Ethereum’s Post-Merge Economics — Is ETH Deflationary? On-Chain Analytics.

mediumDipublikasikan tanggal 2022-10-10Terakhir diperbarui pada 2022-10-11

Abstrak

This article will look at the supply and demand dynamics of the new PoS Ethereum network, as well as the realities of it being deflationary.

Introduction

Following the network’s upgrade on September 15th, Ethereum switched from a proof-of-work (PoW) to a proof-of-stake (PoS) consensus mechanism, enabling the network to reduce its carbon footprint by 99.95%.

This also implies that Ethereum’s daily token supply has decreased since the merge, and the ultrasound money appears to be taking life.

This article will look at the supply and demand dynamics of the new PoS Ethereum network, as well as the realities of it being deflationary.

Pre-Merge

There has been much speculation about Ethereum becoming deflationary following the merge, and now we will be able to examine the data to see what has actually occurred since the merge.

As the developers were working on the Ethereum network’s scheduled merge upgrade for September, many analysts were looking at past information in order to predict Ethereum’s tokens activity after the network’s upgrade.

Given Ethereum’s other major upgrade in August 2021, the EIP-1559, which required the network to burn any Ether tokens used to pay base fees, lowering total supply, many projected that ETH token net issuance would be between -0.5% and -4.5%, depending on network fees, making Ethereum deflationary.

Kraken intelligence — ConsenSys

Read this article for further information on what was anticipated of Ethereum’s network pre-merge:

Ethereum 2.0 — What to Expect?

Introduction

medium.com

Post-Merge: Is Ethereum Now Deflationary?

One of the most spectacular accomplishments of engineering in the blockchain sector was the successful implementation of Ethereum’s move from PoW to PoS consensus mechanism, which had been in the works for many years.

Since PoS works in differently than PoW, we’re going to explore and understand supply dynamics using on chain metrics. This will include analysis of validators, ETH token issuance and the effects of EIP-1559 burn mechanism.

Understanding Proof-of-Stake Ethereum — Slots, Blocks & Epochs

kb.beaconcha.in

In the Ethereum PoS consensus mechanism, miners are replaced by validators and block production and validation goes through the following.

The Ethereum PoS blockchain is constructed from a series of slots, which occur at an average interval of 12 seconds. Each slot represents an opportunity for a validator to build and propose a block. Each slot may or may not have a block in it.

Each sequential set of 32 slots are grouped into an epoch. A set of 128 validators are selected by the protocol to form a committee for each epoch. Only one validator of this committee is algorithmically chosen to propose a block in the upcoming slot.

The remaining validators in the committee provide attestations that the proposed block and included transactions follow the consensus rules. Epochs are then systematically finalized by two-thirds of the validator network.

Validators

The Ethereum PoS protocol allows for the movement of validators both into and out of the validating network. On both entrance and exit, there is a queue system which regulates the number of validators to assure smooth network operation, with the churn limit per Epoch.

Consider below:

glassnode

As per the chart above, active validators have been increasing for most of the Beacon chain’s history.

The Beacon Chain, which was launched in December 2020, is the coordination mechanism of the new PoS network, responsible for creating new blocks, making sure those new blocks are valid, and rewarding validators with ETH for keeping the network secure.

The blue line indicates the network’s enforced cap, or churn limit, which rises as more validators join the network. There’s been periods with major bursts of new validators, such as May 21 — July 21, September 21 and May 22.

On the other hand, there are validators leaving the network, whether voluntary or due to slashing in the event of malicious behaviour. See chart below:

glassnode

To date there’d been 678 voluntary exits and 198 slashing events.

The chart above illustrate that there has been a relatively small number of validators leaving the network and a continual increase in the number of validators joining the network. Despite a protracted crypto winter and an uncertain macroeconomic situation, this suggests an overwhelming faith and conviction in the future of the Ethereum network, a powerful positive indicator.

