How Does Backpack's Staking Token for Equity Conversion Work?

Odaily星球日报Publicado a 2026-02-25Actualizado a 2026-02-25

Resumen

Backpack, a Solana-based wallet and exchange platform founded by ex-FTX members, has announced a novel staking-to-equity conversion plan. Users who stake its native token for at least one year can convert those tokens into real company equity at a fixed ratio, with 20% of equity reserved for this program. This move aims to transition users from token holders to legal company owners. The platform emerged post-FTX collapse, initially focusing on wallet and NFT services (like the Mad Lads NFT collection) before launching its exchange. It has over $4000B in cumulative trading volume and $350M in user assets. Backpack’s tokenomics include a 1B total supply, with 62.5% pre-IPO allocation. The TGE releases 250M tokens (25% of total), entirely distributed to users. The model ties token release to milestones and future IPO, blending crypto incentives with traditional equity. However, the plan faces regulatory challenges, particularly from the SEC, which may classify the token as a security. Dual ownership via tokens and equity could complicate IPO efforts and investor relations. Despite risks, Backpack’s approach attempts to innovate beyond typical “token-as-reward” models by linking crypto community growth to real equity value and long-term ownership.

Original | Odaily Planet Daily (@OdailyChina)

Author | Ding Dang (@XiaMiPP)

On February 24, Backpack CEO Armani Ferrante announced a staking-for-equity conversion plan, where users who stake the platform's native token for at least one year will have the opportunity to convert these tokens into real company equity at a fixed ratio. The company has reserved 20% of its equity for this plan.

From this short statement, the amount of information released far exceeds that of a conventional TGE narrative.

Because, in the traditional TGE narrative, users are seen as traffic and community token holders; but in this design, Backpack attempts to upgrade users from product users to legal company owners.

The question is: Can it really work? Is this a financial innovation, or a high-risk experiment dancing on the edge of regulation? Does it change the power structure, or is it just a more advanced chip management technique? To understand this, we must return to Backpack's own historical trajectory.

Backpack: A Company Rising from the Ruins

Backpack is a "wallet + exchange" integrated platform centered on the Solana ecosystem, founded by former FTX and Alameda Research member Armani Ferrante. It was established after the collapse of FTX, emphasizing compliance and user custody.

However, unlike the development path of "first trading, then ecosystem" followed by centralized exchanges like Binance, Backpack's path is the reverse. It started with a wallet and NFTs, gradually accumulating users, community, and technical foundation, and finally launched an exchange.

Looking back at Backpack's history. In 2022, the collapse of FTX not only tore apart the credit structure of the entire crypto industry but also directly hit projects associated with it. Backpack had just completed a $20 million funding round led by FTX Ventures and Jump Crypto before FTX's collapse. But as the empire fell, approximately 80% of Backpack's operating capital evaporated. At that time, Backpack was positioned as a "wallet + xNFT operating system," aiming to provide Solana users with a safer, integrated entry point, avoiding reliance on centralized platforms.

In April 2023, during the bear market trough, Backpack quietly launched the Mad Lads NFT series, with a minting cost of 6.9 SOL. It quickly became one of the top NFT communities on Solana that year, with the highest floor price reaching 229.4 SOL. Today, when the NFT trend has largely passed, the Mad Lads floor price remains at 18.8 SOL, more than double the original minting price.

In November of the same year, Backpack obtained a Dubai VARA license and launched Backpack Exchange, but it was only in a testing phase at the time. By then, it had already accumulated user trust through its wallet and NFT, and then monetized the traffic through the exchange. In February 2024, Backpack completed a $17 million Series A funding round, with a valuation of $120 million. In January 2025, it acquired FTX Europe's assets for $32.7 million, obtaining a European MiFID II license, further strengthening its compliance foundation, and committing to handle FTX EU customer claims.

Backpack was born with a silver spoon but also rebuilt from the ruins. After nearly three years, Backpack's cumulative trading volume has exceeded $400 billion, with user assets exceeding $350 million.

Now, it is about to make a bigger leap.

Token Issuance Plan and Equity Linkage

On February 17, Backpack announced the start of identity verification before TGE, the first step for users to claim tokens.

