Small-Cap Tokens Hit Four-Year Low, Is the 'Altcoin Bull Run' Completely Hopeless?

marsbitDipublikasikan tanggal 2025-12-16Terakhir diperbarui pada 2025-12-16

Abstrak

Small-cap cryptocurrency tokens have plummeted to multi-year lows, with indices tracking altcoins significantly underperforming both major cryptocurrencies and traditional equities. In 2024–2025, while the S&P 500 and Nasdaq 100 delivered strong double-digit returns with limited drawdowns, altcoin indices like the CoinDesk 80 and MarketVector Small-Cap Index fell sharply—by nearly 40% and to November 2020 lows, respectively. These altcoin indices showed high correlation (0.9) with large-cap crypto assets like Bitcoin and Ethereum but delivered deeply negative returns, higher volatility, and worse risk-adjusted performance (negative Sharpe ratios). Liquidity is increasingly concentrated in high-value, institutionally supported assets such as Bitcoin, Ethereum, SOL, and XRP, indicating a structural shift away from speculative small-cap tokens. The data suggests that altcoins offered no diversification benefits and instead magnified losses during a period of broader market growth.

Author: Gino Matos

Compiled by: Luffy, Foresight News

Since January 2024, the performance comparison between cryptocurrencies and stocks indicates that the so-called new "altcoin trading" is essentially just a substitute for stock trading.

In 2024, the S&P 500 index had a return of approximately 25%, and in 2025 it reached 17.5%, with a cumulative two-year increase of about 47%. During the same period, the Nasdaq 100 index rose by 25.9% and 18.1% respectively, with a cumulative increase of nearly 49%.

The CoinDesk 80 Index, which tracks 80 assets outside the top 20 cryptocurrencies by market capitalization, plummeted 46.4% in the first quarter of 2025 alone, and by mid-July, its year-to-date decline was about 38%.

By the end of 2025, the MarketVector Digital Assets 100 Small-Cap Index fell to its lowest level since November 2020, wiping out over $1 trillion in total cryptocurrency market capitalization.

This divergence in performance is by no means a statistical error. Not only did the overall altcoin portfolio have a negative return, but its volatility was comparable to or even higher than that of stocks; in contrast, major U.S. stock indices achieved double-digit growth with controllable drawdowns.

For Bitcoin investors, the core question is: Can allocating to small-cap tokens deliver risk-adjusted returns? Or is such an allocation merely taking on exposure to a negative Sharpe ratio while maintaining similar correlations to stocks? (Note: The Sharpe ratio is a core metric for measuring the risk-adjusted return of an investment portfolio. Its calculation formula is: Annualized portfolio return - Annualized risk-free rate / Annualized volatility of the portfolio.)

Choosing a Reliable Altcoin Index

For analysis, CryptoSlate tracked three altcoin indices.

The first is the CoinDesk 80 Index, launched in January 2025. This index covers 80 assets outside the CoinDesk 20 Index, providing a portfolio of diversified assets beyond Bitcoin, Ethereum, and other major tokens.

The second is the MarketVector Digital Assets 100 Small-Cap Index. This index selects the 50 smallest tokens by market cap from a basket of 100 assets, serving as a barometer for the market's "junk assets."

The third is a small-cap index launched by Kaiko. This is a research product, not a tradable benchmark, offering a clear sell-side quantitative perspective for analyzing the small-cap asset group.

These three depict the market landscape from different dimensions: the overall altcoin portfolio, high-beta small-cap tokens, and a quantitative research perspective. Yet, the conclusions they point to are highly consistent.

In contrast, the benchmark performance of the stock market shows a completely opposite trend.

In 2024, major U.S. indices achieved gains of around 25%, and in 2025, they also saw double-digit increases, with relatively limited drawdowns during the period. During this time, the maximum intra-year drawdown of the S&P 500 index was only in the mid-to-high single digits, while the Nasdaq 100 index maintained a strong upward trend throughout.

Both major indices achieved compounded annual growth without significant givebacks of gains.

