Infighting Erupted on Launch Day: Robinhood Chain's Launch Platform vlad.fun Sabotaged by Its Own People

Foresight NewsDipublikasikan tanggal 2026-07-20Terakhir diperbarui pada 2026-07-20

Abstrak

On July 15th, the Robinhood Chain token launchpad vlad.fun experienced internal sabotage on its launch day. Two external developers secretly hardcoded their own token into the platform's frontend, making it the only token visible to users and hiding all others. The core team detected the anomaly within two hours, fired the developers, and removed the malicious code. The developers claimed the action was for "clicks." They refunded approximately $15,000 in creator fees and test token profits, totaling about 7.8 ETH, to the team. An additional 4.16 ETH in protocol fees from the launch is held in a team multisig wallet. Built by a five-person team in 48 hours, vlad.fun's code was provided by the two external developers. Their last commit added the hardcoded line. When confronted, they initially blamed technical issues, but later attempted to delete the evidence before confessing. The platform is currently paused. A community member, Will Mexi, clarified he was not involved and was the one who discovered and reported the issue, having previously enabled branch protection which preserved the evidence. vlad.fun's design allows token deployment and direct listing on Uniswap V3/V4 in one transaction, with liquidity permanently locked to reduce rug pull risks. It features anti-whale measures and flexible fee routing. Despite this incident, the Robinhood Chain launchpad ecosystem remains active, with platforms like PONS gaining significant traction.


Author: Nicky, Foresight News


On July 15th, the Robinhood Chain token launch platform vlad.fun experienced malicious actions by internal developers on its launch day. According to official sources, two external developers involved in building the platform secretly created their own token and hardcoded it into the frontend code, causing only that token to be visible to users upon platform launch, while all other creators' tokens were completely hidden. The team discovered the anomaly within two hours, promptly dismissed the involved developers, and removed the malicious code.


The official statement emphasized that the team never approved issuing a vlad.fun platform token, and the two individuals unilaterally decided to launch one for "page views." After negotiation, the duo returned approximately $15,000 in creator fees and test token proceeds. The recovered funds, totaling about 7.8 ETH, have been deposited into the team's secure wallet. Additionally, approximately 4.16 ETH in protocol fees generated from the platform launch are held in the team's multi-signature address.


Public information shows that vlad.fun was rapidly built by a small team of 5 within 48 hours. Currently, two project-affiliated members have issued statements, but the specific identities of the two external developers have not been disclosed as of publishing. According to the incident explanation thread posted by the project's official account on July 18th, the two external developers were responsible for providing the core codebase for the launchpad. In the final code commit before the platform went live, they manually added a line of hardcoded logic to the frontend, forcing their own token to be displayed on the homepage, while other creators' tokens were completely obscured due to loading issues.


After the launch, users quickly noticed the anomaly, with the entire platform displaying only one token. Team members began reviewing the code and found the manually added hardcoded line in the commit history. When questioned by the team, the two developers initially blamed technical issues such as RPC failures, environment variable problems, and caching, but the persistent visibility of the relevant token contradicted such explanations.


According to the official account, one of the developers later requested the disabling of the branch protection feature on the code repository, claiming a need to "rollback some content." Before removing the protection, the team performed a timestamp backup of the entire repository and observed the two deleting the line containing the hardcoded logic. The official statement noted that this attempt to destroy evidence ultimately revealed their intent. Confronted with the evidence, the two developers admitted to their actions.


This incident highlights the trust risks faced by rapidly built crypto projects when involving external developers. The identities of the two involved developers have not been publicly disclosed, with the team stating they have taken advice to withhold their identities for now. vlad.fun stated that in the future, external personnel will no longer be allowed access to sensitive systems, and the team prefers developing based on open-source contracts.


The official website shows that vlad.fun is currently in a suspended operational state. The team stated they will prioritize handling matters for affected users.


Community member Will Mexi publicly clarified his role after the incident. He stated he was responsible for project application listings, frontend optimization, design, branding, and animations, and was not one of the two developers involved, nor did he participate in planning or executing the operation. According to his account, he tested a normal version of the website about 20 minutes before launch, so he did not notice the anomaly.


