如果美国的银行继续倒闭,比特币的价格将会上涨

Crypto VPubblicato 2023-05-08Pubblicato ultima volta 2023-05-08

Introduzione

根据最近的分析,美国银行系统陷入困境,因为 2,300 多家金融机构的债务可能超过资产。因此,专家表示,如果美国的银行继续倒闭,这可能会在未来几周推高比特币价格。

根据最近的分析,美国银行系统陷入困境,因为 2,300 多家金融机构的债务可能超过资产。因此,专家表示,如果美国的银行继续倒闭,这可能会在未来几周推高比特币价格。

财政部和美联储表示,问题只存在于个别银行,但专家警告称,情况远比政府承认的严重。

随着抗通胀措施的到位,美国 4,800 家银行中有将近一半正在消耗用于吸收风险的资本缓冲,美联储将不得不进一步收紧货币政策。

美联储收紧货币政策的全面影响尚未对经济造成冲击,届时专家才能知道美国金融体系能否安全缓解2020年至2021年疫情期间极端货币刺激产生的债务压力.

白宫不为所有存款提供一般担保,因为这看起来像是富人的社会养老金。此外,美国联邦存款保险公司(FDIC)表示,只有1270亿美元的资产,可能需要单独纾困。

出于这个原因,金融当局现在正在向美国证券交易委员会施压,要求其打击旨在在银行股下跌时获利的卖空策略。

消费者银行家协会首席执行官 Lindsey Johnson 敦促政策制定者认真XEM这一问题

美国银行可能倒闭

First Republic Bank 也是自 3 月以来第三家倒闭的美国地区性银行,在此之前,Silicon Valley Bank 和Signature Bank都曾发生过令人震惊的倒闭事件。银行业危机没有停止的迹象。

本周中旬,彭博社报道称 PacWest Bancorp 也在考虑出售。这家总部位于旧金山的银行证实正在XEM“战略选择”。上述消息导致 PacWest Bancorp 的股票进一步暴跌。

《今日美国》援引一项研究显示,约有 180 家银行面临破产风险。主要问题在于存款保险,尽管目前只有一半未投保的储户决定提款。

无保险存款是指如果银行倒闭,存款人将损失部分资金。这也意味着他们有更高的取款动机。

为什么区域性银行倒闭了?

硅谷银行是美国区域性银行系统面临压力的一个例子。这些企业破产的主要原因是美联储 (Fed) 提高了利率。

美联储不得不提高利率以控制通货膨胀。但此举降低了银行持有的资产价值,例如政府债券和抵押贷款支持证券。

通常情况下,银行支付固定利率,当联邦利率较低时,它们的债券就会变得有吸引力。但恰恰相反,当美联储像现在这样加息时,投资者不再看好银行的固定利率。当需求减少时,这些债券的价格就会下跌。

“最近银行资产价值的下降显着增加了美国银行系统对未投保储户的脆弱性,”经济学家在社会科学研究网的一项研究中写道。

上述经济学家认为,美国政府需要干预或再融资。如果政府不作为,银行大规模撤资是不可避免的。

Letture associate

After R&D Investment Catches Up with the U.S., Is the Sino-U.S. Chip Competition Still Just About Money?

The article examines the significance of recent data showing China's total R&D expenditure, measured by purchasing power parity (PPP), catching up to or slightly surpassing that of the United States in 2024. It argues that while this milestone reflects China's immense capacity to mobilize research resources, the competition in semiconductors now extends far beyond sheer financial input. The analysis highlights key differences: China's R&D is heavily skewed towards experimental development (over 80%), focusing on product engineering and industrialization, whereas the U.S. allocates a proportionally larger share (about 15%) to basic research. Furthermore, leading U.S. semiconductor firms reinvest a significant portion of their substantial global sales revenue into R&D, creating a sustainable commercial innovation cycle that is difficult to replicate. The article emphasizes that semiconductor progress depends on converting R&D into commercially viable products that pass rigorous customer validation and achieve repeat orders, not just on spending levels. It concludes that as China enters the top tier of R&D spenders, the critical challenges shift to improving resource allocation efficiency, fostering long-term basic research, and building effective mechanisms to bridge the gap between laboratory discoveries and reliable, market-ready industrial capabilities.

marsbit15 min fa

After R&D Investment Catches Up with the U.S., Is the Sino-U.S. Chip Competition Still Just About Money?

marsbit15 min fa

Top 10% of American Households Capture 88% of Wealth, How Is the AI Era Cake Divided?

AI Worsens Wealth Inequality as Top 10% of US Families Garner 88% of Stock Gains (2019-2026) A report from the China Finance 40 Forum highlights that the AI boom is significantly widening wealth inequality in the United States. From 2019 to Q1 2026, wealth from directly held stocks by US households nearly doubled from $29 trillion to approximately $55 trillion, with rapid growth concentrated post-2023, coinciding with the AI-driven stock market surge. The distribution of these gains has been starkly uneven. Between 2022 and Q1 2026, the wealth increase of about $21 trillion was captured almost entirely by the wealthiest families: the top 10% secured roughly 88% ($18.5 trillion), while the bottom 50% received only about 1% ($0.2 trillion). This has contributed to a growing disparity in disposable income shares. The report, referencing economic historian Robert Allen, draws parallels to historical technological shifts like the "Engels' Pause" during the First Industrial Revolution, where worker wages stagnated despite productivity gains. It suggests AI could induce a similar period where capital收益 outpace labor income, exacerbating inequality. Huang Yiping of Peking University identifies four mechanisms through which AI impacts income distribution: capital-bias (reducing labor's income share), task polarization (hollowing out middle-skill jobs), skill-based digital divides, and wealth amplification through assets. He warns that if this trend continues, strong supply growth driven by AI could be undermined by persistently weak consumer demand, threatening sustainable economic growth. To address these challenges, the report proposes a three-pronged strategy: 1) Defensive measures like strengthening social safety nets and antitrust enforcement; 2) Empowering workers through education reform and lifelong learning to collaborate with AI; and 3) Rebalancing via policies such as potential taxes on AI超额收益 and mechanisms for broader sharing of technology's benefits, ensuring AI's红利 are more equitably distributed.

marsbit21 min fa

Top 10% of American Households Capture 88% of Wealth, How Is the AI Era Cake Divided?

marsbit21 min fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片