a16z Crypto: 9 Charts to Understand the Evolution of Stablecoins

marsbitPublicado a 2026-04-25Actualizado a 2026-04-25

Resumen

Stablecoins are evolving from trading instruments to core financial infrastructure, driven by regulatory clarity and increased adoption. Key trends include accelerated growth following the U.S. GENIUS Act and the EU’s MiCA framework, which spurred non-USD stablecoin activity. Consumer-to-business transactions are growing fastest, doubling in 2025, while stablecoin card usage has surged. Velocity has nearly doubled since 2024, indicating active use rather than passive holding. Geographically, Asia dominates volume, led by Singapore, Hong Kong, and Japan. Notably, domestic transactions now account for nearly three-quarters of payments, highlighting stablecoins' role as local payment mediums on global infrastructure. Non-USD stablecoins, like Brazil’s BRLA, are also gaining traction. The data suggests stablecoins are becoming ubiquitous payment tools—global in design but increasingly local in practice.

Author: a16z crypto

Compiled by: Jiahuan, ChainCatcher

Stablecoins have been finding their footing for years.

Initially, they were just a trading tool, a means to transfer dollars across exchanges. Then they evolved into a savings instrument, held rather than spent. Today, the data points in a new direction: stablecoins are increasingly becoming core financial infrastructure.

The following nine charts reveal the factors driving this trend.

Regulation Accelerates Market Growth

For most of their history, regulatory uncertainty limited institutional participation. Later, the GENIUS Act brought regulatory clarity. It didn't create this trend, but it amplified and accelerated it.

In the United States, the GENIUS Act established the first federal-level framework for stablecoin issuance. This shift is clearly visible in the data: adjusted trading volume had been rising for several quarters before the bill's passage, and growth accelerated further after its passage, reaching approximately $4.5 trillion in Q1 2026.

European regulation—the Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) framework—tells a more complex story. When the法案 fully came into effect at the end of 2024, several major exchanges delisted USDT to comply, leading to a surge in activity for non-dollar stablecoins, which一度 exceeded $40 billion.

Since then, trading volume has stabilized at levels higher than the pre-MiCA baseline, around $15 billion to $25 billion per month. Regulation created a lasting market for non-dollar stablecoins that previously barely existed.

Stablecoin Commercial Activity is Growing

Perhaps the most noteworthy structural change lies in how people are actually using stablecoins.

In terms of raw transaction count, the C2C category far surpasses all others: reaching 789.5 million in 2025. But Consumer-to-Business (C2B) stablecoin transactions grew the fastest, reaching 284.6 million in 2025 compared to 124.9 million in 2024, more than doubling year-over-year (+128%).

Data from stablecoin card infrastructure highlights this trend.

Monthly collateral deposits for stablecoin card programs supported by Rain (including Etherfi Cash, Kast, Wallbit, etc.) grew from nearly zero in November 2024 to over $300 million per month by early 2026. While this is collateral supporting spending, not direct spending of stablecoins, the trajectory is striking: stablecoin commercial activity is on the rise.

Stablecoin Velocity is Increasing

Every dollar of stablecoin supply is turning over more frequently.

Since early 2024, the velocity of stablecoins (the ratio of adjusted monthly transfer volume to circulating supply) has almost doubled, rising from 2.6x to 6x. An increase in velocity means demand for stablecoin transactions is outpacing new issuance, and the existing supply is working harder.

This is a hallmark of a true payment network—the base currency is being actively used, not just held.

Stablecoin Volume Reflects More Payments

If trading, fund flows, and exchange mechanisms—which make up the bulk of stablecoin transactions—are excluded, the estimated total for payments between different entities last year was still between $350 billion and $550 billion.

By volume, the Business-to-Business (B2B) sector dominates stablecoin payments (unsurprising given its scale). But other sectors, such as direct Consumer-to-Consumer (C2C) payments and interactions with merchants, are also expanding rapidly.

Stablecoin Payments are Currently Concentrated in Specific Regions

Geographically, stablecoin payment activity is not evenly distributed.

Nearly two-thirds of the transaction volume comes from Asia, primarily concentrated in Singapore, Hong Kong, and Japan.

North America accounts for about a quarter. Europe's share is around 13%. Latin America and Africa together make up only a very small portion, less than $1 billion.

Not Just Cross-Border Payments, But Local Currencies on Global Rails

The development of non-dollar stablecoins is not limited to Europe; it is also evident in emerging markets, driven by various factors.

