The Biggest Airdrop for Crypto Enthusiasts is Given by Yuanbao

marsbitPublicado a 2026-02-04Actualizado a 2026-02-04

Resumen

The article "The Biggest Airdrop for Crypto Enthusiasts is Given by Yuanbao" discusses the recent trend of crypto investors turning to Yuanbao, a Web2 platform by Tencent, for cash red packet rewards amid a severe market downturn. Starting February 1st, Yuanbao’s cash reward campaign attracted widespread participation, with crypto community members shifting from trading to actively engaging in Yuanbao’s referral-based tasks to earn small but guaranteed cash payouts. This comes as global financial markets, including crypto, experienced significant losses, with Bitcoin dropping below $75,000 and Ethereum and Solana also declining sharply. On January 31st, the crypto market saw over $2.56 billion in liquidations. The author contrasts Yuanbao’s straightforward, no-cost cash rewards with the high-risk, often disappointing airdrops in the crypto space. While crypto airdrops typically offer tokens that require selling to realize gains—and often come with hidden costs like time, research, and potential losses—Yuanbao provides immediate, tangible cash benefits. A case study highlights an Infinex user who lost over $11,900 after a 406-day participation, receiving tokens worth far less than invested. The piece argues that crypto airdrops have evolved from rewarding early users to serving as exit strategies for projects, with declining returns and increased risks. Unlike Web2 companies like Tencent, which use reliable cash incentives backed by strong cash flow and legal frameworks, ...

Author|Golem(@web 3_golem)

"xxx has sent you a cash red envelope!"

After the Yuanbao cash red envelope activity began on February 1st, many long-dead project/research exchange groups completely transformed into "grab Yuanbao wool" mutual aid groups.

For crypto enthusiasts, transitioning from esteemed crypto traders to wool-pulling participants in Yuanbao red envelopes is also a helpless move.

Starting from January 31st, global financial markets plummeted. Precious metals, which had previously surged, quickly crashed. Spot silver nearly erased its yearly gains, and spot gold once fell below $4500. The crypto market didn't fare much better. On February 2nd, Bitcoin broke below the $75,000 support level, hitting a low of $74,604. ETH fell to a low of $2157.14, and SOL even lost the $100 level, touching a low of $95.95.

According to Coinglass data, the crypto market saw a total of $2.5615 billion in liquidations on January 31st, setting a record for the highest single-day liquidation volume since the "10/11 crash." Therefore, "too亏损到不想说话 (losing so much that I don't want to talk)" became the true psychological state of many crypto enthusiasts (like the silent Yi Lihua).

For crypto enthusiasts who just experienced a bloodbath, grabbing Yuanbao red envelopes, though a drop in the bucket for recouping losses, provides some psychological comfort, offering a temporary escape from the harsh market reality.

A joke in group chats

Crypto Airdrops: From Swallowing Losses to Passionate Rights Defense

Calling Yuanbao's cash red envelopes the biggest airdrop for crypto enthusiasts today is not a gimmick.

The amount of cash red envelopes Yuanbao can distribute to each user is not large, mostly ranging from a dozen to a few dozen RMB, but the valuable part is that the interaction is simple and truly cost-free. Users only need to spend a little time recruiting people and step-by-step experiencing product features to get cash red envelopes. The task cycle is short, allowing for quick returns.

In contrast, airdrops from crypto projects are first distributed in the form of tokens. Profit is realized only after the tokens are sold. Although the amount received seems much larger than Yuanbao's in most cases, after deducting the costs of time, research, opportunity, friction, and potential risk of being stuck with worthless tokens, how much is really left?

A user who accompanied Infinex for 406 days deeply feels this. On January 31st, the decentralized perpetual contract trading platform Infinex announced its TGE and airdrop claims. The project team successfully上岸 (made it ashore), but the community was collectively反撸 (screwed over).

一千万是只猫 (X: @RXu107) is a typical example of being反撸. On February 1st, he posted that he spent over $11,900 (approximately 82,000 RMB) participating in this project (4400 U for NFT, 7500 U for public sale) and deeply accompanied it for 406 days as a community member. But on TGE day, not only did he not recover his costs, but his paper loss also exceeded 100,000 RMB (2900 U + 11,284 locked INX tokens).

Facing the反撸, the blogger had no choice but to repeatedly tell his friends how upset he was.

The blogger反撸 by Infinex tells his friend how upset he is

Infinex's fully diluted valuation at TGE was only $150 million. The total investment in Yuanbao's New Year red envelope activity is approximately $140 million USD. What does this mean? It's equivalent to Tencent directly buying Infinex at its maximum valuation and giving it away for free to the entire nation.

Facing the pain of being反撸 and deceived, most people in the community choose the same approach as "一千万是只猫" – swallowing their losses. But some choose to stand up and confront the project team.

