Behind the 25% Surge: The On-Chain Life-and-Death Game of Hyperliquid

比推Dipublikasikan tanggal 2026-03-09Terakhir diperbarui pada 2026-03-09

Abstrak

A dramatic 25% surge in WTI crude oil prices, reaching $119.5 per barrel, has triggered a high-stakes on-chain showdown on the Hyperliquid derivatives exchange. The price spike was driven by a geopolitical crisis: the seven-day blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, a critical chokepoint for 20% of global oil supply. This event led to massive liquidations for several prominent traders who had heavily shorted oil. Key figures include trader CBB, who faced a $3.8 million unrealized loss on a $13.78 million short position, and the account "2 frères 2 fauves," the platform's largest oil short with a $3.4 million loss. Both faced liquidation at $120.76. Another whale, 0x8Af7, was fully liquidated, losing $1.55 million, only to immediately reopen a new $6.48 million short position. In contrast, Sky (formerly MakerDAO) co-founder Rune Christensen profited significantly, gaining over $1.36 million from a $7.82 million long position opened around $93. He employed a sophisticated macro-hedging strategy, simultaneously shorting ETH and equity indices to bet on war-driven oil premiums and risk-off sentiment. The event highlights the emergence and risks of on-chain commodity trading. Platforms like Hyperliquid offer democratized access to leveraged oil futures without traditional brokers or safeguards. However, the automated, unforgiving liquidation mechanisms provide no protection against black swan events like a geopolitical crisis, demonstrating that while the tools are new, the lessons ...

Written by: angelilu, Foresight News

Original title: Crude Oil Surges 25%, Hyperliquid Stages On-Chain Life-and-Death Game


"Friends shorting crude oil are completely fired up."

When on-chain analyst Ai Yi sent this tweet on the morning of March 9, WTI crude oil touched $108 per barrel. The account at the top of Hyperliquid's holdings leaderboard was facing a floating loss approaching $3.4 million, with the liquidation price set at $120.76.

As of publication, the WTI crude oil contract price reached an intraday high of $119.5 and is currently reported at $114.5, accumulating a gain of over 25% since last Friday's closing price.

Due to a Strait, Crude Oil Surges Over 40% in a Week

The story begins with Iran's Strait of Hormuz.

By March 9, the Strait of Hormuz had been almost completely blocked for seven consecutive days. The shutdown of this choke point, which carries about 20% of the world's oil supply, triggered a market quake. By March 9, the WTI crude oil price had surged dramatically within just a week, setting a rare volatility record in recent years, accumulating a gain of over 40% compared to pre-conflict levels.

The shockwaves spread rapidly. The Nikkei index fell 5.4% in a single day, its largest drop since the tariff turmoil; South Korea's KOSPI plummeted 7%; Germany's DAX fell over 3%. Bitcoin was not spared either, falling below $66,000, with the crypto market seeing $120 million in liquidations within an hour. The Crypto Fear & Greed Index dropped to 12, entering the "extreme fear" zone.

But on Hyperliquid, another war was raging.

Three Stories of Shorting Crude Oil

In the on-chain circle, CBB (@Cbb0fe) is not an unfamiliar face. A few months ago, he publicly formed a team specifically to "hunt" another whale, @qwatio. This time, he himself became the prey.

https://x.com/lookonchain/status/2030817006107369727

According to Lookonchain monitoring, CBB shorted 127,175 xyz:CL (WTI crude oil mapping contracts) at an average price of $78.37, with a notional value of approximately $13.78 million. As oil prices soared, his floating loss reached $3.81 million, with the liquidation price hanging at $120.76.

Only a few tenths of a dollar away from that number. But no one knows when the situation in Iran will cool down.

Another account, "2 frères 2 fauves," is in equally dangerous territory. He entered a short position at $78.36, currently holding 12,717 CL with a notional value of approximately $13.37 million, ranking first in CL contract holdings on Hyperliquid. His floating loss is $3.4 million, with the same liquidation price of $120.76.

