Trump’s World Liberty Financial tokens traced to North Korea, Iran – Report

ambcryptoDipublikasikan tanggal 2025-09-20Terakhir diperbarui pada 2025-09-21

Key Takeaways

What is the main concern raised about Trump’s crypto ventures?

Trump’s World Liberty Financial has reportedly sold tokens to entities linked to North Korea, Iran, and sanctioned money-laundering platforms, raising national security and regulatory concerns.

How much has Trump personally earned from World Liberty Financial?

Over $57 million, with crypto assets now comprising 73% of his net worth.


Despite his well-known pro-crypto stance, both in the U.S. and globally, President Donald Trump’s involvement in cryptocurrency ventures has sparked scrutiny.

A new report from government watchdog Accountable.US, titled “American Sell-Out,” alleges that Trump’s World Liberty Financial crypto initiative sold tokens to entities linked to North Korea, Iran, and sanctioned money-laundering platforms. 

This has raised serious national security concerns as Trump’s World Liberty Financial has generated over $1 billion in personal wealth while the Trump family expands aggressively across the digital asset space.

Transaction patterns raising red flags

Specific transactions highlighted in the report illustrate potential exposure to sanctioned entities and high-risk actors.

For instance, on Inauguration Day, a trader known as Shryder.eth purchased $10,000 worth of World Liberty Financial [WLFI] tokens.

This same trader conducted 55 transactions with a Treasury-sanctioned North Korean Lazarus Group wallet.

Adding to that, in October 2024, World Liberty Financial sold nearly 3,500 WLFI tokens to a user who had previously deposited over $26,000 on Iran’s largest crypto exchange, NoBitex.ir, a platform known for facilitating sanctions violations.

The same user also controls a pro-Iran X.com account, posting threats such as,

“U.S. warships will sleep on the ocean floor.”

The report further identifies user 0x9009, who has bought over 10,000 WLFI tokens since February 2025.

This individual also used the A7A5 crypto token, a Russian ruble-backed sanctions evasion tool sanctioned by the U.S. in August 2025.

Moreover, World Liberty Financial sold WLFI tokens to at least 62 users who utilized TornadoCash, a crypto mixing service linked to laundering over $1 billion in illicit assets, including those associated with the Lazarus Group.

Although TornadoCash was sanctioned by the Biden administration in 2022, the Trump administration lifted those sanctions in March 2025.

Steps taken by the firm

Yet, despite these risks, the company only disclosed blacklisting five accounts with “high-risk exposure” on the 5th of September, months after controversial token sales occurred.

Notably, Shryder.eth’s wallet was blacklisted only on the 31st of August, highlighting a delayed response amid growing scrutiny of Trump’s crypto dealings.

Financial disclosures show Trump earned over $57 million from World Liberty Financial, with crypto now 73% of his net worth.

The family’s digital empire grew from 60 to 185 Bitcoin [BTC] treasury companies in a year, generating billions, mainly via foreign exchanges.

In fact, recently Senator Elizabeth Warren too had raised concerns over Trump’s growing influence in crypto, questioning SEC oversight of ETFs launched by his media company.

What’s more?

Adding to the fray, Democratic lawmakers also increased their oversight, requesting SARs since 2023 concerning World Liberty Financial and the Trump token, signaling heightened scrutiny of Trump’s crypto ventures.

The letter had noted, 

“We write regarding the potential misuse of certain politically oriented fundraising ventures for fraudulent, corrupt, or other illegal purposes.” 

This coincided with TRUMP trading at $8.42 after a drop of 0.36% in the past 24 hours, as per CoinMarketCap.

In fact, AMBCrypto also pointed to the Trump family’s recent foray into crypto, which added nearly $1.3 billion to their fortune.

The meteoric rise of these crypto ventures underscores both the opportunity and volatility inherent in the Trump-linked digital asset ecosystem, marking a new chapter in the family’s financial empire. 

Share

Bacaan Terkait

Anda Akan Terkejut Betapa Berbedanya Arsitektur WeChat dan Telegram

**Ringkasan Perbandingan Arsitektur WeChat vs. Telegram** Pada kuartal kedua 2026, WeChat mencapai 1,428 miliar pengguna bulanan. Sebagai platform digital utama, arsitektur WeChat berbeda tajam dengan Telegram dalam beberapa aspek kunci: **Penyimpanan Data:** * **Telegram:** Menyimpan percakapan secara tak terbatas di cloud dengan sinkronisasi otomatis di semua perangkat. Versi desktop dapat berjalan mandiri. * **WeChat:** Riwayat chat disimpan secara lokal di perangkat. Transfer ke perangkat baru memerlukan migrasi manual via kode QR, dan versi desktop selalu membutuhkan konfirmasi dari ponsel. **Fitur Komentar & Diskusi:** * **Telegram:** Komentar di channel terintegrasi langsung dalam antarmuka yang sama melalui grup diskusi terpisah. * **WeChat:** Komentar di artikel akun resmi dimoderasi terlebih dahulu dan tidak memiliki sistem diskusi otomatis yang terikat ke artikel tertentu. **Platform Pengembang:** * **Telegram:** Bot API bersifat terbuka, gratis, dan dokumentasinya tersedia untuk publik. * **WeChat:** Mini-program beroperasi dalam ekosistem tertutup, memerlukan verifikasi, sertifikasi berbayar, dan seringkali lisensi bisnis untuk akses API. **Batas Pengiriman File:** * **Telegram:** Batas unggah 2 GB (umum) dan 4 GB (Premium), tanpa batas kecepatan. * **WeChat:** Batas umum 200 MB untuk file dalam chat. File lebih besar memerlukan "File Transfer Assistant" dan memiliki masa simpan terbatas di server. **Sistem Pembayaran & Ekosistem:** * **WeChat:** WeChat Pay terintegrasi sangat dalam di kehidupan sehari-hari di Tiongkok, menggantikan uang tunai di banyak aspek. * **Telegram:** Tidak memiliki sistem pembayaran fiat terintegrasi skala serupa. Fungsi keuangan lebih banyak melalui bot pihak ketiga dan berfokus pada pembayaran crypto. **Analisis Keamanan (Sudut Pandang AI):** Perbandingan juga menyoroti perbedaan dalam enkripsi. Telegram menawarkan enkripsi end-to-end untuk "Secret Chats", sementara WeChat tidak. Integrasi yang sangat erat antara chat dan pembayaran di WeChat (tanpa enkripsi end-to-end) dapat memperluas permukaan serangan. Misalnya, otoritas Singapura mencatat ratusan kasus penipuan terkait WeChat pada awal 2025. **Kesimpulan:** Kedua platform merepresentasikan filosofi berbeda: WeChat dibangun sebagai ekosistem tertutup yang terintegrasi sangat dalam dengan ekonomi nyata, sedangkan Telegram berfokus pada protokol terbuka, penyimpanan data fleksibel, dan hambatan rendah bagi pengembang. Pilihan arsitektur ini menentukan audiens dan skenario penggunaan masing-masing platform.

cryptonews.ru2j yang lalu

Anda Akan Terkejut Betapa Berbedanya Arsitektur WeChat dan Telegram

cryptonews.ru2j yang lalu

Trading

Spot
活动图片