Glassnode: Cryptocurrency Market Entering Late-Stage Consolidation Phase

marsbitPublié le 2026-07-09Dernière mise à jour le 2026-07-09

Résumé

Bitcoin has now been trading below the realized price and short-term holder cost basis for nearly five months, indicating a prolonged period of undervaluation. The market exhibits late-stage accumulation characteristics. Long-term holders (LTHs) are the primary source of sell-side pressure, with their realized losses reaching a daily peak of $280 million, the highest since December 2022, and accounting for 43% of total on-chain realized losses. A sustained decline in this LTH selling is a crucial prerequisite for a meaningful reversal. Spot ETF flows, while moderating from June peaks, remain in a state of monthly net outflows. Daily trading volumes have collapsed roughly 80% from the October 2025 highs, reflecting weak institutional demand and lack of confidence. Derivatives markets show a cautious tilt towards bullishness, with the put/call ratio hitting a 2026 low and funding rates neutral. However, the options volatility skew remains in "put premium," indicating persistent demand for downside protection, even as the absolute cost of that protection has declined. The spot price currently trades approximately 6% below the $66,000 max pain level. In summary, key conditions for a market bottom are in place, including sustained undervaluation and significant LTH capitulation. However, definitive signals for a transition to a bull market—namely, a sustained drop in LTH realized losses, stabilization of ETF fund flows, and price reclaiming key on-chain cost bases—are not yet c...

Original Authors: CryptoVizArt, Frederik Theissen, Glassnode

Original Compilation: Luffy, Foresight News

Bitcoin price has remained below the True Market Mean and Short-Term Holder cost basis for five consecutive months, indicating a state of deep undervaluation.

The proportion of realized losses from Long-Term Holders to total on-chain realized losses has risen to 43%. The peak single-day realized loss reached $280 million, marking the highest level since December 2022. The outflow from spot ETFs has moderated but remains in a state of monthly net outflows. The average daily ETF trading volume fluctuates between $650 million and $950 million, representing an approximately 80% decline from the peak in October 2025. Institutional buying demand has not yet stabilized.

The derivatives positioning structure has shifted to cautiously bullish, with the Put/Call Open Interest ratio dropping to its lowest point in 2026. However, the options volatility skew still maintains a defensive premium, and the spot price remains significantly below the Max Pain level. The market has entered the late-stage consolidation phase. The continuous narrowing of selling pressure from Long-Term Holders is an important precursor for a potential market reversal and recovery.

Macro Perspective

Crude Oil Surges, Risk Assets Under Collective Pressure

WTI crude oil has risen by 7.9% over the past seven trading days, with most gains concentrated recently. The market reacted to news of the expiration of the US-Iran memorandum of understanding, impacting all asset classes. Bitcoin saw a weekly gain of up to 9.4%, now moderating to a 5% weekly increase. The S&P 500 and the EURO STOXX 50 have both turned negative, with European stocks leading the decline in global risk assets. Bitcoin's current trend is highly synchronized with general risk assets.

Liquidity Environment: Contradictions Intensify

Amidst the external shock from crude oil, the market liquidity environment presents a fragmented picture. The US broad money supply M2 has climbed to a record high of $22.8 trillion. Historically, periods of broad money expansion tend to boost market risk appetite. However, the Federal Reserve's balance sheet continues to shrink via quantitative tightening, currently down $2 trillion from its 2023 peak. These two liquidity signals strongly counteract each other: the broad money supply continues to rise, while quantitative tightening persists, with real interest rates remaining around 1%, keeping the opportunity cost of holding non-yielding digital assets high. The window for macro-level tailwinds is not completely closed, but no clear accommodative support has formed.

On-Chain Data

A Deep Undervaluation Period Lasting Five Months

Over the past week, Bitcoin rebounded from $58,300 to $64,400, showing short-term recovery, but the price remains significantly below the True Market Mean of $76,600 and the Short-Term Holder cost basis of $72,200. Only when the price reclaims these two key levels can the market exit the deep undervaluation zone; otherwise, it remains vulnerable to external negative catalysts.

The duration of this discounted period warrants attention. Since early February 2026, the price has consistently traded below the cost basis of active investors and the break-even point for recent entrants, nearing five months. This qualifies as one of the longer-lasting deep discount cycles in Bitcoin's history.

Sustained coin distribution within a prolonged discount period, with new capital consistently accumulating below the cost basis of earlier buyers and overall active market holdings, historically forms the foundation for cyclical bottoms, offering long-term allocation appeal for value investors. Various indicators suggest the consolidation process is entering its latter stages, but a potential retest towards $53,000 cannot be entirely ruled out.