Brazil is a prime example. The monthly transfer volume of BRLA (a stablecoin backed by the Brazilian Real) has grown from nearly zero in early 2023 to about $400 million per month by early 2026. Access to the PIX instant payment network has driven its adoption.

Although stablecoins are often described as cross-border tools, the proportion of cross-border activity has actually been declining, not rising.

Domestic transactions (stablecoin transfers occurring within the same country/region) have grown from about half of the payment volume in early 2024 to nearly three-quarters by early 2026. What does this mean? Stablecoins are not only establishing themselves as remittance or forex tools but also becoming a local payment medium running on global infrastructure.

Putting all these factors together, a clear picture emerges, though it's not the one most people expected: many thought stablecoins would be purely focused on cross-border transactions. Instead, they are becoming increasingly localized.

While the US dollar remains the core f币锚定 for the vast majority of stablecoins, stablecoins are by no means simply an export of the dollar. Non-dollar variants, such as euro-backed and Brazilian real-backed local currency stablecoins, are gaining popularity.

Although peer-to-peer (C2C) stablecoin transfers far exceed other types of payment flows in quantity, increasingly usage is flowing towards everyday consumption (C2B).

Each quarter's data provides more evidence that stablecoins are developing into general-purpose payment infrastructure. They are global by design but increasingly local in practice.

It's still early days. But the shape of this system is becoming clearer.

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat was the impact of the GENIUS Act on stablecoin trading volume in the US?

AThe GENIUS Act established the first federal-level framework for stablecoin issuance in the US. Before its passage, adjusted trading volume had been increasing for several consecutive quarters. After its enactment, growth accelerated further, reaching approximately $4.5 trillion in Q1 2026.

QWhich region accounts for the largest share of stablecoin payment volume, and which specific areas are the main contributors?

AAsia accounts for nearly two-thirds of the stablecoin payment volume. The main contributors are Singapore, Hong Kong, and Japan.

QWhat is the most significant structural change in how people use stablecoins, as indicated by transaction growth?

AThe most significant structural change is the growth in Consumer-to-Business (C2B) stablecoin transactions. This category saw the fastest growth, more than doubling (+128%) from 124.9 million transactions in 2024 to 284.6 million in 2025.

QWhat does the increasing velocity of stablecoins indicate about their use?

AThe increasing velocity of stablecoins, which nearly doubled from 2.6x to 6x since early 2024, indicates that the demand for stablecoin transactions is outpacing new issuance. It means the existing supply is circulating more frequently, which is a hallmark of a genuine payment network where the base currency is being actively used, not just held.

QContrary to common belief, what trend is observed in the proportion of cross-border stablecoin activity?

AContrary to the common belief that stablecoins are primarily for cross-border transactions, the proportion of cross-border activity has actually been decreasing. Domestic transactions (stablecoin transfers within the same country/region) grew from about half of the payment volume in early 2024 to nearly three-quarters by early 2026.

Lecturas Relacionadas

9,42 millones de minoristas se apresuran por comprar acciones de Longxin Technology, ¿quién resultó adjudicado?

El resultado de la OPV de Changxin Technology (Long鑫 Tech) se ha dado a conocer. Un total de 9.4288 millones de inversores minoristas y 285 instituciones participaron en la suscripción. Tras activar el mecanismo de reequilibrio, la tasa de asignación para minoristas en línea subió a aproximadamente el 0,4714%, la más alta para una nueva acción en la bolsa STAR, con unos 7,7 millones de números asignados. Se necesitaba un capital de aproximadamente 1,06 millones de RMB para obtener una asignación. Las instituciones recibieron el 28,25% de las acciones. Taikang Asset Management fue la institución que más asignaciones obtuvo. Entre los fondos públicos, los tres primeros fueron E Fund, Southern Fund y ICBC Credit Suisse. El fundador de la destacada empresa china de modelos de IA, Liang Wenfeng, a través de sus firmas de gestión cuantitativa Ningbo幻方 y Zhejiang九章, obtuvo la mayor asignación entre los fondos privados, con un valor total de 1750 millones de RMB. Se estima que podría obtener unas ganancias de 730 millones de RMB si la capitalización de mercado de la empresa alcanza los 3 billones de RMB tras su cotización. Se prevé que Changxin Technology cotice el 27 de julio. Su valoración se sitúa principalmente por encima del billón de RMB, con estimaciones que van desde 1 billón hasta más de 4 billones. Sin embargo, la reciente corrección del mercado tecnológico global podría afectar a su desempeño inicial en bolsa.

