Why Is It Difficult for Retail Investors to Break Free from the Loss Cycle of High-Frequency Trading?

比推Published on 2025-12-09Last updated on 2025-12-09

Abstract

Why Retail Traders Struggle to Escape the High-Frequency Trading Loss Cycle Retail investors often fall into a trap of continuous losses in cryptocurrency markets due to high-frequency day trading, which is structurally skewed against them. The author, sharing from personal experience, explains that frequent trading without informational advantages—such as access to real order flow, liquidity maps, or market maker positions—inevitably leads to financial ruin over time. The key insight is that winning isn’t just about making profits but about preserving them. Most successful retail traders actually succeed by trading less: catching major market moves, then stepping back to avoid giving back gains. In contrast, constant trading—often driven by overconfidence and the false belief that discipline and risk management alone can beat the market—results in consistent losses. The article compares modern day trading to a "casino disguised as a café," where inexperienced traders, especially young ones, mistake gambling for a learnable skill. They rely on superficial tools like TradingView charts without understanding that institutional traders use advanced systems like Bloomberg terminals with exclusive data. Ultimately, the author advises retail traders to reduce trading frequency, avoid day trading, and focus on long-term strategies instead of chasing quick wins. The real tragedy is not losing money but believing that high-frequency trading is a sustainable strategy rather...

Author: Pickle Cat

Compiled by: Deep Tide TechFlow

Original Title: Losing Retail Investors Keep Trading, Winning Retail Investors Take Breaks


Want to stop losing money in the cryptocurrency market? First, stop your day trading!

Because for ordinary investors, day trading is structurally a "scam."

This article is long, but if you are willing to spend 120 seconds reading it, I guarantee you will thank yourself years later.

I started trading when I was a teenager.

I’ve had victories that made me feel like "Batman," and I’ve also suffered devastating losses that shattered me and still haunt me to this day.

I’ve tried every trading strategy an ordinary investor can find.

There was even a whole year when I was obsessed with day trading, thinking it would finally turn things around for me, but I failed so miserably that it still stings every time I think about it.

My profit and loss (PNL) was so bad that the automatic Bitcoin purchase plan I set up for my grandma made more money than I did.

Later, I transformed into a low-frequency swing trader, rarely adjusting my positions. After making a profit, I would decisively exit and then take a break from trading for a while.

It was only then that my life started to improve, and everything became clear.

I’m not a saint. I’m writing this to save my younger, foolish, naive, and impulsive self.

First, as an ordinary day trader, you are engaging in high-frequency trading without any informational advantage (no real order flow, no clear liquidity map, no market maker position information, no execution advantage, nothing).

If you only trade a few times a quarter, you might still survive.

But what if you trade more than 10 times a week?

Even if you have the strongest "discipline" and "risk management" skills in the world, the math will eventually make you lose everything.

The reason ordinary investors fail is not that they never win, but that they never stop. The only outcome of high-frequency trading is one: destruction.

This is also why I set up a "penalty system" for myself—if I exceed the quarterly trading limit, I face consequences.

Every major loss I’ve experienced happened because I continued trading after a big win instead of stopping in time.

And all my big wins (the ones where I actually held onto the money for a long time) happened because I caught a major trend and then chose to rest and cool off.

This pattern is so obvious it’s painful.

"Winning" isn’t about suddenly making a lot of money; real "winning" is being able to keep that money instead of losing it all the next year.

Now I see 14-year-olds on TikTok calling themselves day traders, drawing a few lines on TradingView, thinking that buying some "guru’s" course or joining a Discord group means they’ve mastered some daily executable trading system.

It makes me sick. If they knew they were gambling, I wouldn’t mind—at least they’d know they were playing a game.

But the current day trading trend is even bigger than the "proxy buying craze" of 2016 and 2017. And we all know how that ended.

People underestimate the difficulty of trading and severely overestimate their own abilities.

The problem isn’t just mathematical. Yes, the more you trade and the less you stop, the harder it is to sustain profits.

The real problem is that young, ordinary traders genuinely believe that with "discipline" and "risk management," they are not gambling at all. They think day trading is a "skill" that can be executed like a daily habit.

This doesn’t just apply to cryptocurrency day trading; it’s the same for the U.S. stock market and almost every other market.

High-frequency trading is only for institutions.

Take the U.S. stock market, for example.

Do you know what institutional traders don’t even look at? Candlestick charts and TradingView.

They use Bloomberg terminals, which contain data ordinary investors will never see.

Of course, you might already know this. But 14- to 18-year-olds don’t. They think their indicators are the tools all traders use.

That’s the real danger.

If you know you’re gambling, at least part of you will know when to stop.

