Analyzing why crypto is trending again DESPITE markets being in ‘extreme fear’

ambcryptoDipublikasikan tanggal 2026-03-05Terakhir diperbarui pada 2026-03-05

Abstrak

Despite markets being in a state of 'extreme fear' with a Fear & Greed Index reading as low as 10, crypto assets like Bitcoin (BTC), Aave (AAVE), and Uniswap (UNI) saw increased social media attention amid rising geopolitical tensions in early March 2026. Bitcoin dominated discussions with mixed sentiment—positive due to price gains and ETF inflows, but also negative because of rising scams. Aave reached $1 trillion in cumulative lending volume, though governance concerns dampened sentiment. Uniswap secured a legal victory but faced user concerns over wallet issues. Data showed active social engagement but volatile and often neutral-weighted sentiment across these assets, indicating that rising online activity doesn't necessarily reflect positive market expectations.

Rising geopolitical tensions usually push investors towards traditionally safe assets like gold. However, in the first week of March 2026, even as geopolitical tensions intensified, the crypto market reacted somewhat differently than expected.

In the wake of the war between Iran and United States, Israel, global crypto markets recovered a little. In fact, escalating tensions in the Middle East were followed by social data highlighting a hike in attention around Bitcoin [BTC], Aave [AAVE], Uniswap [UNI], and more.

However, despite the surge in online discussions, the Fear & Greed Index is still flashing fear. While at press time it had a reading of 22, it fell to a low of 10 just yesterday.

Bitcoin, Aave, and Uniswap gain traction – Why?

According to Santiment, while Bitcoin (BTC) is continuing to dominate social media discussions in the crypto market, the sentiment around it is divided.

On one hand, on X, many users are focusing on positive developments such as 4–7% daily gains and steady inflows into Bitcoin ETFs. These have helped push BTC into the $70,000-range.

However, at the same time, discussions on Telegram and Reddit have increasingly shifted towards Bitcoin-related scams.

Many channels are flooded by scams offering “Flash BTC” or discounted USDT, which is technically impossible on the Bitcoin network.

As a result, even though social interest is rising, overall sentiment remains mixed.

Next in line is Aave, which recently surpassed $1 trillion in cumulative lending volume. Alas, community sentiment remains muted due to governance concerns following the exit of the Aave Chan Initiative (ACI) and earlier departure of BGD Labs.

Meanwhile, Uniswap secured a legal victory after a U.S court ruled that Uniswap Labs cannot be held responsible for third-party scam tokens.

However, despite the good news for Uniswap, concerns among users persist as many report wallet connection issues and other concerns about dusting attacks.

What this means is that the rise in social sentiment may not be fueled by entirely positive expectations.

Is the data supporting the sentiment?

At the time of writing, Santiment revealed a mixed trend between Bitcoin’s social engagement and market sentiment in recent months.

While the number of active social users discussing BTC steadily increased, weighted sentiment has remained volatile and mostly near neutral.

A sharp drop in early February 2026 reflected a surge in negative discussions, likely tied to market stress, but sentiment quickly recovered – A sign that the pessimism was short-lived.

Meanwhile, the weighted sentiment for Aave and Uniswap from August 2025 to mid-February 2026 highlighted something interesting. Both tokens showed frequent swings between positive and negative sentiment, reflecting how DeFi discussions react quickly to market events and news.

While AAVE’s sentiment mostly stayed near neutral with brief spikes of optimism, UNI experienced stronger positive phases but also sharper drops during periods of market stress.

Meanwhile, the surge in Google searches for “Bitcoin going to zero” in February 2026 underlined the intense fear present in the market. While extreme fear can signal potential long-term opportunities, the recovery this time may be slower.

Thus, with so many developments unfolding, it remains to be seen what happens next.


Final Summary

  • A hike in discussions is symbolic of attention, but “extreme fear” suggested that investors remain hesitant.
  • Rising social activity often attracts fraudulent schemes that distort online sentiment.

Pertanyaan Terkait

QWhy did the crypto market react differently than expected despite rising geopolitical tensions in March 2026?

