create a durable advantage over generic AI output. To start, define your life's work by answering foundational questions about your innate knowledge, unique abilities, and contrarian beliefs. Then, immediately act by publishing your first piece of content. The cycle of creating, receiving feedback, and iterating is the essential path to developing the skills needed for an independent, meaningful career and financial resilience.

marsbit11 h fa

Dan Koe's New Essay: Escaping the Fate of the Wage Slave, How to Survive the AI Replacement Wave?

marsbit11 h fa

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片