Discredited Crypto Terrorist Funding Figures Gain Fresh Life in House Hearing

CoinDeskPolicyPublicado a 2023-11-01Actualizado a 2023-11-02

Resumen

Recent reports that terrorism organizations such as Hamas pocketed as much as $130 million in crypto funding have been proved incorrect but were resurrected in Congress today.

Despite a raging online debate discrediting the scale of crypto support for terrorist groups, the story continues to resonate in important places. Most recently on Thursday, the ranking Democrat at a hearing in the U.S. House of Representatives quoted a figure of $130 million in digital assets flowing to terrorists.

Rep. Brad Sherman (D-Calif.) lamented those vast crypto donations to groups such as Hamas and praised the industry crackdown from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) as one of the things the agency is "doing right."

10

"Some $130 million of cryptocurrency has gone to Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad,"

A D V E R T I S E M E N T
A D V E R T I S E M E N T

Sherman said at an SEC oversight hearing of one of the subcommittees of the House Financial Services Committee. He said the assets are "designed to be perfect means for hidden money, hence the term cryptocurrency, getting to the worst actors in the world."

Massive industry pushback on those initial reports – including an Oct. 10 account from the Wall Street Journal – led to some backtracking. The Wall Street Journal issued a partial correction to clarify what it knew about the flow of virtual currency to terrorists, which had originally cited more than $90 million tied to Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ). And the crypto analytics company the newspaper had relied on for data, Elliptic, put out a detailed blog post explaining how its transaction data had been misconstrued and that an actual amount of crypto donated to Hamas since Oct. 7 by the most prominent funding campaign – Gaza Now – was closer to $21,000.

A D V E R T I S E M E N T
A D V E R T I S E M E N T

A spokesperson for Sherman didn't immediately respond to questions from CoinDesk on his use of the statistics, which are now  reflected in the congressional record.

Sherman had been among more than a hundred lawmakers signing an Oct. 17 letter that used the WSJ reporting as the impetus for a demand that the administration do more to combat illicit use of digital assets, especially in light of Hamas' attack on Israel. That letter cited more than $130 million in cryptocurrencies being raised by Hamas and PIJ.


Lecturas Relacionadas

La ambición de los fabricantes de plataforma: Análisis de las inversiones externas de Leju Robot, entendiendo la guerra de 'posición ecológica' en el campo de los robots humanoides

La ambición del fabricante de robots humanoides Leju: desglose de sus inversiones para entender la "guerra de posicionamiento ecológico" en el sector. Leju Robot, fundado en 2016 y en proceso de salir a bolsa (IPO) en 2026, es un fabricante líder chino del robot humanoide "Kuafu". Para consolidar su posición, Leju ha realizado 13 inversiones estratégicas, estructuradas en tres niveles clave de la cadena de valor: 1. **Componentes clave (4 inversiones):** Adquisición de empresas como Lingxinqiaoshou (manos diestras), Quanzhibo (módulos de articulación) y Lijudongli (motores para articulaciones). El objetivo es controlar los costes de las partes más caras (articulaciones, actuadores finales) y asegurar el suministro. 2. **Capa de software e inteligencia (6 inversiones):** Desarrollo de un "cerebro" complementario. Incluye apuestas por empresas emergentes como Deta Zhineng (modelos base para humanoides) y Jubao Panshi ("cerebro incorporado"), así como por compañías especializadas en datos (Jushen Data, Yunkexing) para alimentar el entrenamiento de IA. Esto complementa su asociación externa con Huawei. 3. **Sinergias de escenario e industria (3 inversiones):** Creación de canales para la implementación práctica. Las inversiones en empresas de logística (Luhai Xintongdao) y otros fabricantes de robots (Jushi Zhineng, Wushi Chuangxin) buscan transformar a Kuafu de un producto aislado a una solución integrada para sectores como la logística y los servicios comerciales. **Conclusión:** Leju está construyendo un ecosistema integral para reducir costes, controlar la cadena de suministro y acelerar la comercialización. Sin embargo, persisten desafíos: la empresa aún no es rentable, sus inversiones son mayoritariamente tempranas y los beneficios de la sinergia no están garantizados en un mercado competitivo. El tiempo dirá si esta estrategia de "posición ecológica" consolida su futuro.

marsbitHace 4 min(s)

La ambición de los fabricantes de plataforma: Análisis de las inversiones externas de Leju Robot, entendiendo la guerra de 'posición ecológica' en el campo de los robots humanoides

marsbitHace 4 min(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片