Goldman Sachs Bows Down, Bitcoin Finally Breaks Through the Gates of Wall Street

marsbitDipublikasikan tanggal 2026-04-24Terakhir diperbarui pada 2026-04-24

Abstrak

Wall Street giants, including Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, Charles Schwab, and the New York Stock Exchange, have reversed their long-standing opposition to Bitcoin and are now actively embracing it. After years of dismissing Bitcoin as a scam, a bubble, or a tool for illicit activities, these institutions are launching Bitcoin ETFs, enabling spot trading, and building dedicated crypto infrastructure. Goldman Sachs, which once called Bitcoin a "fraud tool," is now offering Bitcoin ETFs. Morgan Stanley, which internally banned the term "cryptocurrency," has launched its largest-ever ETF backed by Bitcoin. Charles Schwab has opened spot crypto trading for its retail clients, integrating Bitcoin alongside traditional assets. The NYSE is building robust infrastructure to support digital assets, signaling a long-term commitment. This dramatic shift is driven not by a change in ideology but by economic necessity. As Bitcoin repeatedly survived market crashes and grew into a multi-trillion-dollar asset class, ignoring it became too costly. Wall Street’s business model relies on capturing fees, and Bitcoin’s rise represented a massive wealth transfer occurring outside their ecosystem. The fear of missing out (FOMO) and client demand forced these institutions to capitulate. The article frames this as a historic surrender to Bitcoin’s mathematical inevitability. Unlike the trust-based traditional financial system, Bitcoin operates on decentralized, transparent, and unchangeable rul...

Written by: Sylvain Saurel

Compiled by: Chopper, Foresight News

In the past few days, the axis of the financial world has completely reversed. We have just witnessed what could be called the most rapid, dazzling, and undisguised great shift in values in human history.

Wall Street, the stronghold of traditional finance, the ivory tower of fiat currency, has officially raised the white flag.

They are not just surrendering; they are scrambling to crown the victor.

For fifteen years, the giants of traditional finance told everyone that Bitcoin was a joke, a Ponzi scheme, a bubble, a tool for illegal transactions, a digital tulip, a gimmick cooked up by a bunch of cypherpunks in their basements. They first mocked it, then suppressed it, and now? They are desperate to own it.

Let's see how institutional dignity has collectively collapsed in these past few days.

The Fortress Crumbles: The List of Surrenders

Goldman Sachs: From 'Fraud Tool' to Bitcoin ETF

Yes, that Goldman Sachs. The global investment banking behemoth, once dubbed a "great vampire squid wrapped around the face of humanity" by Rolling Stone magazine, now has its tentacles reaching into the new digital asset realm.

For years, Goldman executives seized every opportunity to mock decentralized currency. We all remember the disdain on financial channels, the suited executives straightening their ties while earnestly telling the public: Bitcoin has no intrinsic value. Its CEO once publicly declared Bitcoin a "fraud tool." The purpose of this narrative was to keep wealth locked within their closed circle, to continue collecting tolls.

But now, the tune has completely changed. Goldman Sachs is launching a Bitcoin ETF. This hypocrisy is both shocking and expected. The institution that once warned you away from a "scam" is now charging you a management fee to hold it for you.

Why the sudden change of heart? Because Wall Street has no eternal morals, only eternal interests. When high-net-worth clients threatened to move their funds, clamoring for exposure to the best-performing asset of the decade, so-called morals vanished overnight. The "scam" magically transformed into an "innovative alternative asset." Goldman didn't have an epiphany; it felt the pressure.

Morgan Stanley: From Banned Word to Largest-Ever ETF Launch

If Goldman's reversal is a comedy, Morgan Stanley is a textbook case of historical irony. Not long ago, Morgan Stanley was extremely hostile to digital assets, even reportedly banning the use of the word "cryptocurrency" in internal company emails. It became Voldemort, an asset class that must not be named. They saw it as a plague, a virus that would contaminate their noble, heavily regulated mahogany-paneled boardrooms.

