[Featured Research]BTC Analyst: Short Squeezes and Spot Demand

GlassnodeDipublikasikan tanggal 2023-02-02Terakhir diperbarui pada 2023-02-02

Abstrak

Bitcoin markets have seen the strongest monthly price performance since Oct-2021, fuelled by both historic spot demand, and a sequence of short squeezes. In this edition, we explore the dynamics taking place in both derivatives markets, and the spot exchanges.

The rally in digital assets has continued this week, with Bitcoin prices reaching a high of $23.9k on Sunday evening. The month of January has seen Bitcoin markets posting the best monthly price performance since Oct-2021, reaching over +43% YTD. This puts Bitcoin prices at the highest level since Aug-2022, and a +6.6% gain off the weekly lows at $22.4k.

In this edition, we will explore some of the mechanics underlying this rally within both the derivative markets, and the spot exchanges. We cover:

1.The recent futures short squeeze and a return of positive futures basis, despite declining aggregate leverage relative to market size.

2.The prevailing decline of spot exchange balances, despite a decreasing dominance of exchange related on-chain activity.

3.The market breaking above the average withdrawal price for several market cohorts, including the class of 2019+, Binance and Coinbase customers, and Whales from the class of 2017.

Squeezing Shorts

After a long, painful, and gruelling 2022, the new year has opened with a notable reversal of the downtrend throughout January. As is often the case, such rallies are usually fuelled by some degree of short squeezes within derivative markets, and this rally is no different.

To date, there have been over $495M in short futures contracts liquidated across three waves, notably with declining scale as the rally played out.

We can see the initial short squeeze in mid-Jan took many traders by surprise, setting an all-time-low of 15% for long liquidation dominance (meaning 85% of liquidations were shorts). This is an even larger magnitude relative to the longs liquidated during the FTX implosion (75% long dominance), showing just how offside many traders were.

Across both perpetual swap, and calendar futures, the cash and carry basis is now back into positive territory, yielding 7.3% and 3.3% annualized, respectively. This comes after much of November and December saw backwardation across all futures markets, and suggests a return of positive sentiment, and perhaps with a side of speculation.

However, despite this return of a positive futures basis, the total open interest relative to the Bitcoin Market cap has been in decline since mid-Nov. The BTC denominated value of open futures contracts has fallen by 36% over this time, dropping from 650k BTC in mid-Nov, to 414k BTC today.

Note that 40% of this decline can be directly attributed to the loss of 95k BTC worth of open interest that was held at the FTX exchange.

If we compare the notional size of open futures contracts to the BTC balance on corresponding exchanges, we can gauge the relative scale of leverage within the market. Here we can see that this leverage ratio has declined from open interest equal to 40% of spot exchange balances, to just 25% over the last 75-days.

Overall, this reflects a significant net reduction in futures leverage, and a closing out of short speculative interest. It potentially also signals a reduction in short term downside hedge positions. On a relative basis, and alongside the increase in observed shift back towards on-chain self-custody (WoC 46), this also puts more emphasis onto spot markets as a key driver of the current market structure.

Inspecting Spot Exchanges

The trend of coins flowing out from spot exchanges has been a major theme since March 2020, which to this day marks the all-time-high exchange coin balance. Today, the total BTC balance held on the exchanges we track is around 2.251M BTC, representing 11.7% of the circulating supply, and a multi-year low that was last seen in Feb 2018.

The total volume of coins flowing both in and out of exchanges is currently around $625M/day in both directions (i.e. $1.25B/day total). On net, there is around $20M in net daily flows, reflecting just 1.5% of the total, and showing that exchange flows are in a remarkably even balance. This differs to Nov-Dec where exchanges saw periods of net outflows on the order of $200M to $300M per day.

The largest monthly outflow of coins in history occurred in this Nov-Dec period, hitting -200k BTC/month in outflows across all exchanges. Today, exchange net-flows have returned to neutral, reflecting a cooling down of outflows. This may signify a slow down in new demand relative to newly mobilized spending (WoC 4), now that the market has rallied over 43% year-to-date.

The largest monthly outflow of coins in history occurred in this Nov-Dec period, hitting -200k BTC/month in outflows across all exchanges. Today, exchange net-flows have returned to neutral, reflecting a cooling down of outflows. This may signify a slow down in new demand relative to newly mobilized spending (WoC 4), now that the market has rallied over 43% year-to-date.

