LUNA Countdown to Death: The "Prophetic Trade" Mystery Before the Evaporation of 40 Billion

比推Publicado a 2026-02-25Actualizado a 2026-02-25

Resumen

Summary: In February 2026, Terraform Labs' bankruptcy liquidator filed a lawsuit against quantitative trading giant Jane Street in Manhattan federal court, alleging insider trading related to the May 2022 collapse of Terra (LUNA) and UST, which erased $40 billion in value. The complaint centers on a private chat group called "Bryce's Secret," through which Jane Street allegedly obtained non-public information. Specifically, it is claimed that Jane Street was tipped off about Terraform's plan to withdraw $150 million UST from the Curve liquidity pool. Ten minutes after the withdrawal, a wallet linked to Jane Street removed $85 million UST. Additionally, as UST crashed, Jane Street reportedly offered to buy Luna at a steep discount. This case follows a separate $4 billion lawsuit against Jump Trading, which allegedly profited from earlier UST depegging events and received secret Bitcoin transfers. Jane Street dismissed the suit as a desperate money grab, arguing the collapse was ultimately caused by Terraform's fraud. The cases highlight ongoing concerns about information asymmetry and insider advantages in crypto markets, despite their decentralized ethos.

Written by: Universe Wave Naruto, Deep Tide TechFlow

Original Title: The Truth Behind LUNA's Collapse? Someone Predicted the Evaporation of 40 Billion Dollars 10 Minutes Early


In May 2022, 40 billion dollars evaporated within 72 hours.

It was the most devastating collapse in crypto history. UST, once hailed as the "crown jewel of algorithmic stablecoins," plummeted from 1 dollar to worthless in just a few days; Luna, once with a market cap nearing 40 billion dollars, fell from its high of 116 dollars to nearly zero.

Millions of ordinary investors lost their savings that early summer. They refreshed their screens, watching the continuously plunging K-line, unsure of what had happened or what to do.

The official explanation came quickly: flaws in the algorithmic design, Do Kwon lied, a natural market death. Most people accepted this answer, relegating that catastrophe to "another lesson in the crypto world," and moved on.

This answer held for nearly four years.

Until February 23, 2026, when Todd Snyder, the bankruptcy liquidator for Terraform Labs, filed a lawsuit in the Manhattan Federal Court. Jane Street, the world's most secretive and profitable quantitative trading giant, was thrust into the spotlight.

That question, silent for four years, finally has a new version of the answer.

Jane Street and LUNA's Secret Group Chat

To understand the weight of this accusation, one must first know who the defendant is.

To most crypto users, Jane Street might be an unfamiliar name. But on Wall Street, it is legendary—a firm that deliberately maintains a low profile yet quietly became one of the most important players in the global financial market.

Between 1999 and 2000, Tim Reynolds, Robert Granieri, Michael Jenkins—three former Susquehanna traders—alongside IBM developer Marc Gerstein, founded Jane Street in a windowless small office in New York. Starting out, they did ADR arbitrage, inconspicuous and unnoticed. But they soon set their sights on a then-niche market product: ETFs, and made it their core battleground.

This bet changed everything.

Today's Jane Street is one of the world's largest market makers, operating simultaneously in 45 countries and over 200 trading venues, holding about 24% of the primary market share for US-listed ETFs, with monthly equity trading volume reaching 2 trillion dollars. In 2024, its annual net trading revenue was 20.5 billion dollars, already on par with Bank of America and Goldman Sachs. In Q2 2025, its single-quarter net trading revenue刷新 (refreshed) to 10.1 billion dollars, with a net profit of 6.9 billion dollars, breaking the quarterly records of all major Wall Street investment banks.

3000 employees, no CEO, no traditional hierarchy, all employees compensated based on the company's overall profits. Jane Street describes itself as a "collection of puzzle solvers," while the outside world calls it an "anarchist commune"—flat, mysterious, and almost completely closed off to the media.

Its alumni list includes a familiar name: SBF (Sam Bankman-Fried) joined Jane Street in 2014 after graduating from MIT, honing his trading intuition here for three years before leaving in 2017 to establish Alameda Research and FTX. The people nurtured by this company have profoundly changed the face of the crypto world, in whatever sense.

Now, this company, known for being "low-key, precise, always on the side of information advantage," sits in the defendant's seat.

And the core of the accusation comes from a private group chat called "Bryce's Secret."

It was created by Jane Street employee Bryce Pratt. He was once an intern at Terraform, left and joined Jane Street, but his old network remained intact—both doors were open to him.

In February 2022, Pratt brought his old colleagues into this private channel, establishing an information pipeline connecting Terraform's interior with Jane Street, with the other end linked to Terraform's software engineers and business development heads. The complaint alleges that it was through this pipeline that Jane Street learned in advance about Terraform's plan to quietly withdraw funds from the Curve liquidity pool—a decision not yet announced to the public.

