The Gray Business of 'Cash for Crypto': How Part-Time Jobs Become Money Laundering Channels for Black Market

比推Dipublikasikan tanggal 2026-01-27Terakhir diperbarui pada 2026-01-27

Abstrak

This article exposes a growing gray market scheme in China, particularly in Guangdong and Shenzhen, where seemingly legitimate part-time jobs are being used as a front for money laundering operations. Criminals recruit often highly educated but risk-unaware young people through platforms like Xianyu, offering "cash for crypto" or "offline crypto exchange" gigs. The task involves receiving RMB in one's personal bank account, converting it to Hong Kong dollars, and then purchasing stablecoins like USDT at designated Hong Kong OTC crypto shops to transfer to specified wallets. Lawyers Deng Xiaoyu and Huang Wenjing from Mankun Law Firm explain that participants unknowingly become a key "human courier" link in money laundering chains, moving illicit funds from crimes like telecom fraud. Once the funds are identified as illegal, participants face frozen bank and social payment accounts, severe disruption to their lives, and potential criminal charges for offenses like money laundering or assisting information network crimes. The OTC shops in Hong Kong are targeted due to regulatory gaps, the anonymity of cash transactions, and the complex financial environment that helps obscure fund trails. The article warns the public to avoid any兼职 (part-time work) involving handling money, account operations, or crypto exchanges for others, as these are almost certainly illicit. Key red flags include being asked to provide personal bank cards, withdraw cash, convert cash to crypto, or being a...

Original Author: Mankun Brand Department

Original Title: Cash for Cryptocurrency: How Part-Time Jobs Become Tools for Money Laundering in the Black Market?


"In Guangdong, especially in Shenzhen, some seemingly ordinary part-time jobs are mass-producing criminal suspects." This is a warning recently posted by Lawyer Deng Xiaoyu, Partner at Mankun (Shenzhen) Law Firm, on the Xiaohongshu platform. In the post, he pointed out that this type of part-time job, known as 'cash for cryptocurrency' or 'offline cryptocurrency exchange errands,' has formed a highly streamlined 'hunting mechanism,' and those primarily targeted are often highly educated young people with insufficient risk awareness.

In these tasks, part-time workers are usually only required to follow instructions to convert funds into Hong Kong dollars and then go to a designated OTC cryptocurrency exchange shop to complete the transaction. What seems like a simple 'errand' unknowingly completes a critical link in money laundering crimes—'human border crossing.' Once the funds are identified as illegal proceeds, participants may be directly exposed to criminal risks.

Lawyer Deng Xiaoyu believes that in recent years, this 'low-threshold, high-reward' part-time model has been systematically used by criminals for money laundering activities. Many participants, without realizing the nature of their actions, have already crossed the boundary of criminal law.

Based on the above judgment, Lawyer Deng Xiaoyu (Partner at Mankun Law Firm, specializing in criminal cases involving crypto assets) and Huang Wenjing (Compliance Consultant at Mankun Law Firm) recently accepted an interview with Shenzhen News Network. Starting from real cases, they systematically dissected the related criminal models, social harms, and legal risks, attempting to 'cut open' this hidden and complex money laundering network to allow more people to see the legal truth within.

Why Does 'Just Helping to Exchange Some Crypto' Involve Money Laundering?

Shenzhen News Network Reporter:

Lawyer Deng Xiaoyu, in the cases you have recently handled, how do criminal gangs typically recruit young people under the guise of 'part-time jobs'?

Deng Xiaoyu:

We recently handled a typical case: an mainland college student received a 'errand part-time job' on a second-hand goods trading platform. The other party requested the student to go to Hong Kong to purchase a certain amount of Tether (USDT) through a local cryptocurrency exchange shop (OTC store) and transfer it to a specified blockchain address.

The specific process was: the part-time worker first used their own bank card to receive RMB, then exchanged it for HKD cash at a mainland currency exchange point, then went to the designated Hong Kong OTC store to purchase USDT, and the store directly transferred the cryptocurrency to the specified wallet.

After the student purchased USDT worth tens of thousands of RMB through the above method, their bank card and WeChat Pay account were frozen by mainland law enforcement agencies, and they were informed that the funds they collected originated from a victim's transfer in an upstream fraud case.