Validator Staked Balance

As validators enter the network they must deposit at least 32 ETH each. The total value staked reflects the sum of all staked deposits, see below.

glassnode

As of now, the total amount of ETH deposited in the network is 13.9 million. We can also observe a steady increase in deposited Ether. It should be noted that deposited Ethereum cannot be withdrawn until the Shanghai upgrade, which is scheduled for early 2023. Another encouraging sign indicating a high level of confidence in the Ethereum network’s future.

Validator’s Losses

Investors would have deposited ETH to the Beacon Chain staking contract at an average price for their staked deposits, commonly known as the realized price. See the chart below:

glassnode

The red curve shows the average price for staked deposits, which is currently at $2,326, which is fairly lower from today’s average trading price of $1,300 per ETH, meaning that there is a substantial unrealized loss incurred by the validators. This can further be seen on the yellow chart, which indicates an amount of unrealized loss, which currently stands at $13.9 billion.

This may give an indication of what could happen when ETH deposits become accessible for withdrawal in 2023. If unrealized losses continue to build but validator count rises and sell-off remains small, this would imply continued confidence for the network, its utility, adoption, and strong belief in Ethereum’s future potential. Since the blockchain industry is rapidly expanding and worldwide adoption is still in its early stages, network participants’ confidence is critical.

Supply Dynamics

To determine and evaluate the utility of Ether, let us first analyze the current ETH supply concentration across the network. The more the utility, the greater the demand for Ether, boosting buying pressure, making the network more deflationary, and reducing the capital flight risk during the times of uncertainty.

This graph shows an area chart perspective of these high concentrations of ETH supply for comparative purposes. Supply areas are represented as a proportion of circulating supply.

glassnode

The orange area represents supply held on exchanges, the red area represents supply in smart contracts, and the purple area represents staked supply held in the beacon chain by the validators.

As we can see, the majority of supply is stored in smart contracts, implying that the majority of ETH is being utilized, generating revenue in network fees and paying validators. On the back of bolstering Ethereum smart contract ecosystem, the ETH locked by the validators are growing meaningfully, further reducing the Ether supply. In this context Ethereum is largely being utilized by the network, whether for smart contracts or network security.

Ethereum’s ETH Issuance

Ethereum’s PoS estimated annual issuance is the function of a validator count. This means that as more validators are staking the Ether issuance increases.

glassnode

This chart above indicates an estimated total ETH issuance continues to climb. Since Jan 22 the amount of ETH minted per year has increased from 227k ETH to 675k ETH today. This will continue to increase as more validators join the network.

Since higher issuance of ETH is not helpful to network becoming deflationary, there is a yield curve, or rewards validators earn on their deposited ETH, which declines as the count increases. See the chart below:

glassnode

The chart above reflects the ETH denominated annual return (%) on a 32-ETH stake validator. The larger the validator count, the lower the yield, which in turn reduces numbers of validators joining, flattening the curve line, and reducing ETH issuance. Currently the yield is at 4.8%, down from 14% in Jan 22, and will likely go down further to a range of 2–3%, and at that stage it’s unlikely more validators will join the network.

With all of the above, we can evaluate the nominal inflation rate and determine if the network is deflationary by incorporating the EIP-1559 burn mechanism.

Ethereum Inflation Rate

Consider the chart below, which illustrates how much Ether supply is being created and issued onto the market.

glassnode

The current issuance rate (minted supply) is 0.56%, which is much lower than the 4% in ETH issuance before Ethereum migrated from the PoW consensus mechanism. This will continue to rise as long as the validator count rises, which may be until the Shanghai upgrade, after which this may start declining due to the implementation of staked ETH withdrawals. Consider the difference below as shown by the chart:

glassnode

As we can see when the merge was executed on September 15, 2022, the daily ETH issuance has dropped from an average of around 13k ETH per day to an average of 800 ETH per day.

EIP-1559 Burn

Let’s now add Ethereum token burning (EIP-1559) to the mix.

glassnode

Consider the chart above which shows the EIP-1559 burn cycle from April 22 up until today. The chart simulates PoS model only and excludes any token issuance under the old PoW model. This simulation will help us to determine EIP-1559’s role and evaluate its full impact on what it would take to make Ethereum a deflationary network.