Crypto blogger Ice Frog (X: @Ice_Frog666666) is a typical representative. He started by airdrop hunting, but ironically, in 2025, Ice Frog was either defending airdrop rights or on his way to defend airdrop rights. He is still negotiating with the prediction market project Space (Odaily Note: Space raised $20 million publicly, the team privately took $13 million) and has even taken legal measures.

Web2 Can Afford Airdrops, Web3 Can't Fulfill Promises

The most ironic point is that today's imbalance between "input and return" in crypto airdrops is not the "moral decay" of a single project, but the result of a整套 (whole set of) changes in the industry structure.

In 2020, Uniswap opened the era of crypto project airdrops. Since then, there have been constant major airdrop opportunities (大毛) in the crypto space. Stories of getting a car, a house, or reaching A8 (wealth level) from airdrops attracted batch after batch of people into the airdrop hunting track, presenting an aesthetic of "the industry is on the rise."

But by 2025, this changed. Market narratives dried up, primary financing weakened, secondary buying power was insufficient. Airdrops were no longer about sharing the future with early users, but more like mortgaging the future for present data, creating an exit path for the project team itself or换取 (exchanging for) the next round of financing window. Thus, major airdrops disappeared, small airdrops shrank, and "being反撸" became the industry norm.

The so-called airdrop is essentially rewriting the advertising budget into a reward pool, bypassing third parties to directly establish growth relationships with users. Whether it's the 1 billion RMB given by Web2's Yuanbao or the fixed airdrop allocation in Web3 project tokenomics, the essence is this same logic.

But the difference is that Web2 giants use cash to buy user certainty, while Web3 offers token rewards as a promise that may be fulfilled. This results in the same strategy leading to two different destinies.

The certainty of Yuanbao's cash red envelopes comes from cash flow and约束机制 (binding mechanisms). Tencent's strong cash flow determines that Yuanbao "can pay out." The binding mechanisms under mature laws determine that Yuanbao "cannot renege." Coupled with the "simple and brainless" no-threshold interaction, users naturally understand it as a "welfare benefit."

In contrast, crypto enthusiasts not only付出 (invest) costs several times higher than Web2羊毛党 (wool-pullers) (e.g., capital, time, energy), but also worry about being sybil attacked, token unlock periods, and ever-changing airdrop rules. The most ironic thing is that the收益 (returns) obtained in the end are not even as good as Yuanbao's.

Therefore, airdrops in the crypto space today have long degenerated from direct growth rewards into promises where the fulfillment of responsibility is constantly postponed, or even not fulfilled at all. If this situation does not change in 2026, the user retention rate will be sacrificed along with it.

From User Growth to Retention, the Utility of Airdrops Can Only Last the First Half

Using airdrops for user growth has always been the most common and direct means in the business world to deal with powerful competitors.

Tencent invested 1 billion RMB cash to support Yuanbao because its competitor Doubao is strong enough. By the end of 2025, Doubao was the first AI product in China to reach 100 million daily active users. The same goes for Web3. In the prediction market track, Polymarket dominates. To compete for users, Opinion, predict.fun, and Limitless also use points airdrops for user growth, directly pulling users into the product.

In the short term, airdrops can indeed create a huge user influx entry point. But in the long run, what determines user retention is still product-market fit, user experience, and ecological linkage, among other factors. In Web3's business history, there are no shortage of project cases that were bustling before the airdrop but became deserted afterwards. Therefore, both Web2 and Web3 face the same "post-airdrop problem": how to retain users.

Ten years ago, Tencent, a company adept at imitating and then surpassing, used "WeChat red envelopes" to push WeChat Pay into a national-level入口 (entry point), proving its extreme familiarity with the "user growth → retention → habit" chain. Whether they can create another miracle for Yuanbao in the same way is still debated, but they at least have ample experience in "how to convert airdrops into retention."

To this end, Odaily Planet Daily contacted an internal staff member of Yuanbao and asked from a product perspective how Web3 project airdrops should be improved. The answer was very practical:

"As one of the internet companies with the largest market capitalization, Web3 projects may not have direct lessons to learn from Tencent. But the core of user growth methods like airdrops is still improving retention. This requires a series of联动 (linkages) after the airdrop. For example, PR and marketing need to think about how to further spread the玩法 (gameplay/mechanism). The product side also needs to make more moves to achieve this."

From the perspective of Web3 practitioners, merely discussing traffic tactics feels shallow. What product features, beyond the token, can actually retain users is worth more scrutiny.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the main reason cryptocurrency enthusiasts are turning to Yuanbao' cash red envelope activity according to the article?

AAfter a significant market crash that caused heavy losses, cryptocurrency enthusiasts are seeking psychological comfort and a temporary escape from the harsh market reality. The activity offers a simple, no-cost way to earn small cash rewards, which provides some solace despite being insufficient to recoup their trading losses.