Afterwards, we collaborated with a professional on-chain technical team for analysis and confirmed that this was a typical 'card reception for U return' money laundering method, and it was linked to organized crime networks in Southeast Asia.

Since then, we have received multiple similar inquiries. Some participants have been investigated for crimes such as fraud, concealing criminal proceeds, and aiding information network criminal activities; although some have not been criminally detained, their bank cards and payment accounts have been frozen for a long time, severely affecting their daily lives, studies, and work.

Shenzhen News Network Reporter:

Advisor Huang Wenjing, why do black market criminal gangs frequently choose Hong Kong cryptocurrency exchange shops (OTC stores) as operational nodes? Is this model harder to track?

Huang Wenjing:

From a practical perspective, there are three main reasons why Hong Kong OTC stores are easily exploited by criminal gangs.

First, the regulatory boundaries are relatively vague, and anti-money laundering requirements are not uniform.

Currently, Hong Kong has a relatively mature licensing and regulatory system for centralized virtual asset trading platforms, but crypto OTC stores are still in a area with relatively vague regulatory boundaries, with various types of entities and inconsistent compliance standards. Some stores have significant shortcomings in fund source verification, transaction monitoring, and anomaly analysis, leaving operational space for the black market.

Second, cash transactions themselves are high-risk scenarios.

OTC stores primarily deal in cash transactions. Anonymous cash lacks the account chain and structured data inherent in bank transfers. Investigations often rely more on physical surveillance, witness testimony, and physical evidence, making overall tracing more difficult.

Third, frequent financial activities provide more space for concealment.

The Hong Kong government also mentioned in the background of the 2024 VAOTC consultation that OTC stores have been used for the first round of cleaning of involved funds in some fraud cases. As an international financial center, Hong Kong's multi-currency circulation and active cross-border transactions make it easier for criminal gangs to package transaction backgrounds and conceal the real purpose of funds.

Dual Loss for Individuals and Society: Criminal Risks Concealed by the 'Legal Narrative'

Shenzhen News Network Reporter:

Lawyer Deng Xiaoyu, in the cases you handle, many so-called 'part-time workers' are highly educated young people. Why are they easily trapped in such traps? Once involved, what legal consequences might they face? What long-term impacts will this bring?

Deng Xiaoyu:

In my opinion, the key reason why this type of part-time job can deceive highly educated groups is that the other party constructs a seemingly complete, reasonable, and legal narrative scenario.

When part-time personnel raise questions, such as 'Why must I go to Hong Kong to operate in person?', the other party usually explains that virtual asset transactions are restricted in the mainland but are legal and open in Hong Kong; and the client is located elsewhere, making a special trip to Hong Kong too costly, so having a nearby part-time worker operate on their behalf is more 'economical and efficient.' Under such a logically self-consistent explanation, many students did not detect obvious abnormalities at the rational judgment level, thus letting their guard down and generating trust.

But criminal risks are often significantly lagging. Many part-time workers only discovered two or three months after the incident that their bank cards and payment app accounts were frozen, or they suddenly received a call from the public security organ, or were even intercepted by customs during normal entry and exit. This sudden change often throws student groups lacking social experience into strong panic, causing持续 impact on their psychological state and normal study and life.

Shenzhen News Network Reporter:

The general public may not be clear about how such part-time jobs, if suspected of money laundering, fuel the black and gray industries? What impact will they have on the financial regulatory order and the anti-money laundering system?

Huang Wenjing:

Taking telecom network fraud crimes, which have been heavily cracked down on by the state in recent years, as an example, 'cheating money' itself is only the first step. The real key lies in how to quickly transfer and conceal the destination of the funds, making them difficult to recover.

If the involved funds only stay in the criminal's account, once the victim reports it, tracking and freezing is not difficult. But through the method involved in this case, the funds are quickly split and circulated in a cross-financial system with 'multiple assets, multiple links, multiple nodes,' eventually forming a vicious cycle of 'cheating faster, transferring faster, and recovering harder.' This type of part-time job is essentially providing key fund channel nodes for the black and gray industry, directly promoting the scale and industrialization of upstream crimes.

