Injective’s ‘supply squeeze’ clears with 99% vote – What’s next for INJ?

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-01-20Last updated on 2026-01-20

Abstract

Injective's 'supply squeeze' proposal was overwhelmingly approved with 99.89% of the vote. The plan aims to dramatically reduce the INJ token supply by doubling the token burn rate and cutting staking reward emissions in half. This aggressive deflationary upgrade complements the existing community buyback program, which has already removed over 6.8 million tokens from circulation. Despite the bullish tokenomics update, the price reaction was muted. INJ saw a brief 4% rally but gave back gains due to broader market pressures, including a Bitcoin dip. Futures market data showed persistently low demand and negative sentiment, indicating the update was overshadowed by macro conditions. It remains to be seen if the deflationary measures will significantly boost INJ's price long-term.

Injective will move forward with its aggressive deflationary plan. The proposal, dubbed “supply squeeze,” received unanimous approval, with 99.89% voting in favor, the blockchain said in a statement.

The Layer 1 chain added,

“The new chapter of INJ is live now to dramatically reduce the token supply, enabling INJ to become one of the most deflationary assets over time.”

The proposal was first floated on the 16th of January and aimed to offer a complementary but fixed solution to the INJ token’s community buyback program.

According to the proposal, IIP-617, INJ’s total supply reduction rate would be doubled. In other words, the supply reduction would be increased by 100% as part of a “structural upgrade to INJ tokenomics.”

For the unfamiliar, Injective [INJ] debuted with a total supply of 100,000,000 tokens and serves as the governance token for the Injective ecosystem.

Injective’s annual inflation rate or emissions distributed as staking rewards are dynamic and fluctuate between 5% and 10% based on an 85% staking ratio.

In the past, the chain’s deflationary plan involved using collected fees to drive token buybacks. Over 6.8 million INJ tokens have been removed from supply via the buyback program.

But the new plan takes it a notch higher. It will cut emissions by half and increase buybacks to tighten supply.

Will the deflation plan boost INJ’s outlook?

However, the results and views on buyback programs across various chains, such as Hyperliquid [HYPE], Pump.fun, and Jupiter [JUP], have been mixed.

Some bill it as a “token value accrual,” while others, like Jupiter, see it as a waste of resources if the token’s price doesn’t rally.

Whether INJ’s double approach will clear Jupiter’s doubts remains unclear.

In the meantime, INJ tracked broader market sentiment rather than the bullish update.

It rallied 4% after the update but erased some of those gains at the time of writing as Bitcoin [BTC] dipped to $90K following U.S. President Donald Trump’s tariffs on Europe.

After slipping below $5, INJ briefly dropped to December lows near $4.4 and may retest support or drop to $4.42 if pressure persists.

Besides, the overall demand on the Futures market remained muted.

Over the past week, Futures CVD (Cumulative Volume Delta), or demand for INJ on the Futures market, became increasingly negative from the 15th of January and dipped even lower despite the ‘supply squeeze’ update.

In fact, even the Open Interest (OI) remained unchanged near $25 million despite the bullish tokenomics update.

Taken together, these data sets showed that broader market sentiment overshadowed the positive INJ development. It remains to be seen whether the price will catch up later.


Final Thoughts

  • Injective approved a plan to cut its dynamic annual emissions, currently 5%-10%, in half.
  • Speculative interest and demand remained low despite a slight 4% bounce after the positive update.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat was the result of the 'supply squeeze' proposal vote for Injective?

AThe 'supply squeeze' proposal received unanimous approval with 99.89% of the vote in favor.

QWhat is the main goal of Injective's new tokenomics plan, IIP-617?

AThe main goal of IIP-617 is to double the total supply reduction rate of INJ, making it one of the most deflationary assets over time by cutting emissions in half and increasing buybacks.

QHow did the price of INJ react immediately after the proposal update, and what was the broader market influence?

AINJ rallied 4% after the update but then erased some of those gains as Bitcoin dipped to $90K following U.S. President Donald Trump's tariffs on Europe, showing that broader market sentiment overshadowed the positive news.

QWhat was the trend for INJ's Futures Cumulative Volume Delta (CVD) after the proposal?