Concentrated Stop-Loss Selling by Long-Term Holders with High-Cost Basis

As the market builds a cyclical bottom, the core question is identifying the primary source of selling pressure. The Relative On-Chain Realized Profit/Loss metric for Long-Term vs. Short-Term Holders, which analyzes the distribution of total realized on-chain profit/loss between the two cohorts, directly reflects the proportional scale of profit/loss realization from each group.

After the price fell below the True Market Mean, the 30-day moving average of realized losses from Long-Term Holders has climbed from 15% in early February 2026 to the current 43%. Stop-loss selling pressure from this group, due to unrealized losses, has become the most dominant bearish force suppressing the price.

These investors mostly entered near cycle highs. After enduring months of deep drawdowns, their holding confidence is gradually eroding, leading to concentrated exits. This coin distribution structure directly explains why every rebound faces concentrated selling from deeply underwater positions, preventing the price from consolidating above the current range.

Stop-Loss Selling Pressure Shows No Signs of Abating

Since Long-Term Holder realized losses have become the main downward pressure, the next key indicator to observe is whether this selling pressure begins to subside.

The Entity-Adjusted LTH Realized Loss metric (30-day SMA) tracks the loss amount realized from the sale of coins held for more than 155 days, excluding internal address transfers, accurately reflecting genuine stop-loss exit behavior. This metric recently reached a new single-day peak, with realized loss scale of approximately $280 million per day—the highest since December 2022. This marks the second significant wave of Long-Term Holder stop-loss selling in this bear market.

The key distinction is that after the first peak, selling pressure saw a temporary decline. This current selling wave has yet to show a contraction in scale. Only when this metric shows a clear decline will the market have the foundational conditions to shift towards a bull market. The trajectory of this metric over the coming weeks to months will be a core signal for determining whether the market has genuinely completed the capitulation process.

Off-Chain Markets

ETF Outflows Slow, But Outflow Trend Persists

Shifting from on-chain to off-chain markets, spot ETF fund flows directly reflect institutional capital behavior. The 30-day moving average of ETF net flows reflects the daily net capital flow into or out of US spot Bitcoin ETFs, smoothing single-day volatility and revealing underlying trends in institutional positioning.

Since mid-May 2026, this indicator entered a period of monthly net outflows. The peak daily outflow reached $193 million in early June, now moderating to a daily net outflow of $88.9 million. The slowdown in outflow scale is a mild positive, but the market still experiences monthly capital depletion, indicating institutional buying demand has not stabilized. Only when fund flows consistently narrow into a balanced range can a basis be formed to anticipate a potential expansionary price move in the near term.

Institutional Trading Volume Remains Depressed

In addition to net inflow data, US spot ETF trading volume can help gauge the recovery level of institutional confidence. The 30-day moving average of average daily ETF trading volume currently fluctuates between $650 million and $950 million, a level comparable to Q4 2024 but roughly 80% lower than the peak daily average of $4.4 billion reached in October 2025.

The current trading scale only reflects a baseline level of institutional participation and remains extremely depressed compared to bull market peaks, indicating that ETF investors' medium-to-long-term bullish confidence has not substantially returned. Only when daily trading volume consistently expands alongside a continuous narrowing of net outflow scale—both signals appearing simultaneously—can a recovery in institutional demand be confirmed. Until both metrics improve in tandem, off-chain data corroborates on-chain indicators, suggesting the market remains broadly dominated by bearish conditions.

Derivatives Markets

Short Squeeze, Positioning Shifts to Cautiously Bullish

Despite the weakening risk sentiment, the derivatives positioning structure has shown a reverse change. The Put/Call Open Interest ratio for options has fallen to 0.56, the lowest level in 2026. The market currently holds two call options for every put option. Options trading flow corroborates this trend: two weeks ago, when Bitcoin retested lows, the market aggressively bought puts for hedging, causing the Put/Call Volume ratio to surge significantly. As call order flow steadily returned, this ratio rapidly declined, even though the spot price only recovered part of its losses.

Perpetual swap funding rates also confirm the positioning shift. The average perpetual funding rate has been consistently below the 0.01% long-short equilibrium line, far from levels indicating crowded long positions. The derivatives market has completed its short-squeeze risk purge and has turned cautiously bullish overall amid external headwinds, a complete reversal from the crowded short positioning structure preceding the previous major decline.

Options Skew Still Prices in Downside Risk

While overall positioning leans bullish, the options volatility skew offers a contrary signal. The 25-delta volatility skew metric (the premium for downside protection relative to upside exposure) remains in a state of premium across all tenors. Each decline this year has pushed this premium higher. By late June, the metric spiked to 24%, representing the strongest defensive sentiment in near-term contracts since the February sell-off. Even with the market's overall positioning leaning long, traders are still willing to pay a premium for downside hedging tools.