More dramatic is the experience of whale 0x8Af7. He shorted 72,179 CL (approx. $7.8 million). As oil prices rose, his short position was entirely force-liquidated, resulting in a loss exceeding $1.55 million.

Yet, just hours after the liquidation, he immediately reopened a position—60,166 new short contracts, with a notional value of $6.48 million.

Was it a misjudgment or inherent gambling tendencies? Perhaps both. But this choice itself speaks to a certain ethos of on-chain high-leverage trading: liquidation is not the end, just the conclusion of the previous round.

There Are Also Winners, The Other Side of a Sky Co-Founder

On the same Hyperliquid, during the same period, Sky (formerly MakerDAO) co-founder Rune Christensen was laughing on the other side, watching the storm.

On-chain analyst EmberCN disclosed that RuneKek (Rune's on-chain account) went long on approximately $7.82 million worth of crude oil contracts, with an entry cost around $93. As of today, with oil prices touching $109, his floating profit has exceeded $1.36 million.

More noteworthy is his portfolio strategy: while going long on crude oil, he also shorted some ETH and XYZ100 (US stock index mapping contracts). This makes his strategy more like a hedge against geopolitical conflict—crude oil benefits from war premiums, while stocks and cryptocurrencies suffer from risk-off sentiment. By positioning on both sides, he hedges out the risk of a one-way bet.

Rune Christensen, a DeFi protocol founder, used on-chain perpetual contracts to build a macro hedging portfolio. This fact itself is more noteworthy than how much money he made.

On-Chain Commodities: New Tools, Old Lessons

This round of oil行情 pushed a previously inconspicuous topic to the forefront: on-chain commodity trading.

The crude oil on Hyperliquid was launched by the Felix protocol (HIP-3 market deployer on Hyperliquid) on January 9, 2026, about two months ago. The initial parameters were a maximum of 5x leverage and an open interest cap of $2.5 million, representing an early small-scale launch. Trading volume only truly exploded after Iran blocked the strait.

Platforms like Phantom have also陆续 launched perpetual contracts for traditional commodities like crude oil and gold. Theoretically, anyone with a wallet can trade crude oil futures like they trade Bitcoin, without opening a traditional futures account or needing a broker.

This is genuine financial democratization. But the other side of the coin is equally real.

Traditional commodity futures markets have strict margin systems, circuit breakers, position limits, and are backed by risk control teams from brokers constantly monitoring the screens. The rules of on-chain perpetual contracts are much simpler: if the position value falls to the liquidation line, the system automatically force-closes it. There are no phone call reminders, no manual intervention.

The liquidation prices for CBB, "2 frères 2 fauves," and others are all set near $120.76—this number isn't random; it's the "safety margin" they calculated when initially building their positions. In normal oil price fluctuations, having over fifty dollars of room from the entry price of $78 seemed quite ample.

But what they didn't anticipate was that a geopolitical crisis could push oil prices up 50% within 72 hours.

This isn't a strategy error; it's a black swan arrival. The problem is, on-chain, there is no mechanism to let you catch your breath when the black swan lands.

When DeFi Meets Hormuz

The connection between the crypto market and traditional geopolitics is happening faster than anyone anticipated.

Hyperliquid users now need to watch the latest developments in Iran's Strait of Hormuz; while DeFi OGs are using on-chain derivatives to hedge war risks.

As the variety of on-chain commodities and on-chain US stock mapping contracts continues to expand, on-chain players will only be increasingly exposed to macro risks. In the traditional financial world, this is called "global macro strategy," requiring professional teams and robust risk control systems. On-chain, it's called "one person's position."


Original link:https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7617972

Pertanyaan Terkait

QWhat event caused the price of WTI crude oil to surge by over 25% in a week on Hyperliquid?