QHow does the article contrast the 'Yuanbao' cash red envelope with typical cryptocurrency project airdrops?

AThe article contrasts them by highlighting that Yuanbao's red envelopes are simple, require no capital investment, and offer immediate cash payouts. In contrast, crypto airdrops are paid in tokens that must be sold to realize profits, involve significant costs (time, research, opportunity cost, potential losses), and often result in users being 'counter-farmed' or receiving less value than expected.

QWhat specific example does the article use to illustrate the problem of being 'counter-farmed' in a crypto airdrop?

AThe article uses the example of a user named '一千万是只猫' who participated in the Infinex project for 406 days. He invested over $11,900 (approx. 82,000 RMB) by buying an NFT and participating in the public sale, but at the Token Generation Event (TGE), he not only failed to recover his costs but also faced an on-paper loss of over 100,000 RMB (2,900 USDT plus 11,284 locked INX tokens).

QWhat fundamental difference does the article point out between Web2 companies like Tencent (Yuanbao) and Web3 projects when conducting airdrop campaigns?

AThe fundamental difference is certainty. Web2 companies like Tencent use cash from their strong cash flow to buy user growth, and mature legal constraints ensure they 'can pay and cannot renege.' Web3 projects, however, offer token rewards as a promise that may be fulfilled later, introducing uncertainty due to factors like vesting periods, changing rules, and the risk of the token's value plummeting.

QAccording to the Yuanbao insider quoted in the article, what is the core challenge for both Web2 and Web3 projects after an airdrop campaign?

AThe core challenge is user retention. The insider stated that the key is improving retention after the airdrop through a series of follow-up actions. This requires efforts from PR and marketing to further spread awareness of the product's features and, crucially, requires the product side to implement more features and improvements to genuinely keep users engaged beyond the initial incentive.

Lecturas Relacionadas

STAR 50 Soars 10.73%, Why Did A-Shares Stage a "V-Shaped Reversal"?

After a prolonged decline, the Chinese A-share market staged a strong rally on July 21. The STAR 50 index surged 10.73%, its largest single-day gain in nearly a year, leading a broad-based "V-shaped" reversal. The Shanghai Composite Index rose 1.79%, the Shenzhen Component Index gained 4.81%, and the ChiNext Index jumped 7.05%. Total market turnover reached 2.97 trillion yuan, an increase of 256.1 billion yuan from the previous session, with over 3,100 stocks advancing. The semiconductor sector spearheaded the rebound, with related ETFs posting significant gains. Analysts attribute the surge to three converging factors. First, coordinated capital inflows from "national team" institutions, insurance funds, listed company buybacks, and fund house self-purchases have bolstered market liquidity and confidence. Second, supportive policy signals, including commitments from regulators to ensure stable market operations, provided a favorable backdrop. Third, a stabilization and recovery in overseas markets, notably South Korea, created a positive external environment. Institutions suggest the most severe panic selling phase for the tech sector has likely passed, following a significant digestion of crowded positions and leveraged funds. While short-term volatility may persist, the medium to long-term outlook remains underpinned by enduring trends like AI computing demand expansion and semiconductor localization. The market's focus now shifts to the sustainability of supportive fund flows, earnings reports, and upcoming catalysts from the global AI industry chain.

marsbitHace 30 min(s)

STAR 50 Soars 10.73%, Why Did A-Shares Stage a "V-Shaped Reversal"?

marsbitHace 30 min(s)

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Post Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, But Is the Plunge Over?

US tech momentum stocks staged a sharp rebound on Tuesday (July 21st). Morgan Stanley's TMT Momentum Factor surged over 12%, marking its largest single-day gain on record, exceeding even peaks from the 2000 dot-com bubble. Key momentum indices from Goldman Sachs also posted their strongest daily performances in years. The rally was led by semiconductors, with the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index jumping 4.6%. This rebound followed three consecutive down days and a cumulative 33% plunge in momentum stocks, one of the steepest drawdowns since the dot-com era. Analysts attribute the surge largely to a short squeeze. Heavy selling had pushed high-beta momentum stocks into deeply oversold territory, forcing many short sellers, particularly in Asia, to cover their positions, creating a self-reinforcing buying spiral. However, the rebound's internals appear weak. Trading volume was notably low, and advancing stocks still lagged decliners on the S&P 500, indicating a narrow, concentrated rally rather than broad market participation. Diverging views emerge on the outlook. BTIG warns the bounce has hit key resistance and recommends selling into strength, citing extreme volatility and historical parallels to past market tops. Conversely, Goldman Sachs and UBS believe the momentum unwind is nearing its end, suggesting it may be time to gradually add exposure, as positioning has been significantly reduced. They caution, however, that high volatility warrants a measured approach, potentially using defined-risk strategies. The upcoming earnings season, particularly reports from major tech firms like Alphabet, is seen as a critical test for the rally's sustainability. Simultaneously, bond markets flashed a warning, with yields rising partly due to spiking oil prices. Analysts note that if long-term Treasury yields break decisively higher, it could pose a significant headwind for equities, especially growth stocks.

marsbitHace 37 min(s)

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Post Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, But Is the Plunge Over?

marsbitHace 37 min(s)

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Record Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, but Has the Rout Ended?