And now, just in recent days, Morgan Stanley welcomed the largest ETF launch in the company's history.

What is the underlying asset of this record-breaking, blockbuster financial product? You guessed it, Bitcoin.

The asset they once tried to erase from the corporate lexicon is now the crown jewel of the modern product line. Advisors who couldn't even type the word are now calling their wealthiest clients one by one, urging them to allocate 1% to 5% of their portfolio to "digital gold." This cognitive dissonance is staggering, but institutional FOMO (Fear Of Missing Out) overrode all prohibitions. They finally understood: you can't ban the future, but you can slap a stock ticker on it and sell it to the masses.

Charles Schwab: Opening the Door to Spot Trading for Retail Investors

While the investment banks play the ETF game, Charles Schwab went more direct: deciding to open direct cryptocurrency spot trading for its vast client base.

Schwab represents the average investor, the gatekeeper of middle-class wealth, retirement accounts, and mainstream investment portfolios. For years, they kept their clients corralled in the safe, predictable pastures of mutual funds, traditional stocks, and municipal bonds. Want to buy Bitcoin? You had to leave Schwab, venture into the wild west of crypto exchanges, and manage your own private keys.

Times have changed. By enabling spot crypto trading, Schwab effectively admits: a portfolio without Bitcoin is incomplete. This isn't just offering an ETF; it's allowing millions of ordinary investors to hold the underlying asset directly through a trusted brokerage account.

The significance of this move for Bitcoin's adoption cannot be overstated. It places this decentralized orange coin right next to Apple, Amazon, and the S&P 500 on the dashboard of the average American investor. It removes the barrier, erases the stigma, and opens the floodgates to a massive pool of capital that has been watching, eager to enter but hesitant.

New York Stock Exchange: Building the Infrastructure Full Throttle

Then there's the heart of traditional finance: the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE). The hallowed halls where traders once yelled on slips are now quietly and efficiently building dedicated crypto infrastructure.

The NYSE isn't just facilitating trades; it's laying the pipes. This infrastructure is live, integrated, and "running as smoothly as a cat on a warm laptop." When the underlying system of global equities decides to build roads and bridges for digital assets, the debate is over.

The New York Stock Exchange does not build infrastructure for passing fads, nor does it invest millions in technical integration for a Ponzi scheme. They build systems for things that are permanent. By integrating crypto assets at the exchange level, the old system formally connects itself to the new digital paradigm. They acknowledge that the future of value transfer, settlement, and asset ownership will, at least in part, run on crypto networks.

The Economics of Hypocrisy

To understand this massive and rapid shift, we must look beyond the surface announcements and delve into the underlying psychology and economic logic of Wall Street.

"First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win."

Often misattributed to Gandhi, this phrase holds universal truth in the realm of disruptive innovation, and it perfectly fits Bitcoin's confrontation with traditional finance.

The Ignore and Laugh Phase (2009–2017)

Early on, Wall Street didn't care. Bitcoin was just a plaything for cypherpunks and libertarians. When it started gaining prominence, the laughter began, dismissed as "Monopoly money." A fixed supply of 21 million, decentralized, leaderless network daring to challenge the US dollar's sovereign currency? It was a top-tier joke at Davos and Wall Street cocktail parties.

The Fight Phase (2017–2023)

As Bitcoin rose from the ashes of bear markets again and again, the laughter turned to fear. It was in this phase that the Dimons threatened to fire any trader who dared buy Bitcoin, the SEC launched relentless crackdowns, and the media constantly published "Bitcoin is dead" obituaries, hundreds of times over.

They fought it because it threatened their business model. Traditional banks rely on gatekeepers, intermediaries, and fractional reserve alchemy. Bitcoin needs none of that. It's peer-to-peer, self-custodied, mathematically transparent. This scared them.