The trend of the overall altcoin indices, however, is vastly different. Reports from CoinDesk Indices show that the CoinDesk 80 Index plummeted 46.4% in the first quarter alone, while the large-cap tracking CoinDesk 20 Index fell 23.2% during the same period.

By mid-July 2025, the CoinDesk 80 Index was down 38% year-to-date, whereas the CoinDesk 5 Index, which tracks Bitcoin, Ethereum, and three other major tokens, achieved a gain of 12% to 13% during the same period.

Andrew Baehr of CoinDesk Indices, in an interview with ETF.com, described this phenomenon as "identical correlation, vastly different profit and loss performance."

The correlation between the CoinDesk 5 Index and the CoinDesk 80 Index is as high as 0.9, meaning their price movements are completely aligned in direction, but the former achieved a slight double-digit growth while the latter plunged nearly 40%.

It turns out that the diversification benefits of holding small-cap altcoins are minimal, while the performance cost is extremely heavy.

The performance of the small-cap asset sector is even worse. According to Bloomberg, by November 2025, the MarketVector Digital Assets 100 Small-Cap Index had fallen to its lowest level since November 2020.

Over the past five years, the return of this small-cap index has been approximately -8%, while the corresponding large-cap index has surged about 380%. Institutional funds clearly favor large-cap assets and avoid tail risks.

Looking at the performance of altcoins in 2024, the Kaiko small-cap index fell over 30% for the year, and mid-cap tokens also struggled to keep up with Bitcoin's gains.

Market winners were highly concentrated in a few top tokens, such as SOL and Ripple. Although the share of altcoin trading volume once rebounded to the 2021 high in 2024, 64% of the trading volume was concentrated in the top ten altcoins.

Liquidity in the cryptocurrency market has not disappeared but has shifted towards higher-value assets.

Sharpe Ratio and Drawdown Magnitude

If compared from the perspective of risk-adjusted returns, the gap widens further. The CoinDesk 80 Index and various small-cap altcoin indices not only have returns deep in negative territory but also have volatility comparable to or even higher than stocks.

The CoinDesk 80 Index plummeted 46.4% in a single quarter; the MarketVector small-cap index fell to pandemic-era lows in November after another round of declines.

The overall altcoin index experienced multiple index-level halving drawdowns: the Kaiko small-cap index fell over 30% in 2024, the CoinDesk 80 Index crashed 46% in Q1 2025, and the small-cap index fell again to 2020 lows by the end of 2025.

In contrast, the S&P 500 and Nasdaq 100 indices achieved cumulative returns of 25% and 17% over two years, with maximum drawdowns only in the mid-to-high single digits. The U.S. stock market had fluctuations, but they were overall controllable; the volatility of cryptocurrency indices, however, was highly destructive.

Even if the high volatility of altcoins is considered a structural feature, their unit risk return from 2024 to 2025 was still far lower than that of holding major U.S. stock indices.

From 2024 to 2025, the overall altcoin index had a negative Sharpe ratio; meanwhile, the S&P and Nasdaq indices had strong Sharpe ratios even without volatility adjustment. After volatility adjustment, the gap between them further widened.

Bitcoin Investors and Cryptocurrency Liquidity

The first insight from the above data is the trend of liquidity concentration and migration towards high-value assets. Reports from Bloomberg and Whalebook on the MarketVector small-cap index both pointed out that since early 2024, small-cap altcoins have consistently underperformed, and institutional funds have instead flowed into Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs.

Combined with Kaiko's observations, although the share of altcoin trading volume rebounded to 2021 levels, funds were concentrated in the top ten altcoins. The market trend is already clear: liquidity has not completely left the cryptocurrency market but has shifted towards higher-value assets.

The previous altcoin bull market was essentially just a basis trade strategy, not a structural outperformance of assets. In December 2024, the CryptoRank Altcoin Bull Index once soared to 88 points, then plummeted to 16 points in April 2025, completely giving back all gains.

The 2024 altcoin bull market ultimately turned into a typical bubble burst; by mid-2025, the overall altcoin portfolio had almost given back all its gains, while the S&P and Nasdaq indices continued to compound growth.

