Mysticism Takes Over Crypto: When Candlestick Charts Give Way to Bazi and Feng Shui

比推Publicado a 2025-12-25Actualizado a 2025-12-25

Resumen

In the crypto world, traditional technical analysis is increasingly being overshadowed by metaphysical practices like astrology and feng shui. The author describes encountering well-known crypto figures—KOLs, traders, and VCs—praying at temples for wealth, highlighting a cultural shift where beliefs in destiny and supernatural forces are becoming mainstream. Some investors and funds now prioritize checking founders' facial fortunes or project name compatibility over conventional due diligence. Anecdotes include a listed company CEO who reportedly earned hundreds of millions by following feng shui advice, while others suffered losses after ignoring such guidance. The trend is framed not as mere superstition but as a psychological response to extreme market volatility and uncertainty. In an environment where tweets from influencers or politicians can trigger 50% price swings, metaphysical practices serve as emotional anchors—much like ocean-faring cultures relying on divine protection during unpredictable voyages. Ultimately, when rationality reaches its limits, belief fills the void.

Author: Xiaobing, Deep Tide TechFlow

Original Title: Satoshi Nakamoto Would Have to Kowtow to the God of Wealth


Every year on the fifth day of the Lunar New Year, Xiaobing wakes up early to go to the Number One Temple of Wealth at Beigao Peak in Hangzhou.

I thought I would be jostling with aunties and uncles, but when I arrived, the scene was filled with familiar faces amidst the swirling incense smoke.

On the left was a well-known爆料KOL, on the right was someone involved in community schemes, and a few tech elites who usually preach "decentralization" were devoutly kowtowing with loud thuds. In that moment, algorithmic consensus and Federal Reserve movements were no match for the three sticks of incense in their hands.

Over the past two years, mysticism has become the "prominent study" in the crypto world. If you're still looking at candlestick charts, you're a classical rookie. The real veterans are now reading Bazi (Eight Characters).

A crypto trader familiar with various macroeconomic indicators eventually turned to mysticism, recently calculating BTC's Bazi—and the outlook is grim: fire clashes with the wealth repository, making 2026 (Bing Wu Year) Bitcoin's darkest hour. I quickly checked my wallet; luckily, it was already empty.

Remember, Alen, a partner at crypto VC y2z Ventures, once stated bluntly that one of their fund's core competencies was "reading faces." In the past, due diligence (DD) involved code audits and business models. Now, it's different: first, check if the founder has a "wealth-losing face," then see if the project's name clashes with Feng Shui.

During a recent trip to Shenzhen, I noticed that traders and KOLs' standard setup isn't data terminals; they all have a "Feng Shui consultant" behind them.

Don't laugh—this approach really works in crypto. Xiaobing knows a boss of a Hong Kong-listed company who is a devout believer in Feng Shui, donating real money to temples—possibly more than the company's R&D budget.

And the result? Feng Shui brought help from noble patrons. Starting in 2023, he bought Bitcoin, earning hundreds of millions of dollars by hoarding it. Later, he caught the wave of the DAT (Crypto Treasury Reserve) narrative, and the company's stock price doubled... Although everyone knows this is "survivorship bias," you can't argue with the fact that he really made a fortune.

There are counterexamples too. A爆料KOL with a frog avatar also had a Feng Shui consultant who advised him not to make moves recently. He couldn't resist and played with contracts, resulting in a neat and tidy liquidation.

About this phenomenon, it's not entirely superstition.

Our traditional land-based civilization emphasizes farming—"sow one grain in spring, reap ten thousand in autumn"—focusing on certainty. But what does maritime civilization face? Storms and unknown waters.

Why do people in the southeastern coastal areas worship Mazu? Not because of ignorance, but because on the vast ocean, besides experience and technology, you need something else.

The crypto world is essentially a modern version of the "Age of Exploration." It faces bottomless seas and sudden storms. This is human nature: the greater the randomness and volatility, the more we seek supernatural spiritual anchors.

When candlestick charts fail, and a single tweet from Musk, Trump, or CZ can sway the market, Feng Shui becomes the last psychological defense. This isn't ignorance; it's an instinctive stress response to massive wealth fluctuations.

After all, when your assets can swing 50% in a day, you need to believe in something to sleep at night. As for whether the God of Wealth understands blockchain, does it really matter?


Twitter:https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

Bitpush TG Discussion Group:https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

Bitpush TG Subscription: https://t.me/bitpush

Original Link:https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7598323

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the main theme of the article '玄学接管币圈:当K线图让位于八字与风水'?

AThe article discusses how metaphysical practices like astrology, fortune-telling, and feng shui are becoming increasingly influential in the cryptocurrency circle, replacing traditional methods like analyzing K-line charts for investment guidance.

QAccording to the article, what did the crypto VC y2z Ventures partner claim as one of their core competencies?

AAlen, a partner at y2z Ventures, stated that one of their fund's core competencies is 'reading facial features' (面相) to evaluate founders and projects, rather than relying solely on technical or business due diligence.

QWhy does the article compare the cryptocurrency market to the 'Age of Exploration'?

AThe article compares the crypto market to the Age of Exploration because both involve navigating high uncertainty and volatility, similar to sailors facing unpredictable storms at sea, leading people to seek supernatural or spiritual anchors for psychological comfort.