From a more macro perspective, money laundering transactions often exhibit characteristics of fragmentation, decentralization, and high frequency, greatly increasing the compliance costs for regulatory departments and financial institutions. If the proportion of such non-real, non-normal economic activity transactions continues to rise in a region's financial system, it will not only distort financial data but also埋下hidden dangers for overall financial security.

Once this risk is noticed by the international community, the region may be labeled a 'high-risk jurisdiction.' For example, some countries and regions are included in FATF's grey list due to insufficient anti-money laundering supervision, and their citizens will face practical difficulties such as restricted account opening and blocked transactions in cross-border financial activities, causing long-term and profound negative impacts on national reputation and economic development.

Characterization and Consequences: The Logic of Identifying Money Laundering Behavior and Sentencing Boundaries

Shenzhen News Network Reporter:

Lawyer Deng Xiaoyu, why did you post on social media specifically to remind the public to be wary of such money laundering traps? From the perspective of criminal law and judicial interpretation, how is this type of behavior usually characterized? How to distinguish between 'occasional personal transactions' and 'operational exchange behavior'?

Deng Xiaoyu:

I post on social media platforms, on one hand, based on my duty as a member of the Shenzhen Lawyers Association Common Crime Defense Committee to popularize legal knowledge, and on the other hand, I hope to protect young people in society as much as possible.

In the cases I接触, the original intention of many part-time workers is to subsidize their living expenses and reduce family burdens through their own labor. But it is this psychology, which is not mixed with malice, that is easily exploited by criminals,进而involved in specific links of money laundering activities.

From judicial practice, the behavior of such part-time workers is more often incorporated into the evaluation system of money laundering crimes. For individuals who simply complete fund exchange and transfer according to instructions, it is generally not appropriate to directly认定as 'illegal business operation罪', but should focus on reviewing whether they objectively participated in the transfer, concealment or hiding of illegal proceeds.

As for the distinction between 'occasional personal transactions' and 'operational exchange behavior', the key is not whether remuneration is received, but whether it has the attributes of sustainability, organization, and external operation. Ordinary part-time workers, if they do not solicit customers externally or form a stable transaction model, usually do not meet the constitutive requirements of the crime of illegal business operation, but this does not mean that there is certainly no criminal risk.

Shenzhen News Network Reporter:

Advisor Huang Wenjing, if the amount involved reaches 'particularly serious circumstances,' what penalties might the relevant personnel face? What are the differences in accountability between unit crime and individual crime?

Huang Wenjing:

Taking the crime of money laundering as an example, according to the "Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China" and the "Interpretation on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Law in Handling Money Laundering Criminal Cases," once it is determined to be '情节严重' (serious circumstances), the sentencing usually directly enters the second level, that is, fixed-term imprisonment of not less than five years but not more than ten years, and also a fine.

It must be emphasized that in judicial practice, the amount involved is only one threshold for incrimination and sentencing. Whether it constitutes 'serious circumstances'还需要be comprehensively judged based on behavioral and result factors such as multiple implementations, causing major losses, and refusing to cooperate in recovering stolen money. A conclusion cannot be simply drawn based on the amount.

In addition, the crime of money laundering applies a 'dual punishment system.' This means that if the act is committed in the name of a unit, the unit itself will be sentenced to a fine; and the directly responsible supervisors and other directly responsible personnel will not be exempted from responsibility because 'the act is under the unit's name,' and still need to bear personal criminal responsibility according to the standards of the crime of money laundering. If the circumstances reach a level for heavier punishment, they may同样face fixed-term imprisonment of not less than five years but not more than ten years and also a fine.

Risk Reminder: How to Avoid Becoming a 'Money Laundering White Glove'?

Shenzhen News Network Reporter:

How should the public identify money laundering risks in part-time jobs? What self-protection measures should be taken once encountering suspicious transactions?

Huang Wenjing:

Actually, to identify this kind of risk, grasping one core judgment is enough:

Any part-time job that asks you to help handle money transactions or account operations is essentially turning you into a fund channel. 99% of them are fraud or money laundering.

