Artículos Relacionados con Lending

El Centro de Noticias de HTX ofrece los artículos más recientes y un análisis profundo sobre "Lending", cubriendo tendencias del mercado, actualizaciones de proyectos, desarrollos tecnológicos y políticas regulatorias en la industria de cripto.

147 Trillion vs 70 Billion: The Rise of On-Chain 'Risk Managers' and the Potential Dawn of a New Era in DeFi Asset Management

"147 Trillion vs 70 Billion: The Rise of On-Chain 'Risk Managers' and the Potential Dawn of a New Era in DeFi Asset Management" Key Points: The role of professional asset managers is emerging in DeFi, ending the era where protocols and governance dictated everything. While early DeFi protocols like Aave and Compound bundled risk management within their code, innovations like Morpho have separated infrastructure from risk judgment. This allows specialized "Risk Managers" to operate independent lending vaults, acting as on-chain asset managers. The market, though early with ~$7B in assets under management (AUM), is rapidly consolidating around top performers like SteakhouseFi (RWA focus), SentoraHQ (AI-driven models), and Gauntlet (crisis management). This modular structure mirrors TradFi's division of labor: distributors (e.g., exchanges) source capital, Risk Managers design strategies and set standards, and underlying protocols handle custody and execution. For traditional asset managers, this familiar structure presents clear entry paths: 1) **Distribution**: Partnering with Risk Managers as a backend service. 2) **Supply**: Bringing real-world assets (RWA) on-chain as collateral. 3) **Operation**: Becoming a Risk Manager themselves (e.g., Bitwise). The core competency required is shifting from coding to traditional risk underwriting and financial expertise—areas where established institutions hold a natural advantage. While the current DeFi market (~$80B) is minuscule compared to global asset management (~$147T), it represents a significant growth runway. The teams that build the trusted standards and rails for risk-managed capital now are poised to define the market's future as institutional capital seeks secure on-ramps.

marsbitHace 9 hora(s)

147 Trillion vs 70 Billion: The Rise of On-Chain 'Risk Managers' and the Potential Dawn of a New Era in DeFi Asset Management

marsbitHace 9 hora(s)

Tiger Research: On-Chain Risk Operators, The Market Cap Gap Between 147 Trillion and 70 Billion

This report by Tiger Research examines the evolution of risk management in decentralized finance (DeFi) lending. It highlights a power shift from protocol developers to specialized professional risk operators who manage on-chain capital. The era of protocols and community governance solely dictating DeFi lending is ending. A new professional asset management layer has emerged. While the sector is nascent, capital and distribution channels are rapidly consolidating around top risk operator teams, whose past performance is now a key criterion for institutional entry. The industry's development, accelerated by modular infrastructures like Morpho, has led to a clear division of labor mirroring traditional finance: distribution channels (e.g., exchanges), strategy/risk management (the risk operators), and product infrastructure/asset custody (smart contract protocols). This structure lowers the entry barrier for traditional institutions. Currently, the total value managed by risk operators is approximately $70 billion, dominated by a few leading teams like Steakhouse (RWA focus), Sentora (AI models), and Gauntlet (crisis management). Competition now centers on collateral standards, distribution access, and crisis response capabilities. The report outlines three primary entry paths for institutions: 1) **Distribution Model**: Leveraging external risk operators as backend service providers (common for exchanges). 2) **Asset Supply Model**: Onboarding real-world assets to DeFi as collateral. 3) **Independent Operator Model**: Building an in-house team to become a risk operator (e.g., Bitwise). The core opportunity lies in the strategy/risk management layer, where traditional financial institutions can leverage their existing expertise in due diligence and risk assessment without deep technical development. A vast opportunity gap exists: the global traditional asset management industry manages ~$147 trillion, while the entire DeFi sector is only ~$800 billion, with the risk operator niche at ~$70 billion. This disparity signifies immense growth potential. Once robust risk frameworks and clearer regulations are established, even a minor allocation from traditional markets could trigger exponential DeFi growth. Early movers who help build these foundational systems will gain significant rule-setting influence and first-mover advantages.

marsbitAyer 07:40

Tiger Research: On-Chain Risk Operators, The Market Cap Gap Between 147 Trillion and 70 Billion

marsbitAyer 07:40

Deconstructing the Real Risks of DeFi Lending: Annual Loss Rate Only 0.03%

Deconstructing the true risks of DeFi lending reveals an annual loss rate of only 0.03% from hacks and exploits. Analysis of DeFi Llama data (excluding cross-chain bridge incidents) for EVM and Solana lending protocols shows that despite high historical attack frequency due to concentrated assets, the sector's security has matured significantly. Over the past year, non-cross-chain lending on these chains saw gross losses of $309M, with net losses after recoveries at $301M. Against a daily average TVL of $99.6B, this translates to a minimal annualized loss rate of approximately 0.03%. The Euler Finance case in 2023, where $197M was fully recovered, exemplifies improving asset recovery capabilities, which now account for roughly 20% of losses in this sector. Loss events follow a log-normal distribution: most are small-scale, with catastrophic losses being rare outliers. This pattern, combined with the massive scale of the total lending market, means single incidents rarely impact the broader ecosystem. It underscores the effectiveness of portfolio diversification and provides a basis for sustainable insurance models. The data indicates DeFi lending has entered a mature phase where risks are quantifiable, categorized, and manageable. The actual financial loss relative to the total capital deployed is extremely low, challenging prevailing narratives of systemic risk.