The Surrender Phase (Current Stage)

What happens when you spend 15 years trying to kill an idea, and it just won't die? When it grows into a multi-trillion dollar asset class completely outside your control?

You have to surrender.

Wall Street's pivot does not stem from a sudden intellectual awakening. They didn't read the Bitcoin whitepaper last night and suddenly understand the brilliance of Satoshi's proof-of-work mechanism.

No, they surrendered because Wall Street is, at its core, a fee-extraction machine. For over a decade, a historic wealth transfer of epic proportions happened completely outside their ecosystem. Native crypto exchanges made tens of billions in revenue while the old guard banks, hampered by arrogance and regulatory shackles, stood on the sidelines.

Ultimately, the numbers told the whole story. The opportunity cost of ignoring Bitcoin became too high to bear. They recognized the ultimate truth of our time: if you can't beat it, join it.

They decided: if people are going to buy Bitcoin, they might as well buy it through a Goldman ETF so Goldman can charge a 0.25% management fee; if they are going to trade it, they might as well trade it on Schwab. Wall Street isn't embracing the spirit of Bitcoin; it's acknowledging its inevitability and trying to get a piece of the action.

Mathematical Inevitability

There is a poetic justice to this sequence of events.

Traditional finance relies on trust: you must trust that the central bank won't debase the currency, that the commercial bank won't gamble away your deposits, that the clearinghouse will settle properly.

And history has repeatedly shown, from the 2008 financial crisis to the hyperinflation of the 2020s, that this trust is often abused.

Bitcoin relies on math. On open-source code, cryptographic hashes, rigid rules enforced by a network of nodes. It doesn't care about your pedigree, zip code, or assets under management. It just produces a block every 10 minutes, tick, tock, next block.

It is this relentless, unwavering consistency that finally broke the institutional resistance. Wall Street realized they were trying to argue against gravity. You cannot legislate away mathematics. You cannot PR away absolute digital scarcity.

The fiat system creaks under the weight of astronomical sovereign debt, endless money printing, and geopolitical turmoil. Bitcoin is the antithesis. In a world awash with financial fiction, it is a pure, un-manipulable ledger. The smart money finally saw it: Bitcoin is not a hedge against the old system; it is a lifeboat.

Everyone Will Bow Down Eventually

Let the last few days go down in financial history as the "Great Capitulation."

It is a validation for the early holders: the cypherpunks, the retail investors, the believers who held through 80% crashes, those laughed at by family at Thanksgiving dinners, the dreamers who saw the future before the institutions did.

They were right, and the suits were wrong.

And now, those suits are forced to buy this asset, at prices reflecting their years of ignorance, from the very people they once mocked.

Goldman bowed. Morgan Stanley bowed. Charles Schwab bowed. The New York Stock Exchange bowed.

They had no choice. The financial architecture of the 21st century is being rewritten, built on decentralized protocols.

The narrative has completely flipped. Holding Bitcoin is no longer seen as the risk. The biggest career risk in traditional finance is now *not* having exposure to Bitcoin. The institutions realized the train is leaving the station, and they are sprinting down the platform, throwing their briefcases on board, desperate for a seat.

We have moved past the adoption phase and into the assimilation phase. But make no mistake: it is not Wall Street assimilating Bitcoin; it is Bitcoin assimilating Wall Street.

The Trojan Horse is inside the city walls, and the soldiers are pouring out. The infrastructure is ready, the ETFs are listed and trading, the spot markets are open, the old gatekeepers have put their pride for a slice of the pie.

Bitcoin cannot be stopped. It never could be stopped. It is an idea whose time has come, backed by the most powerful computational network in human history.

So, welcome to the revolution, titans of Wall Street.

Pertanyaan Terkait

QWhat major shift in attitude towards Bitcoin has been observed among traditional financial institutions like Goldman Sachs recently?

