Microsoft Announces Commercial-Grade Quantum Computer to be Completed in Three Years: Will the Boots Land?

marsbitPublicado a 2026-06-15Actualizado a 2026-06-15

Resumen

Microsoft announces plans to build a commercially viable quantum computer by 2029, a significant acceleration from the previous industry consensus of a decade. The breakthrough is fueled by their new Majorana 2 quantum chip, which boasts a record-breaking average qubit lifetime of 20 seconds—a 1,000-fold reliability improvement over its predecessor. This leap was achieved by leveraging topological qubits, a theoretically more stable technology using Majorana zero modes, and switching the core superconducting material from aluminum to lead. Crucially, Microsoft's "Discovery" agentic AI platform accelerated the R&D process. AI agents autonomously analyzed vast experimental data, optimized manufacturing parameters (like the lead alloy composition), and solved issues like "ghost noise," dramatically speeding up experimentation. While the 20-second coherence time is a landmark, challenges remain: scaling from 12 qubits to the millions needed for practical applications, managing compilation costs, and verifying quantum results. Skeptics call for peer-reviewed data, and questions persist about whether even 20 seconds is sufficient for complex algorithms like breaking RSA encryption. The race is on with other approaches (superconducting, trapped ions), but Microsoft's confidence in its topological roadmap signals a potential shortcut to a scalable quantum future.

Microsoft recently released its new generation quantum chip, Majorana 2. The company claims the average survival time of qubits on this chip has reached an astonishing 20 seconds, a 1000-fold improvement in reliability over the previous generation. Based on this, Microsoft made a bold statement: "By 2029, we will have a commercially valuable, scalable quantum computer." Just last year, the mainstream industry expectation was "ten years from now." Now, Microsoft has directly halved that timeframe.

In the R&D process of this chip, Microsoft heavily leveraged its own AI platform "Microsoft Discovery's" agentic AI, allowing AI teams to collaborate like human research teams, autonomously analyzing massive experimental data, proposing hypotheses, and optimizing manufacturing processes. One is the hardware breakthrough in quantum computing, the other is the software assist from artificial intelligence. Two of the most cutting-edge fields are now reinforcing each other.

What is a Quantum Chip?

A quantum chip manipulates qubits (quantum bits). A qubit can exist in a superposition of 0 and 1. Before measurement, it's like a spinning coin, simultaneously carrying the possibility of both 0 and 1. The superposition state of two qubits can encompass four possibilities: 00, 01, 10, 11; three qubits correspond to eight possibilities... and so on. The quantum state of n qubits is 2^n-dimensional. Through carefully designed operations, quantum gates (the logical gates in quantum computing) manipulate the phase of the quantum state, causing probability amplitudes to interfere within the superposition, thereby amplifying the correct answer. This is why quantum computers are said to possess "exponential computational power."

Furthermore, two entangled qubits share a peculiar correlation: measuring one instantly determines the state of the other, regardless of the distance between them. By leveraging these quantum properties, quantum computers are expected to tackle tasks that are difficult for classical computers to perform efficiently.

A quantum chip is a specialized processor used to generate, manipulate, and measure these qubits. It doesn't use traditional transistors but employs superconducting circuits, trapped ions, photons, or even topological materials to capture quantum states and make them perform calculations according to a prescribed logic, i.e., quantum gates.

Weaknesses of Quantum Chips

Despite their power, qubits possess a fatal weakness: extreme sensitivity and fragility.

The superposition state of a qubit can collapse instantly into a definite 0 or 1 when subjected to even minor external disturbances, such as temperature fluctuations, electromagnetic radiation, or cosmic rays, thereby losing its parallel computing capability. This phenomenon is called decoherence.

Before Microsoft's Majorana 1 chip, the typical lifetime of mainstream superconducting qubits was only tens of microseconds. This meant they would often 'die' shortly after being prepared, before much computation could be done. Therefore, a key metric for evaluating a quantum chip is the qubit lifetime, also known as coherence time.

Microsoft's claim of a 20-second qubit lifespan has caused an earthquake-like reaction within the industry. For quantum operations, 20 seconds is an astronomical figure. Performing a quantum gate operation only requires a microsecond (one-millionth of a second). Twenty seconds theoretically allows for twenty million operations, enough to run fairly complex quantum algorithms. Microsoft even drew an analogy: "This improvement is roughly equivalent to inventing a phone battery that lasts nearly three years on a single charge, compared to the original one-day battery."