At 5:44 PM on May 7, 10 minutes after Terraform Labs quietly withdrew 150 million dollars in UST from the Curve 3pool, a wallet allegedly associated with Jane Street followed by pulling out 85 million dollars in UST, the largest single transaction in the pool's history.

By May 9, UST had fallen to 0.8 dollars, and signs of collapse were undeniable. At this point, Pratt messaged Do Kwon and the Terraform team via the group chat, suggesting Jane Street could consider "purchasing Luna at a significant discount."

While harvesting retail investors, they were also preparing to pick up bargains from the fire.

The defendants named in this case, besides Pratt, include Jane Street co-founder Robert Granieri—the only one of the four founders still active—and employee Michael Huang. The lawsuit cites the Commodity Exchange Act and the Securities Exchange Act, simultaneously raising charges of fraud and unjust enrichment, demanding a jury trial, and seeking compensation and disgorgement of profits.

Bloomberg, citing the core statement in the complaint, reported: Jane Street's operations allowed it to "close billions of dollars in potential risk exposure at the right moment, just hours before the collapse of the Terraform ecosystem."

Jump Trading and Deeper Darkness

The Jane Street lawsuit is not an isolated incident. Two months prior, the same liquidator, Todd Snyder, had already sued Jump Trading and its co-founder William DiSomma, along with former Jump Crypto president Kanav Kariya, in an Illinois federal court, seeking 4 billion dollars in damages.

Jump's story is, in a sense, even more shocking than Jane Street's.

The complaint reveals a picture never fully pieced together before: as early as May 2021, during UST's first de-pegging crisis, Jump secretly intervened, buying approximately 20 million dollars worth of UST to stabilize the price back to 1 dollar.

Later, the public believed the packaged algorithmic stablecoin story—the algorithm worked, the system was self-healing. Terraform借此 (took advantage of this) evade regulatory scrutiny, and Jump, in exchange, received over 61 million Luna tokens at a price of 0.40 dollars per token, when the market price was around 90 dollars—a discount of over 99%. Jump later sold these tokens, with the complaint estimating profits of around 1.28 billion dollars.

During the final collapse in May 2022, Luna Foundation Guard transferred nearly 50,000 bitcoins (approx. 1.5 billion dollars) to Jump without a written agreement, nominally for market support. The final whereabouts of these bitcoins remain unconfirmed to this day. The complaint states: "It is unclear whether Jump further enriched itself through this."

Notably: DiSomma and Kariya, during previous SEC investigative inquiries, invoked the Fifth Amendment hundreds of times to refuse to answer. Jump's subsidiary Tai Mo Shan settled with the SEC in 2024 for 123 million dollars, admitting it "misled investors." Kariya himself resigned as president of Jump Crypto the same year, citing the CFTC investigation.

More crucially, according to the Jane Street complaint, it was through Jump's information channels that Jane Street obtained some "non-public key information." The two cases are connected by an invisible thread.

But there's another half to this story.

Jane Street's response was direct: this is a "desperate lawsuit," a "transparent attempt to extract money from the company." They added that the losses of Terra and Luna investors stem from the "multi-billion dollar fraud" created by Do Kwon and Terraform management themselves, and they will vigorously fight back.

This statement is not wrong. Do Kwon pleaded guilty to fraud and was sentenced to 15 years in prison; Terraform also paid a 4.47 billion dollar fine. Luna's death spiral was destined from the mechanism's design: algorithmic stablecoins are, in essence, a system that requires continuous buy-side support and confidence maintenance. Once panic triggers, the arbitrage mechanism operates in reverse, destroying itself at an exponential rate.

But "Do Kwon is guilty" and "others are innocent" are not mutually exclusive propositions.

A building has a fatal structural flaw—that is a fact. During its collapse, whether someone took the opportunity to empty it of its most valuable items before the firefighters arrived is a separate legal and ethical question.

Another detail is worth noting. On the same day the Jane Street lawsuit was exposed, on-chain tracking researcher ZachXBT announced he would release "a major investigation into one of the crypto industry's most profitable institutions on February 26, 2026, regarding multiple employees long using internal data for insider trading." He did not name names. But the微妙 (subtle) timing made the entire crypto Twitter hold its breath in anticipation.

This story isn't over yet. But one thing is already certain: in this market that touts "decentralization," true asymmetry never disappeared; it just moved from bank trading desks to behind on-chain smart contracts, continuing to exist in a more隐蔽 (hidden) form.

The Luna incident might just be the most violent tear in that crack, and those standing on the other side of the crack had already evacuated safely long before the wall collapsed.

"The gentry's money is returned intact, the common people's money is split thirty-seventy," as in the movie, so it is in the crypto world.