In practice, common 'danger signals' include:

  • Asking you to provide or open new bank cards, corporate accounts;

  • Lending WeChat, Alipay payment codes, receiving and paying on behalf of others and immediately transferring out;

  • Requiring offline cash withdrawal, or going to an exchange shop to convert cash into virtual currency, then transferring to a specified address;

  • Repeatedly emphasizing that 'buying and selling virtual currency with cash in Hong Kong is legal,' 'physical stores are open, it can't be illegal,' 'just helping with an errand.'

The common point of these rhetoric is to deliberately divert attention. The real risk does not lie in whether a specific operation is legal in form, but in its purpose to conceal the true source and flow of funds.

Once the funds come from upstream crimes such as telecom fraud or gambling, your account and identity may be regarded as a link in the criminal chain. Lightly, the account may be frozen and investigated; heavily, you may be investigated for criminal responsibility due to serious circumstances.

Shenzhen News Network Reporter:

Lawyer Deng Xiaoyu, what more targeted reminders do you have for young people? Is it necessary to be wary of seemingly legal temptations like 'exchange rate arbitrage'?

Deng Xiaoyu:

I want to particularly remind young people of one sentence:

Any part-time job that uses you as a 'fund channel,' no matter how 'legal and compliant' it is packaged, should be refused at the first moment.

Many people think money laundering is far away from them, but in reality, it is often disguised as 'errand代办,' 'cross-border settlement,' 'point spread or exchange rate arbitrage,' 'buying coins for arbitrage,' and other professional-sounding, even reasonable-sounding terms. In essence, they are all about using your real-name identity to 'pass through'陌生funds.

In the cases we接触, what the other party really values is not the 'labor' of the part-time worker, but their real-name account and the transaction traces formed by their operation, which are used to conceal criminal proceeds. Once the upstream funds are investigated, the original 'part-time worker' may instantly become an 'involved person.' The most direct consequence is account freezing and life restrictions. In serious cases, they may also need to bear corresponding legal responsibilities.

Mankun Lawyer Reminder: Beware of These High-Risk Signals

Based on the interview content and practical experience, we specially提示:

  • Part-time jobs involving代收代付 (acting as payment agent), cash handover, account operations, and加密资产 (encrypted asset) exchange should be highly警惕;

  • Remuneration that明显不匹配 (obviously does not match) the work content is often not a 'good opportunity';

  • The other party刻意回避 (deliberately avoids) questions about the source of funds is an important risk signal;

  • Once doubts arise, the earlier you consult a professional lawyer, the more likely you are to avoid serious consequences.

We will continue to participate in public discussions from a professional perspective, and also hope to help the public better understand legal boundaries and stay away from potential criminal risks through real cases and legal analysis.


Twitter:https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

Bitpush TG Discussion Group:https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

Bitpush TG Subscription: https://t.me/bitpush


Original link:https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7606247

Pertanyaan Terkait

QWhat is the 'cash for cryptocurrency' gray business mentioned in the article, and how does it exploit part-time workers?

AThe 'cash for cryptocurrency' gray business involves criminal gangs recruiting individuals, often high-educated young people, for part-time jobs that require them to convert cash into cryptocurrencies like USDT at Hong Kong OTC shops. These workers unknowingly become key nodes in money laundering schemes, facilitating the cross-border transfer of illicit funds. They are lured with promises of easy money but end up facing severe legal risks, including frozen accounts and criminal charges.

QWhy do criminal organizations prefer using Hong Kong OTC cryptocurrency shops for money laundering activities?

ACriminal organizations favor Hong Kong OTC cryptocurrency shops due to three main reasons: 1) Regulatory boundaries are blurry, with inconsistent anti-money laundering requirements; 2) Cash transactions are inherently high-risk and harder to trace compared to bank transfers; 3) Hong Kong's status as a global financial hub with active cross-border transactions provides more opportunities to disguise the true purpose of funds and obscure their origins.

QWhat legal consequences might part-time workers face if involved in such money laundering schemes?

APart-time workers involved in these schemes may face serious legal consequences, including being investigated for crimes like fraud, concealing criminal proceeds, or aiding information network crimes. They could have their bank and payment accounts frozen, experience disruptions to daily life and studies, and in severe cases, be sentenced to five to ten years in prison with fines if convicted of money laundering under 'particularly serious' circumstances.

