7 biggest crypto collapses of 2022 the industry would like to forget

CointelegraphPublié le 2022-12-27Dernière mise à jour le 2022-12-27

Résumé

A look at some of the biggest disappointments in the crypto space from this year as the industry readies itself for better things to come.

2022 has been a bumpy year for the cryptocurrency market, with one of the worst bear markets on record and the downfall of some major platforms within the space. The global economy is beginning to feel the consequences of the pandemic, and clearly, this has had an influence on the crypto industry.

""

Below is a breakdown of some of the biggest disappointments in the crypto space this year.


Axie Infinity’s Ronin Bridge hacked


In March of this year, Ronin, the blockchain network that runs the popular nonfungible token (NFT) crypto game Axie Infinity, was hacked for $625 million. The hacker took 173,600 Ether (ETH) and 25.5 million USD Coin USDC) from the Ronin bridge in two transactions.


When the Lazarus Group started its attack, five of the nine private keys for the Ronin Network’s cross-chain bridge were hacked. With this vote, they authorized two withdrawals totaling $25.5 million in USDC and 173,600 ETH.


According to the Ronin group, Axie Infinity’s issues began in November 2021, when its user base had expanded to an untenable size. Consequently, the corporation’s safety rules had to be relaxed to fulfill client demand. After the initial phase of fast development was completed, the firm reduced its safety procedures.

The main difficulty was a lack of a suitably decentralized network created by game developer Sky Mavis. The hacker acquired access to the private keys of five of Sky Mavis’ Ronin Chain’s nine validator nodes, enabling them to compromise the network. When the hackers gained control of five nodes, they essentially controlled over half of the network and were free to accept or deny whatever transactions they wanted. They obtained ETH and USDC via falsifying withdrawals.


The crime occurred on March 23, but it was only noticed on March 29, when a user reported being unable to withdraw 5,000 ETH from the Ronin bridge ATM. In the aftermath of the attack, Axie Infinity developers raised $150 million to reimburse the affected users.


TerraUSD/LUNA collapse


On May 7, when over $2 billion in TerraUSD (UST) was unstaked (removed from the Anchor Protocol), hundreds of millions of United States dollars were quickly liquidated. It’s unclear if this was a deliberate attack on the Terra blockchain or a response to rising interest rates. Because of the enormous outflow of cash, the price of UST fell from $1 to $0.91. As a result, market players started trading $0.90 in UST for $1 in Terra (LUNA).


When a considerable amount of UST was moved out, the stablecoin depegged. The availability of LUNA increased as more people sold their UST during the panic.

Following this fall, cryptocurrency marketplaces started to suspend trading pairs such as LUNA and UST. Following the initial accident in May, Do Kwon disclosed a rehabilitation plan for LUNA, and things seemed to improve. However, the currency’s value eventually fell. It was abandoned almost as soon as it began. Finally, Terra launched a whole new currency known as LUNA 2.0.


Investors lost a combined $60 billion due to the panic selling that accompanied the decline of TerraUSD Classic (USTC) and Luna Classic (LUNC), a related token.


On Sept. 14, a South Korean court issued an arrest warrant for Do Kwon. This happened four months after Terraform Labs’ LUNA and UST tokens collapsed. Do Kwon and five others were detained for allegedly violating regional market restrictions.


Three Arrows Capital collapse


When Terra collapsed, the crypto hedge fund Three Arrows Capital (3AC), which had a peak market valuation of more than $560 million, suffered significantly. 3AC had invested heavily in several troubled cryptocurrency projects, including the play-to-earn game Axie Infinity, which lost $625 million to a North Korean hack this year, and the centralized cryptocurrency exchange BlockFi, which laid off hundreds of employees in mid-June.

The UST collapse shattered investor confidence and expedited the slide of cryptocurrencies, which was already underway as part of a bigger flight from risk. A flood of margin calls from 3AC’s lenders sought repayment, but the firm lacked the funds to meet the requests. In addition, many of the company’s counterparties could not meet their investors’ expectations, many of whom were retail investors promised 20% annual returns.


The crypto hedge fund eventually collapsed after taking on major directional trades and borrowing from over 20 institutions, and the founders defaulted on its payments.

Because the founders would not appear in court, the lawsuit proceeded without them. In a leaked court document filed with the Singapore High Court, the Singapore government was asked to accept liquidation proceedings and work with liquidators. As liquidators try to wind down the failed crypto business of Three Arrows Capital, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Martin Glenn has issued subpoenas to the company’s founders.


Voyager Digital’s fall


On July 6, prominent cryptocurrency investment firm Voyager Digital filed for bankruptcy after crypto hedge fund 3AC defaulted on a $650 million loan. 3AC received a significant loan from Voyager with no security. When 3AC defaulted on all of its obligations and its owners left, Voyager lost a significant sum of customer money.