AThe Futures CVD for INJ became increasingly negative from January 15th and dipped even lower after the 'supply squeeze' update, indicating muted demand in the futures market.

QWhat are the two key takeaways listed in the article's 'Final Thoughts'?

AThe two key takeaways are: 1) Injective approved a plan to cut its dynamic annual emissions (5%-10%) in half, and 2) Speculative interest and demand remained low despite a slight 4% price bounce after the update.

Related Reads

Former CFTC Chairman, Circle President Tarbert: Preaching Long-Termism While Cashing Out $30 Million Himself

Former CFTC Chairman and Circle President Heath Tarbert has consistently advocated for a long-term vision in public, urging patience from investors as Circle’s stock price has fallen significantly from its peak. However, it has been revealed that since Circle’s IPO, Tarbert has continuously sold his CRCL shares through pre-arranged trading plans, cashing out approximately $30 million, without making any public market purchases. This contrast between his public messaging and personal actions has drawn criticism. Tarbert joined Circle in July 2023 as Chief Legal Officer, leveraging his regulatory experience to help guide the company through its IPO and expansion. Despite promoting stablecoins as long-term infrastructure, he established a 10b5-1 trading plan just before Circle went public, leading to substantial stock sales over the following year. In March 2026, he initiated another plan to sell more shares. His career trajectory highlights a pattern of moving between high-level regulatory roles and influential positions in the financial sector. After resigning as CFTC Chairman in early 2021, he joined Citadel Securities as Chief Legal Officer just 27 days later, during a period of intense regulatory scrutiny for the firm. He later joined Circle, aiding its efforts to navigate regulatory challenges for its public listing. While Tarbert's expertise in policy and compliance is valuable to companies like Circle, his actions—advocating long-term confidence while personally divesting—raise questions about the alignment between his public statements and his private financial decisions, leaving investors who followed his advice to bear the market risks.

marsbit17m ago

Former CFTC Chairman, Circle President Tarbert: Preaching Long-Termism While Cashing Out $30 Million Himself

marsbit17m ago

Gate Research Institute: The 'Wall Street-ization' Wave of Crypto Financial Products – Competition or Integration?

The article titled "Gate Research Institute: Are Crypto Financial Products Sparking a 'Wall Street' Wave—Competition or Convergence?" explores the evolving relationship between the crypto ecosystem and traditional finance (TradFi). The piece begins by reflecting on Bitcoin's original 2009 vision of decentralization, disintermediation, and moving away from banks. It then contrasts this with the 2024 landscape, where key crypto assets like Bitcoin are increasingly held through Wall Street products like ETFs issued by giants like BlackRock. The article questions whether this signifies that TradFi is systematically taking over the rights to issue, price, custody, and distribute crypto financial assets. The core argument is that this is not a zero-sum takeover but rather a bidirectional convergence where each side addresses the other's weaknesses. Crypto offers 24/7 global markets, programmable settlement, and open access but lacks compliant channels, institutional-grade custody, deep fiat liquidity, and mainstream distribution. TradFi possesses these but is constrained by legacy systems, limited operating hours, and slow settlement. Two primary convergence paths are highlighted: * **Path A (CEX to TradFi):** Exemplified by Gate, which has progressed from offering tokenized stocks and CFDs to providing direct, real stock trading (US, Hong Kong, South Korea) within its platform, using USDT. * **Path B (TradFi to Crypto):** Exemplified by Robinhood, which has integrated crypto trading, acquired exchanges like Bitstamp, and is moving traditional assets like stocks onto the blockchain via tokenization and its own Layer 2. Both paths are ultimately competing to become the next-generation, unified financial account—a "super account" where users can seamlessly trade cryptocurrencies, stocks, ETFs, RWA (Real World Assets), and tokenized treasury products in one interface. The growth of RWA and tokenized treasuries (e.g., BlackRock's BUIDL) is presented as the asset-layer fusion, providing stable, yield-bearing assets on-chain and acting as a bridge between the two worlds. In conclusion, the "Wall Street-ization" of crypto is framed as a mutual transformation. Decentralized ideals persist in the protocol layer, while at the application layer, a more efficient, global, and accessible unified capital market is emerging from this convergence. The future competition lies not between crypto exchanges and stockbrokers, but between platforms vying to offer the most comprehensive asset coverage, liquidity, and user experience within a single account.