ATraditional financial institutions like Goldman Sachs have shifted from dismissing Bitcoin as a 'fraud tool' and a 'joke' to actively embracing it by launching Bitcoin ETFs and offering crypto-related services, driven by client demand and the recognition of Bitcoin as a valuable asset class.

QHow did Morgan Stanley's stance on cryptocurrency change, and what significant action did they take?

AMorgan Stanley transitioned from internally banning the term 'cryptocurrency' to launching the largest ETF debut in its company history, which is based on Bitcoin, reflecting a complete reversal in their approach to digital assets.

QWhat role did Charles Schwab play in making Bitcoin more accessible to average investors?

ACharles Schwab opened up spot cryptocurrency trading for its vast client base, allowing ordinary investors to directly hold Bitcoin through their trusted brokerage accounts, thereby reducing barriers and stigma associated with crypto investments.

QWhy did Wall Street institutions ultimately decide to adopt Bitcoin despite years of opposition?

AWall Street institutions adopted Bitcoin due to the high opportunity cost of ignoring it, client pressure, and the realization that Bitcoin's mathematical scarcity and growing adoption made it an inevitable part of the financial landscape, allowing them to profit through fees and services.

QWhat does the article suggest about the future relationship between Bitcoin and traditional finance?

AThe article suggests that Bitcoin is assimilating Wall Street rather than being assimilated by it, with traditional institutions building infrastructure and integrating Bitcoin into their systems, marking a permanent shift in the financial architecture towards decentralized protocols.

Bacaan Terkait

Peter Todd Peringatkan Teknologi Zcash Terlalu Berisiko Untuk Dorongan Privasi Bitcoin

Pengembang Bitcoin, Peter Todd, menentang usulan untuk memasukkan fitur privasi ala Zcash ke dalam lapisan konsensus Bitcoin, dengan alasan profil risiko kriptografinya terlalu tinggi untuk protokol inti jaringan. Debat ini muncul setelah pengembang ZODL mengungkap masalah yang memengaruhi "shielded pool" Orchard di Zcash, yang memicu diskusi lebih luas tentang privasi, kemampuan audit, dan konsep "osifikasi" Bitcoin. Todd berargumen bahwa sistem akuntansi transparan Bitcoin memungkinkan bug kritis lebih mudah dideteksi dan diperbaiki, seperti pada insiden "value overflow" 2010, karena koin palsu dapat terlihat di blockchain. Sebaliknya, dalam sistem privasi seperti Zcash yang "terlindungi", sebuah bug dapat lebih sulit diamati, diatribusikan, dan dibatalkan, sehingga berpotensi menghancurkan saldo pengguna tanpa mudah dikembalikan. Ia menekankan bahwa meskipun Bitcoin tidak kebal bug, jenis kriptografi yang digunakan Zcash membawa risiko operasional yang jauh lebih tinggi. Todd mencontohkan bahwa sekitar 30% pasokan ZEC sudah berada dalam shielded pool, sehingga kerusakan di sana akan menjadi bencana bagi banyak pengguna. Para pendukung Zcash membantah, menyatakan bahwa bug tidak dapat memengaruhi total pasokan ZEC dan menyoroti bahwa Bitcoin juga pernah mengalami masalah serius. Namun, Todd bersikeras bahwa tidak satu pun insiden Bitcoin mengancam kelangsungan mata uangnya seperti yang mungkin terjadi pada sistem privasi yang kompleks.