Will Mexi said that after the platform officially launched, he saw the token appearing illogically, immediately read the newly committed code, discovered the hardcoded line, and promptly reported it to the core team. He also mentioned that enabling branch protection earlier was due to caution regarding external code, and this setting ultimately preserved the complete commit history and evidence of intent. He simultaneously denied purchasing any platform tokens and claimed to have incurred losses due to expensive RPC, API, and server deployment costs.


Core team member @SOLsesame also expressed support in the incident thread. He belongs to the core small team that has collaborated with Will Mexi and others for over a year and is not one of the involved external developers. His background shows he is an active builder in the Solana ecosystem, having been deeply involved in the ai16z ecosystem and its PartnersNFT and PartnersDAO projects. Recently, he collaborated with Will Mexi to build and launch the Black Bull NFT series from scratch for the ANSEM community within 24 hours.


As a token launchpad on Robinhood Chain, vlad.fun differs from traditional bonding curve launchpads. Its design goal is to complete token deployment and direct launch to Uniswap V3 or V4 in a single transaction, making tokens instantly tradable on decentralized exchanges without going through a "graduation" migration step. Liquidity pool positions are permanently locked via a locker contract and cannot be withdrawn by the team, reducing the risk of rug pulls at the mechanism level.


In terms of fairness design, the platform employs mechanisms such as a fixed supply, no presale, and no large team allocations. It also offers an optional developer priority buy feature, allowing developers to buy at launch with zero transaction fees. An anti-whale mechanism limits single wallet holdings to 2%, preventing concentrated holdings by a single address. For fee routing, the platform supports setting a 1% to 5% transaction fee, which can be instantly directed to specified recipients, including wallet addresses, social accounts, or buyback/burn proxies. Fees are locked at launch and cannot be changed. Additionally, the platform plans optional models such as staking for rewards.


Despite vlad.fun hitting pause due to the internal incident, the launchpad ecosystem on Robinhood Chain has not cooled down. According to DefiLlama data, the chain's current TVL is approximately $258 million, with 24-hour fees around $118,000 and revenue about $106,000. Uniswap's 24-hour fee expenditure on the chain reached $1.95 million. The ecosystem has already gathered multiple launchpads, each forming a differentiated competitive landscape: the latecomer PONS holds the leading launchpad position with intensive development and continuous updates. Its platform token has a market cap of about $12 million, with a gain of over 4200% in the past 7 days. Furthermore, the Butterfly platform focuses on stock-like meme tokens but has yet to produce a hit. Native Uniswap innovative mechanism tokens, such as RWA dividend-sharing tokens like index, which received official attention, once surged to a market cap of $30 million on July 17th.

Kripto yang Sedang Tren

Pertanyaan Terkait

QWhat was the primary technical action taken by the two external developers that led to the incident on vlad.fun?

AThey secretly added a line of hardcoded script to the platform's front-end code, which forced only their own token to be displayed on the homepage, while hiding all other creators' tokens.

QAccording to the article, what was the main reason given by the developers for their actions, and what key evidence contradicted this reason?

AThey claimed it was for 'page views.' However, the key contradictory evidence was that when questioned, they initially tried to blame technical issues like RPC failures or cache problems, but the fact that their token remained consistently visible made these excuses implausible.

QHow did the core team discover and prove the malicious intent of the external developers?

AAfter users reported seeing only one token, the team reviewed the code commit history and found the manually added hardcoded line. The developers then tried to delete this code and asked to disable branch protection on the repository, which the team had already backed up. Their attempt to destroy evidence confirmed their malicious intent.

QWhat are two key design features of the vlad.fun platform aimed at reducing scam risks compared to traditional launchpads?

A1. Tokens are launched directly to Uniswap V3/V4 in a single transaction, making them instantly tradable without a migration step. 2. The liquidity pool is permanently locked via a locker contract, preventing the team from withdrawing it and reducing 'rug pull' risks.

QWhat is the current status of the vlad.fun platform following the incident, and what does the article suggest about the broader launchpad ecosystem on Robinhood Chain?

AThe vlad.fun platform is currently paused. The article suggests that despite this incident, the launchpad ecosystem on Robinhood Chain remains active, with platforms like PONS gaining significant traction and others exploring different niches.

