After the Collapse of the Believe Flywheel Myth, the 26-Year-Old Prodigy Founder Stands as Defendant in Federal Court

marsbitDipublikasikan tanggal 2026-04-16Terakhir diperbarui pada 2026-04-16

Abstrak

In March 2026, 26-year-old Australian entrepreneur Ben Pasternak and his entities B24, Inc. and Believe Foundation were sued in a New York federal court. Investors accused Pasternak of deceptive practices and false advertising through three consecutive token offerings and a forced token migration, causing hundreds of millions in losses. The case centers on Believe (formerly Clout.me), a Solana-based social token launch platform Pasternak founded. Users could create tokens via tweets, with the platform token LAUNCHCOIN reaching a peak market cap of $370 million in May 2025. Pasternak initially claimed he had "zero ownership" of his self-named token, PASTERNAK, which crashed over 95% within a week. In October 2025, Believe forced a migration from LAUNCHCOIN to a new token, BELIEVE, increasing total supply by 33.3%. New tokens were allocated to team members, investors, and the foundation, diluting existing holders. Pasternak falsely claimed no tokens were allocated to insiders for a year, while the foundation received 40 million tokens with no lock-up. The platform generated an estimated $54 million in fees from $6 billion in trading volume. Pasternak earned creator fees throughout. After the migration, significant selling occurred from top wallets. BELIEVE’s value plummeted from its peak to around $1.2 million. Pasternak, a former teen prodigy who dropped out of school at 15, had previously founded apps like Monkey and the food-tech startup NUGGS. His personal life also dre...

On March 23, 2026, a lawsuit was filed in the Southern District of New York Federal Court, officially naming 26-year-old Australian entrepreneur Ben Pasternak and his entities B24, Inc. and Believe Foundation as defendants.

This class action lawsuit, initiated by investors Joshua Lee and Pierre Montmeas, accuses Pasternak of engaging in deceptive business practices and false advertising through three consecutive token offerings and one forced migration, resulting in hundreds of millions of dollars in losses for consumers. By this time, nearly half a year had passed since his last original social media post.

The core of this lawsuit points to a Solana ecosystem application named Believe. Believe (formerly Clout.me) was a Solana social token launch platform launched in 2025, founded by Pasternak. Users could create tokens without code simply by posting a tweet on platform X with "@launchcoin + token name". It utilized a bonding curve mechanism, automatically upgrading to a Meteora liquidity pool once the market cap reached $100,000. The platform was positioned as an "idea crowdfunding platform," and its platform token LAUNCHCOIN reached a peak market cap of $370 million in May 2025.

According to the complaint, Pasternak launched a token named after himself, PASTERNAK, in January 2025, publicly stating on the same day that he had "zero ownership" of the token. This statement successfully built a trust narrative of "no insider allocation," and the token's market cap briefly touched $80 million on its first day. However, within a week, the price plummeted over 95%, and by March 2025, its market cap was only about $190,000.

On April 28, 2025, the platform was renamed from Clout to Believe; on May 2, the on-chain metadata for PASTERNAK was changed to LAUNCHCOIN, though the token contract itself was not redeployed. The complaint points out that in mid-May, the LAUNCHCOIN market cap once exceeded $240 million, reaching an all-time high of $0.3647. The price continued to decline afterwards, while Pasternak and the official Believe account publicly promised at least twelve times during this period to initiate a "flywheel" buyback mechanism, using platform fee revenue to purchase tokens on the open market to support the price.

On October 15, 2025, the Believe team announced the forced migration of LAUNCHCOIN to a new token, BELIEVE. Holders had to complete a 1:1 exchange by October 29; tokens not migrated by the deadline would be permanently destroyed.

Simultaneously, the total supply of the new token inflated from 1 billion to approximately 1.333 billion, an increase of 33.3%. The complaint details the allocation of the new tokens: about 17% allocated to current and future contributors, subject to a four-year vesting period and a one-year lockup; about 5% allocated to early investors, locked for one year; and about 3% allocated to the foundation, with no lockup restrictions, immediately available.

Original LAUNCHCOIN holders received no additional compensation and saw their ownership directly diluted.

The complaint further states that Pasternak publicly stated on the day of the migration announcement that "no individual or entity will get tokens for at least a year," a statement clearly contradicted by the fact that the foundation's approximately 40 million tokens were immediately unlocked. Additionally, the Believe team described the supply increase as "25%," while the actual mathematical calculation was approximately 33%, a discrepancy that sparked widespread skepticism and ridicule within the crypto community.

