Stablecoin Yields May Boost US Bank Deposits: Patrick Witt

TheNewsCryptoPublicado a 2026-03-12Actualizado a 2026-03-12

Resumen

Patrick Witt, executive director of the President’s Council of Advisors for Digital Assets, argues that the debate over stablecoin yields overlooks a broader macroeconomic benefit. Contrary to concerns from banking groups that yield-bearing stablecoins could drain deposits, Witt suggests that under the GENIUS Act framework, compliant stablecoins may actually bring new capital into the U.S. banking system. He explains that global demand for USD is significant, and when foreigners purchase U.S.-issued stablecoins, it represents net new capital entering American banks. This discussion occurs amid ongoing tension between policymakers, banks, and crypto firms regarding whether stablecoin issuers should be allowed to offer rewards or interest-like returns. Traditional banks, like the American Bankers Association, warn that such yields could threaten bank deposits and advocate for a level regulatory playing field. Crypto industry representatives counter that the GENIUS Act already imposes strict reserve requirements, mandating full backing by cash or cash-equivalents. Witt emphasizes that it is not the payment of yield itself that necessitates bank-like regulation, but rather the lending or rehypothecation of underlying funds—which the GENIUS Act explicitly prohibits.

The recent debate concerning stablecoin yields may be neglecting a wider macroeconomic dynamic, as per Patrick Witt, the executive director of the President’s Council of Advisors for Digital Assets.

On March 11, Witt posted on X, mentioning that the stablecoins’ complaint with the GENIUS Act framework could really influence new funds into the U.S. banking system instead of draining deposits away from it, as some banking groups have alerted.

Witt mentioned that lost in the rewards/yield debate is how GENIUS-compliant stablecoins will really lead to deposit inflows. The global demand for USD is huge. Foreigners exchange local currency for stablecoins from a US-based issuer, and that is net new capital setting its foot into the American banking system.

The comment from Witt comes amid the continuing clash of policymakers, banks and crypto firms over whether stablecoin issuers should be allowed to permit rewards or interest-like incentives to holders.

Concerns of the Market Players

Traditional banking groups have alerted that yield-bearing stablecoins could influence deposits from the US banking system. The latest survey authorised by the American Bankers Association found that consumers widely backed limitations on stablecoin rewards, voicing concerns regarding financial risk.

The CEO and ABA President Rob Nichols mentioned earlier this week that our industry welcomes competition and revolution. Although he alerted that the regulator should avoid making an uneven playing field where crypto companies offer bank-like products without following equivalent regulatory standards.

Crypto industry players have claimed that stablecoin issuers so far witness strict reserve needs under the GENIUS Act, which requires tokens to be completely supported by cash or cash-equivalent assets.

Witt also had the same concerns at the start of this month. It is not the paying of yield on a balance per se that requires bank-like regulations, but instead the lending out or rehypothecation of the dollars that make up the underlying balance.

The GENIUS Act deliberately restricts stablecoin issuers from doing the latter.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

CBI Arrests Darwin Labs Co-Founder in Multi-Crore GainBitcoin Scam

Criptos en tendencia

CitreaCTR

wrapped stUSDTWSTUSDT

Velodrome FinanceVELODROME

BrevisBREV

ZRX（0X）ZRX

PancakeSwapCAKE

Preguntas relacionadas

QAccording to Patrick Witt, how could GENIUS Act-compliant stablecoins potentially affect the US banking system?

APatrick Witt argues that GENIUS Act-compliant stablecoins could lead to deposit inflows into the US banking system, as foreigners exchange local currency for stablecoins from US-based issuers, bringing net new capital into American banks.

QWhat concern have traditional banking groups raised about yield-bearing stablecoins?

ATraditional banking groups have warned that yield-bearing stablecoins could drain deposits from the US banking system.

QWhat did the American Bankers Association survey find regarding consumer attitudes toward stablecoin rewards?

AThe American Bankers Association survey found that consumers widely supported limitations on stablecoin rewards, expressing concerns about financial risk.

QWhat regulatory requirement does the GENIUS Act impose on stablecoin issuers regarding their reserves?

AThe GENIUS Act requires stablecoin tokens to be fully backed by cash or cash-equivalent assets.

QAccording to Witt, what specific activity (not the payment of yield itself) would require bank-like regulations for stablecoin issuers?

AWitt stated that it is not the payment of yield itself, but the lending out or rehypothecation of the dollars that make up the underlying balance that would require bank-like regulations.