Bacaan Terkait

a16z: Dari Perusahaan ke DAO, DUNA atau Menjadi Bentuk Organisasi Generasi Berikutnya

a16z menyoroti evolusi bentuk organisasi dari perusahaan tradisional ke DAO dan peran potensial DUNA sebagai struktur hukum baru. Sejarah kolaborasi bisnis dimulai dari usaha keluarga seperti Marco Polo hingga perusahaan modern seperti VOC Belanda, yang memperkenalkan tanggung jawab terbatas dan kemampuan mengumpulkan modal. Namun, perusahaan menghadapi tantangan seperti birokrasi dan masalah keagenan. DAO muncul sebagai model tata kelola terdesentralisasi berbasis blockchain, tetapi menghadapi ketidakpastian hukum, terutama terkait regulasi sekuritas AS (tes Howey) dan kurangnya perlindungan tanggung jawab terbatas bagi anggotanya. Saat ini, proyek crypto sering menggunakan yayasan luar negeri sebagai solusi sementara, yang dapat menyebabkan misalignments insentif. DUNA (Decentralized Unincorporated Nonprofit Association) ditawarkan sebagai solusi. Bentuk hukum ini, yang sudah diadopsi di beberapa negara bagian AS seperti Wyoming, memberikan badan hukum dan tanggung jawab terbatas kepada kelompok terdesentralisasi. DUNA memungkinkan jaringan yang dikelola komunitas untuk beroperasi secara sah, melakukan kontrak, dan memegang aset tanpa struktur manajemen terpusat tradisional, sekaligus menjaga prinsip desentralisasi. Meski tidak menyelesaikan semua tantangan tata kelola atau secara ajaib mengatasi hukum sekuritas, DUNA mengisi kekosongan hukum penting. Ini mewakili langkah evolusioner baru, memperluas pilihan organisasi dan memungkinkan kolaborasi skala internet antar orang asing dengan risiko pribadi yang diminimalkan, menjawab tantangan kolaborasi bisnis yang sudah berlangsung lama.

marsbit8m yang lalu

a16z: Dari Perusahaan ke DAO, DUNA atau Menjadi Bentuk Organisasi Generasi Berikutnya

marsbit8m yang lalu

Laporan Pertengahan Tahun RWA On-Chain 2026: Kapitalisasi Pasar Saham Tokenisasi Meningkat Dua Kali Lipat dalam Setahun, Namun 90% Hak Hanyalah Cangkang Kosong

Laporan Tengah Tahun RWA On-Chain 2026: Kapitalisasi Pasar Saham Ter-tokenisasi Melonjak Dua Kali Lipat dalam Setahun, Namun 90% Hak Adalah 'Cangkang Kosong' Meski data menunjukkan nilai pasar saham ter-tokenisasi terdistribusi naik dari $951 juta (Maret 2026) menjadi $1.89 miliar (Juli 2026), laporan dari insights4vc ini mengungkap kontradiksi mendasar di balik angka tersebut. Mayoritas produk yang memiliki likuiditas tinggi (seperti dari Ondo dan xStocks yang menguasai 72.7% nilai) adalah produk 'pembungkus' yang tidak memberikan hak kepemilikan hukum yang nyata atas saham dasarnya. Sebaliknya, produk yang memiliki hak hukum penuh (seperti saham kanonik) masih sangat terbatas likuiditas dan distribusinya. Pasar berkembang ke arah dua jalur berbeda: produk lepas pantai berfokus pada keterjangkauan dan kompatibilitas lintas blockchain, sementara infrastruktur AS yang teregulasi fokus pada kepastian hukum dan integrasi dengan sistem penyelesaian tradisional (seperti DTC). Tidak ada produk yang saat ini secara berskala menggabungkan keempat elemen kunci: kepemilikan hukum standar, distribusi luas, likuiditas institusional, dan penemuan harga mandiri di on-chain. Pertumbuhan besar didorong terutama oleh beberapa produk saja (SECZ, FGRS, STRCx). Konsentrasi tinggi terjadi di beberapa platform, dan meski tersebar di berbagai jaringan blockchain, banyak produk masih bergantung pada penyedia jasa keuangan tradisional yang sama. Intinya, laporan ini menekankan perlunya kehati-hatian: angka kapitalisasi pasar yang besar tidak mencerminkan arus dana investor atau keutuhan hak kepemilikan. Mayoritas nilai yang dilaporkan berasal dari instrumen yang lebih menyerupai kontrak turunan daripada kepemilikan saham langsung yang sah.

