US Banking Lobby Considers Lawsuit Over OCC Crypto Charters

TheNewsCryptoPublicado a 2026-03-10Actualizado a 2026-03-10

Resumen

A US banking lobby group, the Bank Policy Institute (BPI), is considering legal action against the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) for granting national trust bank charters to cryptocurrency companies like Ripple, BitGo, and Paxos. The BPI argues that these charters, which allow crypto firms to operate as trust banks and provide custody services, could pose risks to Americans and the financial system. They claim this move blurs the definition of a "bank," increases systemic risk, and undermines the credibility of national banking charters. The BPI had previously urged the OCC to reject such applications, and while no final decision on a lawsuit has been made, the group has a history of taking legal action against the agency. Similar concerns were echoed by the Independent Community Bankers of America.

A banking lobby group hailing from the US is looking to take legal action against the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency over the agency permitting national trust bank charters to crypto companies.

An unknown source close to the lobby’s thinking has informed The Guardian that the Bank Policy Institute has plans to sue the OCC for avoiding previous warnings from banking groups and state regulators and proceeding with its revisionism of federal licensing rules to permit national trust bank charters to crypto companies.

As per the group, this could probably put Americans and the financial system at stake. Under Jonathan Gould’s leadership, the OCC permitted the first batch of conditional national trust bank charter approvals to crypto companies comprising Ripple, BitGo and Paxos, among others. Since that time, various companies have demanded similar approvals.

Hanging Sword on OCC

Once permitted, the National Trust Bank charter will grant these firms the ability to function as trust banks and provide custody and asset safekeeping services. In October, the BPI stated it was requesting the OCC to decline applications from crypto companies, comprising Ripple and Circle, as it claimed that permitting such charters could lead to risk to the financial system.

It also mentions that BPI alerts that approving this route and permitting companies to pick a lighter regulatory touch while providing bank-like products could blur the statutory boundary of what it means to be a “bank”, heighten systemic risk and highlight the credibility of the national banking charter itself.

As per The Guardian, the BPI hasn’t decided yet if it plans to pursue legal action against the OCC. Although the report mentioned that the BPI was among a group of banks that had so far taken legal action against the OCC.

The Independent Community Bankers of America issued similar warnings over the OCC’s crypto charter approvals. Lately, the ICBA requested the OCC to pull or change its proposal for issuing licences to crypto companies. ‘

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Hyperliquid (HYPE) Jumps 9%: Can the $40 Zone Be Reached and Anchor the Bull Run?

TagsLawsuitoccUSA

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the main reason the US banking lobby group is considering legal action against the OCC?

AThe banking lobby group, the Bank Policy Institute (BPI), is considering legal action because the OCC is granting national trust bank charters to crypto companies, which they believe avoids previous warnings and could put Americans and the financial system at risk.

QWhich companies were among the first to receive conditional national trust bank charter approvals from the OCC?

ARipple, BitGo, and Paxos were among the first crypto companies to receive conditional national trust bank charter approvals from the OCC under Jonathan Gould's leadership.

QWhat specific concerns does the Bank Policy Institute (BPI) have about granting these charters to crypto firms?

AThe BPI is concerned that granting these charters could blur the statutory boundary of what it means to be a 'bank', heighten systemic risk, and undermine the credibility of the national banking charter itself by allowing companies to operate with a lighter regulatory touch while providing bank-like services.

QHas the Bank Policy Institute (BPI) definitively decided to sue the OCC at this time?

ANo, as per the article, the BPI hasn't yet decided if it will pursue legal action against the OCC, though it has taken such action against the agency in the past.

QWhich other banking group has issued similar warnings to the OCC regarding crypto charters?

AThe Independent Community Bankers of America (ICBA) has also issued similar warnings and recently requested the OCC to withdraw or change its proposal for issuing licenses to crypto companies.

Lecturas Relacionadas

94.000 millones de yuanes, la mayor financiación de este año para robots humanoides ha aparecido

La empresa de robótica humana Neura, con sede en Múnich, ha completado una ronda de financiación Serie C de 14.000 millones de dólares (unos 94.900 millones de RMB), lo que supone la mayor inversión del año en este sector. Tras la operación, su valoración alcanza los 70.000 millones de dólares. La relevancia de esta ronda radica en la participación de inversores industriales como Schaeffler y Bosch, lo que señala un cambio estratégico: el foco pasa de la demostración tecnológica a la implementación práctica en fábricas. Neura, fundada por el experto en robótica industrial Armin Zeher, ha priorizado desde el inicio la aplicabilidad en entornos de producción real, contando ya con BMW como cliente. Otros inversores como NVIDIA, Amazon y Qualcomm aportan perspectivas complementarias en infraestructura de computación, logística y tecnología. El sector de la robótica humana está experimentando una afluencia masiva de capital, impulsada por dos factores clave: los avances en modelos de IA de gran escala, que mejoran la percepción y la toma de decisiones de los robots, y la creciente presión por la escasez y el encarecimiento de la mano de obra en la manufactura global. Actualmente, las empresas siguen dos caminos principales: los robots humanoides de propósito general (como Figure AI), con un horizonte comercial a más largo plazo, y los enfocados en escenarios industriales verticales y específicos (como Neura), que ofrecen una ruta de comercialización más rápida y definida. El campo de batalla real para estos robots ya no es el laboratorio, sino el suelo de la fábrica. Los escenarios de manufactura industrial, por su entorno estructurado y tareas repetitivas, se consideran los primeros en permitir una adopción a escala. Los entornos de trabajo peligrosos también tienen un gran potencial. Sin embargo, los principales retos para la adopción masiva ya no son puramente técnicos, sino de ingeniería y modelo comercial. Destacan los elevados costes de adaptación a cada línea de producción específica y la necesidad de desarrollar sistemas de mantenimiento y servicio locales robustos para garantizar la operación continua. La entrada de gigantes industriales históricos como inversores y la presencia inicial de robots en fábricas como las de BMW marcan un punto de inflexión: la confianza del sector se consolida y la pregunta central evoluciona de "si es posible" a "cómo hacerlo mejor, más rápido y de forma más estable".

marsbitHace 8 hora(s)

94.000 millones de yuanes, la mayor financiación de este año para robots humanoides ha aparecido

marsbitHace 8 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片