Twenty seconds is just the average; some qubits can even last up to a minute. The previous generation Majorana 1 only achieved a lifetime on the millisecond scale, which is why Microsoft states "reliability improved 1000-fold."

So, how did Microsoft achieve this? The answer lies in its chosen technical route: topological quantum computing.

Microsoft's Secret Weapon: Topological Qubits

Most mainstream quantum chips, like those from Google and IBM, use superconducting qubits. This technology is relatively mature, but to avoid environmental interference, it requires extremely low temperatures, close to absolute zero (-273°C). It also suffers from short lifetimes and is prone to errors.

For 20 years, Microsoft has pursued a different, theoretically more advantageous but more challenging path: topological qubits.

If you punch one hole or two holes in a piece of paper and crumple it up, the paper deforms, but the holes remain. One hole doesn't become two, and two don't become one. The number of holes in the paper is a topological invariant. Similarly, the sequence in which two ropes are braided together is also a topological invariant. Topological qubits leverage this topological invariance to protect quantum information. The information isn't stored in specific particles but in the braiding texture formed by the exchange of positions of quasiparticles (collective excitations in particle systems). This storage method is non-local, meaning small disturbances like noise and heat struggle to disrupt the overall topological structure. Consequently, topological qubits are inherently much less sensitive to environmental noise and far more stable than other types of qubits.

The quasiparticle Microsoft uses has a legendary name: Majorana fermion. In 1937, Italian physicist Ettore Majorana predicted the existence of a peculiar fermion whose antiparticle is itself. This particle hasn't been conclusively discovered yet. In the early 21st century, scientists began searching for its analog in condensed matter physics: a quasiparticle called a Majorana zero mode (MZM). When two Majorana zero modes exchange positions in two-dimensional space, the overall quantum state changes; the order of exchange affects the final outcome, similar to how different braiding methods result in different plaits.

In 1997, physicist Alexei Kitaev, then at the Landau Institute in Russia, first theorized the use of Majorana fermions for topological quantum computing. In 2005, Microsoft established Station Q, with Kitaev as a core member at the time. Microsoft has since been committed to this technical path, investing nearly 20 years. In 2025, Microsoft released the first-generation Majorana chip, proving the principle feasibility of topological qubits. They revolutionarily used a topological superconductor, enabling a novel state of matter for more stable quantum computing. Today's Majorana 2 represents a tangible leap in performance, turning principle into practice.

A key improvement lies in the material change: the first-generation Majorana chip used aluminum for its topological superconductor, while the second generation switched to lead. Lead is commonly used as radiation shielding. Using it as a superconductor can significantly thicken the qubit's shield, protecting the fragile quantum state from cosmic ray interference. This seemingly non-disruptive change, coupled with AI optimization of hundreds of process parameters, ultimately led to the 1000-fold reliability improvement.

However, currently, Majorana 2 only integrates 12 qubits. To achieve a commercially valuable universal quantum computer, the industry consensus is that at least several million qubits are needed. Bridging the gap from 12 to 1 million involves countless engineering and physics challenges. Microsoft's confidence in stating 2029 indicates strong belief in their topological route. Theoretically, the error-correction overhead for topological qubits is much lower than other mainstream schemes. If successfully implemented, they have the potential to mature faster than other approaches.

AI's Contribution: How Agentic AI Accelerates Quantum Chip R&D

Another crucial factor in Microsoft's 1000-fold reliability leap is the "assist" from agentic AI. Microsoft's Microsoft Discovery platform deploys agentic AI, where multiple AI agents can take on different roles, such as data analyst, experimental designer, and literature researcher, autonomously completing scientific research workflows under human scientist guidance.

It starts with the core material of the Majorana chip. The first generation used aluminum as the superconductor, while the second generation switched to lead. Changing materials is a complex chain reaction. The team spent years understanding all the trade-offs. Finding the precise doping recipe required hundreds of experiments. Now, AI can first identify high-probability targets through simulation, ideally reducing the required experiments to just one.