marsbit58m yang lalu

Laporan Pertengahan Tahun RWA On-Chain 2026: Kapitalisasi Pasar Saham Tokenisasi Meningkat Dua Kali Lipat dalam Setahun, Namun 90% Hak Hanyalah Cangkang Kosong

marsbit58m yang lalu

Bitcoin di Agustus: Ahli Menantikan Pengujian Rentang, Bukan Pembalikan Cepat

Bitcoin pada Agustus, menurut para analis, kemungkinan akan tetap berada di bawah tekanan. Setelah pemulihan di bulan Juli, pasar tampaknya belum siap untuk pertumbuhan berkelanjutan, dengan risiko penurunan di bawah $60.000 masih ada. Pada akhir Juli, bitcoin diperdagangkan sekitar $63.500, turun sekitar 50% dari rekor tertingginya pada Oktober 2025. Para ahli menyebut kombinasi kondisi makroekonomi yang sulit sebagai faktor penekan, termasuk suku bunga tinggi di AS, inflasi yang tetap tinggi, dan dolar AS yang kuat. Tingkat bunga yang tinggi membuat instrumen pendapatan tetap lebih menarik, sehingga mengalihkan modal dari aset berisiko seperti kripto. Selain itu, aliran keluar bersih dari ETF berbasis bitcoin pada paruh pertama tahun ini menandakan lemahnya permintaan kelembagaan saat ini. Secara historis, Agustus bukanlah bulan yang kuat untuk pasar kripto. Secara teknis, bitcoin terus bergerak dalam kisaran sempit $60.000–$65.000. Para analis memberikan beberapa skenario untuk bulan ini: skenario dasar adalah pergerakan dalam kisaran $58.000–$68.000 (probabilitas 50%), skenario negatif adalah penurunan ke $50.000–$55.000 (probabilitas 30%), dan skenario positif adalah kenaikan ke $71.000–$75.000 (probabilitas 20%). Saran untuk investor adalah fokus pada akumulasi bertahap pada level saat ini untuk jangka panjang, karena harga dianggap menarik. Namun, kewaspadaan diperlukan terhadap potensi penurunan jangka pendek di bawah $60.000. Pergerakan yang lebih signifikan kemungkinan baru akan terjadi pada kuartal IV tahun ini. Faktor kunci yang perlu dipantau meliputi keputusan suku bunga Fed, inflasi, dinamika ETF, dan minat terhadap aset berisiko.

cryptonews.ru3j yang lalu

Bitcoin di Agustus: Ahli Menantikan Pengujian Rentang, Bukan Pembalikan Cepat

cryptonews.ru3j yang lalu

Dompet Perangkat Keras Coldcard Diretas: Peretas Menarik 594 Bitcoin dalam 25 Menit