U.S. tech momentum stocks staged a dramatic rebound on Tuesday, July 21st. Key momentum indices like the Morgan Stanley TMT Momentum Factor and Goldman Sachs' High Beta Momentum Long Index posted historic or near-historic single-day gains, fueled largely by semiconductor stocks. This sharp rally followed a severe three-day sell-off that saw momentum stocks plunge 33%, marking one of the steepest pullbacks since the dot-com bubble. Analysts attribute the bounce primarily to a short squeeze, as forced covering from over-leveraged traders, particularly in Asia, created a buying spiral. However, the rally's health is questioned due to weak market breadth—overall trading volume was low, and decliners outnumbered advancers in the S&P 500 despite the index's gain—suggesting a narrow, concentrated surge rather than broad recovery. Opinions on the sustainability diverge. BTIG strategists warn the rebound has hit key resistance levels, citing extreme volatility and historic stock dispersion as signs of an ongoing broader correction, and recommend selling into strength. Conversely, Goldman Sachs and UBS view the aggressive momentum unwinding as nearing its end, noting reduced positioning and a lack of new fundamental catalysts. They suggest the sell-off presents a selective opportunity to add exposure, albeit cautiously and gradually using defined-risk strategies. The immediate trajectory hinges on the ongoing earnings season, with market focus on Alphabet's capital expenditure guidance for AI investment clarity. Meanwhile, bond markets present a risk, with rising Treasury yields—potentially heading toward 5.5%—and widening credit spreads for mega-cap tech companies posing a threat to equity valuations. The combination of technical factors, earnings results, and macro conditions leaves the durability of the rebound in doubt.

链捕手Hace 40 min(s)

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Record Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, but Has the Rout Ended?

链捕手Hace 40 min(s)

Long-Divided Must Unite, Long-United Must Divide: When L1 Becomes Its Own Rollup, What Is Ethereum's Endgame?

"The Inevitable Cycle: When L1 Becomes Its Own Rollup – What is Ethereum's Endgame?" For years, the Ethereum community grappled with concerns that L2s were fragmenting the ecosystem and eroding L1's value. While L2s provided cheaper execution, they also splintered liquidity and the unified user experience of a single chain. This has prompted a fundamental reassessment of the relationship between L1 and L2. Ethereum's roadmap is evolving. The "Scale" initiative merges L1 and L2 expansion into a holistic framework. L1 itself is advancing with higher gas limits, statelessness, and zkEVM verification, no longer content to be just a low-throughput settlement layer. Consequently, the primary value proposition of L2s is shifting from merely providing cheap blockspace to offering L1 cannot easily provide: application-specific optimizations, privacy features, and flexible governance models. L2s are becoming a spectrum of execution environments with varying degrees of security inheritance from Ethereum. A critical challenge in this multi-chain future is interoperability. The vision is to make Ethereum "feel like one chain again." This relies on advancements in native account abstraction (like EIP-7702) and intent-based architectures (Open Intents Framework), where users declare desired outcomes, and solvers handle the complex cross-chain execution. Furthermore, shortening Ethereum's finality time from minutes to seconds is crucial, as it underpins trust between chains for bridges, stablecoins, and cross-chain applications. Perhaps the most provocative idea is that Ethereum L1 itself could become a form of "its own Rollup." As zkEVM and proof systems mature, high-performance nodes could execute transactions and generate validity proofs. Regular validators would then verify these proofs instead of re-executing all transactions. This blurs the traditional L1/L2 hierarchy, making "Rollup" more of a general execution-verification architecture. Native Rollup aims to integrate L2 validation more directly into the Ethereum protocol, allowing L2s to inherit L1's security more fully and move away from reliance on security councils. In the end, L2s are not destined to replace L1 or be made obsolete by it. The likely future is a unified system where diverse execution environments—each optimized for specific use cases like DeFi, gaming, or privacy—coexist. They will share a common foundation of security, liquidity, and verifiable state, seamlessly connected to restore a cohesive user experience. The next phase for Ethereum is not just about scaling through separation, but about intelligently reintegrating what was separated back into a coherent whole.

链捕手Hace 56 min(s)

Long-Divided Must Unite, Long-United Must Divide: When L1 Becomes Its Own Rollup, What Is Ethereum's Endgame?

链捕手Hace 56 min(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片