Wondering What’s Going On With Solana? Projects Are Taking Massive Hit As Price Plunges

bitcoinistPublished on 2026-02-26Last updated on 2026-02-26

Abstract

Solana projects Step Finance, along with its sister platforms SolanaFloor and Remora Markets, are winding down all operations following a $40 million treasury hack last month. Despite exploring financing and acquisition options, the team found no viable path forward. The STEP token has plunged over 40% in a week and is down 99% from its all-time high. Remora Markets is working on a redemption process for token holders, while media outlet SolanaFloor will archive existing content but cease new publications. Solflare wallet will pause its news section due to the shutdown. Despite these setbacks, Solana’s price saw an 8% increase in 24 hours, trading around $89.

Solana projects Step Finance and its sister platforms have announced they are winding down operations following an exploit last month. This also comes as crypto prices struggle amid the current bear market, with SOL still below the psychological $100 level.

Solana Projects To Wind Down Following Exploit And Amid Price Struggle

In an X post, Solana DeFi aggregator Step Finance announced that it and its sister projects, SolanaFloor and Remora Markets, will be winding down all operations. This follows the hack towards the end of last month involving the firm’s treasury wallets, which resulted in a loss of around $40 million.

Related Reading: This Analyst Predicted Solana Sell-Off At $250, And Is Back With A New Prediction

StepFinance stated that following the hack, they explored every possible path forward, including financing and acquisition opportunities. However, the Solana project was unable to secure a viable outcome, which is why it has decided to end all operations effective immediately. The firm also revealed that it is working on a buyback for STEP holders based on a snapshot taken before the incident.

The STEP token is down over 40% in the past week amid this announcement, currently trading at around 0.00060. The token is down by over 99% from its all-time high (ATH) of $10, set in August 2021.

Furthermore, Step Finance stated that it is also working on a redemption process for Remora rToken holders, with these tokens still backed 1:1. Remora Markets, a tokenized stock marketplace on SOL, also confirmed that it is winding down operations alongside its parent company, Step Finance. Remora stated that they are currently working on a redemption process to allow holders to redeem their tokens for USDC and that they will share more details soon.

Media Outlet To Also Wind Down

Solana media platform Solana Floor, a sister company to Step Finance, also confirmed that it is winding down operations. The platform will no longer publish new content, but the existing website, videos, and newsletters will remain available as an archive. Solana wallet Solflare stated that it will pause its News section inside the wallet due to Solana Floor’s sunsetting.

Related Reading: XRP, Solana Secure Inflows As Institutions Move $1 Billion Out Of Bitcoin And Ethereum

Solflare also revealed that it is considering opening up the space to community-driven articles published directly in the wallet. This will include original long-form articles, fresh insights, analysis, and strong opinions, deep dives into SOL projects/trends, educational crypto explainers, and market analysis.

Meanwhile, Step Finance co-founder George Harrap indicated that there was still the possibility of an acquisition of any of their projects. He stated that some people have reached out about acquiring various businesses and that they will pursue those if serious and have interest, but warned that they are working on a “time crunch.

At the time of writing, the Solana price is trading at around $89, up 8% in the last 24 hours, according to data from CoinMarketCap.

SOL trading at $87 on the 1D chart | Source: SOLUSDT on Tradingview.com

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhy are Step Finance and its sister platforms winding down operations?

AStep Finance and its sister platforms are winding down operations due to a significant exploit last month that resulted in a loss of around $40 million from the firm's treasury wallets, and they were unable to secure financing or acquisition opportunities to continue.

QWhat is the current trading price of the STEP token and how much has it fallen from its all-time high?

AThe STEP token is currently trading at around $0.00060, which is down over 40% in the past week and represents a decline of over 99% from its all-time high of $10 set in August 2021.

QWhat will happen to the SolanaFloor media platform?

ASolanaFloor will no longer publish new content, but its existing website, videos, and newsletters will remain available as an archive. The wallet Solflare will also pause its News section due to this sunsetting.

