March 11 Market Summary: The War Still Isn't Over, Oil Prices Drop Another 15%

marsbitPublié le 2026-03-11Dernière mise à jour le 2026-03-11

Résumé

Market Summary March 11: War Continues, Oil Plunges 15% Wall Street remained indecisive as conflicting signals emerged regarding the Iran conflict. The Dow fell 34 points (-0.07%), the S&P 500 dropped 0.21%, and the Nasdaq barely moved (+0.01%). While Trump claimed the war was "largely over," the White House clarified that military operations were escalating and the Strait of Hormuz remained closed. Energy stocks led declines as oil prices continued to fall. Chip stocks, including Nvidia and Micron, rose on strong demand signals from TSMC. Oil prices crashed another 15%, with Brent at $87.80 and WTI at $83.45. Despite a two-day cumulative drop of over 30%, prices remain 25-30% above pre-war levels. Trump administration comments about war resolution triggered selling, but the Pentagon later emphasized the conflict would continue until "decisive victory." Gold surged 2.44% to $5,228/oz, and silver jumped 6.25%, erasing Monday’s losses. Lower oil prices eased inflation fears, boosting Fed rate cut expectations and safe-haven demand. Bitcoin briefly surpassed $70,000 before retreating to the $69,000–$69,500 range. It faces resistance near $71,500, but institutional buying and potential short squeeze conditions suggest upward momentum. The market’s core conflict remains: trusting Trump’s optimism about war resolution versus the Pentagon’s reality. If diplomacy succeeds, oil may fall below $70 and stocks could rally. If the war persists, oil may rebound above $100, r...

Author: Deep Tide TechFlow

US Stocks: Mixed Signals, Market Stagnates

On Tuesday, Wall Street was like a confused trader—unsure of whom to believe.

The Dow fell slightly by 34 points (-0.07%) to close at 47,707 points, the S&P 500 dropped 0.21%, and the Nasdaq was almost flat with a marginal gain of 0.01%. The three major indices fluctuated between gains and losses throughout the day, ultimately ending almost where they started.

Why is the market so conflicted? On Monday, Trump said the war was "almost over," and the market surged. But on Tuesday, the White House clarified: The Strait of Hormuz has not yet begun escort operations, US military actions are escalating, and diplomatic negotiations have limited prospects. This directly contradicted Monday's optimistic expectations.

The market initially rebounded on hopes of war de-escalation but then turned lower after the White House clarified that the Strait of Hormuz had not resumed escort operations. Investors quickly switched from the euphoria of "the war is ending" to the anxiety of "the war isn't over at all."

Sector performance was highly divergent: Among the 11 sectors of the S&P 500, nine declined, with the energy sector leading the losses. Energy stocks plummeted because oil prices continued to fall—even though the war isn't over, oil prices are still dropping, which is a double blow for energy stocks.

Chip stocks were the only bright spot. Nvidia rose 1.2%, Micron Technology surged 3.5%, and Intel gained 2.6%. The catalyst was strong sales data from TSMC, proving that chip demand remains robust. Amid geopolitical risks, inflation fears, and oil price volatility, chip stocks have become one of the market's few certainties.

Dow 30 components: 3M led gains with a 2.39% rise, Cisco Systems rose 1.84%, and Caterpillar gained 1.69%. The biggest decliners were Boeing, down 3.20%, Salesforce, down 1.95%, and Chevron, down 1.60%.

Year-to-date: The Dow is still in the red, with some distance to go before reversing its annual losses.

Oil Prices: Another 15% Drop, But Still 30% Higher Than Pre-War Levels

On Tuesday, oil prices continued to plummet, but the pace of decline began to slow.

Brent crude plunged 11.28% to close at $87.80 per barrel. WTI crude plummeted 11.94% to settle at $83.45 per barrel. This marked the second consecutive day of sharp declines—Monday's drop from $120 to $95, followed by Tuesday's further decline to the $83–$88 range.

The cumulative two-day drop exceeded 30%, but prices remain 25–30% higher than pre-war levels. Pre-war (February 28), Brent was around $73, and WTI was around $67. Even after two days of steep declines, oil prices are still about $20–$25 per barrel higher than pre-war levels.