For wealth advisors and asset allocators considering diversification beyond Bitcoin and Ethereum, the data from CoinDesk provides a clear case reference.

As of mid-July 2025, the large-cap tracking CoinDesk 5 Index achieved a slight double-digit growth year-to-date, while the diversified altcoin index CoinDesk 80 plummeted nearly 40%, yet their correlation was as high as 0.9.

Investors allocating to small-cap altcoins did not obtain substantial diversification benefits but instead suffered far higher return losses and drawdown risks compared to Bitcoin, Ethereum, and U.S. stocks, while still being exposed to the same macro drivers.

Current capital views most altcoins as tactical trading targets, not strategic allocation assets. From 2024 to 2025, Bitcoin and Ethereum spot ETFs had significantly better risk-adjusted returns, and U.S. stocks also performed brilliantly.

Liquidity in the altcoin market is increasingly concentrating towards a few "institutional-grade coins," such as SOL, Ripple, and other tokens with independent positive factors or clear regulatory prospects. Asset diversity at the index level is being squeezed by the market.

In 2025, the S&P 500 and Nasdaq 100 indices rose about 17%, while the CoinDesk 80 cryptocurrency index fell 40%, and small-cap cryptocurrencies fell 30%

What Does This Mean for Liquidity in the Next Market Cycle?

The market performance from 2024 to 2025 tested whether altcoins could achieve diversification value or outperform in an environment of rising macro risk appetite. During this period, U.S. stocks achieved double-digit growth for two consecutive years with controllable drawdowns.

Bitcoin and Ethereum gained institutional recognition through spot ETFs and benefited from a moderating regulatory environment.

In contrast, the overall altcoin index not only had negative returns and larger drawdowns but also maintained high correlations with major crypto tokens and stocks, yet failed to provide corresponding compensation for the additional risks investors undertook.

Institutional capital always chases performance. The five-year return of the MarketVector small-cap index is -8%, while the corresponding large-cap index surged 380%. This gap reflects the migration of capital towards assets with clear regulation, sufficient derivatives market liquidity, and well-developed custody infrastructure.

The CoinDesk 80 Index's 46% plunge in the first quarter and its 38% year-to-date decline by mid-July indicate that the trend of capital migration towards high-value assets is not reversing but accelerating.

For Bitcoin and Ethereum investors evaluating whether to allocate to small-cap crypto tokens, the data from 2024 to 2025 provides a clear answer: the absolute returns of the overall altcoin portfolio underperformed U.S. stocks, and the risk-adjusted returns were inferior to Bitcoin and Ethereum; despite a correlation as high as 0.9 with major crypto tokens, it provided no diversification value.

Pertanyaan Terkait

QWhat was the performance difference between the S&P 500 and the CoinDesk 80 Index in 2025?

AIn 2025, the S&P 500 index rose by approximately 17.5%, while the CoinDesk 80 Index plummeted by 40%.

QAccording to the article, what is the main reason for the poor performance of small-cap altcoins?

AThe main reason is that institutional capital is migrating towards high-value assets like Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs, which are seen as having clearer regulatory prospects and better infrastructure, leaving small-cap altcoins with negative returns and high volatility.

QWhat was the correlation between the CoinDesk 5 Index and the CoinDesk 80 Index, and what does this imply?

AThe correlation between the CoinDesk 5 Index and the CoinDesk 80 Index was as high as 0.9. This implies that their price directions moved almost identically, yet the performance was drastically different, with the former achieving double-digit gains while the latter fell nearly 40%, offering no meaningful diversification benefit.

QTo what level did the MarketVector Digital Assets 100 Small-Cap Index fall by the end of 2025?

ABy the end of 2025, the MarketVector Digital Assets 100 Small-Cap Index fell to its lowest level since November 2020.

QWhat does the article conclude about allocating to small-cap tokens for Bitcoin investors?

AThe article concludes that allocating to small-cap tokens did not provide a risk-adjusted return benefit. Instead, it resulted in significantly worse returns and higher drawdown risks compared to holding Bitcoin, Ethereum, or U.S. stocks, while still being exposed to the same macroeconomic factors.

