White Supremacists Lean On Crypto, Says Anti-Defamation League Report on Extremists

CoinDeskPolicyPublicado a 2024-01-11Actualizado a 2024-01-12

Resumen

The report says white supremacist groups are drawn to crypto funding, but the amounts are relatively small, and it doesn't make a case that digital assets are paying for illeg...

White supremacist groups in the U.S. have sometimes been funded by crypto, according to a report from the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) that analyzed about $140,000 in transactions connected to 15 extremist groups or individuals last year.

The ADL, a New York-base advocacy group that counters antisemitism and extremism, focused on the movement of bitcoin, and saw that supporters used a wide array of digital assets platforms to get money in the hands of hate groups, though there was no assertion that the money was directly used for illegal action, such as domestic terrorism. And the review suggested the bitcoin received from supporters was often shifted back into the traditional financial system via U.S. banks.

10

"Extremists have increasingly turned to cryptocurrency due to the mistaken belief that the technology offers anonymity and is impervious to deplatforming," noted the report from the ADL's Center on Extremism, examining how the assets made their way into the hands of white nationalists. "Neither of these assumptions are accurate, but extremists have benefited from the lenient practices of cryptocurrency platforms, which often allow extremists to use their services."

Advertisement
Advertisement

About half of the transactions tracked by the ADL went through U.S. exchange Kraken, with others flowing through Binance, Coinbase and other platforms, according to the report. The biggest recipient was white nationalist publishing operation Counter-Currents.

The ADL recommends the crypto companies "update their policies to explicitly prohibit the use of their cryptocurrency exchanges to fund hate and extremism-related activities." It also suggested regulators should limit tokens that aim to shield privacy.

"Continued vigilance in the cryptocurrency space, as well as other financial technology spaces, and responsible moderation by the underlying platforms, are needed to combat the financial elements of this rise in antisemitism, extremism and hate," the organization concluded in its report.

Exchanges push back

For their part, crypto exchanges argue that they're combating illegality and that cryptocurrency transactions are often conducted in plain sight – unlike in banking.

A Kraken spokesperson said the company is disappointed the ADL wrote its report "without engaging us in any dialogue" about its know-your-customer policies and money laundering protections.

"Kraken is vigilant in enforcing these policies and taking proactive steps to prevent Kraken's services from being used as a vehicle for money laundering, terrorist financing or any other illicit activity," the spokesperson said in a statement.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Similarly, Coinbase Chief Policy Officer Faryar Shirzad responded that the company "does not tolerate any illegal activity – of any size – on or using the Coinbase exchange," adding that "our terms of service make this clear."

Shirzad said that the U.S. exchange is under "clear rules around anti-money laundering and sanctions that apply to fiat and crypto." He said the report erred in its "failure to differentiate law-abiding, regulated US exchanges from offshore companies that have served as major hubs for illegal activity," and he added that case is still the preferred medium for criminals who "want to avoid the transparent nature of the blockchain."

While the crypto firms defended their efforts to stave off illegality, the report didn't make specific accusations about the money funding illicit activity.

Extremist groups also rely on the traditional financial system, from online payments to credit cards to bank accounts, where the transparency the ADL used in its review isn't publicly available. But banning the groups from the mainstream financial network tends to raise questions of censorship.

Banks such as JPMorgan Chase & Co. have given large amounts of money to anti-hate groups including the Anti-Defamation League. But the banks' internal programs to review customers who have ties to extremist organizations are difficult to assess from the outside.

Edited by Nikhilesh De.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Acceso a sesiones activas en lugar de bases de datos: cómo ha cambiado el mercado clandestino en Rusia

El mercado negro en Rusia ha cambiado su prioridad: en lugar de vender grandes bases de datos corporativas robadas, los delincuentes ahora comercializan acceso activo y de corta duración a las cuentas de usuarios. El valor de la información interceptada por malware desde dispositivos infectados ha aumentado casi un 13% en el último año, según expertos de BI.ZONE en agosto de 2026. Los usuarios rusos representan del 14% al 18% de este segmento. Los nuevos paquetes, a diferencia de los archivos obsoletos, contienen herramientas para la intrusión instantánea: tokens de sesión activos, contraseñas vigentes, credenciales para VPN y almacenamiento en la nube, y accesos administrativos a redes corporativas. Mientras un archivo con datos antiguos cuesta solo $10-15, una suscripción a un canal privado con datos actualizados diariamente cuesta $250-300 al mes, lo que demuestra que el mercado paga por la actualidad, no por el volumen. Aunque las estadísticas oficiales muestran un descenso en el número de grandes filtraciones de bases de datos desde 2024 y se aplican multas a las empresas por incidentes repetidos, estas medidas regulatorias son ineficaces contra la nueva amenaza. El malware roba datos directamente de los dispositivos personales de los usuarios, fuera del perímetro corporativo protegido, lo que deja sin efecto los mecanismos de responsabilidad administrativa. La vulnerabilidad clave reside en que tokens de sesión robados pueden eludir la autenticación multifactor. En la primera mitad de 2026, 6 de cada 10 ataques web analizados buscaban obtener estas claves para infiltrarse en infraestructuras corporativas. Un solo ordenador infectado puede comprometer toda una red. El artículo también señala una brecha similar en las regulaciones de marcado de llamadas telefónicas, que ha resultado difícil de implementar incluso para los grandes bancos, confundiendo a los usuarios. En conclusión, los delincuentes se han adaptado a las medidas regulatorias contra filtraciones masivas, centrándose ahora en la extracción selectiva de claves de acceso activas. Este tipo de ataque opera en el espacio entre el perímetro corporativo y el dispositivo personal, una zona gris fuera del alcance de las normas actuales. A medida que aumentan las operaciones remotas, el valor de estos tokens de corta vida seguirá creciendo. La experiencia internacional (como el cierre del mercado Genesis en 2023) muestra que cerrar plataformas no elimina la fuente de la infección, y que nuevos canales emergen rápidamente.

cryptonews.ruHace 33 min(s)

Acceso a sesiones activas en lugar de bases de datos: cómo ha cambiado el mercado clandestino en Rusia

cryptonews.ruHace 33 min(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片