QWhat example does the article provide to show the effectiveness of feng shui in crypto investments?

AThe article cites a Hong Kong-listed company老板 who heavily donated to temples and followed feng shui practices, which allegedly helped him earn hundreds of millions by buying Bitcoin in 2023 and benefiting from market trends, though it acknowledges this could be survivorship bias.

QHow does the article explain the shift from traditional analysis to玄学in crypto trading?

AThe article attributes the shift to the extreme randomness and influence of factors like tweets from figures such as Elon Musk or Donald Trump, which make traditional charts unreliable, leading traders to adopt玄学as a psychological defense mechanism against high volatility.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Agent Race Ends, Super Workbench Takes Over

The era of fragmented AI agents is ending. Over the past month, China's tech giants—Tencent, Alibaba, and ByteDance—have simultaneously shifted strategy: instead of launching new, standalone AI agents, they are consolidating their various agent projects into unified "super workbenches." Tencent integrated its QClaw teams into WorkBuddy, a strategic product hailed as a potential third flagship after QQ and WeChat. Alibaba is merging its QoderWork, Wukong, and MuleRun agents into a new "Qianwen Office" platform under DingTalk's leadership. ByteDance rebranded its TRAE SOLO coding agent to TRAE Work, signaling a broader focus on workflow collaboration. This convergence marks a pivotal industry consensus. The initial exploration phase, where companies rapidly built numerous overlapping agents for different scenarios, proved costly and inefficient. With open-source tools eroding technical barriers, competition has shifted from agent creation to resource consolidation and cost control. Historically, platform wars are won not by creating more products, but by simplifying them—as seen with browsers unifying web access and super-apps consolidating services. Now, the "super workbench" aims to become the unified AI entry point for work. This reflects a deeper market realization: the primary audience for AI is no longer just programmers (a market in the tens of millions) but all knowledge workers (a market of billions). The real opportunity lies in augmenting everyday tasks—managing emails, documents, data, and meetings—across the entire workday. The core battleground is becoming control over the primary AI entry point that employees use daily. Tencent's WorkBuddy leverages WeChat and Tencent Docs; Alibaba's Qianwen Office taps into DingTalk's organizational data; ByteDance's TRAE Work integrates with Feishu's workflows. Whoever owns this "super workbench" gains strategic control over orchestrating enterprise data and APIs. This shift is redefining enterprise software. Traditional SaaS applications, valued for their user interfaces, will recede into the background. Their core functionalities will be exposed as standardized "Skills" or APIs for the super workbench's agents to invoke. Software value will shift from selling user seats to charging based on API calls and outcomes delivered. The evolution of agents is moving through clear stages: first as novel standalone products, then as consolidated primary work entry points, and finally as pervasive, invisible capabilities embedded into the digital fabric. The recent moves by major tech firms signal the transition from the first stage into the second, accelerating toward the third. In the end, the most successful agent technology may become invisible—like electricity or the HTTP protocol—a fundamental, unnamed infrastructure powering work itself.

marsbitHace 14 min(s)

Agent Race Ends, Super Workbench Takes Over

marsbitHace 14 min(s)

Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110

Michael Saylor presents 110 arguments against Bitcoin Improvement Proposal (BIP) 110, a soft fork aimed at restricting certain non-monetary data storage uses (like inscriptions) on the Bitcoin blockchain. He acknowledges the proponents' valid concerns—such as node costs, fee pressure, and preserving Bitcoin's monetary focus—but fundamentally disagrees with the proposed solution. Saylor argues that BIP 110 represents a dangerous precedent of using consensus rules to enforce value judgments on transaction validity, moving away from Bitcoin's core principles of neutrality and permissionless innovation. His key objections are organized into eleven categories: 1) It violates neutrality and hard consensus by banning currently valid transactions. 2) It fails to meet the high burden of proof required for a consensus change, lacking concrete data on the alleged crisis. 3) Its seven bundled technical restrictions are overly broad, targeting generic script functionalities and blocking future upgrade paths. 4) It sacrifices compatibility and future optionality by closing off designed upgrade hooks. 5) Its temporary rules add significant complexity (grandfathering, expiry states) without sufficient justification. 6) The economic and security impacts, particularly on miner revenue and fee markets, are uncertain and unmodeled. 7) Superior, market-based tools (fee markets, relay/mining policies) already exist to manage blockchain load. 8) It stifles innovation by creating a chilling effect for developers. 9) Its modified activation mechanism (55% threshold, forced signaling) is aggressive and risks network splits. 10) The precedent it sets—using consensus to suppress disliked but legal uses—is more dangerous than the problem it aims to solve. 11) A better path exists: improving measurements, refining resource-based policies, and allowing market forces to work. Saylor concludes that Bitcoin's strength lies in its neutral rules, open markets, and hard consensus. Changing these foundational elements to target specific use cases is an unnecessary and risky "iatrogenic" intervention. He advocates for guarding Bitcoin's neutrality rather than acting as its redeemer.

marsbitHace 29 min(s)

Michael Saylor: 110 Reasons to Oppose BIP-110

marsbitHace 29 min(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片