NYSE plans tokenized securities platform with 24/7 trading and on-chain settlement

ambcryptoPublicado a 2026-01-19Actualizado a 2026-01-19

Resumen

NYSE plans to develop a platform for trading and on-chain settlement of tokenized securities, enabling 24/7 trading of U.S.-listed equities and ETFs, subject to regulatory approval. The platform will support fractional shares, dollar-based orders, and stablecoin funding, using blockchains like Ethereum and Solana for near-instant settlement. Tokenized shares will be fully fungible with traditional securities, preserving dividends and shareholder rights. This initiative is part of parent company ICE’s broader digital strategy, which includes collaboration with banks like BNY and Citi. The project remains pending regulatory approval but represents a major step toward integrating blockchain into traditional markets.

The New York Stock Exchange has announced plans to develop a platform for trading and on-chain settlement of tokenized securities. The move would allow 24/7 trading of U.S.-listed equities and ETFs, subject to regulatory approval.

In a statement released on 19 January, the NYSE said the platform would support fractional share trading, orders sized in dollar amounts, and stablecoin-based funding, while enabling near-instant settlement using tokenized capital.

24/7 trading and tokenized settlement

According to the exchange, the new digital platform is designed to enable continuous trading. This breaks from traditional market hours that have historically governed U.S. equities markets.

The NYSE said this would allow investors to trade tokenized securities around the clock. Also, settlement will take place on-chain rather than through conventional clearing cycles.

The infrastructure will combine the NYSE’s Pillar matching engine with blockchain-based post-trade systems.

The exchange said the platform will support multiple blockchains, like Solana and Ethereum, for settlement and custody, enabling flexibility as digital market infrastructure evolves.

Tokenized shares remain fully fungible

The NYSE said tokenized shares traded on the platform would be fungible with traditionally issued securities. This means they would represent the same underlying asset.

Tokenized shareholders would continue to receive dividends and governance rights, including voting, in line with existing shareholder protections.

Access to the platform would be provided through qualified broker-dealers, with distribution designed to remain non-discriminatory and aligned with established market-structure principles.

Part of a broader ICE digital strategy

The initiative forms part of a wider digital strategy by Intercontinental Exchange, the NYSE’s parent company.

Intercontinental Exchange [ICE] said it is preparing its clearing infrastructure to support continuous trading. Also, it is exploring the use of tokenized collateral to meet margin and funding requirements outside traditional banking hours.

ICE added that it is working with banks, including BNY and Citi, to support tokenized deposits across its clearinghouses.

The goal is to allow clearing members to manage liquidity and funding across different time zones and jurisdictions without being constrained by standard settlement windows.

Regulatory approval still required

“For more than two centuries, the NYSE has transformed the way markets operate,” said Lynn Martin, President of NYSE Group, adding that the exchange aims to lead the industry toward “fully on-chain solutions” while maintaining existing regulatory standards and investor protections.

ICE executives said the project reflects a long-term shift toward operating market infrastructure on-chain, spanning trading, settlement, custody, and capital formation.

The NYSE has not disclosed a launch timeline, and the platform remains subject to regulatory approval.

If approved, it would mark one of the most significant steps yet by a major U.S. exchange toward integrating blockchain technology directly into traditional securities markets.


Final Thoughts

  • The NYSE’s move signals that tokenization is shifting from pilot projects to core market infrastructure, rather than remaining a niche digital asset experiment.
  • By keeping tokenized shares fully fungible with traditional securities, the exchange is prioritising continuity in market structure and investor protections.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat are the key features of the NYSE's proposed tokenized securities platform?

AThe platform would enable 24/7 trading of U.S.-listed equities and ETFs, support fractional share trading and orders sized in dollar amounts, use stablecoin-based funding, and provide near-instant on-chain settlement. It is designed to be compatible with multiple blockchains like Solana and Ethereum.

QHow will tokenized shares on the new platform differ from traditional securities?

ATokenized shares will be fully fungible with traditionally issued securities, meaning they represent the same underlying asset. Shareholders will retain all rights, including dividends and governance rights like voting, in line with existing protections.

QWhat is the role of Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) in this initiative?

AIntercontinental Exchange (ICE), the NYSE's parent company, is leading a broader digital strategy. This includes preparing its clearing infrastructure for continuous trading, exploring the use of tokenized collateral for margin requirements, and working with banks like BNY and Citi to support tokenized deposits across its clearinghouses.

QIs the NYSE's new platform operational, and what is required for it to launch?

ANo, the platform is not yet operational. The NYSE has not disclosed a launch timeline, and the platform remains subject to regulatory approval before it can be launched.

QAccording to the article, what does the NYSE's move signal for the future of tokenization?

AThe move signals that tokenization is shifting from being a niche digital asset experiment to becoming a core component of market infrastructure, integrating directly into traditional securities markets while maintaining regulatory standards and investor protections.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Podcast Notes | Conversation with GSR Asset Management Head: To Determine if This Crypto Rally is Real, Just Watch the Lending Rates on Aave

