PUMP drops 11% in 24 hours – How likely is further downside?

ambcryptoPublicado a 2025-09-18Actualizado a 2025-09-19

Key Takeaways

What triggered the recent price decline for PUMP?

The price drop was primarily driven by heavy selling from whales and a negative Funding Rate, with short positions dominating the market.

Could PUMP experience a rebound despite the current bearish sentiment?

Yes, there is potential for a rebound if it reaches lower liquidity zones, which could serve as demand areas and push the price higher.


In the past 24 hours, Pump.fun [PUMP]  recorded one of the steepest outflows, with liquidity draining fast and forcing an 11% squeeze that brought its press-time value to $0.007.

Market analysis revealed that derivative investors played the central role in the decline. AMBCrypto reviewed the data to uncover what is happening.

Whales at the center of the decline

Whales have been the main contributors to the price slump witnessed in the market over the past day, according to fresh insights from CoinGlass.

Hyperliquid’s Whale Tracker shows that derivative selling volume made up the largest share of overall trading activity.

Short whales represented over 52% of the market’s trading volume at the time, while longs held a smaller share of 47%, according to the report.

With this imbalance, long whales now face potential liquidation as selling pressure builds and bears maintain control of the market.

PUMP whale trackerPUMP whale tracker

Source:CoinGlass

One whale with an $18 million long position has already come under heavy pressure. The position still remains in profit, but it could face steep losses if PUMP continues to fall.

Retail traders add to bearish sentiment

The bearish mood is not limited to whales, retail investors have also turned negative on PUMP.

CoinGlass data shows that the Funding Rate turned negative in the past day, dropping sharply to -0.0056, at press time.

A negative Funding Rate means short traders are driving the majority of capital flows needed to maintain the balance between long and short positions.

However, this short-dominated inflow has been shrinking, while overall outflows have risen significantly over the past 24 hours.

PUMP open interestPUMP open interest

Source:CoinGlass

Approximately $20.59 million worth of contracts in the perpetual market were closed, as Open Interest declined, reflecting broader bearish sentiment.

With the majority of capital still concentrated in shorts, continued downward pressure could trigger an even sharper plunge for PUMP.

Direction remains split

Despite the heavy selling, the liquidation chart indicates that PUMP’s direction is still two-sided, with the asset either likely to extend its drop or stage a rally.

AMBCrypto analysis shows that PUMP could first slide toward the lower liquidity clusters visible on the chart.

However, these zones may serve as demand areas, which could drive a rebound and push the token higher once again.

PUMP liquidation chart.PUMP liquidation chart.

Source:CoinGlass

For now, the overall market sentiment remains bearish, with both whales and retail traders aligned on the likelihood of more downside pressure.

Share

Lecturas Relacionadas

Los propietarios de carteras de hardware están perdiendo dinero: los matices del almacenamiento en frío de Bitcoin en 2026

Los propietarios de carteras de hardware están perdiendo dinero: matices del almacenamiento en frío de Bitcoin en 2026. A finales del verano de 2026, una serie de incidentes afectaron la confianza en las carteras de hardware. El caso más grave involucró a Coldcard de Coinkite, donde un error en el firmware, presente desde 2021, redujo drásticamente la entropía en la generación de frases semilla. Esto permitió a los atacantes robar entre 1778 y 2417 BTC (115-153 millones de dólares). Otras empresas también reportaron filtraciones: SafePal sufrió una fuga de datos personales de 40.000 clientes, y Trezor vio comprometida información de unos 14.000 usuarios debido al hackeo de su socio logístico. Aunque Trezor y Ledger aseguraron que sus dispositivos no presentaban la misma vulnerabilidad, el episodio generó un impacto reputacional para todo el sector. Paradójicamente, algunos usuarios trasladaron sus fondos a exchanges centralizados (CEX), optando por custodia ajena. El artículo concluye que estos incidentes deben verse como casos específicos y no invalidan todas las carteras de hardware, que siguen siendo una opción práctica y relativamente segura para el auto-custodio. Sin embargo, subraya un desafío mayor: el desarrollo de la Inteligencia Artificial (IA) amplifica tanto las capacidades de defensa como las herramientas de los atacantes para encontrar vulnerabilidades, requiriendo una vigilancia constante.

cryptonews.ruHace 16 min(s)

Los propietarios de carteras de hardware están perdiendo dinero: los matices del almacenamiento en frío de Bitcoin en 2026

cryptonews.ruHace 16 min(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片