Lecturas Relacionadas

STAR 50 Soars 10.73%, Why Did A-Shares Stage a "V-Shaped Reversal"?

After a prolonged decline, the Chinese A-share market staged a strong rally on July 21. The STAR 50 index surged 10.73%, its largest single-day gain in nearly a year, leading a broad-based "V-shaped" reversal. The Shanghai Composite Index rose 1.79%, the Shenzhen Component Index gained 4.81%, and the ChiNext Index jumped 7.05%. Total market turnover reached 2.97 trillion yuan, an increase of 256.1 billion yuan from the previous session, with over 3,100 stocks advancing. The semiconductor sector spearheaded the rebound, with related ETFs posting significant gains. Analysts attribute the surge to three converging factors. First, coordinated capital inflows from "national team" institutions, insurance funds, listed company buybacks, and fund house self-purchases have bolstered market liquidity and confidence. Second, supportive policy signals, including commitments from regulators to ensure stable market operations, provided a favorable backdrop. Third, a stabilization and recovery in overseas markets, notably South Korea, created a positive external environment. Institutions suggest the most severe panic selling phase for the tech sector has likely passed, following a significant digestion of crowded positions and leveraged funds. While short-term volatility may persist, the medium to long-term outlook remains underpinned by enduring trends like AI computing demand expansion and semiconductor localization. The market's focus now shifts to the sustainability of supportive fund flows, earnings reports, and upcoming catalysts from the global AI industry chain.

marsbitHace 24 min(s)

STAR 50 Soars 10.73%, Why Did A-Shares Stage a "V-Shaped Reversal"?

marsbitHace 24 min(s)

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Post Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, But Is the Plunge Over?

US tech momentum stocks staged a sharp rebound on Tuesday (July 21st). Morgan Stanley's TMT Momentum Factor surged over 12%, marking its largest single-day gain on record, exceeding even peaks from the 2000 dot-com bubble. Key momentum indices from Goldman Sachs also posted their strongest daily performances in years. The rally was led by semiconductors, with the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index jumping 4.6%. This rebound followed three consecutive down days and a cumulative 33% plunge in momentum stocks, one of the steepest drawdowns since the dot-com era. Analysts attribute the surge largely to a short squeeze. Heavy selling had pushed high-beta momentum stocks into deeply oversold territory, forcing many short sellers, particularly in Asia, to cover their positions, creating a self-reinforcing buying spiral. However, the rebound's internals appear weak. Trading volume was notably low, and advancing stocks still lagged decliners on the S&P 500, indicating a narrow, concentrated rally rather than broad market participation. Diverging views emerge on the outlook. BTIG warns the bounce has hit key resistance and recommends selling into strength, citing extreme volatility and historical parallels to past market tops. Conversely, Goldman Sachs and UBS believe the momentum unwind is nearing its end, suggesting it may be time to gradually add exposure, as positioning has been significantly reduced. They caution, however, that high volatility warrants a measured approach, potentially using defined-risk strategies. The upcoming earnings season, particularly reports from major tech firms like Alphabet, is seen as a critical test for the rally's sustainability. Simultaneously, bond markets flashed a warning, with yields rising partly due to spiking oil prices. Analysts note that if long-term Treasury yields break decisively higher, it could pose a significant headwind for equities, especially growth stocks.

marsbitHace 31 min(s)

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Post Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, But Is the Plunge Over?

marsbitHace 31 min(s)

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Record Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, but Has the Rout Ended?

U.S. tech momentum stocks staged a dramatic rebound on Tuesday, July 21st. Key momentum indices like the Morgan Stanley TMT Momentum Factor and Goldman Sachs' High Beta Momentum Long Index posted historic or near-historic single-day gains, fueled largely by semiconductor stocks. This sharp rally followed a severe three-day sell-off that saw momentum stocks plunge 33%, marking one of the steepest pullbacks since the dot-com bubble. Analysts attribute the bounce primarily to a short squeeze, as forced covering from over-leveraged traders, particularly in Asia, created a buying spiral. However, the rally's health is questioned due to weak market breadth—overall trading volume was low, and decliners outnumbered advancers in the S&P 500 despite the index's gain—suggesting a narrow, concentrated surge rather than broad recovery. Opinions on the sustainability diverge. BTIG strategists warn the rebound has hit key resistance levels, citing extreme volatility and historic stock dispersion as signs of an ongoing broader correction, and recommend selling into strength. Conversely, Goldman Sachs and UBS view the aggressive momentum unwinding as nearing its end, noting reduced positioning and a lack of new fundamental catalysts. They suggest the sell-off presents a selective opportunity to add exposure, albeit cautiously and gradually using defined-risk strategies. The immediate trajectory hinges on the ongoing earnings season, with market focus on Alphabet's capital expenditure guidance for AI investment clarity. Meanwhile, bond markets present a risk, with rising Treasury yields—potentially heading toward 5.5%—and widening credit spreads for mega-cap tech companies posing a threat to equity valuations. The combination of technical factors, earnings results, and macro conditions leaves the durability of the rebound in doubt.

