BitMart Research Institute Weekly Insights: Fed Hawkish Expectations Heat Up, Crypto Market Continues to Face Pressure, RWA Sector Defies Trend and Breaks Out

marsbitPublicado a 2026-06-23Actualizado a 2026-06-23

Resumen

**BitMart Research Weekly: Fed Hawkishness Weighs on Crypto, RWA Sector Shows Strength** In traditional markets, US equities were mixed as weakening macro data signaled slowing growth. The Federal Reserve held rates at 3.75%, with half of its officials projecting at least one rate hike this year, adopting a more hawkish stance. The crypto market faced sustained pressure. BTC fell 3.7%, underperforming ETH, which dropped 1.2%. Overall market sentiment remained in "Extreme Fear." US spot Bitcoin ETFs saw net outflows of approximately $226.8 million for the week, indicating a lack of sustained institutional buying. Despite the bearish backdrop, the Real World Assets (RWA) narrative gained traction. XLM surged 12.2%, driven by Stellar's RWA tokenization roadmap. Stablecoin market capitalization stabilized near $315.3B, showing structural shifts towards compliant and institutional cash management tools like USDG and BUIDL. A notable stress point emerged as Strategy's STRC traded below its $100 face value for a fifth consecutive week, pressuring its dividend model and raising questions about its Bitcoin treasury management strategy.

I. Macro Economy and Traditional Financial Markets

1. High Divergence in US Stocks: Signals of Slowing Growth Intertwined with Middle East Uncertainties

US stock markets showed high divergence last week. The S&P 500 fell slightly by 0.22%, the Nasdaq rose by 0.27%, and the Dow Jones increased by 0.39%. Macro data continued to weaken: the New York Empire State Manufacturing Index plummeted from 19.6 to 5.7, housing starts dropped sharply to 1.177 million units, and May retail sales grew by 0.4% month-on-month. Overall, this indicates that the high-interest-rate environment is gradually suppressing aggregate demand.

The labor market remains resilient, with initial jobless claims at 226,000. The four-week moving average rose slightly to 223,250, providing some support for overall consumption. The coexistence of consumer resilience with weakening real estate and manufacturing sectors creates a structural divergence, making the Federal Reserve's policy path more complex. The pace of economic cooling is insufficient to drive inflation down rapidly.

2. Fed Holds Rates Steady, Half of Officials Project Rate Hikes This Year, Wash Changes Style

The Federal Reserve maintained the policy rate at 3.75% with a 12:0 vote. Among the 18 officials, 9 project at least one rate hike this year, with 6 projecting more than one hike. Only 1 projects a rate cut this year, and 1 official did not submit Summary of Economic Projections. The Philadelphia Fed's "prices paid" index rose from 47.9 to 53.2, further strengthening the tightening stance.

New Chairman Wash adopted a communication style different from his predecessor, frequently mentioning "first principles," "alternative frameworks," and "mandate range." He was the only official to refuse to submit future interest rate projections in this dot plot, emphasizing that the Fed's core task is achieving price stability. This FOMC statement was almost completely rewritten, significantly shorter in length, increasing market uncertainty about the Fed's future communication and policy path.

II. Crypto Market

1. Market Performance: BTC Underperforms ETH, Market Sentiment Remains in Extreme Fear

Last week, BTC fell 3.7%, fluctuating within the $62,000–$65,000 range; ETH fell 1.2%, remaining around $1,700. As BTC performed significantly weaker than ETH, the BTC/ETH ratio fell 1.6%. The total crypto market cap fell 3.1%; excluding BTC and ETH, the market cap fell 2.3%; the altcoin market excluding the top 10 tokens fell 3.0%, showing a clear broad-based decline pattern.

The top 30 crypto assets fell by an average of 2.5%. Only XLM recorded a significant gain, rising 12.2%, driven by Stellar's roadmap for RWA tokenization, payments, and corporate settlements. Market sentiment remained in the "Extreme Fear" zone, with the Fear & Greed Index at 20. Additionally, jaredfromsubway.eth, one of the largest MEV sandwich bots on Ethereum, suffered a reverse attack, losing approximately $7.5 million, bringing on-chain security risks back into market focus.