In blue we can see the nominal issuance rate under PoS and in the red area we can see the EIP-1559 burn rate applied. If merge would have went live on April 22, the purple curve would indicate that Ethereum would have been deflationary through most of the crypto bull market.

Since July 25, the purple curve moved into a blue territory, meaning the burn is less than PoS issuance, making network inflationary once again. As we can see Ethereum is currently in an inflationary regime.

To address the point, post-merge Ethereum is inflationary, but it wouldn’t take much to shift the network into deflationary zone, i.e. a gas fee of 15 gwei. Given that Ethereum has averaged approximately 10 gwei over the last month, the network will be highly deflationary over the next bull run. This will be boosted further as adoption grows over time.

Summary

Ethereum has the potential to become an ultrasound money, as it was termed previously. As of now, Ethereum continues to dominate the DeFi, accounting for 57.58% of total value in its ecosystem.

defillama.com

Furthermore, over 65% of all volume on the decentralized exchanges occurs on the Ethereum network.

defillama.com

Since the merge, Ethereum still remains as the top network generating most of the fees.

cryptofees.info

As of today, considering the data above, Ethereum is the dominant smart contract chain and despite many competitors in the space, such as Cardano, Avalanche, Solana and several others, the users still largely use Ethereum.

Ethereum is planning to implement further network upgrades. Vitalik Buterin, the Ethereum co-founder shared his vision for future developments well beyond the network’s move to PoS. On of the next major upgrades will be sharding, a scaling solution which the Ethereum Foundation claims will further enable cheap layer-2 blockchains, lower the cost of rollups or bundled transactions, and make it easier for users to operate nodes that secure the Ethereum network. With this upgrade Ethereum will be able to process 100,000 transactions a second, making it considerably faster than VISA.

Ethereum’s adoption is likely to grow, especially if Ethereum does become a network of choice for CBDCs (Central Bank Digital Currencies). Currently, at least two nation states are implementing their pilot programs on top of Ethereum network. The Reserve Bank of Australia is conducting the pilot in cooperation with the Digital Finance Cooperative Research Centre (DFCRC). The DFCRC will develop and install the eAUD (Australian dollar) platform as a private, permissioned Ethereum (Quorum) implementation. The eAUD ledger will operate as a centralized platform, under the management and oversight of the RBA.

Norwegian central bank also tapped up Ethereum for its CBDC. Norway’s central bank has made the source code for its CBDC sandbox publicly available and confirmed that the prototype infrastructure for the project is based on Ethereum technology. The open source code has been made available on GitHub, allowing for the testing of basic token management use cases, including minting, burning and transferring Ethereum’s ERC-20 tokens.

The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) and the central banks of Israel, Norway and Sweden have announced that they are launching ‘Project Icebreaker’, a joint exploration of how central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) can be used for international retail and remittance payments. The BIS is an association of 61 central banks from around the world and has innovation hubs set up in multiple locations focused on exploring the applications of new financial technologies including CBDCs, which are digital versions of countries’ sovereign currencies.

It’s possible that with the success of CBDC pilot programs on Ethereum, it could become the go-to smart chain for several major central banks. It will then be a force to be reckoned with.

Bacaan Terkait

Institusi dan Pemimpin Aset Digital Berkumpul di Konferensi Blockchain Futurist untuk Menjelajahi Masa Depan Keuangan