An Evolving Economy

On-chain transactions for Bitcoin spiked by over 50k transactions per day this week, however we cannot see a corresponding increase in exchange deposits or withdrawal counts. Exchange related transactions represent just 35% of total transaction counts at present, with this dominance remaining in a downtrend since the May 2021 market peak.

This spike in transaction counts is also visible within our Entity-Adjusted data, suggesting it is not associated with a single entity, or internal wallet management. This suggests that recent uptick in transaction activity is occurring elsewhere within the Bitcoin economy.

The USD denominated volume flowing in and out of exchanges has been relatively stable for the past few weeks, however despite this, the relative dominance of exchange related on-chain volume has grown from 2.5% to over 16%.

As we noted in WoC 3 and WoC 2, global transaction volumes for Bitcoin have fallen precipitously since November. This is likely a reflection of a decline in inflated, large size on-chain volumes occurring between Aug-2021 and Nov-2022, due largely to the industry-wide deleveraging, and wallet mismanagement by the FTX/Alameda entity.

Usually, market strength is accompanied by an increase in total on-chain exchange volumes, as investors and traders become more active. With the above as context, we can see that there remains a negative aggregate momentum within exchange transfer volumes. The monthly average is starting to increase, however it remains well below the yearly baseline at this stage.

Specifically looking to Whale entities, holding over 1k BTC, we can also see an uptick in both deposit and withdrawal volumes to exchanges. Throughout January, Whale entities have contributed between $185M to $215M to total exchange inflows (and outflows), with a net bias of around $25M in net withdrawal volumes.

An Average Acquisition Price

With such large volumes of coins flowing both in, and out of exchanges, we can estimate the average acquisition price for various cohorts of the Bitcoin economy. This first chart models the average acquisition price by yearly class, starting the calculation on the 1-Jan each year, and modelling a sort of long-only DCA cost basis.

Through the 2022 downtrend, only those investors from 2017 and earlier avoided hitting a net unrealized loss, with the class of 2018+ seeing their cost basis taken out by the FTX red candle. The current rally however has pushed the class of 2019 ($21.8k) and earlier back into an unrealized profit.

We can create a similar model per exchange, with the chart below showing that recent price action intersected three key cost basis levels:

🟠 The all-exchange, all-time withdrawal price was intersected at $16.7k, and provided a form of support during the end of year consolidation range.

🟡 + 🔵 The average withdrawal price since Jul-2017 for Coinbase and Binance, the two largest exchanges, was just broken through around $21k.

In line with our report last week (WoC 4), this can also be seen within metrics like Percent Supply in Profit, which have increased dramatically as prices rise above their on-chain acquisition price.

Finally, we return to our Whale cohort discussed earlier, however this time reviewing their average acquisition prices since major market bottoms. By starting these traces at market lows, we can assess this cohorts most favourable possible prices.

What we see is that even the average whale, that has been active since the 2017 market 🟡, saw their holdings go into an unrealized loss in 2022 as prices broke below $18k. The cohort since the March 2020 lows have an acquisition price of $23.8k, which is sitting immediately above spot prices at the time of writing.

All three of these models demonstrate just how unforgiving the 2022-23 bear market has been, driving cohorts with even the most favourable starting points into an unrealized loss.

Summary and Conclusions

As the end of January approaches, Bitcoin markets have seen the strongest monthly price performance since Oct-2021, fuelled by both historic spot demand, and a sequence of short squeezes. This rally has brought a large portion of the market back into profit, and resulted in futures markets trading at a healthy contango. We also note that initial impulse of exchange outflows, in the aftermath of FTX have calmed to neutral, and are now balanced by newly motivated inflows.

Bacaan Terkait

Kelompok Katolik dan Penegak Hukum Peringatkan UU CLARITY Dapat Melemahkan Pengamanan Kejahatan Kripto