链捕手Hace 34 min(s)

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Record Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, but Has the Rout Ended?

链捕手Hace 34 min(s)

Bitcoin flashes 3 macro-bottom signals – But can BTC reach $70K?

The article discusses Bitcoin's recent price movement above $66,000 and a shift in market analysis from focusing on a local bottom to a potential macro-cycle bottom. It cites a crypto analyst noting that BTC has flashed three historical technical signals that previously coincided with major market bottoms in 2015, 2019, and 2022, suggesting the current zone could be a strong long-term accumulation area. However, the article also highlights a significant challenge: despite the price breakout, on-chain data shows a lack of supporting liquidity. Stablecoin dominance is rising while the total stablecoin market cap is shrinking, with capital continuing to leave exchanges. This divergence indicates that while the technical setup is bullish, the rally may struggle to sustain enough momentum for a decisive move into the $70,000 region without an influx of fresh capital.

ambcryptoHace 36 min(s)

Bitcoin flashes 3 macro-bottom signals – But can BTC reach $70K?

ambcryptoHace 36 min(s)

Long-Divided Must Unite, Long-United Must Divide: When L1 Becomes Its Own Rollup, What Is Ethereum's Endgame?

"The Inevitable Cycle: When L1 Becomes Its Own Rollup – What is Ethereum's Endgame?" For years, the Ethereum community grappled with concerns that L2s were fragmenting the ecosystem and eroding L1's value. While L2s provided cheaper execution, they also splintered liquidity and the unified user experience of a single chain. This has prompted a fundamental reassessment of the relationship between L1 and L2. Ethereum's roadmap is evolving. The "Scale" initiative merges L1 and L2 expansion into a holistic framework. L1 itself is advancing with higher gas limits, statelessness, and zkEVM verification, no longer content to be just a low-throughput settlement layer. Consequently, the primary value proposition of L2s is shifting from merely providing cheap blockspace to offering L1 cannot easily provide: application-specific optimizations, privacy features, and flexible governance models. L2s are becoming a spectrum of execution environments with varying degrees of security inheritance from Ethereum. A critical challenge in this multi-chain future is interoperability. The vision is to make Ethereum "feel like one chain again." This relies on advancements in native account abstraction (like EIP-7702) and intent-based architectures (Open Intents Framework), where users declare desired outcomes, and solvers handle the complex cross-chain execution. Furthermore, shortening Ethereum's finality time from minutes to seconds is crucial, as it underpins trust between chains for bridges, stablecoins, and cross-chain applications. Perhaps the most provocative idea is that Ethereum L1 itself could become a form of "its own Rollup." As zkEVM and proof systems mature, high-performance nodes could execute transactions and generate validity proofs. Regular validators would then verify these proofs instead of re-executing all transactions. This blurs the traditional L1/L2 hierarchy, making "Rollup" more of a general execution-verification architecture. Native Rollup aims to integrate L2 validation more directly into the Ethereum protocol, allowing L2s to inherit L1's security more fully and move away from reliance on security councils. In the end, L2s are not destined to replace L1 or be made obsolete by it. The likely future is a unified system where diverse execution environments—each optimized for specific use cases like DeFi, gaming, or privacy—coexist. They will share a common foundation of security, liquidity, and verifiable state, seamlessly connected to restore a cohesive user experience. The next phase for Ethereum is not just about scaling through separation, but about intelligently reintegrating what was separated back into a coherent whole.

链捕手Hace 50 min(s)

Long-Divided Must Unite, Long-United Must Divide: When L1 Becomes Its Own Rollup, What Is Ethereum's Endgame?