Podcast Summary: Dialogue with GSR's Head of Asset Management: To Determine if This Crypto Rally is Real, Just Check Lending Rates on Aave Andy Baehr, Managing Director of Asset Management at GSR, discusses the current crypto market, characterizing it as stuck in a state of "ambivalence" with short-lived, unsustainable rallies. He outlines a simple framework: the market moves between "ambivalence" and "conviction" (sustained upward momentum). Currently, every rally resembles a single-stage rocket booster that quickly fizzles out. Baehr identifies three key signals to watch: 1) DeFi lending rates, 2) the potential passage of the CLARITY Act, and 3) the market forming a consensus on the "Fed hawkish peak." He emphasizes that the most immediate indicator for the sustainability of the recent CPI-triggered rally is the USDC borrowing rate on Aave, currently around 3.75%—close to U.S. Treasury yields. The absence of a credit spread indicates low leverage demand and a lack of market energy. He explains that a healthy, sustained rally requires layered buying pressure. Last year's rally progressed from an ETH short squeeze to crypto-native trader influx and finally to ETF inflows. Currently, this structure is missing. Other potential structural buyers like Digital Asset Treasury (DAT) companies are absent, and ETF flows have proven transient. Baehr notes that while small-cap crypto tokens outperformed large caps in Q2—a potential sign of capitation in major assets—capital is also flowing to more exciting opportunities like AI stocks and tech IPOs, leaving crypto sidelined. Regarding DeFi, he highlights that platforms like Aave provide a clear, real-time signal of leverage demand through their supply/demand-driven interest rates. A significant, sustained rate increase would signal genuine market conviction. He also observes the quiet emergence of fixed-income-like products and vaults in DeFi. On regulation, the probability of the CLARITY Act passing before the August 7th deadline has dropped linearly from 75% to below 40% on Polymarket. Baehr suggests its passage would be treated as a bullish surprise, a potent driver for price movement. However, political hurdles, including ethical clause debates and disclosures about the First Family's crypto profits, remain significant obstacles. Ultimately, the market awaits clarity on the Fed's terminal rate under Chair Warsh. Until the "Fed Solstice"—the point where the market collectively understands the peak of hawkish policy—sustained conviction will be difficult to achieve.

marsbitHace 3 min(s)

Podcast Notes | Conversation with GSR Asset Management Head: To Determine if This Crypto Rally is Real, Just Watch the Lending Rates on Aave

marsbitHace 3 min(s)

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Following the collapse of Huione Pay—dubbed the "Alipay of Southeast Asia"—seven months ago, the region's underground financial guarantee platform sector is undergoing a significant reshuffle. This power vacuum has been swiftly filled by emerging platforms such as XinBi, Tiger/Navigator, JinBei (renamed JinBo), Dali/Tiancheng, and FullyLight. These platforms, operating largely via Telegram and offering services like escrow for illicit transactions, have absorbed the vast user base and markets left behind by Huione. While positioning themselves as "trust intermediaries," their primary clientele consists of networks involved in online scams, money laundering, illegal gambling, and even human trafficking. For instance, the Tiger/Navigator platform explicitly provides "escrow" services for kidnapping-for-ransom operations ("强押车交易"). Data underscores the immense scale: Huione alone processed over $103 billion in cryptocurrency payments and facilitated over $31 billion through its escrow market before its downfall, linking it to Cambodia's notorious Prince Group. Since its collapse, competitors have seen explosive growth. For example, the XinBi platform has accumulated over $1.6 billion in total USDT revenue, while platforms like NewPay, OkPay (under Dali), and FullyLight Wallet collectively processed over $4.8 billion in USDT in a single year. This ecosystem thrives in regions like Cambodia and Myanmar, where regulatory gaps allow these platforms to act as critical financial infrastructure for sprawling cybercrime industries, from scam compounds to online casinos. The article concludes that the moniker "Southeast Asian Alipay" is a misnomer, obscuring the platforms' fundamental role in enabling serious criminal enterprises rather than representing legitimate financial innovation.

Odaily星球日报Hace 1 hora(s)

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Odaily星球日报Hace 1 hora(s)

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Title: The Shifting Landscape of Crypto Venture Capital The era of dedicated crypto venture capital funds is undergoing a significant transformation. Once essential for navigating the sector's complexity and high risk, these specialized funds are now facing an identity crisis as the market matures. This shift mirrors historical patterns in other specialized investment classes like cleantech and SPACs, where initial information advantages dissipate as technologies become mainstream and integrated into existing industry frameworks. The article argues that crypto is reaching a critical inflection point, transitioning from a "building phase" to an "integration phase." Major players like Stripe, BlackRock, and Visa now engage with crypto not for its novel mechanics but as a foundational financial infrastructure. Their needs—regulatory compliance, banking partnerships, distribution channels—align with traditional fintech, a domain easily understood by large, generalist funds like Sequoia and Founders Fund. This evolution creates a "barbell effect" within the VC landscape. On one end are massive, diversified platforms that can incorporate crypto as one vertical among many. On the other are small, nimble funds focused on niche, experimental projects. The middle ground—medium-sized dedicated crypto funds—is being squeezed out. Their typical fund size makes it impossible to generate sufficient returns solely from early-stage crypto bets, yet they cannot compete with giants for later-stage deals. Consequently, leading crypto-native firms like Paradigm and Framework Ventures are expanding into AI, robotics, and other sectors, driven partly by LP pressure for better returns amid a broader VC DPI crisis. Others, like Dragonfly and a16z, have narrowed their crypto focus predominantly to financial infrastructure like stablecoins, reframing the sector's core narrative. For crypto entrepreneurs, this consolidation presents challenges. While generalist funds offer larger checks and broader resources, crypto projects now compete fiercely with AI for attention and capital within these firms. Furthermore, the long-term, non-commercial foundational work that built the ecosystem—funded by dedicated crypto VCs—is less likely to attract generalist capital focused on direct returns. The conclusion is that "crypto investor" as a standalone category is becoming obsolete, akin to "internet investor." Crypto is becoming a baseline infrastructure layer. The future will see a barbell structure: large-scale growth financing handled by generalist funds, while pioneering, speculative projects are funded by small, specialized vehicles. The dedicated crypto funds of the 2017-2021 boom, which incubated core infrastructure, are giving way to this new, bifurcated reality.

Foresight NewsHace 1 hora(s)

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Foresight NewsHace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片