Regarding the platform's economic model, Believe charged approximately a 2% fee on each transaction, initially split equally between the token creator and the platform, but adjusted in June 2025 to 70% for the creator and 30% for the platform. The platform also designed a "scout" mechanism, where the first user to trigger a token launch would receive 0.1% of subsequent transaction fees. The complaint estimates that Believe processed approximately $6 billion in trading volume, with total platform fee revenue around $54 million.

As the creator of PASTERNAK, LAUNCHCOIN, and BELIEVE, Pasternak himself continuously received a share of the creator fees. The complaint also notes that in the week the migration was announced, on-chain data showed significant selling activity from top wallet addresses.

Pasternak's last original tweet was posted on October 16, 2025. In this lengthy post, he admitted for the first time that he had never purchased any Solana token before launching his first one, reiterated that the team received no token allocation in the initial offering, clarified the misstatement regarding the supply increase, promised that the foundation's holdings would not be sold, and committed to initiating the buyback flywheel after the migration was complete.

On January 14, 2026, he retweeted a post from the official Believe account, which read: "The idea behind Believe v2 is simple: track everyone's real-time sentiment."

Updates from the official Believe account also stopped on that day, with its last tweet announcing: "New market listing: Nikita Bier (@nikitabier) is now open for trading." Thereafter, both Pasternak's personal and the project's official social media fell completely silent.

Believe v2, launched in January 2026, attempted to pivot to a "sentiment market," allowing users to bet on the real-time popularity of public figures through a perpetual bilateral market, but failed to regain market attention. As of the filing date, the BELIEVE token's market cap was approximately $1.2 million, having evaporated from its historical high.

This lawsuit invokes New York General Business Law Sections 349 and 350, California's Unfair Competition Law and False Advertising Law, alongside common law claims such as negligent misrepresentation and unjust enrichment. The plaintiffs request the court to order the defendants to compensate for actual losses, return platform and creator fees, and, where necessary, impose constructive trusts and injunctive relief on traceable digital assets.

Documents show Pasternak resides in Manhattan, New York, and his controlled entity B24, Inc. is also registered in New York, with platform operations and development pointing to this jurisdiction. As of the time of writing, he has not publicly responded to the lawsuit nor disclosed the specific amount of profit he gained from the Believe project.

A Legendary Teenage Era

Prior to this legal storm, Pasternak's life resume was legendary. Born on September 6, 1999, in Sydney, Australia, into a Jewish family, he grew up in the Vaucluse suburb. He taught himself programming at age 13. In 2014, at 14 years old, he collaborated with an engineer from Chicago during a school science class and completed the iOS game "Impossible Rush" in a few hours, which garnered millions of downloads and briefly reached No. 16 on the US App Store overall chart. Media quickly picked up the story, dubbing him "the next Zuckerberg."

In January 2015, the 15-year-old Pasternak rejected internship offers from Facebook and Google, dropped out of high school, and flew alone to New York to seek venture capital. In April of the same year, he founded Flogg, a social shopping app for teenagers, raising about $2 million from firms like Binary Capital and Greylock Partners.

Flogg's performance fell short of expectations and it shut down by the end of 2016. He promptly redirected resources to a new project, Monkey, a video chat app for teenagers.

Monkey accumulated over 20 million users and was acquired by the Chinese company Holla in 2018, becoming his first successfully sold startup from his teenage years.

Starting in 2018, Pasternak shifted to the food tech sector, co-founding Simulate and launching the plant-based chicken nugget NUGGS. The project attracted support from notable investors like Alexis Ohanian, Jay-Z, and McCain Foods, raising over $50 million in 2021, with the company's valuation once exceeding $250 million. That same year, he was named to the Forbes "30 Under 30" list.

From mobile apps to food tech, and then to Web3, Pasternak's every pivot landed on trending sectors, accompanied by significant controversy and risk. And as he finds himself deep in legal troubles, his personal life has also taken a dramatic turn.

Since the second half of 2024, Pasternak was publicly dating TikTok influencer Evelyn Ha. Evelyn is from the influential Korean-American Ha family of three sisters, and Pasternak frequently shared their luxurious interactions on social platforms.

However, in early April 2026, netizens noticed that the Ha sisters had simultaneously unfollowed him on Instagram, and Evelyn was later revealed to be in a close relationship with a Twitch streamer. The outside world widely interpreted this series of actions as signals of the relationship's end, with some in the crypto community joking that "the Hermès budget can finally be reinvested into the flywheel."

From the teenager writing apps in a Sydney high school classroom to the entrepreneur standing as a defendant in a New York federal court, Ben Pasternak's 26th year has brought both legal and emotional storms. He was once the media's "next Zuckerberg," but now his name is more often associated with "fraud," "collapse," and "unfollow."