Bacaan Terkait

Era Auto Research: 47 Tugas Tanpa Jawaban Baku Jadi Daftar Wajib Uji Kemampuan Agent

Di era Auto Research, 47 tugas tanpa jawaban standar kini menjadi patokan wajib untuk mengukur kemampuan Agent AI. Biasanya, AI Agent tampak serba bisa, namun sebenarnya banyak yang hanya mengandalkan pengetahuan dalam basis data yang sudah ada. Dunia rekayasa nyata lebih keras: stabilitas robot bawah air, batas litium pada baterai, pengendalian kebisingan sirkuit kuantum — masalah-masalah ini tidak memiliki "jawaban sempurna", hanya "optimisasi yang mendekati batas maksimal". Baru-baru ini, Frontier-Eng Bench dari Einsia AI's Navers lab menghadirkan perubahan paradigma. Alih-alih menguji AI dengan soal pemrograman lama, benchmark ini memberikan sistem "loop rekayasa" yang lengkap: mengusulkan solusi, terhubung ke simulator, menerima umpan balik dan error, memperbaiki parameter, dan menjalankannya kembali. Dalam 47 tugas lintas disiplin yang menantang, AI harus bertindak seperti insinyur berpengalaman, mencari solusi optimal di antara tiga kendala yang sulit: daya, keamanan, dan kinerja. Ini bukan sekadar kumpulan tes, melainkan gambaran evolusi Agent. Hasil pengujian menunjukkan bahwa model seperti GPT-5.4 berkinerja cukup stabil, tetapi masih jauh dari menyelesaikan seluruh benchmark. Penelitian ini mengungkap pola penting: peningkatan kinerja AI mengikuti hukum pangkat (power law), di mana kemajuan awal cepat tetapi semakin sulit dan kecil seiring waktu. Selain itu, kedalaman eksplorasi (depth) lebih krusial daripada sekadar menjalankan banyak percobaan paralel (width) untuk mencapai terobosan. Implikasi jangka panjangnya adalah potensi lahirnya "AI Engineer". Di masa depan, manusia mungkin fokus pada penentuan tujuan dan arahan, sementara AI akan bekerja tanpa lelah untuk mengoptimalkan solusi — menjalankan simulasi, menganalisis hasil, dan melakukan iterasi terus-menerus menuju target yang ditetapkan. Frontier-Eng Bench menandai langkah menuju sistem AI yang dapat berevolusi secara mandiri dalam loop umpan balik jangka panjang, membawa kita lebih dekat ke era penelitian otomatis (Auto Research) di mana AI aktif berkontribusi dalam memecahkan masalah rekayasa dunia nyata yang kompleks.

marsbit1j yang lalu

Era Auto Research: 47 Tugas Tanpa Jawaban Baku Jadi Daftar Wajib Uji Kemampuan Agent