But once you believe it’s a "system," you’ll never stop.

You’ll keep clicking until the market empties you out.

Day Trading: A Casino Disguised as a Café

It really is like a casino in disguise.

When you walk into Las Vegas or Macau, you know exactly what kind of place you’re entering. You see the lights, the tables, the dealers, the noise. Your brain immediately realizes: this is gambling.

But today’s day trading is like a casino disguised as a café.

New traders walk in, thinking they’re there to "learn a skill," unaware that they’re already sitting at a table designed to slowly drain them dry.

So they don’t stop.

That’s the essence of the tragedy, not the losses themselves.

The real tragedy is that they genuinely believe they’re not gambling, and it’s this belief that keeps them going until they lose everything.

As for those ordinary traders who seem to be "making money" (like I once was)... honestly, most of them just caught a wave.

They had good luck at the right time, combined with a little discipline learned from previous losses, and finally learned to stop after winning.

Even so, such lucky individuals make up less than one percent of all ordinary traders.

Making money in trading isn’t actually that hard; what’s truly difficult is keeping it.


Twitter: https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

BitPush TG Discussion Group: https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

BitPush TG Subscription: https://t.me/bitpush

Original link: https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7594262

Related Questions

QWhy is day trading considered a structural 'scam' for retail investors according to the article?

ABecause retail investors engage in high-frequency trading without any information advantages (no real order flow, liquidity maps, market maker positions, or execution advantages), making consistent profits mathematically impossible.

QWhat key behavioral pattern does the author identify as the cause of major losses versus major wins?

AMajor losses occurred after big wins when the author continued trading instead of stopping; major wins were retained by catching a big market move and then choosing to rest and cool off.

QHow does the article describe the danger of young retail traders believing day trading is a 'skill' rather than gambling?

AIt creates a false belief that encourages continuous trading until they are wiped out, unlike recognizing it as gambling which might prompt knowing when to stop.

QWhat analogy does the author use to contrast traditional casinos with modern day trading environments?

ADay trading is likened to a casino disguised as a café, where traders think they are learning a skill but are actually at a table designed to slowly drain them.

QWhat is the ultimate challenge in trading as emphasized in the article: making money or keeping it?

AThe real challenge is keeping the money, not making it, as most retail traders fail to preserve gains due to frequent trading and overconfidence.

Related Reads

Fed's Internal Doves Flock to Hawkish Stance, Warsh's Debut "Between a Rock and a Hard Place"

U.S. Federal Reserve officials who previously advocated for rate cuts, including Governor Christopher Waller, have recently shifted their stance, with many now not ruling out the possibility of future rate hikes. This sets a challenging stage for new Fed Chair Kevin Warsh's first policy meeting. Appointed by President Trump based on his dovish views, Warsh now faces a committee where the debate has pivoted from "when to cut" to "whether to hike," driven by persistent inflation above 3%, a strong labor market, and supply-side pressures from AI infrastructure demands and geopolitical tensions. Key figures illustrate the shift. Governor Waller, once concerned about employment, now says data has pushed him toward considering rate increases. Even moderate voices like Governor Lisa Cook, while expecting inflation to ease, have indicated readiness to hike if it fails to do so. Long-time hawks such as regional Fed presidents Beth Hammack, Lorie Logan, and Neel Kashkari have grown more vocal, arguing that the real policy rate is effectively falling and that action may soon be needed. The upcoming Fed meeting is expected to keep rates steady but will likely remove the "easing bias" from its statement, signaling a neutral stance between cuts and hikes. The quarterly "dot plot" is anticipated to show most officials projecting no cuts this year, with some potentially indicating hikes. Chair Warsh, a critic of the Fed's reliance on forward guidance like the dot plot, must navigate communicating this pivot using tools he has questioned, all while steering policy in a direction counter to the preferences of the president who appointed him. The consensus suggests the Fed's next move could well be a rate increase.

marsbit15m ago

Fed's Internal Doves Flock to Hawkish Stance, Warsh's Debut "Between a Rock and a Hard Place"

marsbit15m ago

The Trillion-Yuan Market Cap 'Yi Zhong Tian': Who is the True Value King?

