Circle CEO's Seoul Visit: No Korean Won Stablecoin Issuance, But Met All Major Korean Banks

marsbitPublicado a 2026-04-23Actualizado a 2026-04-23

Resumen

Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire's recent activities in Seoul indicate a strategic shift for the company, moving away from issuing a Korean won-backed stablecoin and instead focusing on embedding itself as a key infrastructure provider within Korea’s financial and crypto ecosystem. Despite Korea accounting for nearly 30% of global crypto trading volume—with a market characterized by high retail participation and altcoin dominance—Circle has chosen not to compete for the role of stablecoin issuer. Instead, Allaire met with major Korean banks (including Shinhan, KB, and Woori), financial groups, leading exchanges (Upbit, Bithumb, Coinone), and tech firms like Kakao. This approach reflects a broader industry transition: the core of stablecoin competition is shifting from issuance rights to systemic positioning. With Korean regulators still debating whether banks or tech companies should issue stablecoins, Circle is avoiding regulatory uncertainty by strengthening its role as a service and technology partner. The company is deepening integration with trading platforms, building connections, and promoting stablecoin infrastructure. This positions Circle to benefit regardless of which entity eventually issues a won stablecoin. Allaire also noted the potential for a Chinese yuan stablecoin in the next 3–5 years, underscoring a regional trend of stablecoins becoming more regulated and integrated with traditional finance. Ultimately, Circle’s strategy highlights that future influence in ...

Discussions around stablecoins have long focused on one question: who will issue the next dominant stablecoin.

However, a series of recent actions by stablecoin issuer Circle in Korea are diminishing the significance of this question itself. (Related reading: On the Eve of Korean Stablecoin Launch: As Regulation Thaws, Circle and Tether Send Different Signals)

In the latest statement, Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire clearly stated: there are no immediate plans to launch a Korean Won stablecoin. Simultaneously, Circle is intensively advancing in Seoul:

Deepening cooperation with the exchange ecosystem
Establishing connections with banks and financial groups
Promoting the deployment of stablecoin infrastructure

This combination of "avoiding issuance while strengthening links" essentially points to a more critical change: the core of stablecoin competition is shifting from "issuance rights" to "systemic positioning."

The Korean Market: High Activity Coexists with Low Structure

Understanding Circle's strategy requires first看清ing the structure of the Korean market. According to data from crypto data firm Kaiko:

Korea accounts for about 30% of global crypto trading volume
Altcoin trading comprises up to 85% of this
Bitcoin and Ethereum combined account for less than 15%

Behind these figures lies not just "active trading," but three deeper characteristics:

Sentiment-driven: Funds concentrate on high-volatility assets, showing significant short-term gaming features
Retail-driven: Institutional participation is novice, market depth is insufficient
Structural imbalance: Liquidity quality is lower than in mature markets (e.g., Japan)

This means Korea is not a "mature financial market," but rather a "high-traffic market that hasn't completed structural upgrades." And this is precisely the timing of Circle's entry.

Circle's Three Key Actions

Within this market structure, Circle's布局 shows a highly consistent direction.

1. Embedding into Trading Flow Entrances

Circle expanded its cooperative relationships with Dunamu (operator of Upbit) and Bithumb. The core of this is not simple business expansion, but embedding USDC and related services into Korea's core trading infrastructure. This corresponds to a key position—the entrance point for capital flow.

2. Connecting with Core Financial System Institutions

Reports indicate Allaire's meetings included: Shinhan Bank, one of Korea's largest commercial banks; KB Financial Group, a leading comprehensive financial holding group; Woori Bank, Korea's second-largest national commercial bank and the only state-owned bank; Kakao Group, the Korean instant messaging giant; Hashed, a Korean crypto venture capital firm; and Coinone, Korea's third-largest exchange.

This combination has a clear direction:

Banking system: Potential issuers
Tech platforms: User entry points
Exchanges: Liquidity cores

Its essence is to complete the connection and binding of multiple stakeholders before regulation is finalized.

3. Clearly Avoiding Issuance Rights Competition

With Korea's stablecoin path still undetermined, Circle chose not to participate in issuing a Korean Won stablecoin. This decision is not conservative, but based on a clearer judgment: issuance rights are still being contested, but infrastructure demand is already certain.

Korea's Core Contradiction: The Dispute Over Issuance Rights

The current分歧 over stablecoins in Korea centers on: some forces within the policy layer favor issuance by tech companies, while the banking system and central bank advocate for bank-led issuance.