Pertanyaan Terkait

QWhat are the main allegations against Ben Pasternak and his entities in the federal lawsuit?

AThe lawsuit alleges that Ben Pasternak, B24, Inc., and Believe Foundation engaged in deceptive business practices and false advertising through three consecutive token offerings and a forced migration, causing consumers to suffer hundreds of millions of dollars in losses.

QWhat was the core mechanism and initial promise of the Believe (formerly Clout.me) platform?

ABelieve was a Solana-based social token launch platform where users could create tokens by posting a specific tweet. It used a bonding curve mechanism and promised an automatic 'flywheel' buyback mechanism, using platform fee revenue to purchase tokens on the open market to support their price.

QWhat controversial action did the Believe team take with the LAUNCHCOIN token in October 2025?

AThe Believe team announced a forced migration from the LAUNCHCOIN token to a new token called BELIEVE. The total supply was inflated by approximately 33.3%, diluting original holders, and the new tokens were allocated to team members, investors, and a foundation, contrary to Pasternak's earlier public statements.

QWhat was the significant contradiction between Pasternak's public statements and the token migration plan?

APasternak publicly stated that 'no individual or entity would receive tokens for at least a year' on the day the migration was announced. However, the foundation's allocation of approximately 40 million BELIEVE tokens was immediately unlocked and usable, directly contradicting his claim.

QWhat was Ben Pasternak's background and public persona before the Believe controversy?

ABefore the Believe controversy, Ben Pasternak was celebrated as a teenage prodigy who created popular apps, sold a company, and founded a successful food-tech startup, NUGGS. He was featured on the Forbes '30 Under 30' list and was often referred to as 'the next Zuckerberg' by the media.

Bacaan Terkait

Seberapa Tinggi Kemungkinan TradeXYZ Memisahkan Diri dari Hyperliquid?

Penulis|Golem, Odaily Planet Daily Seiring pertumbuhan bisnis TradeXYZ yang terus meluas dan menguasai lebih dari 90% pangsa pasar HIP-3 Hyperliquid, diskusi komunitas mengenai kemungkinan TradeXYZ memisahkan diri dari Hyperliquid dan membangun platform perdagangan mandiri semakin meningkat. Analis Sam menyoroti tiga pertanyaan kritis bagi investor HYPE terkait hal ini. TradeXYZ kini mendominasi HIP-3 Hyperliquid, menyumbang 93% dari total volume perdagangan dan 99.7% dari total open interest (OI). Kontribusinya terhadap total volume Hyperliquid mencapai lebih dari 70%, menjadikannya pilar utama. Alasan utama potensi 'keluar' adalah untuk menangkap lebih banyak biaya perdagangan dasar, mengingat pembagian pendapatan saat ini adalah 50/50 dengan Hyperliquid. Namun, terdapat faktor-faktor yang membatasi keputusan tersebut. Pertama, kinerja Hyperliquid yang unggul sulit untuk ditiru dalam waktu singkat. Kedua, Hyperliquid berperan sebagai saluran distribusi dan akuisisi pengguna utama bagi TradeXYZ. Ketiga, terdapat hubungan kepercayaan yang kuat antara pendiri kedua proyek. Kesimpulannya, meskipun TradeXYZ memiliki pengaruh dan daya tawar yang besar, membangun infrastruktur mandiri dianggap tidak rasional karena berisiko tinggi dan dapat berakhir sebagai situasi 'kalah-kalah'. Hyperliquid kehilangan narasi pertumbuhan utama, sementara TradeXYZ menghadapi tantangan teknis, kehilangan saluran distribusi, dan risiko reputasi. Jalur terbaik bagi TradeXYZ kemungkinan adalah bernegosiasi ulang pembagian pendapatan dan secara bertahap mengalihkan fokus ke pengembangan produk dan kepemilikan pengguna, sambil mempertahankan integrasi yang menguntungkan dengan Hyperliquid.

marsbit17m yang lalu

Seberapa Tinggi Kemungkinan TradeXYZ Memisahkan Diri dari Hyperliquid?

marsbit17m yang lalu

Robot "Tinky Winky" Datang ke Rumah untuk Bersih-Bersih, Rp 300.000/Jam, Murni "Kecerdasan Buatan" Manual