Dompet perangkat keras Coldcard berhasil diretas: peretas menarik 594 bitcoin dalam 25 menit. Insiden ini merusak reputasi dompet perangkat keras sebagai metode penyimpanan mata uang digital teraman. Pada 30 Juli 2026, penyerang berhasil menarik 594,5 BTC (sekitar $40 juta) dari 500 alamat. Akar masalahnya adalah bug perangkat lunak yang tak terdeteksi selama lima tahun. Kesalahan pengetikan dalam sebuah makro secara tidak sengaja menonaktifkan fungsi chip khusus untuk menghasilkan angka acak yang benar-benar aman di dompet Coldcard sejak Maret 2021. Alih-alih, perangkat menghasilkan kunci berdasarkan data yang dapat diprediksi, seperti nomor seri prosesor dan waktu sistem, sehingga sangat mengurangi keamanan kriptografinya. Peretas tidak memerlukan akses fisik. Mereka hanya perlu memahami parameter generator yang bermasalah ini dan melakukan pencarian brute-force secara offline untuk menghasilkan kemungkinan frasa seed, menemukan alamat dengan saldo di blockchain publik, dan menandatangani transaksi penarikan. Perusahaan di balik Coldcard, Coinkite, awalnya menyatakan versi baru tidak rentan, tetapi kemudian mengakui semua perangkat yang menjalankan firmware yang terpengaruh berisiko. CEO mereka meminta maaf namun mengecualikan kompensasi finansial kepada korban. Pemilik yang terdampak harus segera: 1. Memperbarui firmware ke versi aman (4.2.0 untuk Mk3, 5.6.0 untuk Mk4/Mk5, atau 1.5.0Q untuk model Q). 2. Menghasilkan frasa seed baru yang benar-benar acak pada perangkat yang telah diperbarui. 3. Memindahkan semua dana ke alamat baru yang dibuat dari frasa seed tersebut. Penggunaan frasa sandi BIP-39 dapat membantu, tetapi tidak menggantikan kebutuhan membuat kunci baru. Insiden ini menyoroti bahwa bahkan perangkat keras khusus memerlukan audit kode independen yang berkelanjutan, terutama untuk fungsi kriptografi. Beberapa lanalisis, termasuk dari Galaxy Research, memperkirakan total dana yang dicuri bisa mencapai 1.000 BTC. Kasus ini mengingatkan pada insiden serupa di masa lalu, seperti bug OpenSSL di Debian, dan mempertanyakan apakah audit otomatis oleh AI dapat sepenuhnya menggantikan tinjauan manusia pada kode kritis.

cryptonews.ru3j yang lalu

Dompet Perangkat Keras Coldcard Diretas: Peretas Menarik 594 Bitcoin dalam 25 Menit

cryptonews.ru3j yang lalu

Trading

Spot

Artikel Populer

Cara Membeli PEOPLE

Selamat datang di HTX.com! Kami telah membuat pembelian ConstitutionDAO (PEOPLE) menjadi mudah dan nyaman. Ikuti panduan langkah demi langkah kami untuk memulai perjalanan kripto Anda.Langkah 1: Buat Akun HTX AndaGunakan alamat email atau nomor ponsel Anda untuk mendaftar akun gratis di HTX. Rasakan perjalanan pendaftaran yang mudah dan buka semua fitur.Dapatkan Akun SayaLangkah 2: Buka Beli Kripto, lalu Pilih Metode Pembayaran AndaKartu Kredit/Debit: Gunakan Visa atau Mastercard Anda untuk membeli ConstitutionDAO (PEOPLE) secara instan.Saldo: Gunakan dana dari saldo akun HTX Anda untuk melakukan trading dengan lancar.Pihak Ketiga: Kami telah menambahkan metode pembayaran populer seperti Google Pay dan Apple Pay untuk meningkatkan kenyamanan.P2P: Lakukan trading langsung dengan pengguna lain di HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): Kami menawarkan layanan yang dibuat khusus dan kurs yang kompetitif bagi para trader.Langkah 3: Simpan ConstitutionDAO (PEOPLE) AndaSetelah melakukan pembelian, simpan ConstitutionDAO (PEOPLE) di akun HTX Anda. Selain itu, Anda dapat mengirimkannya ke tempat lain melalui transfer blockchain atau menggunakannya untuk memperdagangkan mata uang kripto lainnya.Langkah 4: Lakukan trading ConstitutionDAO (PEOPLE)Lakukan trading ConstitutionDAO (PEOPLE) dengan mudah di pasar spot HTX. Cukup akses akun Anda, pilih pasangan perdagangan, jalankan trading, lalu pantau secara real-time. Kami menawarkan pengalaman yang ramah pengguna baik untuk pemula maupun trader berpengalaman.

712 Total TayanganDipublikasikan pada 2024.12.12Diperbarui pada 2026.06.02

Cara Membeli PEOPLE

Diskusi

Selamat datang di Komunitas HTX. Di sini, Anda bisa terus mendapatkan informasi terbaru tentang perkembangan platform terkini dan mendapatkan akses ke wawasan pasar profesional. Pendapat pengguna mengenai harga PEOPLE (PEOPLE) disajikan di bawah ini.

活动图片