Kaspa price prediction: Sell-the-news reaction wipes out recent gains

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-06-30Last updated on 2026-06-30

Abstract

Kaspa (KAS) completed its Toccata hard fork on June 30, introducing smart contracts and KRC-20 token support. In anticipation, KAS price rallied 20.38% to $0.032. However, a "sell-the-news" reaction caused a 7.8% drop within 10 hours. Long-term, the token remains in a bearish trend, having failed to break the $0.04 resistance and now nearing the $0.025 swing low. Technical indicators like the MACD and CMF support this negative outlook. Short-term gains were used as a selling opportunity, with liquidation levels swept above $0.03 before the reversal. Further price declines towards $0.0249 and potentially $0.020 are possible in the coming weeks.

The Kaspa [KAS] network’s Toccata hard fork was completed successfully on Tuesday, June 30. This upgrade introduces smart contract functionality while adding support for KRC-20 tokens.

The price of the KAS token rallied 20.38%, from a low of $0.0266 on Thursday, June 25, to $0.032 on the day of writing. This price surge likely came as a result of speculators and traders positioning themselves for the hard fork.

However, the altcoin has shed 7.8% within 10 hours of trading. What should KAS traders expect next?

The Kaspa long-term price downtrend

Source: KAS/USDT on TradingView

On the 1-day timeframe, the structure of Kaspa has been steadily bearish. The latest bearish leg was made earlier in 2026, from $0.0532 to $0.0249. Since February, KAS has lacked a decisive long-term trend and has twice managed to challenge the $0.04 supply zone.

It was rebuffed in March and May, and the market-wide sell-offs in the past two months have pushed KAS closer to the $0.025 swing low.

The MACD was moving below the zero line to show bearish market momentum. Meanwhile, the CMF was at -0.17, well below the -0.05 threshold that signals significant capital outflows.

The price structure and technicals agree on a bearish long-term outlook.

Traders’ call to action- Sell the news event confirms bearish sentiment

Source: KAS/USDT on TradingView

On the 1-hour timeframe, the recent gains tilted the MACD briefly in bullish favor, and the CMF also signaled increased buying pressure over the past five days. The $0.03 local resistance was overcome briefly as the hardfork got closer to going live.

In recent hours, the swift sell-off confirmed that the short-term gains were only used as a selling opportunity.

Source: CoinGlass

The liquidation heatmap also noted a build-up of short liquidation levels just above the $0.03 round-number resistance. The price move above swept this magnetic zone neatly and has already begun to reverse.

In the coming days and weeks, a price drop to $0.0249 and $0.020 was a possibility swing traders and investors must be prepared for.


Final Summary

  • The recent Kaspa token price gains were part of a sell-the-news type event as the Tocatta Hardfork got closer.
  • The long-term price trend was bearish and a drop below the February 2026 swing low at $0.0249 appeared likely.

Related Questions

QWhat was the main purpose of the Kaspa network's Toccata hard fork, and when was it completed?

AThe Toccata hard fork introduced smart contract functionality and added support for KRC-20 tokens. It was completed successfully on Tuesday, June 30, 2026.

QHow much did the KAS token price rally in the days leading up to the hard fork, and what is cited as the likely reason?

AThe KAS token price rallied 20.38%, from a low of $0.0266 on June 25 to $0.032 around the time of the article's writing. This surge was likely due to speculators and traders positioning themselves ahead of the hard fork.

QWhat does the article describe as the long-term trend for Kaspa's price based on the 1-day timeframe analysis?

AThe article describes the long-term price trend as steadily bearish on the 1-day timeframe. The structure shows a lack of decisive trend since February 2026, with repeated failures to break the $0.04 supply zone, pushing the price closer to the $0.025 swing low.

QWhat key technical indicators mentioned in the article support the bearish long-term outlook for KAS?

AThe MACD (Moving Average Convergence Divergence) was below the zero line, indicating bearish momentum. The CMF (Chaikin Money Flow) was at -0.17, well below the -0.05 threshold, signaling significant capital outflows.

QAccording to the article, what is a potential price target for KAS in the coming days and weeks, and why did the recent price gains reverse?