2. ETF Flows: BTC Net Outflow of $226.8M, Institutional Buying Has Not Resumed Sustained Inflows

Last week, US spot Bitcoin ETFs saw a net outflow of approximately $226.8 million, while spot Ethereum ETFs had a net outflow of approximately $10 million. Split by trading day, BTC ETFs saw a net outflow of about $64.09 million on June 15, a small net inflow of about $10.06 million on June 16, net outflows of about $82.16 million and $90.66 million on June 17 and 18 respectively. The US market was closed on June 19 for the Juneteenth holiday.

For ETH ETFs, there were small net inflows on June 15 and 16, but flows turned net negative again from June 17 to 18, resulting in a week overall close to a small outflow. Overall, compared to the large outflows of the previous week, pressure eased somewhat, but institutional funds have not resumed sustained buying.

3. On-Chain Data: Stablecoin Total Supply Stabilizes, Structure Shows Divergence

DeFiLlama data shows that as of June 22, the total stablecoin market cap was approximately $315.3 billion, increasing by about $287 million in 7 days, a rise of about 0.09%. USDT's market share is about 59.05%. USDT saw a slight 7-day decrease of about 0.12%, USDC grew slightly by about 0.06%, indicating overall stability in mainstream settlement funds. USDS decreased by about 3.47% over 7 days, continuing the trend where ecosystem-focused stablecoins are more prone to contraction in volatile environments.

USD1 and USDG grew by about 9.27% and 6.74% respectively, reflecting expansion in compliance-oriented stablecoins and channel-based distribution networks. USDe remained largely flat over 7 days, with the expansion pace of yield-generating stablecoins slowing but no significant redemptions. BUIDL and USYC maintained slight growth, indicating continued resilience in institutional on-chain cash management demand. Overall, the stablecoin market shifted from total supply contraction in the previous week to supply stabilization with structural divergence, but funds still favor high-certainty dollar instruments.

4. Industry Narratives: STRC Trades Below Par for Fifth Consecutive Week, Strategy's Funding Flywheel Under Pressure

STRC has traded below its $100 par value for the fifth consecutive week. Its price once fell to around $82 before recovering to about $88, but its weekly trading volume still reached $1.6 billion. The nominal dividend yield has risen to 11.5%, with market discussion on whether to raise it further to 11.75% or 12%. Notably, Strategy, which once claimed it would "never sell Bitcoin," sold 32 BTC for the first time in late May this year, raising approximately $2.5 million to pay for preferred share distributions.

Strategy currently faces three potential response paths: raising the STRC dividend yield (each 0.5% increase would bring about $52.45 million in additional annual dividend costs); selling Bitcoin holdings to pay dividends, which would weaken the core narrative; or issuing new STRC shares below par value, which would structurally increase the long-term dividend burden. Last week, STRC accounted for 76.2% of the total trading volume of Bitcoin Treasury preferred securities, down from 80% the previous week. The second most traded asset was Strive's SATA, accounting for 15.8%.

This article is for market analysis only and does not constitute any investment advice. Investment risks are high. Please fully assess your own risk tolerance and implement strict risk control before trading.

Preguntas relacionadas

QAccording to the article, what were the main macroeconomic factors influencing the cryptocurrency market last week?

AThe main factors were a highly divided US stock market with slowing growth signals, a Federal Reserve that maintained interest rates while its 'dot plot' showed a majority of officials expecting at least one rate hike this year, and Fed Chair Warsh's communication shift creating market uncertainty. Weak macroeconomic data, such as a sharp drop in the New York Empire State Manufacturing Index and housing starts, indicated high interest rates are dampening demand.

QHow did the performance of Bitcoin compare to Ethereum last week, and what was the market sentiment?

ABitcoin underperformed Ethereum, falling 3.7% compared to Ethereum's 1.2% decline. Consequently, the BTC/ETH ratio fell by 1.6%. Overall market sentiment remained in the 'Extreme Fear' zone, with the Fear and Greed Index at 20.

QWhat was the trend for US spot Bitcoin and Ethereum ETF fund flows last week?

AUS spot Bitcoin ETFs saw a net outflow of approximately $226.8 million for the week. US spot Ethereum ETFs experienced a smaller net outflow of around $10 million. While the outflows moderated compared to the previous week, institutional capital had not yet resumed sustained buying.