Konferensi Blockchain Futurist kembali pada 21–22 Juli 2026 dengan fokus pada masa depan keuangan. Acara ini menghimpun para pemimpin industri untuk membahas teknologi yang membentuk ulang sistem keuangan, seperti aset digital, stablecoin, tokenisasi, dan kecerdasan buatan. Sebagai acara Web3 dan AI terbesar di Kanada, konferensi ini menampilkan diskusi panel penting tentang regulasi aset digital, adopsi institusional, kepatuhan, serta peran stablecoin dan tokenisasi. Pembicara berasal dari berbagai entitas ternama seperti Bloomberg, JPMorgan, Mastercard, dan Dewan Web3 Kanada. Sponsor utama tahun ini, AiraPay, akan memamerkan infrastruktur pembayaran generasi baru yang menghubungkan perbankan tradisional dengan aset digital. Topik lain yang akan dibahas meliputi tokenisasi aset riil, identitas digital, keuangan terdesentralisasi (DeFi), dan peningkatan modal institusional di ekosistem Web3. "Keuangan sedang mengalami transformasi paling signifikan dalam sejarahnya," kata Tracy Leparulo, Pendiri Konferensi Blockchain Futurist. Acara ini bertujuan menjadi wadah pertemuan bagi para pembangun dan pengadopsi teknologi finansial masa depan. Konferensi ini juga akan menampilkan partisipasi global, termasuk lokakarya dari Invest Hong Kong yang mengeksplorasi peran Hong Kong sebagai pusat inovasi aset digital. Ribuan peserta dari industri teknologi, keuangan, dan aset digital diharapkan hadir.

TheNewsCrypto1m yang lalu

Institusi dan Pemimpin Aset Digital Berkumpul di Konferensi Blockchain Futurist untuk Menjelajahi Masa Depan Keuangan

TheNewsCrypto1m yang lalu

AI Agent "Melahap" Sektor Kripto Mana Saja?

Sekarang, banyak diskusi di industri crypto tentang AI Agent yang akan "memakan" segalanya. Kenyataannya, adopsi AI Agent bersifat spesifik menurut sektor. **Sektor yang Sudah Didominasi AI Agent:** * **Derivatif (Perpetual):** Kecepatan dan eksekusi 24/7 membuat robot unggul. Dalam kompetisi Aster, 43% trader manusia dilikuidasi, sementara 100% AI Agent selamat. * **Arbitrase (MEV):** Hampir sepenuhnya dikuasai robot otomatis yang memindai mempool blockchain. * **Optimasi Yield:** Mayoritas protokol DeFi baru sekarang menyertakan AI Agent otonom untuk manajemen likuiditas dan perdagangan, menunjukkan peningkatan adopsi. * **Perdagangan Spot & Portofolio:** Diperkirakan 65% volume perdagangan crypto global dilakukan oleh bot otomatis. **Sektor 'Medan Pertempuran' (Manusia & AI):** * **Prediksi Pasar (Polymarket):** Untuk arbitrase jangka pendek, AI Agent unggul (66.4% profit rate vs 45.3% manusia). Namun, untuk pasar jangka panjang yang membutuhkan penilaian nuansa, manusia masih lebih baik. * **Lending DeFi:** Keputusan inti tentang penyetoran, pemilihan jaminan, dan risiko masih didominasi manusia, meski proses likuidasi sudah sepenuhnya otomatis. **Sektor yang Masih Didominasi Manusia:** * **Stablecoin & Pembayaran Kartu:** Sebagian besar volume berasal dari aktivitas ekonomi riil seperti pengiriman uang dan pembayaran sehari-hari di luar AS, bukan dari robot. * **Dompet:** Lapisan akhir untuk interaksi manusia dengan blockchain. Proses persetujuan dan kepercayaan memerlukan pengawasan manusia, meski ada peningkatan fitur untuk pengguna. **Pentingnya Lapisan Verifikasi Manusia-Agent:** Semakin banyak AI Agent beraktivitas, semakin penting sistem untuk membuktikan bahwa sebuah Agent bertindak atas nama manusia yang terverifikasi. Projek-projek seperti **World (AgentKit), t54, Self Protocol, dan Kite AI** sedang membangun infrastruktur "trust layer" ini untuk memastikan akuntabilitas dan keamanan dalam ekonomi agentik. **Kesimpulan:** Data menunjukkan AI Agent mendominasi sektor yang mengandalkan kecepatan dan optimasi (trading, MEV, yield). Namun, di lapisan yang menyentuh kehidupan nyata, membutuhkan penilaian, kepercayaan, dan konteks—seperti pembayaran dan identitas—manusia masih memegang peran utama. Masa depan mungkin adalah kolaborasi dimana sistem verifikasi yang kuat memastikan AI Agent dapat beroperasi secara aman dan akuntabel atas nama manusia.