链捕手Hace 50 min(s)

Trading

Spot

Artículos destacados

Qué es $BANK

Banco AI: Un Paso Revolucionario en el Futuro de la Banca Introducción En una era marcada por avances rápidos en tecnología, Banco AI se sitúa en la intersección de la inteligencia artificial (IA) y los servicios bancarios. Este proyecto innovador busca redefinir el panorama financiero, mejorando la eficiencia operativa, las medidas de seguridad y las experiencias del cliente a través del poder de la IA. Al embarcarnos en esta exploración de Banco AI, profundizaremos en lo que implica el proyecto, sus dinámicas operativas, su contexto histórico y hitos significativos. ¿Qué es Banco AI? En su esencia, Banco AI representa una iniciativa transformadora destinada a integrar la inteligencia artificial en varias operaciones bancarias. Este proyecto aprovecha las capacidades de la IA para automatizar procesos, mejorar los protocolos de gestión de riesgos y mejorar la interacción con los clientes a través de servicios personalizados. Los objetivos principales de Banco AI incluyen: Automatización de Funciones Bancarias: Al aprovechar las tecnologías de IA, Banco AI tiene como objetivo automatizar tareas rutinarias, reduciendo la carga sobre los recursos humanos y mejorando la eficiencia. Mejora en la Gestión de Riesgos: El proyecto utiliza algoritmos de IA para predecir e identificar riesgos, fortaleciendo así las medidas de seguridad contra fraudes y otras amenazas. Personalización de Servicios Bancarios: Banco AI se centra en ofrecer productos y servicios financieros a medida al analizar datos y comportamientos de los clientes. Mejoramiento de la Experiencia del Cliente: La implementación de soluciones impulsadas por IA, como chatbots y asistentes virtuales, tiene como objetivo proporcionar a los usuarios interacciones más humanas, revolucionando la forma en que los clientes se relacionan con los bancos. Con estos objetivos, Banco AI se posiciona como un jugador crucial para hacer que la banca sea más eficiente, segura y centrada en el usuario. ¿Quién es el Creador de Banco AI? Los detalles sobre el creador de Banco AI siguen siendo desconocidos. Como tal, no se ha identificado a ninguna persona u organización específica en la información disponible. El anonimato que rodea el inicio del proyecto plantea preguntas, pero no resta valor a su ambiciosa visión y objetivos. ¿Quiénes Son los Inversores de Banco AI? Al igual que con el creador del proyecto, no se ha divulgado información específica sobre los inversores u organizaciones que apoyan a Banco AI. Sin esta información, es un desafío delinear el respaldo financiero y el apoyo institucional que podrían estar impulsando el proyecto hacia adelante. No obstante, la importancia de contar con una sólida base de inversión es fundamental para sostener el desarrollo en un campo tan innovador. ¿Cómo Funciona Banco AI? Banco AI opera en múltiples frentes innovadores, centrándose en factores únicos que lo diferencian de los marcos bancarios tradicionales. A continuación, se presentan las características operativas clave: Automatización: Al aplicar algoritmos de aprendizaje automático, Banco AI automatiza varios procesos manuales dentro de los bancos. Esto resulta en la reducción de costos operativos y permite que los trabajadores humanos redirijan sus esfuerzos hacia actividades más estratégicas. Gestión Avanzada de Riesgos: La integración de la IA en las prácticas de gestión de riesgos equipa a los bancos con herramientas para predecir con precisión amenazas potenciales como el fraude, garantizando que la información y los activos de los clientes permanezcan seguros. Recomendaciones Financieras Personalizadas: A través del aprendizaje continuo a partir de las interacciones con los clientes, los sistemas de IA desarrollan una comprensión matizada de las necesidades del usuario, lo que les permite ofrecer consejos adaptados sobre decisiones financieras. Interacciones Mejoradas con los Clientes: Al utilizar chatbots y asistentes virtuales impulsados por IA, Banco AI permite una experiencia más atractiva para el cliente, permitiendo a los usuarios resolver sus consultas rápidamente, reduciendo así los tiempos de espera y mejorando los niveles de satisfacción. En conjunto, estas características operativas posicionan a Banco AI como un pionero en el sector bancario, estableciendo nuevos parámetros para la entrega de servicios y la excelencia operativa. Línea de Tiempo de Banco AI Entender la trayectoria de Banco AI requiere mirar su contexto histórico. A continuación, se presenta una línea de tiempo que destaca hitos y desarrollos importantes: Inicios de 2010: La conceptualización de la integración de la IA en los servicios bancarios comenzó a ganar atención a medida que las instituciones bancarias reconocieron los posibles beneficios. 2018: Se produjo un aumento notable en la implementación de tecnologías de IA cuando los bancos comenzaron a utilizar herramientas de IA como chatbots para el servicio al cliente básico y sistemas de gestión de riesgos para mejorar la seguridad. 2023: La sofisticación de la IA continuó avanzando, con la introducción de IA generativa para tareas más complejas como el procesamiento de documentos y análisis de inversiones en tiempo real. Este año marcó un salto significativo en las capacidades que la tecnología de IA otorgó a los bancos. 2024-Estatus Actual: A partir de este año, Banco AI se encuentra en una trayectoria ascendente, con investigaciones y desarrollos en curso que pronto mejorarán las capacidades en las operaciones bancarias. La continua exploración de las aplicaciones de IA sugiere emocionantes desarrollos aún por venir. Puntos Clave Sobre Banco AI Integración de la IA en la Banca: Banco AI se centra en adoptar inteligencia artificial para optimizar los procesos bancarios y mejorar la experiencia del usuario. Enfoque en Automatización y Gestión de Riesgos: El proyecto enfatiza fuertemente estas áreas, con el objetivo de desplazar la carga de tareas rutinarias mientras mejora los marcos de seguridad a través de análisis predictivos. Soluciones Bancarias Personalizadas: Al aprovechar los datos de los clientes, Banco AI permite servicios bancarios adaptados a las necesidades individuales de los usuarios. Compromiso con el Desarrollo: Banco AI se mantiene comprometido con esfuerzos de investigación y desarrollo continuos, asegurando su adaptabilidad y relevancia continua a medida que la tecnología sigue evolucionando. Conclusión En resumen, Banco AI ejemplifica un paso crucial hacia adelante en la industria bancaria, aprovechando la inteligencia artificial para redefinir los paradigmas operativos, mejorar la seguridad y promover la satisfacción del cliente. A pesar de las lagunas en la información sobre el creador y los inversores, los objetivos claros y los mecanismos funcionales de Banco AI proporcionan una sólida base para su evolución continua. A medida que la tecnología de IA sigue avanzando y fusionándose con el sector bancario, Banco AI está bien posicionado para impactar significativamente el futuro de los servicios financieros, mejorando la forma en que entendemos e interactuamos con la banca.