The catalyst for Tuesday's plunge was again Trump's statement in a CBS interview that the war was "basically done." The market chose to believe the president's words over clarifications from other White House officials.

However, US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth later poured cold water on this optimism. Hegseth stated at a Pentagon briefing that the war would not end until "the enemy is thoroughly and decisively defeated," which would proceed on America's timeline. This suggests the war could last for weeks or even months.

International Energy Agency (IEA) Executive Director Fatih Birol issued a statement on Tuesday, noting that IEA member countries would meet to assess current supply security and market conditions. This hints that the IEA might release strategic petroleum reserves—if it does, oil prices could fall further.

Saudi Arabia warned of catastrophic consequences. Saudi Aramco, the world's largest oil exporter, cautioned on Tuesday that if oil flows through the Strait of Hormuz cannot resume, it would have "catastrophic consequences" for the oil market.

Oil prices are now in a delicate balance: Trump says the war is ending → oil prices plummet; the Pentagon says the war isn't over → but the market no longer believes it.

Gold: Surges 2.4%, Back Above $5,200

On Tuesday, gold staged a strong rebound.

Gold surged 2.44% to $5,228 per ounce, gaining $124.70 in a single day. This completely erased Monday's losses and set a new rebound high. Silver performed even more impressively, soaring 6.25% to $89.81 per ounce, with gains 2.5 times those of gold.

Why did safe-haven assets surge? There are three reasons:

First, oil prices plummeted from nearly $120, easing inflationary pressures and boosting expectations for Fed rate cuts. Lower oil prices → lower inflation expectations → higher probability of Fed rate cuts → gold benefits.

Second, the US dollar's rally stalled. The dollar's surge on Monday suppressed gold, but its momentum paused on Tuesday, giving gold a breather.

Third, geopolitical risks haven't truly disappeared. Although Trump said the war is ending, the Pentagon says it isn't, the Strait of Hormuz remains closed, and Saudi Arabia warns of catastrophic consequences—all of which support safe-haven demand.

Gold has risen about 100% year-to-date, and silver has gained about 150%. Even after Monday's plunge, the long-term trend remains intact.

Cryptocurrencies: Bitcoin Breaks $70,000 but Pulls Back

On Tuesday, the crypto market performed steadily with slight gains.

According to CoinGecko data, the global crypto market cap is approximately $2.46 trillion, with Bitcoin's dominance at 56.9%. Bitcoin briefly broke above $70,000 during Tuesday's session but later retreated to the $69,000–$69,500 range.

Bitcoin faces resistance from whale sell orders near $71,500, which is the main obstacle to short-term gains. If this resistance level is breached, the next target is $75,000.

Strategy firms purchased $1.28 billion worth of Bitcoin, bringing their total holdings to over 738,000 BTC. Institutional funds continue to enter the market, providing a floor for Bitcoin.

Bitcoin shows conditions for a potential short squeeze: negative funding rates and dominant short positions. Historically, extreme shorting often precedes price reversals. If shorts are forced to cover, Bitcoin could surge rapidly.

Technical outlook: Bitcoin has been oscillating in the $65,000–$75,000 range for over two weeks. If the war truly ends, oil prices fall, inflationary pressures ease, and Fed rate cut expectations rise, Bitcoin could break above $75,000. But if the war persists, the market will remain cautious.

Today's Summary: The War Isn't Over, the Market Is in Self-Delusion

March 11, the 12th day of the US-Iran war, and the market is mired in conflicting signals and self-delusion:

US Stocks: The Dow fell slightly by 34 points (-0.07%), the S&P 500 dropped 0.21%, and the Nasdaq edged up 0.01%, with all three indices nearly flat. The market is torn between Monday's optimism from Trump's "war is ending" and Tuesday's reality from the White House: "Hormuz not restored, military actions escalating." Chip stocks were the only bright spot, with Nvidia up 1.2% and Micron up 3.5%, while energy stocks led the declines.

Oil Prices: Brent crude plunged 11.28% to $87.80, and WTI plummeted 11.94% to $83.45, marking a cumulative two-day drop of over 30%. Trump said the war is "basically done," but Defense Secretary Hegseth stated, "The war won't end until the enemy is彻底 defeated." Oil prices are still 25–30% higher than pre-war levels, and Saudi Arabia warns that closing the Strait of Hormuz would have "catastrophic consequences."