Twitter:https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

Bitpush TG Discussion Group:https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

Bitpush TG Subscription: https://t.me/bitpush

Original link:https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7614333

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the core allegation against Jane Street in the Terra (LUNA) collapse lawsuit?

AThe lawsuit alleges that Jane Street used non-public information obtained through a private chat called 'Bryce's Secret' to learn about Terraform Labs' plan to secretly withdraw $150 million UST from the Curve liquidity pool. This allowed a Jane Street-associated wallet to withdraw $85 million UST just 10 minutes later, enabling them to avoid massive losses before the ecosystem's collapse.

QWho is Bryce Pratt and what role did he allegedly play in the events?

ABryce Pratt was a former Terraform Labs intern who later worked at Jane Street. He allegedly created the 'Bryce's Secret' private chat, which served as an information pipeline between Terraform insiders and Jane Street, facilitating the transfer of material non-public information.

QWhat connection does the lawsuit draw between Jane Street case and the earlier case against Jump Trading?

AThe lawsuit suggests a connection, stating that Jane Street obtained some of its 'non-public key information' through Jump Trading's information channels. This links the two cases, with Jump Trading also facing a separate $4 billion lawsuit for its alleged role in the collapse.

QHow did Jane Street respond to the allegations in the lawsuit?

AJane Street dismissed the lawsuit as a 'desperate litigation' and a 'transparent attempt to extract money from the company.' They argued that the losses were fundamentally caused by the '$10 billion fraud' manufactured by Do Kwon and Terraform Labs' management themselves.

QWhat was the alleged role of Jump Trading during UST's first depegging crisis in May 2021?

AThe lawsuit against Jump Trading alleges that during UST's first depeg in May 2021, Jump secretly intervened by buying approximately $20 million worth of UST to stabilize its price back to $1 dollar. In return, they reportedly received over 61 million Luna tokens at a massive 99%+ discount, later selling them for an estimated profit of $1.28 billion.

Lecturas Relacionadas

STAR 50 Soars 10.73%, Why Did A-Shares Stage a "V-Shaped Reversal"?

After a prolonged decline, the Chinese A-share market staged a strong rally on July 21. The STAR 50 index surged 10.73%, its largest single-day gain in nearly a year, leading a broad-based "V-shaped" reversal. The Shanghai Composite Index rose 1.79%, the Shenzhen Component Index gained 4.81%, and the ChiNext Index jumped 7.05%. Total market turnover reached 2.97 trillion yuan, an increase of 256.1 billion yuan from the previous session, with over 3,100 stocks advancing. The semiconductor sector spearheaded the rebound, with related ETFs posting significant gains. Analysts attribute the surge to three converging factors. First, coordinated capital inflows from "national team" institutions, insurance funds, listed company buybacks, and fund house self-purchases have bolstered market liquidity and confidence. Second, supportive policy signals, including commitments from regulators to ensure stable market operations, provided a favorable backdrop. Third, a stabilization and recovery in overseas markets, notably South Korea, created a positive external environment. Institutions suggest the most severe panic selling phase for the tech sector has likely passed, following a significant digestion of crowded positions and leveraged funds. While short-term volatility may persist, the medium to long-term outlook remains underpinned by enduring trends like AI computing demand expansion and semiconductor localization. The market's focus now shifts to the sustainability of supportive fund flows, earnings reports, and upcoming catalysts from the global AI industry chain.

marsbitHace 7 min(s)

STAR 50 Soars 10.73%, Why Did A-Shares Stage a "V-Shaped Reversal"?

marsbitHace 7 min(s)

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Post Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, But Is the Plunge Over?

US tech momentum stocks staged a sharp rebound on Tuesday (July 21st). Morgan Stanley's TMT Momentum Factor surged over 12%, marking its largest single-day gain on record, exceeding even peaks from the 2000 dot-com bubble. Key momentum indices from Goldman Sachs also posted their strongest daily performances in years. The rally was led by semiconductors, with the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index jumping 4.6%. This rebound followed three consecutive down days and a cumulative 33% plunge in momentum stocks, one of the steepest drawdowns since the dot-com era. Analysts attribute the surge largely to a short squeeze. Heavy selling had pushed high-beta momentum stocks into deeply oversold territory, forcing many short sellers, particularly in Asia, to cover their positions, creating a self-reinforcing buying spiral. However, the rebound's internals appear weak. Trading volume was notably low, and advancing stocks still lagged decliners on the S&P 500, indicating a narrow, concentrated rally rather than broad market participation. Diverging views emerge on the outlook. BTIG warns the bounce has hit key resistance and recommends selling into strength, citing extreme volatility and historical parallels to past market tops. Conversely, Goldman Sachs and UBS believe the momentum unwind is nearing its end, suggesting it may be time to gradually add exposure, as positioning has been significantly reduced. They caution, however, that high volatility warrants a measured approach, potentially using defined-risk strategies. The upcoming earnings season, particularly reports from major tech firms like Alphabet, is seen as a critical test for the rally's sustainability. Simultaneously, bond markets flashed a warning, with yields rising partly due to spiking oil prices. Analysts note that if long-term Treasury yields break decisively higher, it could pose a significant headwind for equities, especially growth stocks.

marsbitHace 15 min(s)

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Post Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, But Is the Plunge Over?

marsbitHace 15 min(s)

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Record Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, but Has the Rout Ended?