AEven though geopolitical tensions typically drive investors toward safe-haven assets like gold, the crypto market saw a recovery and increased attention around assets like Bitcoin, Aave, and Uniswap, possibly due to factors like positive ETF inflows and specific token developments.

QWhat was the reading of the Fear & Greed Index at the time of writing, and what does it indicate?

AThe Fear & Greed Index had a reading of 22 at press time, indicating 'fear,' and it had dropped to as low as 10 just the day before, reflecting extreme market fear and investor hesitancy.

QWhat are some reasons behind the divided sentiment around Bitcoin on social media?

ASentiment was divided because platforms like X highlighted positive developments such as daily gains and ETF inflows, while Telegram and Reddit saw increased discussions about Bitcoin-related scams, like offers for 'Flash BTC' or discounted USDT.

QWhat recent achievements or challenges did Aave and Uniswap face that affected community sentiment?

AAave surpassed $1 trillion in cumulative lending volume, but sentiment was muted due to governance concerns after the exit of the Aave Chan Initiative and BGD Labs. Uniswap secured a legal victory against responsibility for scam tokens, but users still had concerns about wallet connection issues and dusting attacks.

QHow did the weighted sentiment for Bitcoin, Aave, and Uniswap behave according to Santiment's data?

ABitcoin's social engagement increased, but weighted sentiment remained volatile and mostly neutral, with a sharp negative drop in early February that quickly recovered. Aave and Uniswap showed frequent swings between positive and negative sentiment, with Aave near neutral and Uniswap having stronger positive phases but sharper drops during stress.

Bacaan Terkait

OpenAI Tidak Lagi Mengandalkan Model Termahal untuk Menghasilkan Uang

OpenAI tidak lagi mengandalkan model termahal untuk menghasilkan uang. Pada 30 Juli, perusahaan mengumumkan penyesuaian harga, menurunkan harga model GPT-5.6 Luna sebesar 80% dan Terra sebesar 20%. Yang lebih penting dari angka penurunan harga adalah pesan intinya: untuk banyak tugas, model terkuat (seperti Sol) tidak selalu diperlukan. OpenAI secara eksplisit merekomendasikan strategi di mana model mahal (Sol) menangani perencanaan dan analisis kompleks, sementara model yang lebih terjangkau (Luna) mengeksekusi tugas, menulis kode, dan menjalankan pengujian. Pergeseran ini mencerminkan perubahan industri AI dari hanya mengejar kecerdasan tertinggi menuju optimisasi biaya dan efisiensi untuk penggunaan skala besar. Anthropic juga mengikuti pola serupa dengan meluncurkan Claude Opus 5 dengan harga setengah dari model andalannya, Fable 5. Kedua raksasa Silicon Valley ini menunjukkan bahwa model flagship kini berfungsi lebih untuk nilai merek dan pembuktian teknologi, sementara model "kendaraan massal" yang lebih murah (seperti Luna, Terra, Opus) yang akan mendorong adopsi komersial luas dan menghasilkan pendapatan utama. OpenAI mengungkapkan bahwa penurunan biaya ini sebagian didorong oleh model AI (Sol) yang mengoptimalkan kode produksi dan alur kerjanya sendiri, menciptakan siklus peningkatan efisiensi yang dapat mempercepat penurunan biaya di masa depan. Intinya, kompetisi AI bergeser dari "siapa yang paling pintar" menjadi "mana yang paling bernilai". Perusahaan tidak lagi membeli satu model tunggal, tetapi merancang sistem dengan beberapa model yang cocok untuk tugas yang berbeda—mirip dengan arsitektur komputasi awan. Tujuan akhir OpenAI adalah membangun ekosistem yang mengunci alur kerja pengembang melalui volume panggilan API yang sangat besar dan biaya yang sangat rendah, sehingga menciptakan daya tarik yang kuat. Ketika AI menjadi murah dan tersebar luas seperti listrik, tertanam dalam setiap proses tanpa diperdebatkan, era sesungguhnya baru dimulai.

marsbit1j yang lalu

OpenAI Tidak Lagi Mengandalkan Model Termahal untuk Menghasilkan Uang

marsbit1j yang lalu

Gaji Puluhan Miliar untuk Rebut Tukang Listrik, Meta Buru-buru Buka Sekolah Kejuruan Sendiri