AThe blockade of the Strait of Hormuz by Iran, a critical chokepoint for approximately 20% of global oil supply, for seven consecutive days caused the price surge.

QWhich prominent Hyperliquid user faced a significant unrealized loss of over $3.8 million on their short oil position?

AThe user CBB (@Cbb0fe) faced an unrealized loss of over $3.8 million on a short position of 127,175 xyz:CL contracts, with a liquidation price at $120.76.

QHow did Rune Christensen, a co-founder of Sky (formerly MakerDAO), profit from the oil price movement on Hyperliquid?

ARune Christensen profited by taking a long position on oil contracts worth approximately $7.82 million at a cost of around $93. As the price rose to $109, he realized an unrealized profit of over $1.36 million.

QWhat is a key difference between trading traditional commodity futures and their on-chain perpetual contract equivalents, as highlighted in the article?

AA key difference is that traditional markets have strict margin requirements, circuit breakers, position limits, and broker risk teams monitoring positions, while on-chain perpetual contracts have simpler rules with automatic liquidation at the margin call price without human intervention or warnings.

QWhat new type of trading strategy did Rune Christensen employ on Hyperliquid during the geopolitical crisis?

ARune Christensen employed a macro hedging strategy by simultaneously longing oil contracts and shorting both ETH and the XYZ100 (a US stock index mapping contract), betting that oil would benefit from war premiums while stocks and crypto would suffer from risk-off sentiment.

Bacaan Terkait

Bank Italia Tidak Melihat Keunggulan Sistemik Stablecoin dalam Transfer

Studi Bank Italia menunjukkan bahwa stablecoin tidak memberikan keunggulan sistemik yang berkelanjutan dalam hal biaya dan kecepatan transfer uang. Semua keuntungan hilang akibat biaya untuk deposit dan penarikan ke/dari fiat serta proses dalam infrastruktur pembayaran lokal. Peneliti membandingkan transfer 200 USDC di 10 koridor bilateral antara Italia dengan Brasil, Argentina, Jepang, UEA, dan Afrika Selatan. Metriknya adalah biaya total dan waktu penyelesaian dibandingkan layanan uang standar. Biaya akhir transfer stablecoin bervariasi dari 0,3% hingga hampir 9%, tergantung arahnya. Di koridor dengan sistem pembayaran instan, penyelesaian membutuhkan waktu kurang dari 20 menit. Sementara di daerah tanpa infrastruktur tersebut, proses memakan waktu satu hingga dua hari kerja. Biaya dan penundaan utama dikaitkan dengan pertukaran dan konversi mata uang, serta kualitas infrastruktur lokal. Komisi blockchain bukan faktor utama. Rata-rata biaya transfer uang global adalah 6,65%. Di sebagian besar koridor yang diteliti, stablecoin lebih murah dari level ini, namun dibandingkan dengan Wise, stablecoin hanya lebih unggul di tiga dari tujuh rute yang sebanding. Penulis berpendapat efeknya akan lebih terasa jika stablecoin bisa dibelanjakan langsung untuk barang/jasa tanpa konversi ke mata uang lokal. Mereka juga mencatat bahwa rezim regulasi yang melarang tidak menghilangkan permintaan akan "koin stabil", dan aturan yang terlalu ketat justru mempersulit penggunaan oleh klien ritel.