marsbitHace 2 días 02:15

Deconstructing the Real Risks of DeFi Lending: Annual Loss Rate Only 0.03%

marsbitHace 2 días 02:15

Annual Loss Rate Only 0.03%: Data Disassembles the Real Risk of DeFi Lending

DeFi lending's real-world annual loss rate from hacks and exploits is approximately 0.03% of the Total Value Locked (TVL), excluding cross-chain bridge incidents. This analysis, based on data from DeFi Llama, shows that while lending protocols are frequent targets due to their concentrated assets, the actual financial impact relative to the sector's massive scale is minimal. The overall DeFi hack total of $77.51B is heavily skewed by cross-chain bridge breaches. Removing those, losses drop to $45.18B, with lending and AMM protocols being the most affected non-bridge categories. Risk has significantly improved as the ecosystem has matured. For the year leading to May 2026, net losses in EVM and Solana lending protocols were $30.1 million against an average daily TVL of $99.6 billion, resulting in the 0.03% loss rate. Notably, the industry's asset recovery capability, exemplified by the full recovery and surplus from the Euler Finance hack, mitigates net losses, with a ~20% recovery rate for non-bridge lending incidents. Attack scale follows a log-normal distribution, meaning most incidents are small, and catastrophic losses are rare. This demonstrates that diversification across protocols is an effective risk mitigation strategy. The data indicates that DeFi lending has evolved into a measurable, compartmentalized, and relatively low-risk sector within the broader digital asset landscape.

marsbit05/18 07:46

Annual Loss Rate Only 0.03%: Data Disassembles the Real Risk of DeFi Lending

marsbit05/18 07:46

Aave Is Surrendering the Throne of DeFi Lending Due to Its Own Stupidity

Aave, a leading DeFi lending protocol, is facing a severe crisis and losing its dominant market position due to its poor handling of a recent security incident. The crisis began when Kelp DAO suffered a hack resulting in a loss of $292 million in rsETH. In the aftermath, approximately $17.2 billion in funds flowed out of Aave as user panic escalated. The article criticizes Aave's crisis management as "extremely foolish." Instead of promptly offering reassurance or committing to cover the potential bad debt—estimated between $123.7 million and $230.1 million, which Aave could have afforded—the protocol initially deflected blame, emphasizing that its code was not at fault. This delay and lack of a clear guarantee led to widespread user anxiety, triggering a bank run-like scenario where users withdrew funds or borrowed aggressively from other pools, causing liquidity shortages. Meanwhile, Aave’s competitor Spark—a fork of Aave’s own code—has benefited significantly. Having removed support for rsETH months earlier, Spark avoided any losses from the incident and has since seen its TVL grow by nearly $2 billion, attracting major deposits such as over $1.24 billion from Justin Sun. Spark has actively capitalized on the situation, publicly criticizing Aave’s security reputation. Although Aave’s founder Stani eventually announced a relief plan named "DeFi United" with several partners and a personal donation, the damage to user trust and capital outflows may be irreversible. The article concludes that Aave is losing its throne in DeFi lending to aggressive competitors like Spark, Morpho, and Jupiter Lend.

Odaily星球日报04/24 02:38

Aave Is Surrendering the Throne of DeFi Lending Due to Its Own Stupidity

Odaily星球日报04/24 02:38

A Transformative Era for DeFi Collateral: Exploring RWA as the New Composable Infrastructure for DeFi

DeFi Collateral Transformation: RWA Emerges as Composable Infrastructure The tokenized Real-World Asset (RWA) market has reached $27 billion, yet only about $2.7 billion is actively used as collateral in DeFi lending markets. This growth was accelerated by key 2025-2026 regulatory milestones in the U.S., including the GENIUS Act for stablecoins and the classification of major blockchain tokens as digital commodities. The composition of tokenized assets differs significantly from those actively used in DeFi. U.S. Treasuries dominate tokenized AUM (48.5%) but represent only 2% of DeFi deposits. Conversely, credit assets (17% of AUM) constitute 80% of deposits, driven by yield differentials that enable profitable leverage strategies. Reinsurance is emerging as a new composable asset class, with over 80% of its tokenized supply active in DeFi. The market is evolving in real-time. As yield spreads compress, collateral diversification is increasing, evidenced by Aave Horizon's shifting composition. Permissionless access is a critical driver for distribution, as demonstrated by Maple Finance's 'syrup' tokens, which have been composably deployed across multiple chains and protocols without requiring permissions. In conclusion, while the absolute value of RWA in DeFi is still small, its rapid growth rate, the divergence between tokenized and utilized assets, and the power of permissionless composability are the key trends shaping this new infrastructure layer.

marsbit04/20 10:22

A Transformative Era for DeFi Collateral: Exploring RWA as the New Composable Infrastructure for DeFi

marsbit04/20 10:22

活动图片