Perlombaan AI kini menghadapi hambatan baru: **kelangkaan tenaga ahli teknik**, terutama tukang listrik. Proyek data center raksasa seperti "Stargate" OpenAI membutuhkan ratusan pekerja konstruksi yang bekerja hingga 7 hari seminggu. Menurut prediksi, AS membutuhkan **130.000 tukang listrik tambahan** hingga 2030, namun puluhan ribu lowongan per tahun tetap tak terisi. Gaji yang ditawarkan sangat tinggi, mencapai **$240.000-$280.000 per tahun** untuk tukang listrik andal. Namun, kelambatan proyek karena kekurangan tenaga kerja bisa menyebabkan kerugian **$14,2 juta per bulan**. Presiden Microsoft menyebut kelangkaan tukang listrik sebagai **hambatan utama** ekspansi data center. Kompleksitas data center AI sangat tinggi karena kebutuhan daya besar (setara puluhan ribu rumah), sistem distribusi listrik rumit, dan tantangan pendinginan yang membutuhkan ahli pipa dan HVAC. Akibatnya, perusahaan seperti Meta dan Alphabet berinvestasi besar dalam pelatihan. Meta mengalokasikan **$115 juta** untuk mendirikan sekolah pelatihan konstruksi, menawarkan program gratis dengan tunjangan hidup. Upaya ini menarik minat generasi Z, dengan lonjakan pendaftaran sekolah kejuruan. Namun, tantangan berlanjut: konsumsi listrik data center AI melonjak **84,2% per tahun**, mendorong harga listrik naik. Selain itu, pekerjaan konstruksi bersifat proyek - setelah data center selesai, ribuan pekerja terlatih harus mencari pekerjaan baru, berpotensi membanjiri sektor lain dan menekan upah. Masa depan pasar tenaga kerja teknik pasca-boom AI masih belum pasti.

marsbit1j yang lalu

Gaji Puluhan Miliar untuk Rebut Tukang Listrik, Meta Buru-buru Buka Sekolah Kejuruan Sendiri

marsbit1j yang lalu

The Fed Harus Naikkan Suku Bunga di September? Bagaimana Tekanannya pada Crypto dan Saham AS?

Pasar telah meningkatkan perkiraan suku bunga Federal Reserve (The Fed) pada September menjadi lebih dari 73%, meningkat pesat dari kurang dari 53% sepekan sebelumnya. Lonjakan ini dipicu oleh perbedaan suara dalam rapat The Fed Juli (9-3) dan kekhawatiran inflasi akibat kenaikan harga minyak, yang didorong oleh ketegangan geopolitik di dekat Selat Hormuz. Kunci penentu berikutnya adalah data CPI bulan Juli pada 12 Agustus. Jika inflasi menunjukkan kenaikan berlanjut, probabilitas kenaikan suku bunga September akan semakin kuat. Untuk aset kripto seperti Bitcoin, ekspektasi kenaikan suku bunga biasanya menekan harga karena meningkatkan biaya peluang memegang aset tidak menghasilkan dan menarik aliran modal ke aset yang lebih aman. Namun, dampaknya mungkin terbatas jika pasar memandang kenaikan ini sebagai akhir dari siklus pengetatan. Saham AS terkait kripto (seperti Coinbase, MicroStrategy) cenderung bereaksi lebih volatil. Kenaikan suku bunga meningkatkan tingkat diskonto dalam valuasi, memberi tekanan lebih besar pada saham pertumbuhan dan teknologi. Hal ini bertepatan dengan musim laporan keuangan dimana investor kini lebih kritis, menilai apakah pengeluaran modal besar-besaran untuk AI dapat benar-benar menghasilkan pendapatan dan arus kas. Perusahaan dengan cerita pertumbuhan lemah dan arus kas negatif mungkin menghadapi volatilitas lebih tinggi jika The Fed benar-benar menaikkan suku bunga.

marsbit1j yang lalu

The Fed Harus Naikkan Suku Bunga di September? Bagaimana Tekanannya pada Crypto dan Saham AS?

marsbit1j yang lalu

Trading

Spot
活动图片