The article analyzes the three leading Chinese optical module companies, collectively nicknamed "Yi Zhong Tian": Xinyisheng, Zhongji Innolight, and TFC Optical Communication. It evaluates their "cost-performance" not by current stock price, but through three lenses: PEG ratio (growth vs. valuation), earnings quality, and premium/discount for certainty. Xinyisheng shows the most attractive PEG ratio and high profitability, but its valuation reflects discounts for risks like high customer concentration and reliance on overseas markets. Zhongji Innolight, the most expensive, commands a premium for its market leadership, dominant share in key products like 800G/1.6T modules, and higher earnings certainty, though it faces geopolitical risks. TFC Optical, as an upstream component supplier ("water seller"), has the highest gross margin and bets on the long-term CPO/NPO architecture trend, but trades at a high valuation with more stable, less explosive growth. The core argument is that while these companies dominate module assembly, the true profit pool and technological moat lie upstream in laser and switch chips, currently controlled by U.S. firms like Lumentum and Coherent. The long-term "cost-performance" for these Chinese leaders hinges on whether the domestic industry, exemplified by companies like Yuanjie Technology, can successfully move up the value chain into high-power laser chips. Otherwise, their high growth may remain confined to the lower-margin assembly segment.

marsbit25m ago

The Trillion-Yuan Market Cap 'Yi Zhong Tian': Who is the True Value King?

marsbit25m ago

Has the Crypto Market Bottomed? Here's What Institutions Think

The crypto market is in a period of significant debate, with leading institutions offering differing views on whether a bottom has been reached. Three prominent firms have published detailed analyses: * **Galaxy Digital** argues Bitcoin has **not yet bottomed**. Their analysis of 13 historical indicators across six dimensions (valuation, profit-taking, miner pressure, etc.) shows only four are fully met. They project a potential bottom range between $30k and $54k. * **NYDIG** states a bottom is **possible but not likely**. While metrics are close to historic bear market extremes, they note the absence of a classic panic-selling event. They also suggest increased institutional adoption may have structurally altered the market cycle, potentially leading to a shallower downturn. * **Standard Chartered Bank** asserts the **bottom has already occurred** at around $59k. They cite two key factors: potential US-Iran diplomatic progress and the anticipated SpaceX IPO, which they believe absorbed capital and caused ETF selling pressure that is now subsiding. They forecast a year-end price target of $100k. Despite the surface-level disagreement, the reports share critical common ground more valuable for long-term investors: 1. All three believe the market bottom will form **within this year**. 2. All agree the current price is **closer to the bottom than to previous highs**. 3. All maintain a **bullish long-term outlook** for Bitcoin and a new cycle. The core takeaway is that while the exact bottom price ($40k, $50k, or $60k) is debated, the consensus is that a bottom is imminent. For long-term holders, the primary focus should not be pinpointing the absolute low, but on the future potential for prices to reach $100k, $200k, or higher. The fundamental thesis for Bitcoin—sovereign debt accumulation, inflation, declining trust in centralized institutions, global digitization, and improved accessibility—remains intact and is arguably strengthening. The overall landscape is viewed as more favorable than in previous crypto winters.

marsbit35m ago

Has the Crypto Market Bottomed? Here's What Institutions Think

marsbit35m ago

The 'Chip' Challenge and Breakthroughs in China's Optical Industry Chain

China's Photonics Industry: Bottlenecks and Breakthroughs In the global AI race, computing chips dominate the narrative, but the underlying bottleneck increasingly defining the scale of AI clusters is light—or more specifically, optical connectivity. Optical modules, which translate electrical signals to light and vice versa, are crucial for connecting thousands of GPUs in AI data centers, preventing data congestion and ensuring efficient model training. High-speed modules (800G, 1.6T) are now standard, with performance hinging on advanced DSP (Digital Signal Processor) chips. This is where a critical dependency lies. Two US giants—Marvell and Broadcom—collectively dominate over 90% of the high-end DSP chip market. Chinese optical module leaders like Zhongji Innolight and Eoptolink rely on these chips to manufacture modules for overseas AI customers, primarily in North America. While this creates a supply chain vulnerability, complete decoupling is difficult. Marvell derives over half its revenue from Greater China, and the US firms depend on Chinese partners for chip packaging and optical components. The risk from laser chips (e.g., from Lumentum), another key component, is considered more manageable due to multiple global suppliers and faster progress in domestic alternatives from companies like YOFC and Accelink. To mitigate risks, China's industry is pursuing a multi-pronged strategy: diversifying supply chains and locking in long-term orders; fostering a domestic market ecosystem to adopt homegrown DSPs from firms like Huawei HiSilicon and CETC; accelerating R&D in high-speed DSPs and advanced packaging; and investing in next-gen technologies like silicon photonics and Co-Packaged Optics (CPO) to reduce reliance on discrete DSPs. The ultimate solution lies not in short-term博弈 but in persistent advancement of domestic high-end chip R&D and manufacturing. While challenges remain in performance, certification, and ecosystem building, China's vast domestic market and manufacturing base provide a crucial buffer, buying time for the industry to achieve greater technological independence.