In the token economic model announced by Backpack, the total token supply is 1 billion. The pre-IPO total supply is 625 million tokens (62.5%), released in three phases:

  • Phase 1 (TGE): Releases 25% of the total supply, i.e., 250 million tokens. Among them, 240 million (24%) are allocated to points holders, and 10 million (1%) are allocated to Mad Lads holders. This phase is 100% allocated to users, with no internal team share.
  • Phase 2 (Pre-IPO): Accounts for 37.5%, i.e., 375 million tokens, as "growth-triggered unlocks," released gradually based on key milestones (such as regulatory approval, new product launches, and geographic expansion).
  • Phase 3 (Post-IPO): Also accounts for 37.5%, i.e., 375 million tokens, deposited into company treasury, locked for one year after IPO, for the team and investors.

From its token distribution plan, we can already see that token issuance is closely tied to the IPO. Backpack is currently negotiating terms for a new $50 million funding round with a valuation of $1 billion. If calculated based on this valuation, the 20% equity is worth $200 million.

In the short history of the cryptocurrency industry, token issuance has quietly evolved from an optional financing tool to an almost "instinctive choice" and default path for almost all projects. As users, we are familiar with this method, but this goes beyond what we are familiar with.

From the perspective of the entire industry, this play fills a gap. Coinbase successfully IPOed in 2021 but never issued a native token; DeFi projects like Uniswap issued governance tokens but did not take the equity listing route. Backpack is trying a "dual-track system," where tokens are used for community incentives and equity for long-term ownership, but there is no precedent for this in the crypto industry.

Is Token Issuance + IPO Feasible?

Although this plan is bold and innovative, it faces regulatory challenges.

In the context of U.S. regulation, most tokens could be considered securities by the SEC. Once that happens, companies must comply with registration, disclosure, and anti-fraud rules. If an IPO is pursued in the future, the SEC will review the history of token issuance, structural design, and potential violation records.

More complex is that the coexistence of equity and tokens may trigger "ownership conflicts": IPO investors worry about dilution of rights (such as voting rights, dividends), while token holders expect value capture, which could be seen as "dual financing" or misleading behavior. Especially during the Gensler era from 2022 to 2024, enforcement tightened, and many projects directly abandoned IPOs.

In short, token issuance takes the fast lane of "decentralized/on-chain financing," while IPO takes the slow lane of "centralized compliance/equity financing." Backpack is trying to drive two cars at the same time, which requires extremely strong structural design and regulatory communication capabilities; otherwise, it may face listing delays or regulatory fines.

Although there is no complete precedent in the crypto industry, there are precedents. Coinbase, also a centralized exchange, completed its IPO in 2021, but they had actually considered issuing a token. Backpack co-founder Can Sun revealed in a podcast two years ago that he participated in Coinbase's listing work and helped design their token economic model. Although Coinbase ultimately chose a pure equity listing, this experience provided valuable reference for Backpack. And at that time, he had already planned to realize this unfulfilled wish at Backpack.

Can It Change the Industry?

Today, the现状 of the crypto industry is that a large number of tokens shrink by more than 80% in price one year after listing. "Listing is the peak" has almost become a curse. Backpack seems to be looking for another path: giving tokens the possibility of leading to equity, promoting a change in incentive methods.

In the past, the model we were familiar with was "earning tokens with products," where the project first creates a good product, and users earn token rewards by using it, such as fee sharing, liquidity mining, airdrops, etc. The token's value comes from the product's actual performance. Backpack's method is more like using token expectations to feed back into the company's valuation, i.e., equity binding, IPO narrative, using the expected value of tokens to quickly gather funds, community, and attention, thereby raising the company's valuation and accelerating financing and product iteration. Tokens are no longer just reward tools but valuation engines.

Of course, this transformation is full of uncertainty. How will regulation define it? How to balance rights between equity and tokens? Will the market really buy into the narrative of future shareholders? There are no ready-made answers to these questions. But in a pessimistic moment for the crypto industry, Backpack is at least trying to provide a new tension.

Backpack once rebuilt from the ruins; this time, it is building a bridge in the cracks of the system.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the key requirement for Backpack users to convert their staked tokens into equity?

AUsers must stake Backpack's native tokens for at least one year to be eligible for conversion into company equity at a fixed ratio.

QHow much of Backpack's equity has been reserved for the token-to-equity conversion plan?

ABackpack has reserved 20% of the company's equity for this token-to-equity conversion initiative.

