City of Baltimore goes after prediction markets for sports betting

cointelegraphPublié le 2026-08-13Dernière mise à jour le 2026-08-13

Résumé

The City of Baltimore and Mayor Brendan Scott have filed lawsuits against prediction market platforms Kalshi and Polymarket. The city alleges these companies operate illegal, unlicensed sports-betting platforms that mislead users about the legality of their products. Officials argue that event contracts traded on these platforms constitute unlawful wagers under Maryland state law, not legitimate financial instruments. The complaint also names Robinhood, Webull, and Coinbase as partners in these alleged deceptive practices. This action represents a significant clash between state authorities and the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), which asserts regulatory jurisdiction over such markets, classifying event contracts as "swaps." A Polymarket spokesperson countered that the city's lawsuit contradicts the established federal regulatory framework. Legal experts anticipate the conflict may ultimately require a Supreme Court resolution.

The City of Baltimore and its mayor, Brendan Scott, filed lawsuits against Kalshi and Polymarket over allegations that the companies violated local gambling laws.

In a Thursday notice, the Baltimore mayor’s office said that the two prediction market companies operated “illegal, unlicensed sports-betting platforms” and misled users about the ”legality and regulatory status of their products.” The lawsuits are centered on claims disputing Kalshi’s and Polymarket’s characterization of event contracts, arguing that the trades amount to unlawful wagers under state laws.

“These companies are running sportsbooks without licenses and betting that a new label will put them above the law,” said Scott. “It won’t. Baltimore will not let multibillion-dollar companies put profits over people and harm our communities through illegal gambling.”

Notably, the city’s complaint against Kalshi included Robinhood, Webull and Coinbase as partners with the prediction market platform. All companies were accused of deceptive practices by marketing sports contracts as something that can ”lawfully be purchased and traded in Maryland.”

The legal action against prediction market companies was the latest conflict between US state and federal authorities, and many experts expect it to end with an appeal to the Supreme Court. The US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), under Chair Michael Selig, and companies have argued that event contracts on prediction markets amount to “swaps” within its purview, while both Baltimore lawsuits and other state-level authorities dispute that claim.

“City-specific action runs counter to the CFTC’s established framework for regulating prediction markets,“ a Polymarket spokesperson told Cointelegraph in response to the lawsuit. “As courts have recognized, prediction markets on CFTC-registered exchanges are governed by federal law, not a patchwork of state and local rules.”

Related: Judge stays CFTC’s case against US soldier over prediction market bets

Questions liées

QWhat is the main legal allegation against Kalshi and Polymarket by the City of Baltimore?

AThe City of Baltimore alleges that Kalshi and Polymarket operated illegal, unlicensed sports-betting platforms and misled users about the legality and regulatory status of their products, arguing that their event contracts constitute unlawful wagers under state laws.

QWhich companies were named as partners of Kalshi in the city's complaint?

AThe city's complaint against Kalshi named Robinhood, Webull, and Coinbase as partners with the prediction market platform.

QWhat core regulatory argument do prediction market companies and the CFTC make in their defense?

APrediction market companies and the CFTC argue that event contracts on these platforms amount to 'swaps,' which fall under federal regulatory purview and the CFTC's established framework, not state or local gambling laws.

QAccording to Mayor Brendan Scott, what motivates the city's legal action against these companies?

AMayor Brendan Scott stated that the city will not let multibillion-dollar companies put profits over people and harm communities through illegal gambling, implying the action is to protect the public from unlicensed gambling operations.

QWhat broader legal conflict does the article suggest this case is a part of?

AThe article suggests this case is part of the latest conflict between US state/federal authorities over the classification and regulation of prediction markets, with many experts expecting it could ultimately be appealed to the Supreme Court.

Lectures associées

Analystes : MiCA n'a pas provoqué d'exode global notable de l'USDT

Analyses : MiCA n'a pas provoqué d'exode mondial notable de l'USDT Les restrictions d'accès au stablecoin USDT sur les plateformes européennes réglementées n'ont pas entraîné de fuite mondiale significative de capitaux hors de l'actif, selon les données d'Artemis Analytics et une étude indépendante d'universités italiennes et britanniques. Les données ne montrent pas de changement notable dans l'offre ou la demande globale d'USDT directement lié à l'entrée en vigueur du règlement MiCA. L'effet est cependant visible au niveau européen. Sur les plateformes ciblant ce marché, la part d'USDC a augmenté après les restrictions sur l'USDT, principalement en raison de la réduction du trading de ce dernier. Mais au niveau mondial, les parts de marché et volumes agrégés des principaux stablecoins sont restés quasiment inchangés. Fin juillet, environ 183,46 milliards d'USDT étaient en circulation, représentant 61,2% du marché total des stablecoins. Le déclin modeste de son offre reflète une contraction générale du secteur. L'activité on-chain avec l'USDT continue de se développer en dehors de l'UE, notamment sur des marchés émergents comme l'Argentine, où les stablecoins sont de plus en plus utilisés pour les paiements et transferts plutôt que comme simple réserve de valeur. En conclusion, MiCA a modifié les préférences d'actifs au sein des services européens réglementés, mais n'a pas pour l'instant altéré la structure globale du marché, où l'USDT conserve son leadership.

cryptonews.ruIl y a 1 h

Analystes : MiCA n'a pas provoqué d'exode global notable de l'USDT

cryptonews.ruIl y a 1 h

Trading

Spot
活动图片