This is just the beginning. Quantum chip manufacturing involves countless aspects: software, architecture, material stack, processes, measurement, etc. Changing one parameter can trigger chain reactions. Human engineers struggle to monitor all variables simultaneously, but AI agents can. Crucially, Microsoft's quantum team has accumulated nearly two decades of vast experimental data, in various formats, held by scientists in different countries with different backgrounds. AI agents can synthesize this data and uncover correlations invisible to humans, as no single person possesses such a broad perspective.

Another AI killer app is accelerating experiments. Creating topological quantum states requires simultaneously adjusting hundreds of voltage parameters, followed by measurement—the most time-consuming and delicate part of quantum computing. Previously, a scientist might take weeks to manually complete one round of measurement. The team tried automation with early machine learning methods but failed. It wasn't until they trained a dedicated AI agent using the Microsoft Discovery platform that they reduced the entire cycle by several orders of magnitude. AI can scan the entire parameter space in parallel, automatically determining the lowest point where everything can function normally and pinpointing it.

Finally, AI also helped solve the "ghost noise" problem. At one point, experimental data was consistently off, and scientists spent a long time troubleshooting without success. Later, an AI agent integrated physical models, device logs, and process knowledge to identify an uncalibrated temperature sensor from the raw data that was subtly corrupting the measurement results.

It's fair to say that without AI's involvement, the 1000-fold performance leap of Majorana 2 might have taken several more years to achieve. This reinforces a growing consensus: quantum computing and artificial intelligence can mutually reinforce each other. AI accelerates the R&D of quantum computing hardware, and future quantum computers will, in turn, boost AI by providing exponential computational power for machine learning.

Will the Boots Land?

Microsoft is not the only player in this arena. The path to the "quantum shore" isn't limited to topological quantum chips; there are also superconducting quantum chips, trapped-ion chips, photonic quantum chips, and silicon spin qubits. Governments worldwide are also ramping up investments. China has large-scale deployments in quantum communication and quantum computing; the US has allocated significant funding to quantum computing companies; the EU has launched its "Quantum Flagship" initiative.

Can Microsoft truly deliver a commercial-grade quantum computer by 2029? Paul Stevenson, a physics professor at the University of Surrey in the UK, commented that Microsoft seems to have made a breakthrough in manufacturing reliable qubits. If the results hold up to scrutiny, the timeline sounds reasonable. However, many scientists are hoping to see more detailed data that has undergone peer review, as Microsoft's related papers on this achievement have not yet completed the peer-review process.

Of course, amidst Microsoft's high-profile announcements and excitement, several questions warrant calm consideration. First, are 20 seconds enough? A 20-second qubit lifetime is indeed a staggering leap compared to tens of microseconds. However, practical quantum algorithms require hundreds of millions or billions of quantum gate operations. Even at one microsecond per operation, 20 seconds only allows for twenty million steps, still several orders of magnitude short of the numbers needed for tasks like cracking RSA encryption or precisely simulating drug molecules. Remember, decoherence is a limit set by physical laws, something engineering can never completely overcome. Second, there's the compilation cost issue. Every time a quantum computer solves a problem, it first requires compiling on a classical computer to translate the problem into a specific quantum circuit, and then solving equations based on the quantum chip's parameters to obtain the electromagnetic pulse sequences corresponding to the quantum gates. This compilation process isn't universal; it's one-off per problem. Moreover, the classical computing power consumed by compilation itself might be comparable to, or even exceed, the cost of solving the problem directly using classical methods. Third, what if the quantum computer outputs a wrong answer? Humans cannot verify it with a classical computer; if they could, they wouldn't need the quantum computer in the first place. If the final answer is wrong, there's no way to know where the error occurred.

The dream of building a commercial-grade quantum computer is like a boot hanging in the air,迟迟不肯落地. One day, even if it lands, it might just be a dull thud. Looking back at the history of science and technology, progress sometimes resembles "willows planted unintentionally grow into shade, while flowers cultivated with great care fail to bloom." What is highly anticipated may not be realized, and breakthroughs might emerge from the most unexpected places.

References

https://news.microsoft.com/source/features/innovation/majorana-2-microsoft-discovery-agentic-ai/

https://www.bluequbit.io/blog/quantum-chips

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cj4p7gyvp52o

https://zhuanlan.zhihu.com/p/2035004303467917427?share_code=14f9XN3e5wlBq&utm_psn=2035105136662553502&utm_source=wechat_session&utm_medium=social&s_r=0&wechatShare=1

This article is from WeChat public account: 心智观察所 , Author: 心智观察所

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the key performance breakthrough Microsoft announced for its new Majorana 2 quantum chip, and by what factor has reliability improved compared to the previous generation?

