Tokenized Gold and Yield Opportunities

tokeninsight_enDipublikasikan tanggal 2025-04-02Terakhir diperbarui pada 2025-04-03

Why Gold Matters

Gold is making headlines in 2025, hitting new all-time highs amid a surge in safe-haven demand. The price of gold surpassed $3,000 per ounce for the first time ever, reflecting a comeback for the yellow metal. Investors are once again flocking to gold due to renewed worries about fiat currency debasement and global instability.

With Bitcoin often called “digital gold,” some have questioned whether physical gold is still relevant. The recent data speaks for itself: gold remains crucial for diversification and stability. The 1-year retrun of gold as at March 2025 is 36%, outpacing major stock indices as well as Bitcoin.

Lower Volatility Compared to Bitcoin

Gold’s price fluctuations are much milder compared to Bitcoin’s wild swings. For example, as of 2024, Bitcoin’s volatility was roughly 47%, versus only 12% for gold. This means Bitcoin can swing almost four times more sharply than gold on average – a huge difference for risk-conscious investors. We saw this in action in early 2025: over a span of weeks when tech stocks (Nasdaq) fell nearly 15%, gold held steady (up ~1%) while Bitcoin dropped about 20%, mirroring the stock sell-off. Gold’s lower volatility makes it a valuable asset for preserving capital during market turmoil, whereas Bitcoin often behaves like a high-beta risk asset.

Source: https://www.ishares.com/us/insights/bitcoin-volatility-trends#:~:text=,deviation%20of%20annualized%20daily%20returns

Low Correlation with Bitcoin

Gold and Bitcoin have diverged in recent market cycles. In the past year, gold steadily climbed to new highs, boosted by inflation fears and war tensions. Bitcoin, on the other hand, traded in wide ranges and was heavily influenced by investor risk appetite. Notably, gold’s correlation with traditional assets is low or even negative, which is ideal for diversification. In fact, gold has shown a negative correlation with Bitcoin as well, which strengthens portfolio diversification when holding both.

Tokenized Gold in 2025

One of the most exciting developments is how gold itself has joined the blockchain revolution. Tokenized gold – digital tokens 100% backed by physical gold – has seen remarkable growth. The market capitalization of gold-backed crypto tokens hit a record $1.4 billion in March 2025. Two tokens dominate this space: PAX Gold (PAXG) and Tether Gold (XAUt). These allow investors to own gold in digital form, combining the stability of gold with the flexibility of crypto.

Source: https://www.coindesk.com/markets/2025/03/27/tokenized-gold-hits-new-record-market-cap-as-trading-volumes-soar-in-march

PAXG (Paxos Gold)

PAX Gold (PAXG) is issued by Paxos Trust Company, a New York-regulated financial institution. Each PAXG token represents one fine troy ounce of gold stored in LBMA-accredited vaults in London. Importantly, Paxos operates under strict oversight – the token is fully backed 1:1 by physical gold and undergoes monthly third-party audits to verify the reserves. This regulatory compliance (Paxos is chartered by the NYDFS) gives PAXG holders confidence that the token truly is fully backed.

In 2025, PAXG’s popularity grew steadily. Its market capitalization stands around $680 million, roughly half of the tokenized gold sector. Daily trading volumes for PAXG often reach tens of millions of dollars. PAXG benefited from regulatory trust – even after some stablecoin scrutiny in the US, Paxos Gold continued to operate smoothly. We also saw new use cases: for example, in late 2024 the derivatives exchange Deribit launched PAXG futures and options, indicating rising institutional interest in tokenized gold as a trading asset.

XAUt (Tether Gold)

Tether Gold (XAUt) is another major gold-backed token, issued by TG Commodities, a company affiliated with Tether. Each XAUt represents one troy ounce of gold stored in Swiss vaults that meet London Good Delivery standards. XAUt has gained traction and in 2025 with about $770 million market cap.

However, XAUt has a different regulatory profile. In 2023, Tether moved its gold token operations under the oversight of El Salvador – TG Commodities is licensed as a stablecoin issuer in El Salvador, which provides a regulatory framework. Tether Gold publishes periodic reports on its gold reserves and claims full backing, but unlike Paxos, it has not yet undergone a full independent audit of those reserves. This has led to some transparency concerns. Tether’s leadership has stated that a comprehensive audit (by a Big Four firm) is a top priority in light of new stablecoin rules, so the hope is that XAUt’s backing will be verified to the same standard as PAXG in the near future.