The essence of this conflict is: are stablecoins financial instruments or internet products?

Until this question is resolved:

The issuing entity cannot be determined
Business models are difficult to solidify
The market landscape remains unstable

This is perhaps the fundamental reason why Circle chose to "bypass the issuance right."

From Issuer to Infrastructure Provider

Integrating the above actions leads to a clear conclusion: Circle is transitioning from a "stablecoin issuer" to a "stablecoin infrastructure provider."

This transformation is reflected on three levels:

Revenue structure: Shifting from issuance scale to technology and service capabilities
Risk structure: Avoiding direct exposure to regulatory uncertainty
Market adaptation: Flexibly embedding into different regulatory systems

Under this model, regardless of who ultimately issues the stablecoin, Circle can participate.

Circle's Asia Observations

After the Korea trip, Jeremy Allaire also mentioned that a Chinese Yuan (RMB) stablecoin presents a huge opportunity, and China might launch one within the next 3 to 5 years.

This statement did not address the method or participation, and is closer to a general observation on regional trends. But combined with Circle's actual actions in Korea, it can be understood as a more holistic view of Asia. From the current situation, although the paths of China and Korea differ, they show several common characteristics:

Stablecoins are entering the core agenda of regulation
Relationships with the traditional financial system are increasingly close
Participating entities are becoming more diverse

In this process, the role of stablecoins is changing: from an early crypto trading medium to a broader financial infrastructure.

Circle's布局 in Korea, along with its continued attention to the Chinese market, essentially point to the same thing: finding a position to embed within this infrastructure evolution process.

The Future Stablecoin System

Behind Circle's strategy change lies a corresponding macro trend. The future stablecoin system will likely appear as:

Coexistence of multiple sovereign currencies
Constrained by strong regulatory frameworks
Deep integration with the traditional financial system

In this landscape, issuance rights belong to nations or licensed institutions, and technology and clearing capabilities also become new competitive cores. Therefore, for institutions like Circle, their value is no longer limited to USDC itself, but lies in whether they can become the connection layer and infrastructure layer between different stablecoin systems.

Who Issues is No Longer the Core Question

While the market is still discussing: Who will issue the stablecoin? Which country will land it first?

Circle has already provided another answer through its actions: what determines the long-term position is not the issuance right, but whether one is embedded in the system.

In the future stablecoin landscape, a structure is likely to emerge:

Highly localized issuers
Highly收敛 (convergent/concentrated) regulation
Underlying capabilities provided by a few globalized institutions

In this structure: some companies will not appear on the front line, but will exist in every transaction.

*This content is for reference only and does not constitute any investment advice. The market carries risks, investment requires caution.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat was the main strategy of Circle during its recent activities in South Korea, according to the article?

ACircle's main strategy was to avoid issuing a Korean won stablecoin and instead focus on embedding itself as a stablecoin infrastructure provider by deepening cooperation with exchanges, establishing connections with banks and financial groups, and promoting the implementation of stablecoin infrastructure.

QWhat are the three key characteristics of the South Korean crypto market structure mentioned in the article?

AThe three key characteristics are: 1) Emotion-driven, with funds concentrated in high-volatility assets and significant short-term speculation; 2) Retail-driven, with low institutional participation and insufficient market depth; 3) Structural imbalance, with lower liquidity quality compared to mature markets like Japan.

QWhy did Circle choose not to participate in the competition for issuing a Korean won stablecoin?

ACircle chose not to participate because the issue of who holds the stablecoin issuance rights in South Korea is still under debate and regulatory uncertainty, with policymakers divided between tech companies and banks. Circle instead focused on the already certain demand for infrastructure.

QWhat shift in role is Circle undergoing, as indicated by its actions in South Korea?

ACircle is shifting from being a stablecoin issuer to becoming a stablecoin infrastructure provider, focusing on technology and service capabilities, avoiding direct regulatory risks, and flexibly embedding itself into different regulatory systems.

QWhat did Jeremy Allaire suggest about the future of the Chinese Yuan stablecoin, and how does it relate to Circle's overall strategy?

AJeremy Allaire suggested that there is a huge opportunity for a Chinese Yuan stablecoin and that China might launch one within the next 3 to 5 years. This aligns with Circle's broader Asian strategy of observing regional trends and seeking to embed itself as infrastructure in the evolution of stablecoin systems, regardless of the specific issuance path taken by different countries.