AMicrosoft announced that its new Majorana 2 quantum chip achieves an average quantum bit (qubit) lifetime of 20 seconds. This represents a 1000-fold improvement in reliability compared to the previous generation, Majorana 1.

QWhat is the core theoretical advantage of Microsoft's topological qubit technology compared to mainstream superconducting qubits used by companies like Google and IBM?

AThe core theoretical advantage of Microsoft's topological qubit is its inherent resistance to environmental noise and decoherence. Quantum information is stored non-locally in the topological 'braiding' of quasi-particles (Majorana zero modes), making the qubit state much more stable and less susceptible to disruptions from temperature fluctuations or electromagnetic interference.

QHow did Microsoft's 'agentic AI' system, part of the Microsoft Discovery platform, contribute to the development of the Majorana 2 chip?

AMicrosoft's agentic AI accelerated the research by autonomously analyzing vast experimental data, proposing hypotheses, and optimizing manufacturing parameters. It helped identify optimal material compositions (e.g., switching from aluminum to lead), parallel-scanned parameter spaces to find operational 'sweet spots,' dramatically reduced measurement cycle times, and even diagnosed a 'ghost noise' issue caused by an uncalibrated sensor, compressing years of potential work into a shorter timeframe.

QAccording to the article, what is Microsoft's stated timeline for building a commercially valuable, scalable quantum computer, and how does this compare to the industry's previous mainstream expectation?

AMicrosoft stated it aims to build a commercially valuable, scalable quantum computer by 2029. This timeline is approximately half the duration of the industry's previous mainstream expectation of 'ten years from now' (which, if stated last year, would have pointed to around 2034).

QWhat are two major practical challenges or questions raised in the article regarding the path to a practical, commercial quantum computer, even with a 20-second qubit lifetime?

AThe article raises several challenges: 1) Algorithmic Scale: A 20-second lifetime allows for about 20 million quantum gate operations, but practical algorithms for tasks like breaking RSA encryption or simulating complex molecules may require billions or trillions of operations, leaving a significant gap. 2) Compilation Overhead: Each problem requires a unique compilation process on a classical computer to translate it into quantum circuits and control pulses. This process itself can be computationally expensive, potentially negating the quantum speedup for some problems. 3) Error Verification: It is difficult to verify if a quantum computer's answer is correct for problems that are intractable for classical computers, creating a trust issue.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Me construí una estación de trabajo de inversión con IA

En los últimos quince días, me he sumergido en la "Vibe Coding" – escribir código mediante lenguaje natural con IA – y he construido mi propia plataforma de inversión. Usando principalmente Codex, Claude Code y la API de DeepSeek, he convertido ideas que antes solo existían en mi mente en herramientas funcionales. He desarrollado cuatro utilidades clave: 1. **Panel de Activos Multimercado:** Una vista unificada de mis inversiones en acciones estadounidenses, criptomonedas, acciones de Hong Kong y China continental, con seguimiento del rendimiento total y por activo. Luego añadí funciones como monitoreo de movimientos bruscos de precios y un "mapa de inversiones" para visualizar las relaciones dentro de un sector. 2. **Monitor de Apuestas en Mercados de Predicción (PM):** Agrega y supervisa apuestas sobre eventos futuros (como valoraciones de empresas o eventos macro), correlacionando sus cambios de probabilidad con noticias y movimientos del mercado para identificar oportunidades, especialmente en dinámicas de Asia Oriental. 3. **Panel de Gestión de Contenidos:** Una herramienta operativa simple, alojada en la nube, para gestionar temas de artículos, progresos de escritura y calendarios de publicación en múltiples plataformas. 4. **Herramienta de Formateo Automático:** Un script que convierte automáticamente un documento en los formatos específicos requeridos por diferentes plataformas de medios, ahorrando tiempo en el proceso de publicación. La conclusión principal es que la IA ha cambiado fundamentalmente la investigación para los inversores minoristas. No se trata de volverse un experto de la noche a la mañana, sino de poder construir progresivamente sistemas básicos personalizados: para observar activos, monitorear señales del mercado, mapear relaciones sectoriales y realizar revisiones de decisiones. El "Vibe Coding" acelera enormemente el ciclo de retroalimentación "idea-implementación-uso-mejora", permitiendo que herramientas rudimentarias pero útiles surjan y evolucionen rápidamente, transformando la manera en que los inversores organizan su información y toman decisiones.

marsbitHace 17 min(s)

Me construí una estación de trabajo de inversión con IA

marsbitHace 17 min(s)

Una vez tokenizados los activos, ¿cómo se sale?