Source: https://gold.tether.to/

Yield Opportunities in DeFi

Beyond simple buying and holding, tokenized gold has opened up new use cases in decentralized finance (DeFi). In 2025, crypto investors are deploying gold-backed tokens in various yield-generating strategies, effectively putting their gold to work. This is a notable development – historically gold just sat in a vault earning nothing, but now gold can earn yield without leaving the vault, thanks to DeFi protocols.

Liquidity Pools & AMMs

For example, Uniswap’s PAXG/USDC pool allows traders to swap between tokenized gold and the U.S. dollar. Liquidity providers in this pool earn trading fees.

This setup lets LPs earn passive income while maintaining exposure to gold, making it an appealing option—especially during periods of heightened gold interest and trading activity.

Source: https://defillama.com/yields/pool/459e731e-60a0-45fa-8b49-092468ab14f5

Another option is the PAXG/WETH pool, which enables swaps between gold and Ethereum. This pool has a higher liquidity. However, it also tends to carry higher impermanent loss, because PAXG (which tracks gold) is relatively stable, while WETH (which tracks Ethereum) is highly volatile. When ETH’s price moves sharply up or down, the relative value between the two assets diverges—causing imbalances that lead to greater IL for liquidity providers.

Both pools offer yield opportunities, but the risk-reward profile differs depending on the volatility of the paired asset.

Source: https://defillama.com/yields/pool/40ac1aaf-26f1-4a04-b908-539f37672ef2

Impermanent loss

Impermanent loss (IL) is a key concept in decentralized finance (DeFi), particularly for liquidity providers (LPs) on automated market makers (AMMs) like Uniswap. It occurs when the value of tokens in a liquidity pool diverges from the value those tokens would have had if simply held outside the pool, due to price changes between the paired assets. IL is "impermanent" because it only becomes a realized loss if the LP withdraws their funds during a period of price divergence; if prices revert to their original ratio, the loss may diminish or disappear. However, the risk and magnitude of IL depend heavily on the volatility and correlation of the paired assets.

The PAXG/USDC pool pairs PAX Gold (PAXG), a stablecoin pegged to the price of gold, with USD Coin (USDC), a stablecoin pegged to the U.S. dollar. Both assets are designed to maintain stable values relative to their respective pegs—gold and USD. Because gold prices tend to fluctuate modestly compared to cryptocurrencies and USDC remains tightly pegged to $1, the price ratio between PAXG and USDC is relatively stable over time. This stability minimizes the divergence in their relative values within the pool, resulting in a lower risk of impermanent loss.

In contrast, the PAXG/WETH pool pairs PAXG with Wrapped Ether (WETH), a tokenized version of Ethereum’s native cryptocurrency, ETH. While PAXG tracks gold and exhibits moderate price movement, WETH is tied to ETH, which is notoriously volatile in the crypto market. Ethereum’s price can swing dramatically—sometimes 20-50% or more in a short period—driven by market sentiment, network developments, or macroeconomic factors. When WETH’s price rises or falls significantly relative to PAXG, the pool’s constant product formula forces a rebalancing of the assets, reducing the LP’s exposure to the outperforming asset (e.g., PAXG during a rally) and increasing exposure to the underperforming one. This rebalancing amplifies IL, as the LP ends up with fewer high-value tokens than they would have by simply holding.

Impermanent Loss estimates from Yield Samurai

Source:https://yieldsamurai.com/

Bacaan Terkait

Serenity, 'Pemimpin Komunitas' Ritel vs Leopold, Dewa Saham Baru: Bagaimana Dua Pemburu Top Ini Menggali Kekayaan dari 'Batas Fisik' AI?