Sebuah koalisi yang terdiri dari pemimpin Katolik, kelompok yang sejalan dengan penegak hukum, dan advokat anti-penjualan manusia memperingatkan bahwa RUU CLARITY Act berpotensi melemahkan pengamanan yang digunakan untuk memerangi kejahatan yang dimungkinkan oleh crypto. Kritik ini berfokus pada ketentuan yang akan melindungi pengembang perangkat lunak non-kustodial agar tidak diperlakukan seperti penyedia pengiriman uang. Perdebatan ini menyentuh salah satu pertanyaan tersulit dalam regulasi crypto: bagaimana membedakan perangkat lunak netral dari perantara keuangan. Para pendukung crypto berargumen bahwa pengembang yang menerbitkan kode non-kustodial tidak boleh diregulasi seperti bursa atau prosesor pembayaran. Sementara para pengkritik khawatir pengecualian yang terlalu luas dapat menyulitkan pelacakan keuangan ilegal. Perangkat lunak non-kustodial adalah inti dari DeFi. Arsitektur ini menciptakan tantangan penegakan hukum ketika aktor jahat menggunakan alat yang sama. Meski RUU CLARITY Act bertujuan menciptakan aturan struktur pasar yang lebih jelas, penentangan ini menunjukkan bahwa perdebatan kebijakan juga menyangkut isu seperti perdagangan manusia, pengelakan sanksi, dan visibilitas bagi penegak hukum. Tekanan ini tidak berarti RUU tersebut mati, tetapi mungkin membutuhkan amandemen, perlindungan yang lebih sempit, atau persyaratan pelaporan tambahan untuk mengatasi kekhawatiran tentang celah bagi keuangan ilegal. Bagi perusahaan crypto, aturan yang lebih jelas dapat membuka investasi, namun jika RUU ini dianggap melemahkan pencegahan kejahatan, jalur politisnya bisa menjadi lebih sulit.

bitcoinist23m yang lalu

Kelompok Katolik dan Penegak Hukum Peringatkan UU CLARITY Dapat Melemahkan Pengamanan Kejahatan Kripto

bitcoinist23m yang lalu

Rincian Kasus Penipuan Parah yang Melanda Unicorn Kripto Blockstream

**Rangkuman: Tuduhan Penipuan dan Pertanyaan Seputar Blockstream** Tahun ini, Blockstream, perusahaan kripto yang didirikan oleh perintis Bitcoin Adam Back, menjadi sorotan. Awalnya, karena investasi Jeffrey Epstein pada 2014 dan spekulasi bahwa Back bisa jadi Satoshi Nakamoto. Namun, kontroversi utama muncul dari laporan investigasi oleh akun NatInfoSec yang menuduh skema obligasi penambangan Bitcoin Blockstream (BMN) berpotensi penipuan mirip Ponzi. **Titik Tuduhan Utama:** 1. **Kapasitas dan Pembayaran yang Dipertanyakan:** NatInfoSec menyatakan untuk memenuhi kewajiban BMN, Blockstream membutuhkan daya komputasi (hashrate) 20-45 EH/s, tetapi dashboard perusahaan hanya menunjukkan 15 EH/s. Tidak ada bukti publik yang memadai (data listrik, impor perangkat keras, atribusi pool penambangan) untuk mendukung skala yang diklaim. Klausul dalam kontrak BMN juga memungkinkan Blockstream membayar dengan Bitcoin dari sumber mana pun, mempertanyakan asal hasil yang dibayarkan kepada investor. 2. **Imbal Hasil Tinggi yang Mencurigakan:** Obligasi BMN menawarkan imbal hasil tetap hingga sekitar 20% per tahun, angka yang sulit dipertahankan di industri penambangan Bitcoin yang sangat fluktuatif. Beberapa penawaran juga diklaim melibatkan perpanjangan pokok ke obligasi baru dengan imbal lebih tinggi. 3. **Masalah Pengungkapan dan Masa Lalu Eksekutif:** Christopher William Cook, figur kunci di divisi penambangan Blockstream dan CEO Exacore (entitas operasional terkait), memiliki catatan kriminal. Ia dihukum pada 2008 karena penipuan surat (mail fraud) dan menjalani hukuman penjara. Informasi ini tidak diungkapkan dalam dokumen penawaran BMN. Materi pemasaran juga diduga membesar-besarkan keterkaitan Cook dengan NASA. 4. **Keterkaitan dengan BSTR dan SPAC:** NatInfoSec mempertanyakan apakah potensi liabilitas BMN dan latar belakang Cook telah diungkapkan dengan benar dalam proses persiapan IPO perusahaan terkait Bitcoin, Bitcoin Standard Treasury Company (BSTR), yang melibatkan Adam Back. **Tanggapan dan Debat Komunitas:** BitMEX Research menganalisis tuduhan tersebut, mengakui kemungkinan catatan kriminal Cook dan kekhawatiran atas imbal hasil tinggi. Namun, mereka berpendapat bahwa beberapa tuduhan kurang bukti atau menyesatkan, menekankan pemisahan struktur hukum antara BMN, Blockstream, dan BSTR. Perdebatan di komunitas berfokus pada **kemampuan untuk memverifikasi** hashrate dan hasil penambangan yang sebenarnya yang mendasari BMN. Para pendukung seperti Samson Mow membela operasi penambangan Blockstream, sementara para pengkritik meminta bukti verifikasi independen yang jelas. **Pertanyaan yang Belum Terjawab untuk BMN:** Kontroversi ini menyisakan beberapa pertanyaan kunci tentang BMN: skala sebenarnya dan batas tanggung jawab, kecukupan hashrate penambangan untuk mendukung pembayaran, sumber imbal hasil tetap yang tinggi, kemampuan memverifikasi aset Bitcoin yang digunakan untuk pembayaran, serta peran dan kepentingan Cook. Sampai saat ini, Blockstream belum memberikan tanggapan resmi yang menyeluruh terhadap berbagai tuduhan ini.