Lecturas Relacionadas

STAR 50 Soars 10.73%, Why Did A-Shares Stage a "V-Shaped Reversal"?

After a prolonged decline, the Chinese A-share market staged a strong rally on July 21. The STAR 50 index surged 10.73%, its largest single-day gain in nearly a year, leading a broad-based "V-shaped" reversal. The Shanghai Composite Index rose 1.79%, the Shenzhen Component Index gained 4.81%, and the ChiNext Index jumped 7.05%. Total market turnover reached 2.97 trillion yuan, an increase of 256.1 billion yuan from the previous session, with over 3,100 stocks advancing. The semiconductor sector spearheaded the rebound, with related ETFs posting significant gains. Analysts attribute the surge to three converging factors. First, coordinated capital inflows from "national team" institutions, insurance funds, listed company buybacks, and fund house self-purchases have bolstered market liquidity and confidence. Second, supportive policy signals, including commitments from regulators to ensure stable market operations, provided a favorable backdrop. Third, a stabilization and recovery in overseas markets, notably South Korea, created a positive external environment. Institutions suggest the most severe panic selling phase for the tech sector has likely passed, following a significant digestion of crowded positions and leveraged funds. While short-term volatility may persist, the medium to long-term outlook remains underpinned by enduring trends like AI computing demand expansion and semiconductor localization. The market's focus now shifts to the sustainability of supportive fund flows, earnings reports, and upcoming catalysts from the global AI industry chain.

marsbitHace 17 min(s)

STAR 50 Soars 10.73%, Why Did A-Shares Stage a "V-Shaped Reversal"?

marsbitHace 17 min(s)

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Post Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, But Is the Plunge Over?

US tech momentum stocks staged a sharp rebound on Tuesday (July 21st). Morgan Stanley's TMT Momentum Factor surged over 12%, marking its largest single-day gain on record, exceeding even peaks from the 2000 dot-com bubble. Key momentum indices from Goldman Sachs also posted their strongest daily performances in years. The rally was led by semiconductors, with the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index jumping 4.6%. This rebound followed three consecutive down days and a cumulative 33% plunge in momentum stocks, one of the steepest drawdowns since the dot-com era. Analysts attribute the surge largely to a short squeeze. Heavy selling had pushed high-beta momentum stocks into deeply oversold territory, forcing many short sellers, particularly in Asia, to cover their positions, creating a self-reinforcing buying spiral. However, the rebound's internals appear weak. Trading volume was notably low, and advancing stocks still lagged decliners on the S&P 500, indicating a narrow, concentrated rally rather than broad market participation. Diverging views emerge on the outlook. BTIG warns the bounce has hit key resistance and recommends selling into strength, citing extreme volatility and historical parallels to past market tops. Conversely, Goldman Sachs and UBS believe the momentum unwind is nearing its end, suggesting it may be time to gradually add exposure, as positioning has been significantly reduced. They caution, however, that high volatility warrants a measured approach, potentially using defined-risk strategies. The upcoming earnings season, particularly reports from major tech firms like Alphabet, is seen as a critical test for the rally's sustainability. Simultaneously, bond markets flashed a warning, with yields rising partly due to spiking oil prices. Analysts note that if long-term Treasury yields break decisively higher, it could pose a significant headwind for equities, especially growth stocks.

marsbitHace 24 min(s)

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Post Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, But Is the Plunge Over?

marsbitHace 24 min(s)

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Record Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, but Has the Rout Ended?

U.S. tech momentum stocks staged a dramatic rebound on Tuesday, July 21st. Key momentum indices like the Morgan Stanley TMT Momentum Factor and Goldman Sachs' High Beta Momentum Long Index posted historic or near-historic single-day gains, fueled largely by semiconductor stocks. This sharp rally followed a severe three-day sell-off that saw momentum stocks plunge 33%, marking one of the steepest pullbacks since the dot-com bubble. Analysts attribute the bounce primarily to a short squeeze, as forced covering from over-leveraged traders, particularly in Asia, created a buying spiral. However, the rally's health is questioned due to weak market breadth—overall trading volume was low, and decliners outnumbered advancers in the S&P 500 despite the index's gain—suggesting a narrow, concentrated surge rather than broad recovery. Opinions on the sustainability diverge. BTIG strategists warn the rebound has hit key resistance levels, citing extreme volatility and historic stock dispersion as signs of an ongoing broader correction, and recommend selling into strength. Conversely, Goldman Sachs and UBS view the aggressive momentum unwinding as nearing its end, noting reduced positioning and a lack of new fundamental catalysts. They suggest the sell-off presents a selective opportunity to add exposure, albeit cautiously and gradually using defined-risk strategies. The immediate trajectory hinges on the ongoing earnings season, with market focus on Alphabet's capital expenditure guidance for AI investment clarity. Meanwhile, bond markets present a risk, with rising Treasury yields—potentially heading toward 5.5%—and widening credit spreads for mega-cap tech companies posing a threat to equity valuations. The combination of technical factors, earnings results, and macro conditions leaves the durability of the rebound in doubt.