Trading, withdrawals, and deposits were all suspended when Voyager reported that 3AC would not repay its loan. In June, Sam Bankman-Fried, billionaire CEO of trading firms FTX and Alameda Research, presented Voyager with a $500 million line of credit to help them weather the market collapse.

On July 5, 2022, Voyager Digital Holdings filed for bankruptcy in the Southern District of New York. According to Voyager Digital, the corporation owes between $1 billion and $10 billion to its more than 100,000 debtors. Despite its debts, however, the company believes it has assets worth between $1 and $10 billion. They also guarantee that adequate money is available to pay off the company’s unsecured creditors.

In a September court filing, insolvent cryptocurrency broker Voyager Digital revealed that it would auction off its remaining assets.

""

Celsius crash and liquidity crisis


Celsius’s value plummeted on July 13, 2022, when one of the main crypto businesses, Celsius Network, declared bankruptcy. As the price of cryptocurrencies fell, investors on the Celsius network started withdrawing their Bitcoin holdings in search of safer alternatives.

Consequently, panicked investors left Celsius in volume. Despite stating they were forced to do so due to “extreme market conditions,” Celsius Network halted BTC withdrawals, swaps and transfers on June 12. Users of the site understandably thought that Celsius had declared bankruptcy and would be unable to refund their money. The value of the Celsius cryptocurrency plummeted by 70% in only a few hours and fell further in the days that followed.

The crypto market has seen a significant sell-off due to the insecurity and falling prices of many major cryptocurrencies, which corresponded with the drop in the price of Celsius. In addition, due to escalating cash flow issues, Celsius announced 23% layoffs on July 3, 2022. When the time came, the company filed for bankruptcy on July 13, 2022.

Celsius had total liabilities of $6.6 billion and assets of $3.8 billion, resulting in a $1.2 billion hole in the company’s balance sheet due to the court ruling.


FTX collapse


FTX and its U.S. equivalent, FTX.US, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy on Nov. 11. The exchanges collapsed due to a lack of liquidity and money mismanagement, resulting in a large number of withdrawals from fearful investors.

Following the announcement of bankruptcy, FTX.US briefly restricted withdrawals on Nov. 11, despite earlier promises that FTX.US would be unaffected by FTX’s liquidity concerns. On the evening of Nov. 11, an alleged hack took more than $600 million from FTX wallets. The assault was revealed by FTX in its assistance channel on the instant-messaging network Telegram.

According to some Twitter users, hackers were also attempting to get access to FTX-linked bank accounts. Plaid, a company that connects consumer bank accounts with financial applications, responded to “concerning public reports” by denying FTX access to their products, claiming that they had no proof that their tools had been used unlawfully.

Bankman-Fried was arrested in the Bahamas on Dec. 12 at the request of the U.S. government, which wanted him extradited for eight criminal offenses, including wire fraud and conspiracy to defraud investors. Bankman-Fried was eventually deported to the United States and is awaiting trial after posting a $250 million bail.


BlockFi bankruptcy


The collapse of FTX earlier in the month generated fear and uncertainty across the market. BlockFi, another cryptocurrency exchange, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy on Nov. 28. With assets and liabilities ranging from $1 billion to $10 billion, the firm had over 100,000 creditors. In addition, they had a $275,000,000 debt to Sam Bankman-Fried’s American subsidiary, FTX US. The application shows that the largest client has a balance of $28 million.

Following the demise of Three Arrows Capital, multiple firms, including the crypto company that operates a trading exchange and an interest-bearing custodial service for cryptocurrencies, had serious liquidity issues.

BlockFi agreed earlier this year to accept a credit package from FTX worth up to $400 million to help it weather a liquidity restriction caused by the exchange’s exposure to the TerraUSD stablecoin’s collapse. As a result of these concerns, BlockFi was reliant on the performance of the cryptocurrency exchange FTX, which may now jeopardize its financial stability.


While 2022 may have been a tough year for the crypto market, there may be a silver lining. Investor sentiment seems to be improving, and the crypto market has always recovered from previous bear markets and platform collapses. The events of 2022 could pave the way for new platforms to learn from the mistakes of their predecessors.