QHow can the public identify and avoid falling into money laundering traps disguised as part-time job opportunities?

AThe public should be wary of any part-time job that involves handling financial transactions or account operations, as these are likely money laundering traps. Key red flags include: being asked to provide or open new bank accounts, lending out personal payment QR codes for receiving and transferring funds, converting cash to cryptocurrencies at physical shops, and explanations that emphasize the legality of such actions in Hong Kong. Any offer that turns you into a 'funds channel' should be refused immediately.

QWhat impact do these money laundering activities have on the broader financial system and society?

AThese activities exacerbate the scale and industrialization of upstream crimes like telecom fraud by enabling rapid transfer and concealment of illicit funds, making recovery more difficult. They increase compliance costs for regulatory authorities and financial institutions, distort financial data, and pose risks to overall financial security. If persistent, such activities could lead to a region being labeled a 'high-risk jurisdiction' by international bodies like FATF, resulting in restricted financial activities and long-term negative impacts on national reputation and economic development.

Bacaan Terkait

Rincian Kasus Penipuan Parah yang Melanda Unicorn Kripto Blockstream

**Rangkuman: Tuduhan Penipuan dan Pertanyaan Seputar Blockstream** Tahun ini, Blockstream, perusahaan kripto yang didirikan oleh perintis Bitcoin Adam Back, menjadi sorotan. Awalnya, karena investasi Jeffrey Epstein pada 2014 dan spekulasi bahwa Back bisa jadi Satoshi Nakamoto. Namun, kontroversi utama muncul dari laporan investigasi oleh akun NatInfoSec yang menuduh skema obligasi penambangan Bitcoin Blockstream (BMN) berpotensi penipuan mirip Ponzi. **Titik Tuduhan Utama:** 1. **Kapasitas dan Pembayaran yang Dipertanyakan:** NatInfoSec menyatakan untuk memenuhi kewajiban BMN, Blockstream membutuhkan daya komputasi (hashrate) 20-45 EH/s, tetapi dashboard perusahaan hanya menunjukkan 15 EH/s. Tidak ada bukti publik yang memadai (data listrik, impor perangkat keras, atribusi pool penambangan) untuk mendukung skala yang diklaim. Klausul dalam kontrak BMN juga memungkinkan Blockstream membayar dengan Bitcoin dari sumber mana pun, mempertanyakan asal hasil yang dibayarkan kepada investor. 2. **Imbal Hasil Tinggi yang Mencurigakan:** Obligasi BMN menawarkan imbal hasil tetap hingga sekitar 20% per tahun, angka yang sulit dipertahankan di industri penambangan Bitcoin yang sangat fluktuatif. Beberapa penawaran juga diklaim melibatkan perpanjangan pokok ke obligasi baru dengan imbal lebih tinggi. 3. **Masalah Pengungkapan dan Masa Lalu Eksekutif:** Christopher William Cook, figur kunci di divisi penambangan Blockstream dan CEO Exacore (entitas operasional terkait), memiliki catatan kriminal. Ia dihukum pada 2008 karena penipuan surat (mail fraud) dan menjalani hukuman penjara. Informasi ini tidak diungkapkan dalam dokumen penawaran BMN. Materi pemasaran juga diduga membesar-besarkan keterkaitan Cook dengan NASA. 4. **Keterkaitan dengan BSTR dan SPAC:** NatInfoSec mempertanyakan apakah potensi liabilitas BMN dan latar belakang Cook telah diungkapkan dengan benar dalam proses persiapan IPO perusahaan terkait Bitcoin, Bitcoin Standard Treasury Company (BSTR), yang melibatkan Adam Back. **Tanggapan dan Debat Komunitas:** BitMEX Research menganalisis tuduhan tersebut, mengakui kemungkinan catatan kriminal Cook dan kekhawatiran atas imbal hasil tinggi. Namun, mereka berpendapat bahwa beberapa tuduhan kurang bukti atau menyesatkan, menekankan pemisahan struktur hukum antara BMN, Blockstream, dan BSTR. Perdebatan di komunitas berfokus pada **kemampuan untuk memverifikasi** hashrate dan hasil penambangan yang sebenarnya yang mendasari BMN. Para pendukung seperti Samson Mow membela operasi penambangan Blockstream, sementara para pengkritik meminta bukti verifikasi independen yang jelas. **Pertanyaan yang Belum Terjawab untuk BMN:** Kontroversi ini menyisakan beberapa pertanyaan kunci tentang BMN: skala sebenarnya dan batas tanggung jawab, kecukupan hashrate penambangan untuk mendukung pembayaran, sumber imbal hasil tetap yang tinggi, kemampuan memverifikasi aset Bitcoin yang digunakan untuk pembayaran, serta peran dan kepentingan Cook. Sampai saat ini, Blockstream belum memberikan tanggapan resmi yang menyeluruh terhadap berbagai tuduhan ini.