QWhat distinguishes Backpack's development path from traditional centralized exchanges like Binance?

AUnlike Binance's 'trading first, ecosystem later' approach, Backpack started with a wallet and NFT ecosystem (Mad Lads) to build user trust and community before launching its exchange.

QWhat major regulatory challenge does Backpack face with its dual-token and equity model?

AThe primary regulatory challenge is the potential classification of tokens as securities by the SEC, which would require compliance with registration, disclosure, and anti-fraud rules, and could complicate IPO plans due to ownership conflicts and dual financing concerns.

QHow does Backpack's tokenomics model link token distribution to its IPO plans?

ABackpack's token distribution is structured in three phases: TGE (25% to users), pre-IPO (37.5% unlocked via milestones), and post-IPO (37.5% reserved for team/investors), directly tying token releases to IPO progression and company growth triggers.

Lecturas Relacionadas

STAR 50 Soars 10.73%, Why Did A-Shares Stage a "V-Shaped Reversal"?

After a prolonged decline, the Chinese A-share market staged a strong rally on July 21. The STAR 50 index surged 10.73%, its largest single-day gain in nearly a year, leading a broad-based "V-shaped" reversal. The Shanghai Composite Index rose 1.79%, the Shenzhen Component Index gained 4.81%, and the ChiNext Index jumped 7.05%. Total market turnover reached 2.97 trillion yuan, an increase of 256.1 billion yuan from the previous session, with over 3,100 stocks advancing. The semiconductor sector spearheaded the rebound, with related ETFs posting significant gains. Analysts attribute the surge to three converging factors. First, coordinated capital inflows from "national team" institutions, insurance funds, listed company buybacks, and fund house self-purchases have bolstered market liquidity and confidence. Second, supportive policy signals, including commitments from regulators to ensure stable market operations, provided a favorable backdrop. Third, a stabilization and recovery in overseas markets, notably South Korea, created a positive external environment. Institutions suggest the most severe panic selling phase for the tech sector has likely passed, following a significant digestion of crowded positions and leveraged funds. While short-term volatility may persist, the medium to long-term outlook remains underpinned by enduring trends like AI computing demand expansion and semiconductor localization. The market's focus now shifts to the sustainability of supportive fund flows, earnings reports, and upcoming catalysts from the global AI industry chain.

marsbitHace 23 min(s)

STAR 50 Soars 10.73%, Why Did A-Shares Stage a "V-Shaped Reversal"?

marsbitHace 23 min(s)

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Post Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, But Is the Plunge Over?

US tech momentum stocks staged a sharp rebound on Tuesday (July 21st). Morgan Stanley's TMT Momentum Factor surged over 12%, marking its largest single-day gain on record, exceeding even peaks from the 2000 dot-com bubble. Key momentum indices from Goldman Sachs also posted their strongest daily performances in years. The rally was led by semiconductors, with the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index jumping 4.6%. This rebound followed three consecutive down days and a cumulative 33% plunge in momentum stocks, one of the steepest drawdowns since the dot-com era. Analysts attribute the surge largely to a short squeeze. Heavy selling had pushed high-beta momentum stocks into deeply oversold territory, forcing many short sellers, particularly in Asia, to cover their positions, creating a self-reinforcing buying spiral. However, the rebound's internals appear weak. Trading volume was notably low, and advancing stocks still lagged decliners on the S&P 500, indicating a narrow, concentrated rally rather than broad market participation. Diverging views emerge on the outlook. BTIG warns the bounce has hit key resistance and recommends selling into strength, citing extreme volatility and historical parallels to past market tops. Conversely, Goldman Sachs and UBS believe the momentum unwind is nearing its end, suggesting it may be time to gradually add exposure, as positioning has been significantly reduced. They caution, however, that high volatility warrants a measured approach, potentially using defined-risk strategies. The upcoming earnings season, particularly reports from major tech firms like Alphabet, is seen as a critical test for the rally's sustainability. Simultaneously, bond markets flashed a warning, with yields rising partly due to spiking oil prices. Analysts note that if long-term Treasury yields break decisively higher, it could pose a significant headwind for equities, especially growth stocks.

marsbitHace 30 min(s)

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Post Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, But Is the Plunge Over?

marsbitHace 30 min(s)

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Record Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, but Has the Rout Ended?