bitcoinist51m yang lalu

Peter Todd Peringatkan Teknologi Zcash Terlalu Berisiko Untuk Dorongan Privasi Bitcoin

bitcoinist51m yang lalu

UBS: Tingkat Kepadatan Saham Teknologi A-Shares Jauh Belum Capai Puncak Sejarah

Artikel ini menyajikan analisis UBS mengenai kondisi pasar teknologi A-shares. Meskipun volume perdagangan dan proporsi kapitalisasi pasar sektor teknologi besar telah mencapai rekor tertinggi, UBS menilai bahwa tingkat kepadatan (crowdedness) masih jauh dari puncak sejarah. Indikator inti, yaitu rasio over-weight reksa dana terhadap sektor teknologi besar (elektronik, komunikasi, komputer, dan pertahanan), tercatat 9.9% pada Q1 2026, lebih rendah dari puncak sejarah 14.1% pada Q4 2015 dan jauh di bawah puncak sektor konsumen (18.7%). Laporan UBS mencatat bahwa siklus gaya investasi (style cycle) biasanya berlangsung sekitar tiga tahun, sementara kinerja unggul gaya pertumbuhan teknologi saat ini baru berjalan kurang dari dua tahun sejak perubahan kebijakan pada September 2024, menunjukkan ruang lebih untuk kenaikan. Dasar fundamental pasar juga menguat dengan pemulihan laba. UBS memproyeksikan pertumbuhan laba semua perusahaan A-shares naik dari 3.9% pada 2025 menjadi 11% pada 2026. Pada Q1 2026, laba sektor non-keuangan tumbuh 11.8% (y/y), dengan margin kotor dan margin bersih mencapai level tertinggi sejak 2023. Inflasi yang meningkat (PPI +2.8% pada April) juga diperkirakan akan mendorong ekspansi pendapatan. Dari sisi konfigurasi taktis, UBS cenderung pada gaya pertumbuhan dan siklus dalam skenario "slow bull", dan merekomendasikan over-weight pada enam sektor: elektronik, komunikasi, peralatan listrik, mesin, logam non-besi, dan kimia.

marsbit1j yang lalu

UBS: Tingkat Kepadatan Saham Teknologi A-Shares Jauh Belum Capai Puncak Sejarah

marsbit1j yang lalu

Pejabat Fed: Saat Ini Pilihan Adalah Tetap Sabar atau Naikkan Suku Bunga, Inflasi Adalah Risiko Nomor Satu Ekonomi, AI Belum Berpengaruh

Pejabat Federal Reserve (Fed) AS, termasuk Presiden Bank Sentral Kansas City Jeffrey Schmid, San Francisco Mary Daly, dan Richmond Thomas Barkin, menyampaikan sinyal kebijakan yang cenderung hawkish mengenai inflasi dan suku bunga. Schmid menegaskan bahwa inflasi adalah risiko nomor satu bagi ekonomi AS dan untuk pertama kalinya secara terbuka memasukkan kenaikan suku bunga sebagai opsi kebijakan, tidak lagi menyebut kemungkinan penurunan suku bunga. Dia mempertanyakan apakah Fed harus tetap bersabar atau bertindak menaikkan suku bunga 25-50 basis poin untuk menekan inflasi yang bertahan di sekitar 3,5%. Daly menyatakan kebijakan moneter saat ini berada pada posisi yang baik, namun ketidakpastian ekonomi terlalu tinggi sehingga memberikan panduan ke depan berisiko menyesatkan pasar. Fed siap merespons ke dua arah. Dia juga menyebutkan bahwa AI belum mendorong atau menurunkan inflasi saat ini, dan peningkatan produktivitas secara luas belum terlihat dalam data makro. Efek deflasi AI baru mungkin relevan dalam kerangka waktu 5-10 tahun. Barkin menilai pasar tenaga kerja AS saat ini seimbang dan tidak menunjukkan ketegangan secara keseluruhan. Investor, berdasarkan kontrak futures suku bunga, kini menilai probabilitas kenaikan suku bunga dalam tahun ini telah meningkat. Fed diperkirakan akan mempertahankan suku bunga tetap pada pertemuan FOMC Juni mendatang.

marsbit1j yang lalu

Pejabat Fed: Saat Ini Pilihan Adalah Tetap Sabar atau Naikkan Suku Bunga, Inflasi Adalah Risiko Nomor Satu Ekonomi, AI Belum Berpengaruh

marsbit1j yang lalu

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片