marsbit3j yang lalu

Rincian Kasus Penipuan Parah yang Melanda Unicorn Kripto Blockstream

marsbit3j yang lalu

Kelompok Reddit yang Pernah Memaksa Tembok Bursa Wall Street, Apakah Telah Menemukan GME Berikutnya?

**Ringkasan Artikel: Komunitas Reddit r/wallstreetbets Menargetkan Wendy's (WEN), Apakah Ini GME Berikutnya?** Pada 24 Juni, saham Wendy's (WEN) melonjak setelah sebuah postingan berjudul "We need to save Wendy's" viral di subreddit r/wallstreetbets (WSB), memicu spekulasi bahwa ini bisa menjadi "meme stock" atau sasaran "short squeeze" berikutnya, mirip dengan fenomena GameStop (GME) pada 2021. Postingan tersebut, yang menggunakan guyonan lama di komunitas WSB tentang bekerja di Wendy's setelah investasi gagal, berhasil menarik perhatian dan mendorong diskusi untuk membeli saham atau opsi beli (call options). Saham WEN naik lebih dari 20% dalam perdagangan pra-pasar, dengan volume perdagangan yang sangat tinggi. Artikel ini menganalisis apakah WEN memiliki potensi untuk menjadi "squeeze" sistematis seperti GME. Beberapa faktor pendukung yang teridentifikasi adalah: * **Rasio Short Interest yang Cukup Tinggi:** Sekitar 31.83% saham beredar dipinjam untuk dijual (short), yang dapat menjadi bahan bakar jika harga naik dan para pedagang short terpaksa membeli kembali saham. * **Perhatian Komunitas yang Kuat:** Wendy's memiliki identitas merek yang mudah dikenali dan cocok dengan budaya meme di WSB. Namun, analisis menunjukkan bahwa situasi WEN **tidak sama ekstremnya dengan GME tahun 2021**: * **Struktur Short yang Tidak Seekstrem GME:** Rasio short interest WEN (31.83%) jauh di bawah level GME yang pernah melebihi 100%, sehingga tekanan untuk menutup posisi short tidak separah saat itu. * **Bukti untuk "Gamma Squeeze" Masih Lemah:** Meski ada diskusi tentang opsi beli, belum ada bukti kuat bahwa pembelian opsi tersebut sudah cukup masif untuk memaksa market maker (penjual opsi) membeli saham dalam jumlah besar sebagai lindung nilai, yang dapat memicu akselerasi harga berkelanjutan. * **Sejarah sebagai Meme Stock:** WEN pernah mengalami lonjakan serupa pada 2021 yang akhirnya mereda, menunjukkan bahwa antusiasme komunitas tidak selalu diterjemahkan menjadi kenaikan harga yang berkelanjutan. * **Narasi Dasar yang Terbatas:** Kampanye "selamatkan Wendy's" lebih merupakan lelucon komunitas daripada didasarkan pada kesulitan finansial perusahaan yang nyata. **Kesimpulan:** Pergerakan harga WEN menunjukkan bahwa perhatian dari komunitas retail seperti WSB masih dapat dengan cepat menggerakkan harga saham. Namun, bukti saat ini lebih mengarah pada **"meme pop" jangka pendek atau "squeeze" ringan**, bukan tekanan short sistematis skala penuh seperti GME. Keberlanjutan rally akan bergantung pada apakah diskusi berkembang di luar satu postingan panas, volume perdagangan tinggi bertahan selama beberapa hari, dan aktivitas opsi beli meningkat secara signifikan untuk menciptakan putaran umpan balik yang memperkuat kenaikan harga.