Lectures associées

Analyse de rapport : Le secteur des semi-conducteurs a bondi de 155 %, Bernstein estime que NVDA et AVGO sont "absurdement bon marché"

Résumé : Le cabinet Bernstein a publié son analyse trimestrielle du secteur des semi-conducteurs. Le point central est que l'IA est désormais le principal moteur de croissance, portant l'indice SOX à une hausse de 155% sur un an. La hausse est jugée fondamentalement saine. Bernstein souligne une divergence forte au sein du secteur. Malgré des valorisations globalement élevées pour le secteur (P/E de 34,1x), l'analyste estime que les leaders clés de la chaîne d'approvisionnement en IA, NVIDIA (NVDA) et Broadcom (AVGO), sont "absurdement bon marché". Cela s'explique par leurs perspectives de croissance à long terme (p.ex. Blackwell pour NVDA) et leurs positions dominantes. Les deux sociétés sont notées « Surperformance ». Le cabinet a amélioré sa recommandation sur AMD à "Surperformance", citant des opportunités à la fois dans l'IA/GPU et dans les CPU. En revanche, il reste prudent sur Qualcomm (QCOM, "Égalité avec le marché"), en raison des pressions sur le marché des smartphones. Les équipementiers semi-conducteurs restent favorisés. Pour les semi-conducteurs analogiques, la valorisation est jugée élevée malgré la reprise. Bernstein met en garde contre deux risques principaux : un niveau de participation historiquement élevé des investisseurs dans le secteur et une montée des niveaux d'inventaire qui pourrait peser sur les prix si la demande faiblissait. L'analyse conclut qu'en dépit de la solide demande d'IA, la sélectivité est désormais cruciale.

marsbitIl y a 16 mins

Analyse de rapport : Le secteur des semi-conducteurs a bondi de 155 %, Bernstein estime que NVDA et AVGO sont "absurdement bon marché"

marsbitIl y a 16 mins

Entretien long avec le PDG d'Anthropic : Quand l'IA devient une super-arme, comment trouver l'équilibre entre commerce et sécurité ?

Dario Amodei, PDG d'Anthropic, discute de l'équilibre entre innovation commerciale et responsabilité sécuritaire dans le développement de l'IA. Il évoque son départ d'OpenAI dû à des divergences de valeurs et un manque de confiance, et défend la stratégie d'Anthropic axée sur les applications entreprises pour aligner modèle économique et éthique. Il aborde les risques sociétaux, notamment la suppression potentielle de nombreux emplois de cols blancs, tout en proposant des solutions pour une transition positive. Amodei insiste sur la nécessité d'une coopération entre acteurs de confiance pour établir des normes de sécurité élevées, citant sa collaboration avec Google. Concernant la sécurité nationale, il justifie les contrats avec le Département de la Défense américain par la nécessité de contrer des adversaires, mais en fixant des limites strictes contre la surveillance de masse ou les armes autonomes. Il explique également la non-publication du modèle "Mythos", jugé trop puissant et risqué, en attendant des mécanismes de défense adaptés. Enfin, il rejette l'idée d'un "moment" singulier d'auto-amélioration de l'IA, décrivant plutôt une accélération exponentielle graduelle. Il conclut sur la nécessité d'une gouvernance équilibrée, évitant à la fois le contrôle exclusif par des entreprises privées ou par les gouvernements.

marsbitIl y a 26 mins

Entretien long avec le PDG d'Anthropic : Quand l'IA devient une super-arme, comment trouver l'équilibre entre commerce et sécurité ?

marsbitIl y a 26 mins

Émetteur de DRAM ETF : Samsung, SK Hynix et Micron franchissent tous le cap du trillion de dollars, l'ère de l'IA pour les puces mémoire ne fait que commencer

Les trois géants des semi-conducteurs mémoire (Samsung, SK Hynix, Micron) ont vu leur capitalisation boursière dépasser 1 000 milliards de dollars, suscitant des interrogations sur la durabilité de cette croissance. Un récent article de Morningstar met en garde contre les cycles historiques de surproduction et la nature « commoditisée » de la mémoire, suggérant que l'enthousiasme pourrait être déconnecté des fondamentaux. Cependant, l'article de Roundhill Investments (gérant du DRAM ETF) défend une thèse différente, arguant que l'ère de l'IA change structurellement l'industrie. La demande n'est plus tirée par l'électronique grand public, mais par les infrastructures d'IA, notamment par la mémoire HBM (High Bandwidth Memory). La fabrication du HBM présente des barrières technologiques extrêmes, contrôlée quasi exclusivement par les trois leaders, ce qui limite fortement l'entrée de nouveaux acteurs et crée une pénurie durable. Les fondamentaux semblent solides : les bénéfices combinés des trois sociétés pourraient atteindre 704 milliards de dollars d'ici 2027, avec des marges à des niveaux records. Leurs valorisations, bien qu'en hausse, restent modérées par rapport aux projections de croissance des bénéfices. L'article conclut que le secteur, historiquement volatile, pourrait entrer dans une nouvelle ère de profitabilité soutenue grâce à l'IA, justifiant une réévaluation des modèles d'investissement traditionnels.

marsbitIl y a 46 mins

Émetteur de DRAM ETF : Samsung, SK Hynix et Micron franchissent tous le cap du trillion de dollars, l'ère de l'IA pour les puces mémoire ne fait que commencer

marsbitIl y a 46 mins

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片