Artículos Relacionados con DEX

El Centro de Noticias de HTX ofrece los artículos más recientes y un análisis profundo sobre "DEX", cubriendo tendencias del mercado, actualizaciones de proyectos, desarrollos tecnológicos y políticas regulatorias en la industria de cripto.

DeFi Sector Bounces Back Strongest: Which High-Revenue Projects Offer Entry Opportunities?

DeFi Sector Leads Recovery: Which High-Revenue Projects Are Worth Watching? DeFi has been one of the most active sectors during the recent market rebound. Beyond chasing price action, a key fundamental metric for evaluating DeFi protocols is sustainable revenue, which indicates real user demand. This analysis highlights high-revenue projects across key categories, using protocol fee data (net of supplier payouts). **DEX** * **Uniswap (UNI)**: Leads with $7.18M in 30-day revenue. Protocol fees from v2 and select v3 pools are used for UNI token burns. * **Solana DEXs**: Jupiter (JUP, $4.69M 30-day revenue) uses 50% of revenue for JUP buybacks. Meteora (MET, $1.67M) and Raydium (RAY, $1.13M) also allocate portions of fees to token buybacks. * **PancakeSwap (CAKE)**: Earned $5.16M in 30 days, with part of its fees used for CAKE burns, maintaining a net deflationary supply. * **Aerodrome (AERO)**: On Base, it generated $4.11M in 30 days. Revenue is directly distributed to veAERO holders rather than used for buybacks. **Lending** * **World Liberty Financial (WLFI)**: Top earner with $10.47M in 30-day revenue. A proposal passed to use 100% of fees from its Protocol-Owned Liquidity (POL) for WLFI buybacks, but holder net income remains zero. * **Aave (AAVE)**: Generated $4.12M in 30 days. Its buyback program was paused in April 2026 following the rsETH bridge attack. **ETH Staking** * **ether.fi (ETHFI)**: Earned $3.03M in 30 days. Revenue from eETH withdrawals is used for ETHFI buybacks, which are then distributed to sETHFI stakers. * **Lido (LDO)**: Generated $2.31M. Its new NEST mechanism automatically uses 50% of annual revenue exceeding $40M for LDO buybacks. In summary, several DeFi protocols are generating significant revenue, with many employing token buyback or direct distribution mechanisms. This revenue provides a fundamental basis for evaluation amid market volatility.

marsbitHace 6 hora(s)

DeFi Sector Bounces Back Strongest: Which High-Revenue Projects Offer Entry Opportunities?

marsbitHace 6 hora(s)

DeFi Sector Rebounds Most Strongly, Which High-Revenue Projects Can Be a Good Opportunity to 'Get On Board'?

**Title: DeFi Sector Leads Market Rebound: High-Revenue Projects to Watch** The recent surge in Bitcoin and Ethereum has revitalized the altcoin market, with DeFi emerging as one of the most active sectors. Beyond chasing price rallies, a key fundamental metric for evaluating DeFi projects is their protocol revenue—the actual income retained after paying liquidity providers. This indicates genuine user demand and sustainable business models. **Top Revenue-Generating DeFi Projects:** * **DEX (Decentralized Exchanges):** * **Uniswap (UNI):** Leads with $7.18M in 30-day revenue. It accrues income from protocol fees, which are now active on multiple chains and used to buy back and burn UNI. * **Solana Ecosystem:** Jupiter ($4.69M), Meteora ($1.67M), and Raydium ($1.13M) are top performers, with substantial revenues driven by Solana's vibrant trading activity. Jupiter and Raydium use a portion of fees for token buybacks, while Meteora has also executed significant buybacks. * **PancakeSwap (CAKE):** Generated $5.16M recently, maintaining a strong position on BNB Chain and other networks. Its token CAKE continues a net deflationary trend through buybacks and burns. * **Aerodrome (AERO):** On Base chain, it earned $4.11M. Its revenue is directly distributed to veAERO holders instead of funding buybacks. * **Lending:** * **World Liberty Financial (WLFI):** Topped the lending sector with $10.47M in 30-day revenue. A proposal to use fees from its proprietary market making for WLFI buybacks passed, but token holders' net income remains zero currently. * **Aave (AAVE):** Earned $4.12M. It had an active buyback program until it was paused in April 2026 following a security incident. * **ETH Staking:** * **ether.fi (ETHFI):** Generated $3.03M. Revenue from eETH withdrawals is fully used to buy back ETHFI, which is then distributed to sETHFI stakers. * **Lido (LDO):** Earned $2.31M. Its recently activated NEST mechanism automatically uses 50% of annual revenue above $40M to buy back LDO. In summary, during the market rebound, several DeFi protocols across DEXs, lending, and staking are demonstrating strong revenue generation. Key models include direct fee collection, token buyback/burn programs, and revenue distribution to governance token stakers, providing fundamental strength amidst market volatility.

Odaily星球日报Hace 7 hora(s)

DeFi Sector Rebounds Most Strongly, Which High-Revenue Projects Can Be a Good Opportunity to 'Get On Board'?

Odaily星球日报Hace 7 hora(s)

Hyperliquid's Compliance Journey: From Permissionless to Permissioned via HIP-3

Hyperliquid’s Compliance Path: From Permissionless to Permissioned HIP-3 Hyperliquid currently blocks U.S. access because its permissionless, on-chain infrastructure conflicts with U.S. market structure laws, which restrict futures trading to registered exchanges, clearinghouses, and brokers. Through its Hyperliquid Policy Center (HPC), the project is advocating for regulatory modernization, proposing that regulated entities be allowed to build products on HyperCore (its exchange and clearing layer) while fulfilling their compliance obligations. The platform’s modular stack separates roles like a traditional exchange (DCM), clearinghouse (DCO), and broker (FCM), but reconstructs them on-chain with code. This enables permissionless access, self-custody, and 24/7 global trading, but clashes with U.S. rules requiring KYC, specific margin models, and custodial arrangements. To resolve this, HPC is engaging with U.S. regulators (CFTC, SEC) to seek clarity that deploying on-chain software does not itself trigger licensing, and to establish exemptions allowing non-custodial wallets to route users to regulated derivatives. Recent political signals suggest openness to this approach. On the technical side, Hyperliquid Labs has introduced permissioned HIP-3 deployers on testnet. These allow regulated entities to launch markets, perform KYC, and whitelist compliant users. While these create separate order books, whitelisted market makers can bridge liquidity between them, ensuring deep, shared liquidity across the same L1. Features like payload-based “PA” permissions enable DEX-level account controls (e.g., reduce-only orders), mirroring traditional broker authorities. The strategy is not to open the native, permissionless front-end to U.S. users, but to position Hyperliquid as neutral infrastructure that U.S. regulated firms can use while meeting their legal duties. This paves a compliant path for U.S. investor access while preserving the protocol’s core, permissionless nature.

marsbitAyer 02:11

Hyperliquid's Compliance Journey: From Permissionless to Permissioned via HIP-3

marsbitAyer 02:11

活动图片