QWhat is the current situation with STRC, and what challenges does its issuer, Strategy, face according to the article?

ASTRC has traded below its par value for five consecutive weeks, with its price dipping to around $82 before recovering to about $88. Its nominal dividend yield has risen to 11.5%. Strategy faces three main challenges: 1) Raising the STRC dividend rate, which would significantly increase annual costs; 2) Selling Bitcoin holdings to pay dividends, which weakens its core narrative; and 3) Issuing new STRC shares below par value, which would structurally increase long-term dividend burdens.

QWhich cryptocurrency among the top 30 assets posted a significant gain last week, and what was the reported reason?

AXLM (Stellar) recorded a significant gain of 12.2%. The increase was attributed to the positive market reaction to Stellar's recently released roadmap focusing on Real-World Asset (RWA) tokenization, payments, and enterprise settlement solutions.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Una ‘diosa’ de la caridad con 3 millones de seguidores era todo una IA: la farsa del ‘orfanato falso’ desmonta de la noche a la mañana una beneficencia transnacional

La australiana Lily Jay, una influencer de Instagram con casi 3 millones de seguidores, es investigada por ABC NEWS Verify por una supuesta red de estafa benéfica utilizando contenido generado por IA. A través de su 'Lily Jay Foundation', publicaba videos de proyectos en Uganda, Gaza, Nepal y Sudán, incluyendo la inauguración de un orfanato en Uganda, donde la imagen de ella con niños mostraba anomalías típicas de la IA, como letras mal escritas. Las autoridades de Uganda confirmaron que no existe registro de dicho orfanato. Además, imágenes de un premio humanitario que recibió contenían la marca de agua invisible SynthID de ChatGPT. La investigación revela que la fundación, que operaba desde Kosovo, se define en su sitio web como "no una organización benéfica". Aunque solicitaba donaciones, no figuraba como entidad benéfica registrada en Australia, lo que evita la obligación de transparencia financiera. Tres personas figuran como directores, uno vinculado a una firma de relaciones públicas que promocionó el falso premio. Tras la investigación de ABC, el sitio web eliminó para visitantes australianos los botones de donación y la advertencia sobre su estatus, aunque se mantuvieron activos para el extranjero. Expertos advierten que este caso explota la confianza y el deseo de creer en actos de bondad, marcando un peligroso precedente del uso del 'deepfake' y la IA para defraudar en el sector humanitario.

marsbitHace 3 min(s)

Una ‘diosa’ de la caridad con 3 millones de seguidores era todo una IA: la farsa del ‘orfanato falso’ desmonta de la noche a la mañana una beneficencia transnacional

marsbitHace 3 min(s)

L2 'Recalibrating': Cuando L1 se convierte en su propio Rollup, ¿cuál es el final del camino de Ethereum?

"L2 «recalibración»: cuando L1 se convierte en su propio Rollup, ¿cuál es el final de Ethereum?" La relación entre L1 y L2 en Ethereum está evolucionando. Originalmente, L2 (como los Rollups) se centraban en ofrecer espacio de transacción barato, mientras que L1 priorizaba la descentralización y seguridad. Sin embargo, los avances en Ethereum, como el aumento del límite de Gas y el desarrollo de zkEVM, permiten que L1 también escale significativamente. Esto obliga a repensar el valor de L2, que ya no puede basarse solo en costos bajos, sino que debe ofrecer funciones diferenciadas como privacidad o modelos de gobernanza flexibles. La creciente fragmentación entre múltiples L2 plantea problemas de interoperabilidad y experiencia de usuario. La comunidad está trabajando en soluciones como marcos de intenciones (intents) y una capa de interoperabilidad nativa (EIL) para que Ethereum "vuelva a sentirse como una sola cadena", facilitando las interacciones entre diferentes entornos de ejecución sin que el usuario note la complejidad subyacente. Acortar el tiempo de finalidad de L1 también es crucial para aplicaciones cross-chain. Un concepto provocador sugiere que, con la adopción de sistemas de prueba (zkEVM) en la red principal, Ethereum L1 podría, en un sentido arquitectónico, convertirse en una especie de "Rollup de sí mismo", donde la ejecución y la verificación se separan. Esto, junto con la visión de "Native Rollup", podría difuminar los límites tradicionales entre L1 y L2, transformándolos en un espectro de entornos de ejecución con diferentes funcionalidades pero que comparten seguridad, liquidez y un sistema de estado común. En conclusión, el futuro de Ethereum no es que L1 reemplace a L2 o viceversa. En cambio, el ecosistema podría evolucionar hacia un conjunto unificado de entornos de ejecución especializados que, trabajando en conjunto, ofrezcan escalabilidad, diversidad de funciones y una experiencia de usuario cohesiva. El reto es volver a ensamblar, sin perder los beneficios de la escalabilidad, un Ethereum que funcione como un todo integrado para el usuario final.