marsbit3j yang lalu

Kelompok Reddit yang Pernah Memaksa Tembok Bursa Wall Street, Apakah Telah Menemukan GME Berikutnya?

marsbit3j yang lalu

Blockstream, Unicorn Kripto, Terjerat dalam Skandal Penipuan Berat: Kisah Lengkap

Sejak awal tahun, pionir Bitcoin Adam Back dan perusahaan yang didirikannya, Blockstream, berada di pusat perhatian komunitas kripto. Baru-baru ini, akun investigasi NatInfoSec menerbitkan artikel panjang yang menuduh Blockstream melakukan penipuan serius terkait penerbitan obligasi pertambangan Bitcoin (BMN). Tuduhan utama mencakup: 1. **Kapasitas dan Kemampuan Pembayaran yang Dipertanyakan**: Untuk memenuhi kewajiban BMN yang diterbitkan, Blockstream membutuhkan daya komputasi (hashrate) lebih dari 20 EH/s, bahkan hingga 45 EH/s. Namun, dasbor mereka hanya menunjukkan 15 EH/s. Tidak ada bukti publik yang sesuai (seperti data jaringan listrik, impor perangkat keras, atau atribusi kolam penambangan) untuk mendukung skala kewajiban tersebut. Klausul "Substitute Performance BTC" dalam BMN2 juga memungkinkan Blockstream menggunakan BTC dari sumber mana pun untuk pembayaran tanpa perlu mengungkapkan asalnya. 2. **Imbal Hasil Tinggi dengan Risiko Utang**: Beberapa tingkat obligasi BMN menawarkan imbal hasil tetap hingga sekitar 20% per tahun. Di industri pertambangan Bitcoin yang sangat siklis, imbal hasil tetap setinggi itu dianggap berisiko tinggi dan memerlukan penjelasan yang jelas. 3. **Masalah Pengungkapan dan Masa Lalu Chris Cook**: Christopher William Cook, seorang figur kunci di bisnis pertambangan Blockstream dan CEO Exacore (entitas operasional yang dipisahkan), memiliki catatan kriminal. Pada 2008, ia dihukum karena penipuan pos dengan hukuman penjara 41 bulan. Informasi ini tidak diungkapkan dalam dokumen penawaran BMN. Materi pemasaran juga disebutkan secara menyesatkan tentang pengalaman kerjanya di NASA. 4. **Keterkaitan dengan BSTR/SPAC**: NatInfoSec mempertanyakan apakah catatan Cook dan kewajiban potensial BMN seharusnya diungkapkan dalam dokumen SEC untuk Bitcoin Standard Treasury Company (BSTR), yang terkait dengan Adam Back dan berencana go public melalui SPAC. Namun, analis seperti BitMEX Research berpendapat bahwa karena struktur hukum yang terpisah dan tidak adanya jaminan grup, risiko BMN tidak serta merta menjadi risiko BSTR. BitMEX Research mengakui bahwa latar belakang Cook kemungkinan benar dan menyuarakan kekhawatiran tentang imbal hasil tinggi, tetapi menilai bukti untuk tuduhan lain tidak memadai. Debat komunitas berpusat pada **kemampuan untuk memverifikasi** daya komputasi sebenarnya, sumber pendapatan, dan asal BTC yang digunakan untuk pembayaran kupon BMN. Pertanyaan inti yang belum terjawab meliputi: skala pasti dan batas tanggung jawab BMN, kecukupan daya komputasi tambang untuk mendukung pembayaran, sumber imbal hasil tetap 20%, keterlibatan Cook, dan verifikasi aset cadangan untuk pembayaran. Hingga saat ini, Blockstream belum memberikan tanggapan sistematis terhadap kontroversi ini.

链捕手4j yang lalu

Blockstream, Unicorn Kripto, Terjerat dalam Skandal Penipuan Berat: Kisah Lengkap

链捕手4j yang lalu

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片