**Tokenización de activos: ¿Cómo retirarse?** La tokenización resuelve cómo llevar los activos a la cadena, pero no cómo los tenedores pueden redimirlos. Este "problema de salida" es crucial, ya que la falta de liquidez instantánea limita la utilidad de los activos tokenizados (RWA) como garantía o en DeFi. Han surgido tres modelos para ofrecer salidas inmediatas, diferenciándose en su estructura de capital: 1. **Modelo de balance (ej. Grove Basin):** Una entidad única (como Sky) proporciona liquidez inmediata desde su propio balance. Es simple pero la capacidad está limitada a ese balance único. 2. **Bóvedas dedicadas por activo (ej. Upshift Clear):** Proveedores de liquidez independientes financian bóvedas separadas para cada activo RWA. Escala con más capital, pero el capital está fragmentado y aislado por activo. 3. **Capa de liquidez compartida (ej. Symbiotic Liquid Lane):** Un fondo de capital compartido (varias bóvedas) financia simultáneamente las redenciones de múltiples activos RWA. El capital es más eficiente, puede generar rendimiento entre redenciones (ej., en préstamos DeFi) y los descuentos de redención se fijan en un mercado competitivo (RFQ) entre market makers. La comparación clave gira en torno a cinco dimensiones: fuente del capital, fijación de precios de redención, eficiencia del capital, escalabilidad a nuevos activos y combinabilidad (composability). **Liquid Lane** busca ser una infraestructura de liquidez compartida, eficiente y flexible que pueda escalar con el mercado, especialmente para activos con ventanas de redención largas (crédito privado, activos estructurados), transformando así cómo se mantienen, financian y utilizan los RWA en la cadena.

marsbitHace 23 min(s)

Una vez tokenizados los activos, ¿cómo se sale?

marsbitHace 23 min(s)

Después de la tokenización de activos, ¿cómo salir?

**Resumen: ¿Cómo salir tras la tokenización de activos?** La tokenización resuelve cómo llevar activos a la cadena, pero la mitad del problema sin resolver es cómo los tenedores pueden redimir (salir). Existen tres modelos principales para proporcionar liquidez inmediata para activos tokenizados del mundo real (RWA), que difieren en su estructura de capital y eficiencia: 1. **Modelo de balance general (ej., Grove Basin):** Una sola entidad (como Sky) proporciona liquidez inmediata desde sus reservas cuando los tenedores redimen. Es rápido, pero la capacidad está limitada por un solo balance. 2. **Modelo de bóveda dedicada (ej., Upshift Clear):** Proveedores de liquidez independientes financian bóvedas separadas para cada activo soportado. Introduce capital externo, pero el capital está aislado y solo sirve a un activo a la vez. 3. **Capa de liquidez compartida (ej., Symbiotic Liquid Lane):** Proveedores de capital financian bóvedas compartidas que pueden apoyar múltiples activos simultáneamente. El capital se reutiliza, genera rendimientos entre redenciones y los precios de redención se fijan en un mercado competitivo de RFQ. La comparación clave se basa en cinco dimensiones: fuente de capital, fijación de precios, eficiencia de capital, escalabilidad a nuevos activos y composibilidad. Liquid Lane apunta a ser una infraestructura compartida y capital-eficiente, particularmente valiosa para activos con ventanas de redención largas (como crédito privado), permitiendo salidas T+0 mientras el capital sigue siendo productivo. Esto transforma la liquidez de un parche aislado en un bien común escalable para el mercado de RWA.

链捕手Hace 36 min(s)

Después de la tokenización de activos, ¿cómo salir?