Foresight News2m yang lalu

AI Agent "Melahap" Sektor Kripto Mana Saja?

Foresight News2m yang lalu

Setelah Naik 11 Kali Lipat dalam Setahun, Laporan Keuangan Micron Jadi Ujian Tekanan Tren Penyimpanan AI

Penulis: Claude, TechFlow Deep Tide Pandangan Deep Tide: Bagi yang bertaruh pada penyimpanan AI, 24 Juni adalah hari penentu. Micron akan merilis laporan kuartalan setelah penutupan pasar. Sahamnya telah naik sekitar 11 kali lipat dari $103 menjadi $1134 dalam setahun, dengan kapitalisasi pasar $1,28 triliun. Pasar bertaruh pada kenaikan lebih lanjut. Konsensus Wall Street memperkirakan laba per saham (EPS) naik sekitar 932% dan pendapatan naik sekitar 270% (y/y). Semakin tinggi kenaikan, semakin tinggi ekspektasi yang harus dipenuhi. Laporan ini menjadi momen pengujian taruhan tersebut dan merupakan tantangan terberat untuk tren penyimpanan AI tahun ini. Harga saham Micron naik ~11x dalam setahun. Dengan kapitalisasi $1,28T dan kenaikan ~297% YTD, pembeli di level ini pasti bertanya "berapa lama lagi kenaikan ini?". Laporan keuangan adalah momen verifikasi. Pasar masih optimis. Wall Street memperkirakan EPS ~$19,72 (naik ~932% y/y) dan pendapatan ~$345B (naik ~270% y/y). Angka ini didorong oleh High-Bandwidth Memory (HBM), chip memori berkecepatan tinggi untuk akselerator AI. Kapasitas HBM Micron untuk 2026 telah habis terjual, pesanan sampai akhir tahun. Analis terus menaikkan prediksi. Konsensus EPS untuk kuartal ini naik 68% dalam 90 hari terakhir, dari $11,73 menjadi $19,72. Rentang prediksi 31 analis sangat lebar (EPS $7,53-$24,08, pendapatan $197B-$401B), menunjukkan ketidakpastian tentang seberapa tajam titik balik ini. Perhatian pada rumor: Ada klaim bahwa asumsi harga memori Citigroup terlalu konservatif, sehingga Micron akan melampaui ekspektasi. Ini keliru. Citigroup justru termasuk yang paling agresif, memperkirakan harga DRAM naik ~200% pada 2026. Target harga Citigroup $1200 dan Deutsche Bank $1500, keduanya memperkirakan kelangkaan pasokan berlanjut hingga 2028. Risikonya: ekspektasi sudah sangat tinggi. Fokus utama: Margin laba kotor. Panduan Micron menunjukkan margin ~81%, tertinggi dalam sejarahnya dan termasuk elite di industri semikonduktor. Keberlanjutan margin ini menjadi pertanyaan besar, mengingat siklus kuat Micron. Sinyal puncak profitabilitas atau pelemahan harga komoditas memori dapat memberi tekanan pada saham, meski angka pendapatan bagus. Penentu arah saham: Panduan untuk kuartal keempat (Q4) lebih penting daripada kinerja kuartal ini. Pasar sudah mengharapkan kinerja kuat. Apakah pertumbuhan bisa berlanjut secara kuartalan (q/q) adalah garis pembatas. Kedua, kemajuan produksi HBM dan alokasi kapasitas 2027 akan menentukan kelangsungan cerita tahun depan. Dalam sejarah industri memori, waktu yang paling berisiko terjebak bukan saat kinerja terburuk, tapi saat ekspektasi paling penuh. Micron saat ini berada di posisi itu. Jika berencana bertindak setelah laporan, perhatikan panduan dan HBM terlebih dahulu, baru kemudian total pendapatan.

marsbit8m yang lalu

Setelah Naik 11 Kali Lipat dalam Setahun, Laporan Keuangan Micron Jadi Ujian Tekanan Tren Penyimpanan AI

marsbit8m yang lalu

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片