链捕手Hace 27 min(s)

U.S. Tech Momentum Stocks Record Largest Single-Day Gain Ever, but Has the Rout Ended?

链捕手Hace 27 min(s)

Bitcoin flashes 3 macro-bottom signals – But can BTC reach $70K?

The article discusses Bitcoin's recent price movement above $66,000 and a shift in market analysis from focusing on a local bottom to a potential macro-cycle bottom. It cites a crypto analyst noting that BTC has flashed three historical technical signals that previously coincided with major market bottoms in 2015, 2019, and 2022, suggesting the current zone could be a strong long-term accumulation area. However, the article also highlights a significant challenge: despite the price breakout, on-chain data shows a lack of supporting liquidity. Stablecoin dominance is rising while the total stablecoin market cap is shrinking, with capital continuing to leave exchanges. This divergence indicates that while the technical setup is bullish, the rally may struggle to sustain enough momentum for a decisive move into the $70,000 region without an influx of fresh capital.

ambcryptoHace 29 min(s)

Bitcoin flashes 3 macro-bottom signals – But can BTC reach $70K?

ambcryptoHace 29 min(s)

Long-Divided Must Unite, Long-United Must Divide: When L1 Becomes Its Own Rollup, What Is Ethereum's Endgame?

"The Inevitable Cycle: When L1 Becomes Its Own Rollup – What is Ethereum's Endgame?" For years, the Ethereum community grappled with concerns that L2s were fragmenting the ecosystem and eroding L1's value. While L2s provided cheaper execution, they also splintered liquidity and the unified user experience of a single chain. This has prompted a fundamental reassessment of the relationship between L1 and L2. Ethereum's roadmap is evolving. The "Scale" initiative merges L1 and L2 expansion into a holistic framework. L1 itself is advancing with higher gas limits, statelessness, and zkEVM verification, no longer content to be just a low-throughput settlement layer. Consequently, the primary value proposition of L2s is shifting from merely providing cheap blockspace to offering L1 cannot easily provide: application-specific optimizations, privacy features, and flexible governance models. L2s are becoming a spectrum of execution environments with varying degrees of security inheritance from Ethereum. A critical challenge in this multi-chain future is interoperability. The vision is to make Ethereum "feel like one chain again." This relies on advancements in native account abstraction (like EIP-7702) and intent-based architectures (Open Intents Framework), where users declare desired outcomes, and solvers handle the complex cross-chain execution. Furthermore, shortening Ethereum's finality time from minutes to seconds is crucial, as it underpins trust between chains for bridges, stablecoins, and cross-chain applications. Perhaps the most provocative idea is that Ethereum L1 itself could become a form of "its own Rollup." As zkEVM and proof systems mature, high-performance nodes could execute transactions and generate validity proofs. Regular validators would then verify these proofs instead of re-executing all transactions. This blurs the traditional L1/L2 hierarchy, making "Rollup" more of a general execution-verification architecture. Native Rollup aims to integrate L2 validation more directly into the Ethereum protocol, allowing L2s to inherit L1's security more fully and move away from reliance on security councils. In the end, L2s are not destined to replace L1 or be made obsolete by it. The likely future is a unified system where diverse execution environments—each optimized for specific use cases like DeFi, gaming, or privacy—coexist. They will share a common foundation of security, liquidity, and verifiable state, seamlessly connected to restore a cohesive user experience. The next phase for Ethereum is not just about scaling through separation, but about intelligently reintegrating what was separated back into a coherent whole.

链捕手Hace 43 min(s)

Long-Divided Must Unite, Long-United Must Divide: When L1 Becomes Its Own Rollup, What Is Ethereum's Endgame?

链捕手Hace 43 min(s)

Trading

Spot