186 Vistas totalesPublicado en 2024.04.06Actualizado en 2024.12.03

Cómo comprar BANK

¡Bienvenido a HTX.com! Hemos hecho que comprar Lorenzo Protocol (BANK) sea simple y conveniente. Sigue nuestra guía paso a paso para iniciar tu viaje de criptos.Paso 1: crea tu cuenta HTXUtiliza tu correo electrónico o número de teléfono para registrarte y obtener una cuenta gratuita en HTX. Experimenta un proceso de registro sin complicaciones y desbloquea todas las funciones.Obtener mi cuentaPaso 2: ve a Comprar cripto y elige tu método de pagoTarjeta de crédito/débito: usa tu Visa o Mastercard para comprar Lorenzo Protocol (BANK) al instante.Saldo: utiliza fondos del saldo de tu cuenta HTX para tradear sin problemas.Terceros: hemos agregado métodos de pago populares como Google Pay y Apple Pay para mejorar la comodidad.P2P: tradear directamente con otros usuarios en HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): ofrecemos servicios personalizados y tipos de cambio competitivos para los traders.Paso 3: guarda tu Lorenzo Protocol (BANK)Después de comprar tu Lorenzo Protocol (BANK), guárdalo en tu cuenta HTX. Alternativamente, puedes enviarlo a otro lugar mediante transferencia blockchain o utilizarlo para tradear otras criptomonedas.Paso 4: tradear Lorenzo Protocol (BANK)Tradear fácilmente con Lorenzo Protocol (BANK) en HTX's mercado spot. Simplemente accede a tu cuenta, selecciona tu par de trading, ejecuta tus trades y monitorea en tiempo real. Ofrecemos una experiencia fácil de usar tanto para principiantes como para traders experimentados.

814 Vistas totalesPublicado en 2025.05.09Actualizado en 2026.06.02

Discusiones

Bienvenido a la comunidad de HTX. Aquí puedes mantenerte informado sobre los últimos desarrollos de la plataforma y acceder a análisis profesionales del mercado. A continuación se presentan las opiniones de los usuarios sobre el precio de BANK (BANK).