Here’s why Injective [INJ] will drop to the $10 demand zone next

ambcryptoPublished on 2025-08-31Last updated on 2025-09-01

Key Takeaways

Injective was testing a key trendline support at the time of writing. This trendline stretched back to April, and its failure could see prices fall to $12 and $10 in the coming weeks.


Injective [INJ] looked primed for another downward leg, observed crypto analyst Ali Martinez.

AMBCrypto found that the altcoin was bearish across multiple timeframes. The buying pressure to halt the descent at the trendline support was missing.

Injective Ali Charts

Source: Ali on X

This weakness could see the price falter and retest the $12 demand zone. A deeper correction to $10.3 would become viable, especially if Bitcoin [BTC] falls toward the $100k mark.

Weekly rejection stalls bullish case

Injective 1-week Chart

Source: INJ/USDT on TradingView

On the 1-week chart, Injective showed a bearish swing structure. The swing points were at $35.26 and $6.34, made in December 2024 and April 2025, respectively.

The $15.48 level marked the local weekly resistance that INJ bulls have tried to breach over the past month. They failed, and over the past two weeks, INJ faced repeated rejection at this resistance.

Even though the CMF was above +0.05 to reflect inflow pressure, Injective prices were still unable to breakout past the $15.5 resistance region.

In the coming days, the 20-period moving average at $12.38 would likely be tested as support.

Daily chart signals: trendline under fire

INJ 1-day Chart

Source: INJ/USDT on TradingView

On the 1-day chart, the trendline support mentioned earlier was under attack.

However, the bullish order block at $12.2 was likely to serve as a demand zone, even if the trendline gave way.

The technical indicators showed bears had the upper hand.

CMF slipped below 0.05, signaling heavy capital outflows. Meanwhile, MACD crossed bearish weeks ago and recently dropped under zero—hinting that further losses were likely.

Lower timeframes confirm bearish drift

Injective 2-hour Chart

Source: INJ/USDT on TradingView

The lower timeframe market structure was also bearish. The lower highs and lower lows were marked in yellow. At the time of writing, the $12.67 low was under threat.

Even though the CMF was above +0.05, the bearish structure and low trading volume meant that a move downward was likely.

The $12-$12.1 demand zone would be next week’s price target.

Disclaimer: The information presented does not constitute financial, investment, trading, or other types of advice and is solely the writer’s opinion

Share

Related Reads

Uncovering the Truth About Agent Commerce, Payments, and Infrastructure

Decoding Agent Commerce, Payments, and Infrastructure: The Reality Over the past year, I've been building infrastructure for the Agent economy, engaging with major players like Stripe, Visa, Coinbase, Google, and dozens of startups. A clear conclusion emerges: true, large-scale demand does not yet exist. Startups face structural challenges. Data points illustrate this gap. Stripe's Agent commerce platform has over 1,000 merchants but only single-digit transacting agents. Visa's Agent payment token requires 9-month KYC and a $250M revenue threshold, accessible only to giants like Amazon. On-chain analysis reveals actual daily Agent transaction volume is around $17k, half of which are test transactions. The article analyzes four potential markets: **1. Agent-to-Merchant (A2M):** Current AI shopping UX is often inferior to traditional e-commerce for visual, comparison-heavy purchases (clothing, electronics). Chat interfaces are a step back. Real merchant interest is defensive "Agent Engine Optimization," fearing future obsolescence, not current demand. Potential exists in high-frequency, low-decision purchases (e.g., food delivery) or simplifying terrible UX (complex checkouts, non-native shoppers), but these require massive consumer distribution channels dominated by giants like DoorDash and Amazon. **2. Agent-to-API (A2A):** Developers already have subscriptions and billing for core APIs (compute, data). The argument for micro-payments via crypto for sub-dollar API calls is addressed by pre-paid balances today. The deeper issue is supplier resistance; major SaaS firms rely on enterprise contracts, not fractional cent pricing. Opportunity lies in the long tail of niche services, but this is a smaller market catering to developers, a historically low-paying group. **3. Agent-to-Agent (A2A):** This remains a theoretical long-term vision with near-zero current transaction volume. It involves unique challenges: discovery, trust, negotiation, dispute resolution. When it materializes, it will require a fundamentally new settlement infrastructure for high-speed, variable-value, multi-party transactions. It's a real long-term bet, but not the current market. **4. Agent-to-Finance (A2F):** This is the only category with existing, paying demand. Integrating AI into financial workflows (trading, portfolio management) is a natural evolution and enables new capabilities like autonomous rebalancing. However, competition favors incumbents with regulatory licenses, compliance infrastructure, and existing client relationships. **The Real Issue:** Why is infrastructure still being built? Incumbents can afford long-term bets, and payment companies see every problem as a nail for their payment hammer. However, payment is just one piece. The core challenge is *coordination*—orchestrating work between Agents and humans, verifying outcomes, and settling results. Payment is part of settlement, which is part of coordination. Companies that solve the coordination problem will subsume payments, not the other way around. Startups lack the infinite runway of giants and must find today's real market, which, after a year of exploration, lies outside these four categories—in an area with real, growing, and underserved activity.

marsbit1h ago

Uncovering the Truth About Agent Commerce, Payments, and Infrastructure

marsbit1h ago

Kalshi, MTS, and a16z's Ambition

The article "Kalshi, MTS, and a16z's Ambition" explores prediction markets as a focal point of excitement in 2025 for investors, crypto enthusiasts, and media. It traces their intellectual lineage from Friedrich Hayek's ideas on dispersed knowledge and market coordination to Robin Hanson's Logarithmic Market Scoring Rule (LMSR), which incentivizes truthful information sharing. The piece argues that a16z's significant investment in prediction market platform Kalshi (valued at $220B) transcends mere financial speculation. a16z frames prediction markets as a new form of "media" that provides "presence"—a way for individuals to actively engage with and influence world events through financial stakes, countering postmodern detachment. By wagering on outcomes, users become "super observers," and the market's aggregated probabilities gain authoritative power to define event truth and importance. The article uses media company MTS ("Monitoring The Situation") as a case study of a16z's "new media" strategy: rapidly producing high-intensity, multi-format content to "take over the timeline." However, prediction markets like Kalshi are presented as the ultimate piece in this media empire. Their real-money, crowd-sourced probabilities possess a unique "reality distortion field" and perceived objectivity, potentially swaying public opinion and granting a private company unprecedented interpretive power over reality. Ultimately, Kalshi's immense valuation is attributed not just to its exchange model, but to its role as a foundational component in a16z's envisioned new media landscape, where prediction markets define narrative and truth.

链捕手1h ago

Kalshi, MTS, and a16z's Ambition

链捕手1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片