marsbit49m ago

The 'Chip' Challenge and Breakthroughs in China's Optical Industry Chain

marsbit49m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

What is TRUMP CAT

Trump Cat Family, $Trump Cat: An Unraveled Mystery Introduction In the constantly evolving landscape of crypto projects and web3 innovations, a curious phenomenon has emerged—one that appears to straddle the line between cryptocurrency and internet meme culture. This is the enigmatic “Trump Cat Family”, also referred to as “$Trump Cat”. Though it might arouse curiosity among crypto enthusiasts, the reality appears far removed from the standard definition of a crypto project. This article aims to explore the concept of Trump Cat Family, bringing to light the context surrounding it and clarifying its status in the crypto realm. What is Trump Cat Family, $Trump Cat? At first glance, one might think that “Trump Cat Family” refers to a legitimate cryptocurrency or web3 project. However, upon deeper investigation, it becomes evident that the term lacks the trappings of a traditional crypto venture. Instead, “Trump Cat” seems to be predominantly associated with the viral meme culture that surged following controversial statements made by former U.S. President Donald Trump regarding Haitian immigrants. The media coverage sparked a myriad of memes, humorous interpretations, and a wave of social commentary. These memes depict various forms of satire centred on Trump's dialogue, often utilising cats in comedic and sometimes absurd scenarios. Rather than a structured project aimed at addressing technological advancements or financial transactions, the “Trump Cat Family” concept exists predominantly in the realm of internet humour. Who is the Creator of Trump Cat Family, $Trump Cat? In the investigation of who stands behind the “Trump Cat Family,” it becomes apparent that there exists no identifiable creator or founding figure. The phenomenon seems to have originated from collective internet expression, rather than from a singular visionary with a defined project goal. This anonymity further emphasises its status as a meme rather than a structured initiative akin to most known crypto projects. Who are the Investors of Trump Cat Family, $Trump Cat? Given that “Trump Cat Family” does not conform to the characteristics of a reputable crypto project, the question of investment becomes moot. There have been no established foundations or organisations expressing support for a project by this name. Instead, what exists are individual contributors to meme culture—hobbyists, artists, and social media users who collectively populate the internet with their interpretations and humour surrounding the term “Trump Cat.” This organic growth within digital human communication reflects more of a social commentary than a financial investment landscape. How Does Trump Cat Family, $Trump Cat Work? If one seeks to establish how “Trump Cat Family” operates, the answer is vastly different from what might be expected of standard crypto projects. There are no operational mechanisms, technological innovations, or unique features inherent to this phenomenon. Instead, it exists through viral spread online, relying upon social media platforms for proliferation. The “how” lies in the realm of culture and communication—its essence derived from the dynamics of social interaction rather than from established crypto protocols or blockchain functionalities. What makes “Trump Cat” unique, if anything, is the way it dramatizes a political dialogue through humour. People utilise engaging visuals, inside jokes, and inventive storytelling to convey sentiments regarding political figures and societal issues. The power of memes transcends traditional communication, encapsulating complex thoughts in a form that resonates widely, yet remains elusive in terms of quantifiable success or structured goals. Timeline of Trump Cat Family, $Trump Cat September 2024: The discourse surrounding Donald Trump's comments about Haitian immigrants allegedly consuming pets gains traction online, leading to a blossoming of memes and parodic interpretations across various platforms. Continuing Impact: Following this period, the “Trump Cat” phenomenon sees continued life as social media users leverage humour to address, critique, or simply celebrate the absurdity of political conversations and events. It is essential to note that as “Trump Cat Family” lacks the formal structure of a traditional project, the timeline consists primarily of anecdotal observation rather than remarkable milestones commonly found in recognised crypto ventures. Key Points Meme Culture: Rather than a structured crypto initiative, “Trump Cat” aligns more with the evolving landscape of internet memes. Origin of the Term: The genesis of “Trump Cat” relates directly to commentary on President Trump's remarks about Haitian immigrants, sparking widespread humorous representation. Absence of a Project Framework: The term fails to align with any defined project objectives, creators, or investors, marking it as a novel cultural experience rather than a crypto project. Conclusion In summary, the investigation into “Trump Cat Family, $Trump Cat” reveals a phenomenon entrenched in internet meme culture rather than a recognised project within the cryptocurrency or web3 sectors. The virality surrounding the term is birthed from collective user engagement, reflective of modern digital discourse rather than a formalised initiative with structure or strategic foresight. For all the curiosity it may invoke among those seeking the next big crypto project, “Trump Cat Family” serves as a testament to humanity's creativity, humour, and often absurd relationship with politics in the digital age.

264 Total ViewsPublished 2025.01.22Updated 2025.01.22

What is TRUMP CAT

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of CAT (CAT) are presented below.

活动图片