Spot Price Deviates from Max Pain Level

Beyond positioning and volatility skew, the relative position of the spot price to the options market structure provides further clues. The current Bitcoin spot price is approximately 6% below the aggregate market Max Pain level of $66,000. The Max Pain price is the strike price at which the maximum number of open option contracts would expire worthless, and the price often gravitates towards this level approaching expiry.

This week's decline further widened the gap between spot and Max Pain, but the deviation is far less extreme than during the February sell-off, placing it only in the middle of the 2026 price fluctuation range. Throughout the year, the Max Pain level has consistently acted as a gravitational center, with the spot price oscillating around it, rarely experiencing prolonged, significant deviation. If the price can sustainably hold above $66,000, short-term signals would turn optimistic. If the gap widens further, it would reinforce the overall defensive trading sentiment evident in the options market.

Crash Protection Costs Continue to Decline

While signals from volatility skew and positioning diverge, the absolute cost trend for hedging downside risk is clear. With the market's modest rebound, the put-side of the one-month volatility curve has generally repriced lower. The implied volatility for put options 5% out-of-the-money (OTM) has declined significantly. The lowest pricing points on the volatility curve are concentrated in far OTM call options.

Overall defensive sentiment persists, but the absolute cost traders pay to hedge against declines has noticeably decreased. Extending the time frame makes this trend clearer: the volatility premium driven by extreme put hedging demand during the February and June sell-offs has gradually dissipated entering July. The DVOL volatility index has fallen to a 12-month low, as the market enters a low-volatility regime. While cautious sentiment still dominates the tape, hedging demand is gradually subsiding.

Summary

Comprehensive analysis of data from on-chain, off-chain, and derivatives dimensions clearly reveals characteristics typical of the late stages of a bear market.

On-chain data shows a prolonged, five-month deep undervaluation cycle continues. The single-day realized loss scale from Long-Term Holders has risen to $280 million, indicating large-scale coin distribution is underway. However, a sustained decline in this capitulation metric remains a necessary precursor for an effective market reversal.

Regarding off-chain data, ETF fund outflow scale has narrowed from its June peak but remains in a state of persistent monthly net outflows. The average daily trading volume is down approximately 80% from the October 2025 peak, reflecting low institutional confidence in taking long positions.

From the derivatives perspective, market positioning has shifted to cautiously bullish, with the Put/Call ratio hitting a new yearly low. However, the volatility skew and options surface continue to price in downside risk.

Synthesizing all indicators, the foundational conditions required for a market bottom are largely in place, but the core confirmatory signals have not yet emerged. Subsequent price action needs to meet three conditions: sustained cooling of Long-Term Holder stop-loss selling pressure, stabilization of institutional fund flows, and the price effectively reclaiming and holding above the True Market Mean. Only on this basis will the probability of a transition to a new bull market cycle significantly increase.

Questions liées

QAccording to the article, for how many consecutive months has the Bitcoin price been below its true market average and the short-term holder cost basis?

AFor five consecutive months.

QWhat is the main source of selling pressure in the market as identified by Glassnode?

ALong-term holders realizing losses (stop-loss selling) is identified as the core source of selling pressure.

QWhat are the three key conditions that need to be met for a sustainable market turnaround, as summarized in the article?

A1. A sustained cooling-off of stop-loss selling pressure from long-term holders. 2. Stabilization of institutional fund flows (ETF inflows/outflows). 3. The price effectively stabilizing above the true market average.

QWhat is the trend in the U.S. spot Bitcoin ETF data mentioned in the article?

AETF outflows have slowed from their June peak but monthly net outflows persist. Daily trading volume remains around 80% below its October 2025 peak, indicating low institutional confidence.

QHow does the article describe the overall phase the cryptocurrency market is currently in?

AThe market is in the late stage of a bottoming process or bear market capitulation phase, with conditions for a potential bottom forming but not yet confirmed.