Gold: Surged 2.44% to $5,228, and silver soared 6.25% to $89.81, completely erasing Monday's losses. Plummeting oil prices eased inflationary pressures, boosting Fed rate cut expectations, while safe-haven demand remains strong.

Cryptocurrencies: Bitcoin broke above $70,000 during the session but retreated to $69,000–$69,500, with a global market cap of $2.46 trillion. It faces resistance from whale sell orders at $71,500, institutions bought $1.28 billion, and conditions for a potential short squeeze are forming.

The core market contradiction now: Trump says the war is ending, the Pentagon says it isn't—whom to believe?

Oil prices plummeted from $120 to $83, and the market chose to believe the president. But the Strait of Hormuz remains closed, Saudi Arabia warns of disaster, and the Pentagon vows to彻底 defeat the enemy—all these facts point to the war being far from over.

The market is now betting that Trump will use diplomacy to end the war quickly. If the bet pays off, oil prices will continue to fall below $70, and US stocks will rebound strongly. If the bet fails and the war drags on for weeks, oil prices could return above $100, and the market could crash again.

At least for today, one thing is very clear: The market would rather believe the president's optimism than the Pentagon's reality. How long can this self-delusion last? Tomorrow's CPI data might provide the answer.

Questions liées

QWhat was the performance of the US stock market on March 11th, and why was it described as 'confused'?

AThe Dow Jones fell 34 points (-0.07%), the S&P 500 fell 0.21%, and the Nasdaq was almost flat with a 0.01% gain. The market was described as 'confused' because it was torn between the optimism from Trump's statement that the war was 'almost over' on Monday and the reality check from the White House on Tuesday that the Strait of Hormuz had not reopened and military action was escalating.

QHow much did oil prices fall on March 11th, and what was the main catalyst for this decline?

ABrent crude oil fell 11.28% to $87.80 per barrel, and WTI crude oil fell 11.94% to $83.45 per barrel. The main catalyst for this decline was President Trump's statement in a CBS interview that the war was 'basically finished,' which the market chose to believe.

QWhy did gold and silver prices surge on March 11th?

AGold surged 2.44% and silver surged 6.25% due to three main reasons: 1) Falling oil prices eased inflation pressure, increasing expectations for Fed rate cuts, which benefits gold. 2) The US dollar's upward momentum stalled, giving gold a breather. 3) Geopolitical risks had not truly disappeared, supporting safe-haven demand.

QWhat key resistance level is Bitcoin facing according to the article, and what could help it break through?

ABitcoin is facing significant whale sell-order resistance near $71,500. A break above this level could be aided by the war actually ending, leading to falling oil prices, easing inflation pressure, and rising expectations for Federal Reserve interest rate cuts.

QWhat is the core contradiction the market is facing regarding the war, according to the article's summary?

AThe core contradiction is that President Trump says the war is ending, while the Pentagon (Defense Secretary Hegseth) says the war will not end until the enemy is 'thoroughly and decisively defeated.' The market is choosing to believe the President's optimism and betting on a swift diplomatic end to the war, despite facts on the ground suggesting it is far from over.

Lectures associées

Un Trader de Bitcoin Affirme que les Sommets et les Creux des Cycles Correspondent à des Délais Exactement Identiques

Un trader utilisant le pseudonyme Ryan (@DodysDD) affirme avoir identifié une précision mathématique étonnante dans les cycles de prix du Bitcoin. Selon son analyse, les phases de marché haussier, du plus bas au plus haut (ATH), dureraient exactement 1064 jours, comme observé lors des cycles 2014-2017, 2018-2021 et 2022-2025. De même, les phases baissières (du pic au creux) correspondraient à 364 jours, comme en 2017-2018 et 2021-2022. Ce schéma, s'il se vérifiait, offrirait aux investisseurs un cadre temporel simple pour anticiper les tendances majeures. Cependant, l'article souligne les risques inhérents à ce type de théorie. La précision apparente dépend souvent du choix des points de référence (cours de clôture, sommets intradays...), ce qui peut conduire à une sélection biaisée des données. Il n'existe aucune preuve que le Bitcoin soit régi par un minutage aussi exact, son prix étant influencé par une multitude de facteurs (halvings, conditions macroéconomiques, psychologie des investisseurs...). Malgré ces limites, ce récit cyclique trouve un écho dans la communauté des traders, surtout dans un contexte actuel d'incertitude sur la phase de marché. Il fournit une narration simple face à la complexité. En conclusion, si l'observation sert de cadre d'analyse populaire, elle doit être abordée avec scepticisme et ne peut, à elle seule, prédire les futurs sommets ou creux du marché.