Perusahaan robotika AS Tau Robotics memperkenalkan layanan pembersihan rumah menggunakan robot humanoid yang dikendalikan dari jarak jauh (remote). Robot dengan antena di kepala seperti "Wi-Fi router" ini menawarkan jasa bersih-bersih di area San Francisco dengan harga $30 (sekitar Rp 200.000) per jam, lebih murah dibandingkan jasa pembersih manusia. Artikel mengungkapkan bahwa demonstrasi video yang memperlihatkan robot mampu mencuci tangan, mengepel lantai, dan membuang sampah sebenarnya dioperasikan secara manual dari jarak jauh, bukan sepenuhnya otonom. Meski begitu, video tersebut diputar dalam kecepatan normal (1x), berbeda dengan demo robot lain yang sering dipercepat. Tau Robotics, startup yang baru didirikan tahun 2024, memiliki tiga "karyawan" robot: Chelsea untuk dapur dan kamar mandi, Elon untuk pembersihan rutin dan mengingat penataan barang, serta Tony untuk pembersihan mendalam. Pendekatan remote control ini dinilai sebagai cara cerdas untuk mengisi kesenjangan kemampuan (gap) sambil mengumpulkan data dari lingkungan rumah nyata, mirip dengan konsep "shadow mode" pada mobil otonom. Alasan menggunakan bentuk humanoid adalah agar operator dapat memetakan gerakan tubuhnya secara intuitif ke robot, sehingga memudahkan kendali jarak jauh untuk tugas-tugas rumit. Artikel juga menyebutkan tantangan besar robot humanoid masuk ke rumah tangga dan membandingkannya dengan upaya serupa di Tiongkok serta robot 1X Neo dari AS. Meski demikian, kehadiran robot berbentuk manusia di rumah dianggap dapat memberikan nilai emosional tertentu bagi pengguna. Layanan Tau saat ini tersedia secara undangan di San Francisco.

marsbit31m yang lalu

Robot "Tinky Winky" Datang ke Rumah untuk Bersih-Bersih, Rp 300.000/Jam, Murni "Kecerdasan Buatan" Manual

marsbit31m yang lalu

Dari TPU ke Agent yang Berevolusi Sendiri: Bagaimana Jeff Dean Menilai Langkah Selanjutnya AI

Jeff Dean, Kepala Ilmuwan AI di Google, membagikan pandangannya tentang arah perkembangan AI dalam wawancara di YC Startup School 2026. Ia menekankan bahwa tahap berikutnya AI bukan hanya tentang melatih model yang lebih pintar, tetapi membangun sistem yang memungkinkan AI bekerja jangka panjang, terus mencoba, memvalidasi otomatis, dan mengakumulasi kemampuan. **Tren Utama AI:** * **Perubahan Fokus:** Kompetisi AI bergeser dari "siapa yang memiliki model lebih besar" ke "siapa yang dapat mengorganisir kecerdasan dengan lebih baik." * **Kemampuan Agent:** Kemampuan AI kini mendekati insinyur pemula dan berkembang pesat dalam tugas kompleks dan alur kerja panjang. * **Otomatisasi Penelitian:** Sistem AI akan semakin banyak digunakan untuk meningkatkan sistem AI itu sendiri melalui eksperimen otomatis dan evaluasi. **Peluang dan Tantangan:** * **Peluang Startup:** Tim kecil dapat bersaing dengan fokus pada bidang spesifik di mana model umum gagal (tingkat keberhasilan ~1%). Peluang terletak pada data milik pribadi, alat evaluasi khusus, atau model domain-spesifik. * **Tantangan Teknis:** Biaya utama dalam sistem AI saat ini adalah **perpindahan data**, bukan komputasi. **Latensi rendah** dan **efisiensi energi** sangat penting untuk pengambilan keputusan real-time dan agen yang berjalan lama. * **Rekayasa Konteks:** Kunci untuk sistem AI yang berguna terletak pada organisasi konteks—alat, memori, lingkungan eksekusi, dan mekanisme umpan balik—bukan hanya modelnya sendiri. **Keterampilan (skills)** yang dikodekan menjadi aset berharga. **Saran untuk Inovasi:** * **Prinsip Pertama:** Tantang asumsi yang ada dan hitung kembali batasan dari sudut pandang prinsip pertama. * **Spesifikasi yang Jelas:** Ketika kode menjadi murah, **spesifikasi yang jelas**, **selera (taste)** dalam memilih masalah, dan **standar penerimaan** menjadi lebih berharga. * **Metode Ilmiah Terotomatisasi:** AI dapat mempercepat siklus penemuan dengan mengotomatisasi proposal eksperimen dan membuat verifikasi yang cepat dan murah. Pada intinya, di era AI, kemampuan langka yang paling berharga tetaplah **kemampuan untuk melihat dan mendefinisikan masalah dengan jelas.**

marsbit1j yang lalu

Dari TPU ke Agent yang Berevolusi Sendiri: Bagaimana Jeff Dean Menilai Langkah Selanjutnya AI

marsbit1j yang lalu

Trading

Spot
活动图片