U.S. tech momentum stocks staged a dramatic rebound on Tuesday, July 21st. Key momentum indices like the Morgan Stanley TMT Momentum Factor and Goldman Sachs' High Beta Momentum Long Index posted historic or near-historic single-day gains, fueled largely by semiconductor stocks. This sharp rally followed a severe three-day sell-off that saw momentum stocks plunge 33%, marking one of the steepest pullbacks since the dot-com bubble. Analysts attribute the bounce primarily to a short squeeze, as forced covering from over-leveraged traders, particularly in Asia, created a buying spiral. However, the rally's health is questioned due to weak market breadth—overall trading volume was low, and decliners outnumbered advancers in the S&P 500 despite the index's gain—suggesting a narrow, concentrated surge rather than broad recovery. Opinions on the sustainability diverge. BTIG strategists warn the rebound has hit key resistance levels, citing extreme volatility and historic stock dispersion as signs of an ongoing broader correction, and recommend selling into strength. Conversely, Goldman Sachs and UBS view the aggressive momentum unwinding as nearing its end, noting reduced positioning and a lack of new fundamental catalysts. They suggest the sell-off presents a selective opportunity to add exposure, albeit cautiously and gradually using defined-risk strategies. The immediate trajectory hinges on the ongoing earnings season, with market focus on Alphabet's capital expenditure guidance for AI investment clarity. Meanwhile, bond markets present a risk, with rising Treasury yields—potentially heading toward 5.5%—and widening credit spreads for mega-cap tech companies posing a threat to equity valuations. The combination of technical factors, earnings results, and macro conditions leaves the durability of the rebound in doubt.

链捕手Hace 33 min(s)

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Record Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, but Has the Rout Ended?

链捕手Hace 33 min(s)

Long-Divided Must Unite, Long-United Must Divide: When L1 Becomes Its Own Rollup, What Is Ethereum's Endgame?

"The Inevitable Cycle: When L1 Becomes Its Own Rollup – What is Ethereum's Endgame?" For years, the Ethereum community grappled with concerns that L2s were fragmenting the ecosystem and eroding L1's value. While L2s provided cheaper execution, they also splintered liquidity and the unified user experience of a single chain. This has prompted a fundamental reassessment of the relationship between L1 and L2. Ethereum's roadmap is evolving. The "Scale" initiative merges L1 and L2 expansion into a holistic framework. L1 itself is advancing with higher gas limits, statelessness, and zkEVM verification, no longer content to be just a low-throughput settlement layer. Consequently, the primary value proposition of L2s is shifting from merely providing cheap blockspace to offering L1 cannot easily provide: application-specific optimizations, privacy features, and flexible governance models. L2s are becoming a spectrum of execution environments with varying degrees of security inheritance from Ethereum. A critical challenge in this multi-chain future is interoperability. The vision is to make Ethereum "feel like one chain again." This relies on advancements in native account abstraction (like EIP-7702) and intent-based architectures (Open Intents Framework), where users declare desired outcomes, and solvers handle the complex cross-chain execution. Furthermore, shortening Ethereum's finality time from minutes to seconds is crucial, as it underpins trust between chains for bridges, stablecoins, and cross-chain applications. Perhaps the most provocative idea is that Ethereum L1 itself could become a form of "its own Rollup." As zkEVM and proof systems mature, high-performance nodes could execute transactions and generate validity proofs. Regular validators would then verify these proofs instead of re-executing all transactions. This blurs the traditional L1/L2 hierarchy, making "Rollup" more of a general execution-verification architecture. Native Rollup aims to integrate L2 validation more directly into the Ethereum protocol, allowing L2s to inherit L1's security more fully and move away from reliance on security councils. In the end, L2s are not destined to replace L1 or be made obsolete by it. The likely future is a unified system where diverse execution environments—each optimized for specific use cases like DeFi, gaming, or privacy—coexist. They will share a common foundation of security, liquidity, and verifiable state, seamlessly connected to restore a cohesive user experience. The next phase for Ethereum is not just about scaling through separation, but about intelligently reintegrating what was separated back into a coherent whole.

链捕手Hace 49 min(s)

Long-Divided Must Unite, Long-United Must Divide: When L1 Becomes Its Own Rollup, What Is Ethereum's Endgame?

链捕手Hace 49 min(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片