Penulis: Jae, PANews Setelah logika investasi sederhana seperti membeli Nvidia kehilangan daya tariknya, uang cerdas kini beralih ke fondasi fisik di balik operasi AI. Dua figur dengan gaya berbeda menjadi sorotan: **Serenity**, trader anonim dengan avatar anime di platform X yang mengklaim pernah menolak tawaran kerja dari Nvidia dan menerbitkan makalah di Nature, serta **Leopold Aschenbrenner**, mantan peneliti OpenAI berusia 24 tahun yang kini mengelola dana lindung nilai senilai miliaran dolar. **Strategi Serenity: Teori "Daun Shiso" dan Pencarian "Titik Sumbatan"** Serenity, dengan akun @aleabitoreddit, terkenal berkat analisis mendalamnya tentang rantai pasokan AI level terendah. Ia menggunakan analogi "Daun Shiso" – komponen kecil yang tak tergantikan dalam hidangan mewah – untuk mengidentifikasi perusahaan mikro dengan monopoli teknologi di titik kritis tertentu, seperti bahan substrat untuk modul optik. Metodenya melibatkan studi mendalam makalah ilmiah, pemetaan rantai pasokan, dan pengujian dengan AI. Fokusnya adalah pada teknologi CPO dan material tingkat molekuler, menghasilkan rekomendasi saham seperti AXTI (naik 6x) dan perusahaan bahan kimia Jepang NCI. **Strategi Leopold: Arbitrase Infrastruktur dan Batasan Fisik** Leopold, melalui dana Situational Awareness LP, menerapkan strategi **arbitrase infrastruktur**. Ia yakin hambatan utama menuju AGI adalah sumber daya fisik seperti listrik, lahan, dan pusat data, bukan hanya chip. Portofolionya sangat terkonsentrasi: **posisi panjang besar** pada penyedia penyimpanan (SanDisk) dan cloud komputasi (CoreWeave), serta **posisi pendek masif** (melalui opsi put) terhadap raksasa semikonduktor seperti Nvidia, TSMC, dan ASML. Ia berargumen valuasi chip telah melampaui kecepatan pembangunan infrastruktur pendukungnya. Ia juga berinvestasi besar pada perusahaan penambangan Bitcoin, yang dilihatnya sebagai alternatif pusat daya komputasi AI yang terdiskonto. **Inti Bersama dan Tantangan** Kedua strategi berbagi inti yang sama: **meninggalkan lapisan perangkat lunak dan berfokus pada perangkat keras yang dibatasi oleh hukum fisik**. Baik material langka Serenity maupun infrastruktur Leopold memegang kekuatan untuk menarik "pajak" di era AI. Namun, keduanya menghadapi risiko: - **Serenity**: Risiko **likuiditas** pada saham mikro. Rekomendasinya dapat mendorong harga, tetapi koreksi bisa tajam. Latar belakang dan rekam jejaknya yang tidak terverifikasi juga menambah risiko bagi pengikut. - **Leopold**: Risiko **ketidaksesuaian waktu** antara logika fundamental dan pasar. Valuasi tinggi chip bisa bertahan lebih lama dari perkiraan, menyebabkan kerugian besar pada posisi opsi put-nya. Keduanya menandai pergeseran logika investasi AI, dari semikonduktor itu sendiri menuju **material, peralatan, daya, dan lahan** yang mendasarinya. Titik kritis dengan kelangkaan dan hambatan teknologi tinggi di rantai pasokan fisik AI mungkin akan menarik perhatian pasar lebih besar ke depan.

marsbit3j yang lalu

Serenity, 'Pemimpin Komunitas' Ritel vs Leopold, Dewa Saham Baru: Bagaimana Dua Pemburu Top Ini Menggali Kekayaan dari 'Batas Fisik' AI?

marsbit3j yang lalu

Nocera Berganti Nama Menjadi Nocera Holdings, Melangkah Penuh ke AI, Pusat Data, Robotika, Biotek, dan Aset Digital