链捕手Hace 36 min(s)

El Triple Momento de Anthropic: Filtración de Código, Enfrentamiento Gubernamental y Armaización

**Resumen: El Triple Momento de Anthropic: Filtración de Código, Enfrentamiento con el Gobierno y la "Armamentización"** Anthropic lanzó su nuevo modelo Fable (versión "domada" del más potente Mythos), pero apenas dos meses después, el gobierno de EE.UU. ordenó su bloqueo para ciudadanos extranjeros, citando preocupaciones de seguridad nacional por un posible *jailbreak*. Este incidente destapa la guerra latente entre los laboratorios de IA frontera, las grandes tecnológicas y los gobiernos. El artículo argumenta que, más allá de la narrativa de seguridad, Anthropic actúa movida por una **necesidad económica**: evitar que sus modelos se conviertan en una mercancía y acercarse al usuario final para capturar valor y, sobre todo, **datos**. Su cambio en la política de retención de datos (ahora guarda todo durante 30 días incluso para empresas) es un paso clave para alimentar y mejorar sus modelos con uso real, creando un ciclo virtuoso frente a competidores. Este impulso choca directamente con la visión de empresas de software como Microsoft, cuyo CEO, Satya Nadella, advierte de un futuro donde unos pocos modelos de IA capturen todo el valor, vaciando industrias. Sin embargo, para Anthropic, dominar la "pila" completa es una necesidad de supervivencia. El controvertido intento inicial de Anthropic de degradar silenciosamente el rendimiento de Fable para tareas de desarrollo de otros LLMs (retirado luego por las críticas) revela una ambición mayor: la convicción de que **solo ellos deberían construir IA frontera**. Combinado con su creencia de ser los únicos que toman en serio los riesgos de una superinteligencia, esto justifica, bajo el paraguas de la "seguridad", políticas que consolidan su control y ventaja comercial. El artículo concluye que la coherencia interna de Anthropic entre su misión, talento y negocio es poderosa pero preocupante: otorgar un poder potencialmente ilimitado a quienes están convencidos de saber lo que la humanidad necesita tiene un historial peligroso. El enfrentamiento con el gobierno de EE.UU. por Fable es solo el primer capítulo de este conflicto inevitable.

marsbitHace 52 min(s)

El Triple Momento de Anthropic: Filtración de Código, Enfrentamiento Gubernamental y Armaización

marsbitHace 52 min(s)

Trading

Spot
Futuros

Artículos destacados

Cómo comprar CHIP

¡Bienvenido a HTX.com! Hemos hecho que comprar USD.AI (CHIP) sea simple y conveniente. Sigue nuestra guía paso a paso para iniciar tu viaje de criptos.Paso 1: crea tu cuenta HTXUtiliza tu correo electrónico o número de teléfono para registrarte y obtener una cuenta gratuita en HTX. Experimenta un proceso de registro sin complicaciones y desbloquea todas las funciones.Obtener mi cuentaPaso 2: ve a Comprar cripto y elige tu método de pagoTarjeta de crédito/débito: usa tu Visa o Mastercard para comprar USD.AI (CHIP) al instante.Saldo: utiliza fondos del saldo de tu cuenta HTX para tradear sin problemas.Terceros: hemos agregado métodos de pago populares como Google Pay y Apple Pay para mejorar la comodidad.P2P: tradear directamente con otros usuarios en HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): ofrecemos servicios personalizados y tipos de cambio competitivos para los traders.Paso 3: guarda tu USD.AI (CHIP)Después de comprar tu USD.AI (CHIP), guárdalo en tu cuenta HTX. Alternativamente, puedes enviarlo a otro lugar mediante transferencia blockchain o utilizarlo para tradear otras criptomonedas.Paso 4: tradear USD.AI (CHIP)Tradear fácilmente con USD.AI (CHIP) en HTX's mercado spot. Simplemente accede a tu cuenta, selecciona tu par de trading, ejecuta tus trades y monitorea en tiempo real. Ofrecemos una experiencia fácil de usar tanto para principiantes como para traders experimentados.

444 Vistas totalesPublicado en 2026.04.21Actualizado en 2026.06.02

Cómo comprar CHIP

Discusiones

Bienvenido a la comunidad de HTX. Aquí puedes mantenerte informado sobre los últimos desarrollos de la plataforma y acceder a análisis profesionales del mercado. A continuación se presentan las opiniones de los usuarios sobre el precio de CHIP (CHIP).

活动图片