U.S. tech momentum stocks staged a dramatic rebound on Tuesday, July 21st. Key momentum indices like the Morgan Stanley TMT Momentum Factor and Goldman Sachs' High Beta Momentum Long Index posted historic or near-historic single-day gains, fueled largely by semiconductor stocks. This sharp rally followed a severe three-day sell-off that saw momentum stocks plunge 33%, marking one of the steepest pullbacks since the dot-com bubble. Analysts attribute the bounce primarily to a short squeeze, as forced covering from over-leveraged traders, particularly in Asia, created a buying spiral. However, the rally's health is questioned due to weak market breadth—overall trading volume was low, and decliners outnumbered advancers in the S&P 500 despite the index's gain—suggesting a narrow, concentrated surge rather than broad recovery. Opinions on the sustainability diverge. BTIG strategists warn the rebound has hit key resistance levels, citing extreme volatility and historic stock dispersion as signs of an ongoing broader correction, and recommend selling into strength. Conversely, Goldman Sachs and UBS view the aggressive momentum unwinding as nearing its end, noting reduced positioning and a lack of new fundamental catalysts. They suggest the sell-off presents a selective opportunity to add exposure, albeit cautiously and gradually using defined-risk strategies. The immediate trajectory hinges on the ongoing earnings season, with market focus on Alphabet's capital expenditure guidance for AI investment clarity. Meanwhile, bond markets present a risk, with rising Treasury yields—potentially heading toward 5.5%—and widening credit spreads for mega-cap tech companies posing a threat to equity valuations. The combination of technical factors, earnings results, and macro conditions leaves the durability of the rebound in doubt.

链捕手Hace 17 min(s)

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Record Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, but Has the Rout Ended?

链捕手Hace 17 min(s)

Long-Divided Must Unite, Long-United Must Divide: When L1 Becomes Its Own Rollup, What Is Ethereum's Endgame?

"The Inevitable Cycle: When L1 Becomes Its Own Rollup – What is Ethereum's Endgame?" For years, the Ethereum community grappled with concerns that L2s were fragmenting the ecosystem and eroding L1's value. While L2s provided cheaper execution, they also splintered liquidity and the unified user experience of a single chain. This has prompted a fundamental reassessment of the relationship between L1 and L2. Ethereum's roadmap is evolving. The "Scale" initiative merges L1 and L2 expansion into a holistic framework. L1 itself is advancing with higher gas limits, statelessness, and zkEVM verification, no longer content to be just a low-throughput settlement layer. Consequently, the primary value proposition of L2s is shifting from merely providing cheap blockspace to offering L1 cannot easily provide: application-specific optimizations, privacy features, and flexible governance models. L2s are becoming a spectrum of execution environments with varying degrees of security inheritance from Ethereum. A critical challenge in this multi-chain future is interoperability. The vision is to make Ethereum "feel like one chain again." This relies on advancements in native account abstraction (like EIP-7702) and intent-based architectures (Open Intents Framework), where users declare desired outcomes, and solvers handle the complex cross-chain execution. Furthermore, shortening Ethereum's finality time from minutes to seconds is crucial, as it underpins trust between chains for bridges, stablecoins, and cross-chain applications. Perhaps the most provocative idea is that Ethereum L1 itself could become a form of "its own Rollup." As zkEVM and proof systems mature, high-performance nodes could execute transactions and generate validity proofs. Regular validators would then verify these proofs instead of re-executing all transactions. This blurs the traditional L1/L2 hierarchy, making "Rollup" more of a general execution-verification architecture. Native Rollup aims to integrate L2 validation more directly into the Ethereum protocol, allowing L2s to inherit L1's security more fully and move away from reliance on security councils. In the end, L2s are not destined to replace L1 or be made obsolete by it. The likely future is a unified system where diverse execution environments—each optimized for specific use cases like DeFi, gaming, or privacy—coexist. They will share a common foundation of security, liquidity, and verifiable state, seamlessly connected to restore a cohesive user experience. The next phase for Ethereum is not just about scaling through separation, but about intelligently reintegrating what was separated back into a coherent whole.

链捕手Hace 33 min(s)

Long-Divided Must Unite, Long-United Must Divide: When L1 Becomes Its Own Rollup, What Is Ethereum's Endgame?

链捕手Hace 33 min(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片