Nocera, Inc. (Nasdaq: NCRA) mengumumkan transformasi korporat besar dan perubahan merek menjadi **Nocera Holdings**, sebuah perusahaan induk yang akan berfokus pada bidang teknologi beragam dan pertumbuhan tinggi. Perusahaan memperluas syarat perjanjian pembiayaan hingga $300 juta untuk mendanai akuisisi, investasi strategis, dan peluang ekspansi. Nocera Holdings akan mengejar peluang di berbagai sektor teknologi utama: * **AI & Infrastruktur AI:** Mencari akuisisi dan kemitraan di platform infrastruktur AI, aplikasi tingkat perusahaan, dan solusi operasional terkait AI. * **Pusat Data:** Mengevaluasi peluang di Asia dan Eropa Timur untuk pusat data dan proyek infrastruktur pendukung, didorong oleh permintaan komputasi awan dan AI. * **Bioteknologi & AI Medis:** Menjelajahi investasi dalam diagnostik, otomatisasi, teknologi medis, dan platform operasional yang digerakkan oleh AI. * **Robotika & "AI Fisik":** Fokus pada otomatisasi industri, robotika, dan aplikasi AI dunia nyata, khususnya di pasar Asia yang berkembang pesat. * **Blockchain & Aset Digital:** Terus mengembangkan strategi blockchain, tokenisasi, dan infrastruktur aset digital sebagai bagian dari portofolio jangka panjang. Transformasi ini didukung oleh pembaruan merek dan strategi komunikasi internasional. Perusahaan juga tetap berkomitmen untuk memperkuat neraca keuangan dan mematuhi peraturan pencatatan Nasdaq. Dengan hubungan dan kehadiran pasar di Asia, Nocera Holdings bertujuan menciptakan nilai jangka panjang bagi pemegang saham melalui teknologi generasi berikutnya.

marsbit4j yang lalu

Nocera Berganti Nama Menjadi Nocera Holdings, Melangkah Penuh ke AI, Pusat Data, Robotika, Biotek, dan Aset Digital

marsbit4j yang lalu

Siapa yang Bisa Menghasilkan Uang di Era Agents?

Banyak yang memperkirakan pengguna blockchain berikutnya akan didominasi oleh Agen (Agents). Namun, di dunia seperti itu, siapa yang sebenarnya akan mendapatkan nilai? Teori lama dalam kripto, seperti "Protokol Gemuk" (Fat Protocols) yang berfokus pada manusia, dan teori "Aplikasi Gemuk" (Fat Apps) yang berfokus pada hubungan dengan pengguna, mungkin tidak lagi berlaku ketika pengguna adalah Agen. Agen bersifat rasional, tanpa loyalitas merek, dan dapat beralih antar platform dengan mudah. Mereka tidak peduli pada antarmuka pengguna (UX) atau kemudahan. Ini mengikis keunggulan aplikasi yang menguasai hubungan dengan pengguna. Lalu, siapa yang menangkap nilai? Artikel ini menjelaskan beberapa kemungkinan skenario: 1. **Aplikasi Menjadi "Tanpa Kepala" (Headless):** Pemenang di lapisan aplikasi saat ini (seperti dompet, agregator) dapat membuka infrastruktur mereka sebagai API untuk Agen, beralih menjadi penyedia backend murni. 2. **Kebangkitan Kembali Protokol:** Jika integrasi menjadi sangat mudah, Agen mungkin melewati perantara dan berinteraksi langsung dengan protokol dasar, memberi napas baru pada teori Protokol Gemuk. 3. **Runtuhnya Daya Tarif Harga di Seluruh Lapisan Teknologi:** Agen yang selalu mencari harga terbaik dapat memicu perang harga ekstrem, memaksa margin semua lapisan mendekati biaya marjinal. Kripto menjadi utilitas dengan keuntungan tipis. 4. **Agen Menciptakan Aktivitas Ekonomi Baru:** Agen memungkinkan aktivitas yang tidak layak bagi manusia (misalnya, rebalancing portofolio berbiaya sangat rendah, perdagangan mesin-ke-mesin), memperbesar total kue ekonomi secara signifikan. 5. **Model Bisnis Baru yang Belum Terbayangkan:** Seperti pergeseran ke ekonomi perhatian di era internet, mungkin muncul model bisnis dominan baru di dunia Agen yang saat ini belum terpikirkan. Kemungkinan besar, manusia dan Agen akan tetap hidup berdampingan. Untuk transaksi manusia, teori Aplikasi Gemuk masih relevan. Sedangkan untuk transaksi Agen, pertanyaan kuncinya adalah: apa yang membuat sebuah Agen memilih Anda, bukan hanya harga termurah? Faktor seperti likuiditas, latensi rendah, atau jaminan penyelesaian mungkin menjadi jawabannya.

marsbit4j yang lalu

Siapa yang Bisa Menghasilkan Uang di Era Agents?

marsbit4j yang lalu

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片