bitcoinistIl y a 2 h

Un Trader de Bitcoin Affirme que les Sommets et les Creux des Cycles Correspondent à des Délais Exactement Identiques

bitcoinistIl y a 2 h

94 billions, le plus grand financement de l'année pour les robots humanoïdes est apparu

Dans le secteur des robots humanoïdes, un tournant majeur est marqué par le financement record de 14 milliards de dollars (environ 94,9 milliards de yuans) levé par l'entreprise allemande Neura. Cette levée de fonds de série C, menée par des investisseurs industriels de renom comme Schaeffler et Bosch, ainsi que des géants technologiques (NVIDIA, Amazon), porte l'évaluation de Neura à environ 70 milliards de dollars. Cet investissement massif signale un changement profond : la filière passe d'une phase de démonstration technologique à une phase d'industrialisation et de déploiement concret en usine. Contrairement aux sociétés axées sur un robot humanoïde "universel" (comme Figure AI), Neura adopte une approche pragmatique, ciblant d'abord des applications industrielles verticales et spécifiques, comme en témoigne son partenariat avec BMW. La conjonction de plusieurs facteurs explique cet afflux de capitaux : les progrès de l'IA (modèles de grande taille) qui améliorent les capacités de perception et de décision des robots, et les pressions structurelles sur le marché du travail (vieillissement, pénurie de main-d'œuvre, coûts salariaux) qui créent une demande croissante dans la fabrication. Les principaux défis pour une adoption massive ne sont plus uniquement techniques. Ils concernent désormais les coûts d'adaptation aux lignes de production existantes, la formation des opérateurs et la mise en place d'un réseau de maintenance fiable. L'entrée en scène de capitaux industriels expérimentés démontre une confiance accrue dans la capacité du secteur à résoudre ces problèmes d'ingénierie et de modèle commercial, achevant ainsi la transition cruciale du laboratoire au sol de l'usine.

marsbitIl y a 7 h

94 billions, le plus grand financement de l'année pour les robots humanoïdes est apparu

marsbitIl y a 7 h

Le marché de la pré-introduction en bourse d'Anthropic chute après qu'une directive américaine force l'arrêt du modèle

Anthropic a annoncé avoir reçu une directive du gouvernement américain lui ordonnant de suspendre l'accès aux modèles Claude Fable 5 et Claude Mythos 5 pour les ressortissants étrangers, y compris ses propres employés étrangers. Cette mesure d'urgence, justifiée par des préoccupations de sécurité nationale liées au contrôle des exportations, a forcé la désactivation mondiale des deux modèles le 12 juin. Les autres modèles d'Anthropic, comme Claude Opus 4.8, restent opérationnels. La réaction du marché a été immédiate : le contrat perpétuel lié à Anthropic sur Hyperliquid a chuté de 3,7%, reflétant l'impact sur sa valorisation pré-IPO. Anthropic a contesté la base de cette directive, arguant que la vulnérabilité de "jailbreak" évoquée par le gouvernement était mineure, déjà connue et non exclusive à ses modèles. La société a averti qu'un tel seuil d'intervention, s'il était généralisé, pourrait stopper les déploiements de nouveaux modèles d'IA de pointe. Cet événement illustre comment la régulation de l'IA devient un facteur négociable sur les marchés financiers. Les instruments tokenisés et les contrats pré-IPO permettent désormais aux traders de réagir instantanément à ce type de nouvelles réglementaires, même en l'absence d'informations publiques détaillées. Cela intègre l'infrastructure d'IA dans une dynamique de marché spéculative similaire à celle de la cryptomonnaie, avec des risques de volatilité basée sur des informations incomplètes.

bitcoinistIl y a 13 h

Le marché de la pré-introduction en bourse d'Anthropic chute après qu'une directive américaine force l'arrêt du modèle

bitcoinistIl y a 13 h

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片