marsbit1j yang lalu

Wall Street's 'Perburuan Kepatuhan': Migrasi Besar-besaran Cadangan Stablecoin

Dalam sepekan terakhir, beberapa lembaga Wall Street secara bersamaan mempercepat langkah mereka dalam pengembangan dana pasar uang ter-tokenisasi. Pada 12 Mei, JPMorgan Chase mengumumkan peluncuran dana pasar uang ter-tokenisasi kedua mereka, JLTXX, di Ethereum. Di hari yang sama, Payward (induk perusahaan Kraken) menjalin kerja sama strategis dengan Franklin Templeton untuk mengintegrasikan dana ter-tokenisasi seri BENJI ke platform Kraken sebagai alat kolateral dan manajemen kas bagi institusi. Tidak lama sebelumnya, BlackRock kembali mengajukan permohonan kepada SEC untuk dua dana ter-tokenisasi baru, memperdalam kerja samanya dengan Securitize. Serangkaian tindakan ini mencerminkan bahwa antisipasi regulasi mendorong persiapan sisi penawaran dari para institusi besar. Aksi para raksasa keuangan ini menargetkan likuiditas crypto dari berbagai sisi. BlackRock, melalui kemitraan dengan Securitize, berupaya mentransformasi bisnis penyimpanan cadangan stablecoin tradisionalnya secara menyeluruh menjadi aset ter-tokenisasi. JPMorgan, dengan produk JLTXX-nya, mempersiapkan infrastruktur penyelesaian dan cadangan backend untuk bank-bank besar di masa depan jika mereka menerbitkan stablecoin. Sementara itu, kolaborasi Franklin Templeton dan Kraken dengan BENJI bertujuan menyediakan alat manajemen kas berbasis blockchain yang menghasilkan yield dan dapat digunakan sebagai kolateral, mengakali potensi larangan pembayaran bunga pada stablecoin. Langkah-langkah ini sebagian besar dipicu oleh kerangka regulasi yang sedang dibentuk, terutama GENIUS Act yang menetapkan daftar ketat aset cadangan yang memenuhi syarat untuk stablecoin dan melarang pembayaran bunga kepada pemegangnya. Peraturan pelaksanaannya ditargetkan selesai pada 2026. Di sisi lain, CLARITY Act yang sedang dibahas akan mengatur struktur pasar aset digital. Celah antara kedua undang-undang ini—di mana stablecoin dilarang memberi bunga tetapi aset ter-tokenisasi lainnya (seperti dana pasar uang) mungkin tidak—menciptakan peluang bagi produk seperti BENJI. Para pelaku pasar memperkirakan pasar stablecoin dan dana ter-tokenisasi dapat mencapai triliunan dolar dalam beberapa tahun ke depan, mendorong persaingan sengit di antara institusi keuangan tradisional untuk menguasai aliran likuiditas baru ini.

marsbit3j yang lalu

Wall Street's 'Perburuan Kepatuhan': Migrasi Besar-besaran Cadangan Stablecoin

marsbit3j yang lalu

SK Hynix Menjadi "Pengkhianat Kapitalis", Karyawan Samsung Mogok Kerja Besar-besaran

Pembicaraan antara Samsung Electronics dan serikat pekerjanya mencapai titik kritis, dengan serikat pekerja mengancam akan melakukan pemogokan selama 18 hari mulai 21 Mei karena perundingan gagal. Pemogokan yang melibatkan puluhan ribu pekerja di divisi semikonduktor ini berpotensi mengganggu produksi memori global. Inti perselisihan terletak pada struktur bonus. Serikat pekerja menuntut formula pembagian keuntungan tahunan yang tetap sebesar 13% dari laba operasional divisi semikonduktor, mencontoh kesepakatan yang telah diterapkan oleh pesaing SK Hynix. SK Hynix tahun lalu menyetujui pembagian 10% laba operasional kepada karyawan untuk sepuluh tahun ke depan, yang telah menghasilkan bonus signifikan berkat keuntungan besar dari penjualan HBM untuk chip AI Nvidia. Manajemen Samsung menawarkan bonus satu kali berdasarkan kinerja saat ini, tetapi menolak mengikatnya dalam formula tahunan yang permanen. Kekhawatiran mereka adalah menetapkan preseden yang dapat mengacaukan struktur kompensasi di seluruh grup bisnis yang beragam dan memicu tuntutan serupa dari divisi lain. Konflik ini menyoroti pertanyaan yang lebih luas dalam industri AI: bagaimana keuntungan besar yang dihasilkan oleh teknologi ini didistribusikan di dalam perusahaan? Model bagi hasil berbasis tunai ala SK Hynix menawarkan alternatif terhadap skema kepemilikan saham tradisional Silicon Valley. Hasil negosiasi di Samsung, apa pun bentuknya, dapat menjadi tren penting bagi pekerja di seluruh rantai pasokan teknologi tinggi untuk memperjuangkan bagian yang lebih adil dari "kue AI".

marsbit3j yang lalu

SK Hynix Menjadi "Pengkhianat Kapitalis", Karyawan Samsung Mogok Kerja Besar-besaran

marsbit3j yang lalu

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片