cryptonews.ru1j yang lalu

Bank Italia Tidak Melihat Keunggulan Sistemik Stablecoin dalam Transfer

cryptonews.ru1j yang lalu

Boom Bitcoin Memanas: Pernyataan Baru Saylor Picu Spekulasi Pembelian

Ketua Eksekutif MicroStrategy Inc., Michael Saylor, kembali memicu spekulasi pembelian Bitcoin baru perusahaan setelah memposting pesan "Bitcoin Drive engaged" pada 2 Agustus. Postingan hari Minggu ini disertai dengan pelacak pembelian biasa MicroStrategy, yang sejalan dengan praktik Saylor memberi sinyal perubahan treasury sebelum laporan mingguan. Laporan Saylor menunjukkan bahwa cadangan Bitcoin MicroStrategy adalah 843.775 BTC dengan nilai pasar sekitar $53,25 miliar. Dua penjualan Bitcoin baru-baru ini, total 3.588 BTC, telah mengurangi cadangan dari 847.363 BTC. Penjualan ini, menurut pengajuan SEC, ditujukan untuk mendanai pembayaran saham preferen dan menambah cadangan dolar AS. Perusahaan juga dilaporkan tidak melakukan pembelian Bitcoin dalam minggu yang berakhir 26 Juli, sambil meningkatkan cadangan dolar AS menjadi sekitar $3,75 miliar. Ekspektasi untuk pengumuman treasury pada hari Senin diperkuat oleh pola sebelumnya, di mana sinyal serupa pada hari Minggu mendahului pengungkapan cadangan uang yang lebih besar pada 27 Juli. Pembaruan data hari Senin ini akan menunjukkan apakah MicroStrategy kembali ke akumulasi Bitcoin, karena perusahaan menyeimbangkan cadangan Bitcoinnya yang besar dengan kewajiban tunai yang meningkat dan manajemen modal yang aktif. Risiko keuangan tetap tinggi setelah MicroStrategy melaporkan kerugian operasional $8,33 miliar untuk kuartal II 2026, termasuk kerugian belum terealisasi $8,32 miliar pada aset digitalnya.

cryptonews.ru1j yang lalu

Boom Bitcoin Memanas: Pernyataan Baru Saylor Picu Spekulasi Pembelian

cryptonews.ru1j yang lalu

Saham Perusahaan yang Bergerak di Bidang Kecerdasan Buatan Diperdagangkan Seperti 'Meme Coin', Sementara Bitcoin Hampir Tak Berubah Harganya — Tinjauan Mingguan

Tinjauan minggu ini menyoroti dominasi berita pasar saham tradisional dan makroekonomi atas berita kripto. Peringatan keamanan mendesak dikeluarkan untuk pengguna Coldcard terkait potensi kompromi kunci pribadi. Sementara itu, Bitcoin relatif stabil di sekitar $64.000, perhatian pasar justru terfokus pada volatilitas ekstrem di saham AI dan pasar Asia, terutama Korea Selatan yang mengalami penurunan signifikan. Likuidasi besar oleh dana "Situational Awareness" diduga berkontribusi pada penurunan ini. Di sektor kripto, tren bearish berlanjut dengan beberapa perusahaan seperti BitMart dan Storj Labs mengumumkan penutupan atau kebangkrutan. Perusahaan yang masih beroperasi, seperti Coinbase, mengalami tekanan dengan penurunan harga saham dan gelombang PHK di industri. Di sisi lain, MicroStrategy terus menambah cadangan kasnya dan membeli kembali sahamnya. Ekosistem DeFi menghadapi tantangan potensial dari kesuksesan proyek seperti Trade.xyz dan Pump.fun, yang dapat memutuskan untuk beroperasi secara mandiri. Isu perdagangan orang dalam juga mencuat di platform Hyperliquid. Sementara itu, token AI seperti Bittensor (TAO) menarik perhatian investor venture capital, meski disertai peringatan agar investor retail berhati-hati. Artikel ditutup dengan penekanan kembali pada pentingnya kewaspadaan keamanan, khususnya dalam penyimpanan aset kripto secara mandiri, di tengah potensi meningkatnya kerentanan perangkat keras dompet digital.

cryptonews.ru1j yang lalu

Saham Perusahaan yang Bergerak di Bidang Kecerdasan Buatan Diperdagangkan Seperti 'Meme Coin', Sementara Bitcoin Hampir Tak Berubah Harganya — Tinjauan Mingguan

cryptonews.ru1j yang lalu

Trading

Spot
活动图片