AThe article suggests a potential price drop to $0.0249 and even $0.020 is a possibility. The recent price gains reversed because they were part of a 'sell-the-news' event, where the price surge before the hard fork was used as a selling opportunity, leading to a swift sell-off once the event occurred.

Related Reads

The "Number Game" Behind Trillion-Dollar Valuations: OpenAI and Anthropic's Revenue Can't Be Compared Directly

"Valuation Game in Trillions: The 'Digital Metrics Play' Behind OpenAI and Anthropic's Incomparable Revenues" Investors face significant uncertainty as core financial metrics from the two AI giants, OpenAI and Anthropic, cannot be compared directly due to differing accounting methods. OpenAI projects its annualized revenue run rate (ARR) to reach or exceed $70 billion by year-end, while Anthropic announced in July that its ARR had hit $65 billion. However, a key discrepancy renders these figures incomparable: Anthropic records the total sales value generated through cloud partners like Amazon as revenue, whereas OpenAI only counts its net share from partners like Microsoft. This reporting difference has tangible market impact. A recent tech stock downturn was partly attributed to investor attempts to adjust OpenAI's numbers for a direct comparison, leading to lower estimates and concerns about its growth pace. Currently, OpenAI's ARR is reportedly around $50 billion, with expectations to approach $70 billion by December. The issue highlights broader concerns about ARR as a non-standardized, often manipulated metric used to showcase growth and justify high private valuations. It is calculated by extrapolating short-term performance or summing contract values, offering companies considerable discretion. A significant gap exists between ARR and actual recognized annual revenue: OpenAI expects 2026 revenue of roughly $35 billion (half its year-end ARR projection), and internal documents show Anthropic's 2025 revenue was about $4.6 billion against a published ARR exceeding $9 billion. Experts warn that the opacity surrounding these key players creates a "black box" effect, complicating investment decisions and amplifying market volatility. As their performance is a bellwether for the AI investment narrative, any signs of slowing sales growth could ripple through the broader market, affecting chipmakers and other beneficiaries of the AI boom. The reliance on ARR sidesteps a fundamental question: the scale of real sales needed to justify trillion-dollar valuations and cover massive expenditures. The situation may improve with greater transparency, particularly if Anthropic proceeds with its anticipated Wall Street debut, which would subject the company to standardized GAAP financial reporting.

marsbit1h ago

The "Number Game" Behind Trillion-Dollar Valuations: OpenAI and Anthropic's Revenue Can't Be Compared Directly

marsbit1h ago

The Brutal Truth of the VC Industry: Why Most Funds Haven't Returned the Principal After 9 Years?

**VC's Harsh Reality: Why Most Funds Haven't Returned Capital After 9 Years** This article uses hard data to dissect key trends in venture capital and AI spending. It reveals that large, established VC firms are heavily clustered in similar AI investments, while emerging managers are more likely to back unconventional companies. Data shows that of scored seed deals, emerging funds invested 24.7% in "outlier" startups versus only 11.5% for giant funds, largely due to specialized funds with different mandates. A critical finding from Carta data exposes that most VC funds fail to return investors' capital even after nine years. Median funds from 2017 have only returned $0.37 for every dollar invested. This creates pressure for funds nearing their lifecycle end, which can influence their advice to portfolio companies regarding exits or follow-on funding—a dynamic founders must understand. The analysis of AI spending identifies a crucial, often overlooked market: the middle layer between basic and frontier models, which accounts for ~40% of enterprise AI spend. Price wars are intense here due to lab competition, open-source models, and fine-tuning. The article advises startups to categorize AI spending into three lines—salary replacement (benchmarked against labor costs), productivity tools (evaluated by usage), and product-integrated costs (focused on margins)—to spend effectively. Finally, it highlights a decline in rigorous due diligence for deep tech (e.g., quantum computing), where large deal sizes, reliance on lead investor reputations, and herd behavior often replace independent technical validation, risking a repeat of historical investment bubbles.

marsbit2h ago

The Brutal Truth of the VC Industry: Why Most Funds Haven't Returned the Principal After 9 Years?

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片