marsbitHace 5 min(s)

L2 'Recalibrating': Cuando L1 se convierte en su propio Rollup, ¿cuál es el final del camino de Ethereum?

marsbitHace 5 min(s)

Fragmentos Eternos del Dinero: Los Pagos de Terceros no tienen una Primera Naturaleza

**Fragmentos eternos del dinero: Los pagos de terceros carecen de una primera naturaleza** El sector de pagos vive una época convulsa, con Stripe intentando adquirir PayPal. Stripe, que alcanzó una valoración de 100.000 millones de dólares durante la pandemia pero no salió a bolsa, busca ahora nuevas narrativas de crecimiento a través de adquisiciones y la expansión hacia las stablecoins y la economía de los agentes. El artículo argumenta que la industria de pagos es inherentemente fragmentada y está subordinada a la banca tradicional, lo que limita el potencial disruptivo de cualquier jugador. Los esfuerzos de Stripe en stablecoins (como OUSD) y su red de pago para agentes (Tempo) son vistos como apuestas de futuro, pero enfrentan el desafío de la adopción real más allá del ámbito cripto. Se destaca que los modelos de negocio basados solo en procesamiento de pagos son limitados. El futuro podría estar en los servicios de valor añadido, especialmente en las redes de liquidación. Empresas como Stripe y Circle, al obtener licencias bancarias, podrían desarrollar sistemas de liquidación más eficientes que capturen parte del valor tradicionalmente retenido por los bancos. En conclusión, Stripe se enfrenta a una guerra de trincheras en un sector fragmentado. Su éxito depende de si puede trascender el simple procesamiento y capitalizar las oportunidades en stablecoins, agentes y, sobre todo, en la infraestructura de liquidación, para escapar de la eterna fragmentación del dinero.

marsbitHace 28 min(s)

Fragmentos Eternos del Dinero: Los Pagos de Terceros no tienen una Primera Naturaleza

marsbitHace 28 min(s)

La odisea legislativa del proyecto de ley cripto 'Clarity': El camino del compromiso bipartidista en EE.UU. está plagado de espinas

Los legisladores estadounidenses intentan avanzar la ley Clarity para regular el mercado de criptomonedas, pero el camino hacia un acuerdo bipartidista está lleno de obstáculos. Tras un acuerdo inicial roto en enero, se logró un compromiso en mayo sobre los rendimientos ("yield"), pero la inclusión de cláusulas éticas para los funcionarios electos se ha convertido en una línea roja para los demócratas, dejando el proyecto sin su apoyo en un comité clave. En julio, los republicanos apuran una votación en el pleno del Senado, pero las divisiones persisten. Algunos republicanos se alían con los grandes bancos en la disputa sobre los rendimientos, mientras que las agencias de aplicación de la ley se oponen a las protecciones para desarrolladores. Aunque hay consenso sobre la necesidad de una ley de estructura de mercado, las cuestiones de financiación ilícita y protección al consumidor siguen siendo preocupaciones centrales. Se espera un texto de compromiso entre comités del Senado, pero su éxito bipartidista es incierto. Los demócratas insisten en que sin fuertes disposiciones éticas, no habrá votos a favor. El proceso continúa con reuniones y debates, pero el resultado final—ya sea una votación simbólica, una ley para 2026 o un nuevo marco de compromiso—sigue siendo una incógnita en esta carrera contra el reloj legislativo.

Foresight NewsHace 57 min(s)

La odisea legislativa del proyecto de ley cripto 'Clarity': El camino del compromiso bipartidista en EE.UU. está plagado de espinas

Foresight NewsHace 57 min(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片