marsbitHace 17 min(s)

9,42 millones de minoristas se apresuran por comprar acciones de Longxin Technology, ¿quién resultó adjudicado?

marsbitHace 17 min(s)

Una ‘diosa’ de la caridad con 3 millones de seguidores era todo una IA: la farsa del ‘orfanato falso’ desmonta de la noche a la mañana una beneficencia transnacional

La australiana Lily Jay, una influencer de Instagram con casi 3 millones de seguidores, es investigada por ABC NEWS Verify por una supuesta red de estafa benéfica utilizando contenido generado por IA. A través de su 'Lily Jay Foundation', publicaba videos de proyectos en Uganda, Gaza, Nepal y Sudán, incluyendo la inauguración de un orfanato en Uganda, donde la imagen de ella con niños mostraba anomalías típicas de la IA, como letras mal escritas. Las autoridades de Uganda confirmaron que no existe registro de dicho orfanato. Además, imágenes de un premio humanitario que recibió contenían la marca de agua invisible SynthID de ChatGPT. La investigación revela que la fundación, que operaba desde Kosovo, se define en su sitio web como "no una organización benéfica". Aunque solicitaba donaciones, no figuraba como entidad benéfica registrada en Australia, lo que evita la obligación de transparencia financiera. Tres personas figuran como directores, uno vinculado a una firma de relaciones públicas que promocionó el falso premio. Tras la investigación de ABC, el sitio web eliminó para visitantes australianos los botones de donación y la advertencia sobre su estatus, aunque se mantuvieron activos para el extranjero. Expertos advierten que este caso explota la confianza y el deseo de creer en actos de bondad, marcando un peligroso precedente del uso del 'deepfake' y la IA para defraudar en el sector humanitario.

marsbitHace 57 min(s)

Una ‘diosa’ de la caridad con 3 millones de seguidores era todo una IA: la farsa del ‘orfanato falso’ desmonta de la noche a la mañana una beneficencia transnacional

marsbitHace 57 min(s)

L2 'Recalibrating': Cuando L1 se convierte en su propio Rollup, ¿cuál es el final del camino de Ethereum?

"L2 «recalibración»: cuando L1 se convierte en su propio Rollup, ¿cuál es el final de Ethereum?" La relación entre L1 y L2 en Ethereum está evolucionando. Originalmente, L2 (como los Rollups) se centraban en ofrecer espacio de transacción barato, mientras que L1 priorizaba la descentralización y seguridad. Sin embargo, los avances en Ethereum, como el aumento del límite de Gas y el desarrollo de zkEVM, permiten que L1 también escale significativamente. Esto obliga a repensar el valor de L2, que ya no puede basarse solo en costos bajos, sino que debe ofrecer funciones diferenciadas como privacidad o modelos de gobernanza flexibles. La creciente fragmentación entre múltiples L2 plantea problemas de interoperabilidad y experiencia de usuario. La comunidad está trabajando en soluciones como marcos de intenciones (intents) y una capa de interoperabilidad nativa (EIL) para que Ethereum "vuelva a sentirse como una sola cadena", facilitando las interacciones entre diferentes entornos de ejecución sin que el usuario note la complejidad subyacente. Acortar el tiempo de finalidad de L1 también es crucial para aplicaciones cross-chain. Un concepto provocador sugiere que, con la adopción de sistemas de prueba (zkEVM) en la red principal, Ethereum L1 podría, en un sentido arquitectónico, convertirse en una especie de "Rollup de sí mismo", donde la ejecución y la verificación se separan. Esto, junto con la visión de "Native Rollup", podría difuminar los límites tradicionales entre L1 y L2, transformándolos en un espectro de entornos de ejecución con diferentes funcionalidades pero que comparten seguridad, liquidez y un sistema de estado común. En conclusión, el futuro de Ethereum no es que L1 reemplace a L2 o viceversa. En cambio, el ecosistema podría evolucionar hacia un conjunto unificado de entornos de ejecución especializados que, trabajando en conjunto, ofrezcan escalabilidad, diversidad de funciones y una experiencia de usuario cohesiva. El reto es volver a ensamblar, sin perder los beneficios de la escalabilidad, un Ethereum que funcione como un todo integrado para el usuario final.

marsbitHace 58 min(s)

L2 'Recalibrating': Cuando L1 se convierte en su propio Rollup, ¿cuál es el final del camino de Ethereum?

marsbitHace 58 min(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片