Lectures associées

ACL 2026 dominé par les chercheurs d'origine chinoise, tous les premiers auteurs des meilleurs articles sont chinois, les articles exceptionnels quasi monopolisés

**ACL 2026 : domination chinoise et omniprésence des LLM** La conférence ACL 2026, tenue à San Diego, a battu des records avec 12 148 soumissions (+45%). Les grands modèles de langage (LLM) ont dominé les thèmes de recherche. Les trois **meilleurs articles** ont tous pour premiers auteurs des chercheurs chinois : 1. **"The Imperfective Paradox in Large Language Models"** (Bolei Ma et al.) : Démontre que les LLM open-source échouent sur un paradoxe linguistique basique, agissant comme des moteurs narratifs plutôt que des raisonneurs logiques. 2. **"Memory efficiency and resource-rational encoding in sentence processing"** (Weijie Xu et al.) : En contraignant la mémoire de travail des modèles, on les rend plus efficaces et leur traitement ressemble davantage à la cognition humaine. 3. **"Characterizing the Expressivity of Local Attention in Transformers"** (Jiaoda Li et al.) : Explique théoriquement pourquoi l'attention locale, plus efficace, améliore l'expressivité des Transformers. Parmi les 18 **articles remarquables**, les contributions de chercheurs chinois sont majoritaires, notamment dans les domaines du raisonnement, de l'apprentissage par renforcement, de la sécurité des LLM et de l'efficacité. Les statistiques confirment l'ampleur de la participation chinoise (54% des auteurs) et la prédominance des LLM (cités dans 23% des titres). Cette édition marque l'avènement d'une recherche en linguistique computationnelle profondément transformée par les grands modèles.

marsbitIl y a 24 mins

ACL 2026 dominé par les chercheurs d'origine chinoise, tous les premiers auteurs des meilleurs articles sont chinois, les articles exceptionnels quasi monopolisés

marsbitIl y a 24 mins

OpenAI recrute un expert en banque d'investissement avec un salaire annuel de seulement 1,3 million de yuans, les commentaires jugent cette somme insuffisante

OpenAI recrute un expert en banque d'investissement pour un poste basé à San Francisco, avec un salaire annuel proposé entre 185 000 et 205 000 dollars (soit environ 1,25 à 1,3 million de yuans), complété par des actions. Cette offre salariale, jugée basse par de nombreux commentateurs, suscite des réactions. La mission principale de ce "Subject Matter Expert" au sein de l'équipe Applied AI est de former les modèles d'IA aux métiers de la banque d'investissement. Il devra traduire les processus réels du secteur (recherche, modélisation financière, valorisation, exécution de transactions, etc.) en tâches d'évaluation, produire des travaux de référence de haute qualité et établir des critères d'évaluation rigoureux pour distinguer les sorties d'IA simplement plausibles des résultats précis, traçables et exploitables professionnellement. Le candidat idéal doit posséder au moins deux ans d'expérience en banque d'investissement, incluant l'exécution de transactions réelles, et maîtriser Excel et PowerPoint. Une compréhension fine de l'évolution des responsabilités et du jugement tout au long d'une carrière en banque est également requise. OpenAI justifie ce recrutement ciblé en expliquant que la banque d'investissement représente un environnement exigeant pour les travaux intellectuels, et que les enseignements tirés de ce domaine permettront d'améliorer les modèles et produits d'IA pour des déploiements responsables dans le secteur financier.

marsbitIl y a 26 mins

OpenAI recrute un expert en banque d'investissement avec un salaire annuel de seulement 1,3 million de yuans, les commentaires jugent cette somme insuffisante

marsbitIl y a 26 mins

Zuckerberg commence à miser sur les marchés prédictifs, tandis que les pays asiatiques les considèrent encore comme des jeux d'argent

Les marchés prédictifs, autrefois conceptuels, connaissent une croissance significative avec un volume mensuel atteignant 140 milliards de dollars. Leur principe est simple : des contrats se règlent à 1 dollar si un événement se produit, 0 dollar sinon, le prix reflétant ainsi la probabilité en temps réel. Cette croissance est validée par l'entrée de Meta avec son projet « Arena ». Leur mécanisme repose sur « la peau dans le jeu » : les participants risquent leur propre capital, garantissant la crédibilité de leurs informations. Ils surpassent souvent les sondages traditionnels en précision, comme démontré lors d'élections ou pour les prévisions de taux d'intérêt. Alors que les marchés occidentaux les intègrent dans le système financier régulé (ex. : décision de justice aux États-Unis), la plupart des pays d'Asie les assimilent encore au jeu d'argent, entraînant trois problèmes majeurs : une fuite des capitaux vers des plateformes offshore non régulées, une perte de souveraineté sur des données informationnelles précieuses, et un abandon de la protection des utilisateurs. L'enjeu pour l'Asie n'est donc plus de bloquer ces marchés, mais d'engager une discussion constructive pour les encadrer de manière responsable, transformer les données générées en actifs nationaux et regagner un leadership cédé à l'étranger.

Foresight NewsIl y a 35 mins

Zuckerberg commence à miser sur les marchés prédictifs, tandis que les pays asiatiques les considèrent encore comme des jeux d'argent

Foresight NewsIl y a 35 mins

Trading

Spot
活动图片