marsbit4j yang lalu

Rincian Kasus Penipuan Parah yang Melanda Unicorn Kripto Blockstream

marsbit4j yang lalu

Kelompok Reddit yang Pernah Memaksa Tembok Bursa Wall Street, Apakah Telah Menemukan GME Berikutnya?

**Ringkasan Artikel: Komunitas Reddit r/wallstreetbets Menargetkan Wendy's (WEN), Apakah Ini GME Berikutnya?** Pada 24 Juni, saham Wendy's (WEN) melonjak setelah sebuah postingan berjudul "We need to save Wendy's" viral di subreddit r/wallstreetbets (WSB), memicu spekulasi bahwa ini bisa menjadi "meme stock" atau sasaran "short squeeze" berikutnya, mirip dengan fenomena GameStop (GME) pada 2021. Postingan tersebut, yang menggunakan guyonan lama di komunitas WSB tentang bekerja di Wendy's setelah investasi gagal, berhasil menarik perhatian dan mendorong diskusi untuk membeli saham atau opsi beli (call options). Saham WEN naik lebih dari 20% dalam perdagangan pra-pasar, dengan volume perdagangan yang sangat tinggi. Artikel ini menganalisis apakah WEN memiliki potensi untuk menjadi "squeeze" sistematis seperti GME. Beberapa faktor pendukung yang teridentifikasi adalah: * **Rasio Short Interest yang Cukup Tinggi:** Sekitar 31.83% saham beredar dipinjam untuk dijual (short), yang dapat menjadi bahan bakar jika harga naik dan para pedagang short terpaksa membeli kembali saham. * **Perhatian Komunitas yang Kuat:** Wendy's memiliki identitas merek yang mudah dikenali dan cocok dengan budaya meme di WSB. Namun, analisis menunjukkan bahwa situasi WEN **tidak sama ekstremnya dengan GME tahun 2021**: * **Struktur Short yang Tidak Seekstrem GME:** Rasio short interest WEN (31.83%) jauh di bawah level GME yang pernah melebihi 100%, sehingga tekanan untuk menutup posisi short tidak separah saat itu. * **Bukti untuk "Gamma Squeeze" Masih Lemah:** Meski ada diskusi tentang opsi beli, belum ada bukti kuat bahwa pembelian opsi tersebut sudah cukup masif untuk memaksa market maker (penjual opsi) membeli saham dalam jumlah besar sebagai lindung nilai, yang dapat memicu akselerasi harga berkelanjutan. * **Sejarah sebagai Meme Stock:** WEN pernah mengalami lonjakan serupa pada 2021 yang akhirnya mereda, menunjukkan bahwa antusiasme komunitas tidak selalu diterjemahkan menjadi kenaikan harga yang berkelanjutan. * **Narasi Dasar yang Terbatas:** Kampanye "selamatkan Wendy's" lebih merupakan lelucon komunitas daripada didasarkan pada kesulitan finansial perusahaan yang nyata. **Kesimpulan:** Pergerakan harga WEN menunjukkan bahwa perhatian dari komunitas retail seperti WSB masih dapat dengan cepat menggerakkan harga saham. Namun, bukti saat ini lebih mengarah pada **"meme pop" jangka pendek atau "squeeze" ringan**, bukan tekanan short sistematis skala penuh seperti GME. Keberlanjutan rally akan bergantung pada apakah diskusi berkembang di luar satu postingan panas, volume perdagangan tinggi bertahan selama beberapa hari, dan aktivitas opsi beli meningkat secara signifikan untuk menciptakan putaran umpan balik yang memperkuat kenaikan harga.

marsbit4j yang lalu

Kelompok Reddit yang Pernah Memaksa Tembok Bursa Wall Street, Apakah Telah Menemukan GME Berikutnya?

marsbit4j yang lalu

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片