marsbit21m ago

Gate Research Institute: The 'Wall Street-ization' Wave of Crypto Financial Products – Competition or Integration?

marsbit21m ago

Claude's Major New Feature: Screen Recording + Voice, Distilling Your Skills into AI Tasks in One Click

Claude has introduced a major new feature called "Record a Skill," available for Pro, Max, and Team users. This function, found in the Claude desktop app's CoWork menu, allows users to create reusable AI skills simply by recording their screen and providing voice narration while performing a task. Claude then automatically analyzes the recording and generates a functional Skill. A hands-on test confirmed the feature works seamlessly. Users start recording via the Skills manager, perform their workflow while verbally explaining the steps and logic, and avoid including sensitive information. After recording, Claude processes the content and creates the Skill, which can be saved and later invoked with a slash command (/). This eliminates the need for manual adjustments or writing complex instruction files. The innovation goes beyond mere efficiency. Previously, creating a Skill required writing a detailed SKILL.md file in Markdown—a significant barrier for non-technical users. "Record a Skill" bypasses this by directly capturing both actions and the implicit reasoning shared in the narration. This lowers the barrier to knowledge transfer and automation, addressing a core challenge in corporate knowledge management: the difficulty of getting experts to write and maintain documentation. However, the feature also highlights a shift in the nature of work. A case study from March 2026 showed a freelancer whose five-year client relationship was effectively replaced by a hand-coded Claude Skill automating their content workflow. With the even lower barrier of screen recording, the ability to distill personal expertise into automatable skills accelerates this trend. The "moat" for work is moving from simply knowing how to do a task to mastering tasks that are difficult or impossible to automate.

marsbit25m ago

Claude's Major New Feature: Screen Recording + Voice, Distilling Your Skills into AI Tasks in One Click

marsbit25m ago

Feeding AI "Noise" Can Also Boost Scores, This Work Enables Positive Transfer with Noise

Feeding "Noise" to AI Can Improve Performance: A Method Enables Positive Transfer from Noise This work, Semi-Supervised Noise Adaptation (SSNA), introduces a Noise Adaptation Framework (NAF) that challenges traditional transfer learning. Instead of requiring a labeled source domain of real data (e.g., images, text), NAF uses randomly generated Gaussian noise as the source. For a target task with C classes, it constructs C noise clusters by sampling from Gaussian distributions. Although this synthetic noise contains no semantic meaning, NAF trains it to form a discriminative class structure in a shared representation space—clustering same-class noise and separating different classes. The key is aligning this learned structure from the noise domain to the real, sparsely labeled target domain. A small number of target labels are still essential to establish the correspondence between noise clusters and actual classes. The training objective combines: 1) supervised loss on the few labeled target samples, 2) classification loss for the noise to build its structure, and 3) a distribution alignment loss (using Negative Domain Similarity) to minimize the gap between the noise and target domains in the shared space. Experiments show significant gains in few-label settings. With just 4 labels per class, NAF with a ResNet-18 backbone improves accuracy over a standard supervised baseline (ERM) by +12.35% on CIFAR-10, +7.61% on CIFAR-100, +4.38% on DTD-47, and +2.74% on Caltech-101. It also benefits fine-grained datasets and scales to ImageNet-1K (with 100 labels/class) and text classification (AG News). NAF can be integrated into existing semi-supervised methods like FixMatch for further gains. Ablation studies confirm the transferred benefit comes from the discriminative structure of the noise, not randomness itself. Collapsing all noise into a single point causes negative transfer, while increasing separation between noise cluster centers improves performance. The amount of noise per class is less critical once a basic structure forms. In conclusion, this work demonstrates that for positive transfer, the semantic content of source data may not be necessary. What can be effectively transferred is the *organizational structure* of categories within a representation space. This offers a promising alternative for scenarios where real source data is unavailable due to privacy, copyright, or procurement constraints.

marsbit27m ago

Feeding AI "Noise" Can Also Boost Scores, This Work Enables Positive Transfer with Noise

marsbit27m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片