QWhat is the process for STEP and rToken holders following the shutdown?

AStep Finance is working on a buyback for STEP holders based on a snapshot taken before the exploit. For Remora rToken holders, a redemption process is being developed to allow them to redeem their tokens 1:1 for USDC.

QWhat was the co-founder's statement regarding the possibility of an acquisition?

ACo-founder George Harrap indicated that some people have reached out about acquiring various businesses, and they will pursue serious offers, but warned that they are working on a 'time crunch'.

Related Reads

Dialogue with Jia Hang | Looking Back at Two Decades of Chinese Payment Going Global

**Summary: A Conversation with Jia Hang on Two Decades of China's Payment Globalization** Jia Hang, a veteran with over twenty years in payments, reflects on China's attempts to build a global payment network through three key phases: UnionPay (card networks), Alipay+ (digital wallets), and now, stablecoins. His journey began at UnionPay International, aiming to establish China's card network abroad. While successful in following Chinese tourists ("where Chinese go, UnionPay goes"), it struggled to achieve true global scale. The core lesson: card networks like Visa/Mastercard's unassailable advantage isn't just technical standards, but their deeply entrenched **governance and profit-sharing models** that create powerful network effects. Competing as the "same species" is nearly impossible. At Ant Group, he led Alipay+, a strategy to bypass card networks by interconnecting local e-wallets worldwide. While innovative, it faced a similar ceiling. Mobile QR payments and card swipes were essentially **the same species competing for the same pie**, lacking a disruptive value proposition for users or a sustainable new incentive model to replace the card networks' established flywheel. Today, at Singapore's DCS, Jia focuses on stablecoin-based payments. He argues stablecoins represent a fundamental shift. They are not competing with Visa for consumer payments but challenging the **traditional banking and account system for value movement**. Products like "U Cards" (stablecoin-linked payment cards) are transitional, leveraging existing card networks for acceptance while building new rails. The real potential lies in stablecoins enabling seamless, low-cost global value transfer, potentially reorganizing the financial infrastructure around **accounts rather than cards**. Jia believes stablecoin adoption for local retail payments, cross-border transactions, and as high-yield savings vehicles is becoming irreversible. This could gradually reduce reliance on traditional fiat channels, especially in regions with weak currencies or capital controls. The quest for the "next global payment network" continues, now centered on whether stablecoins can successfully bridge Web2 and Web3, establish new governance, and create compelling user value beyond mere cost reduction.

marsbit13m ago

Dialogue with Jia Hang | Looking Back at Two Decades of Chinese Payment Going Global

marsbit13m ago

Circle's Stock Price Plunges 76%, Hong Kong Dollar Stablecoin Set to Launch Within Two Weeks

Circle's stock price has plunged approximately 76% from its 2023 peak, reflecting a major market revaluation. Despite this, Circle President Heath Tarbert emphasized the company's focus on long-term execution and its dominant position with USDC's $73 billion circulation across 34 blockchains. The competitive landscape is intensifying. A new consortium-backed stablecoin, Open USD, is attempting to challenge incumbents by sharing reserve yields with partners. More significantly, Visa's new stablecoin platform, initially supporting Open USD while also being compatible with USDC, could erode Circle's network effects. In response, Circle is expanding into real-world payments through partnerships like the one with Japan's JCB. Separately, Tether (USDT) faces a two-year compliance window under new U.S. regulations, requiring it to adjust its reserve composition away from assets like Bitcoin and loans towards cash and U.S. Treasuries. Meanwhile, in Hong Kong, Standard Chartered-backed fintech firm Dian Dian is poised to launch a licensed HKD-pegged stablecoin (HKDAP), moving the industry into a phase where the real test is integrating licensed stablecoins into actual payment flows and corporate treasury systems. The sharp decline in Circle's stock underscores a broader shift: the stablecoin market is moving from a winner-takes-all dynamic to a multi-player competitive arena where execution, compliance, and real-world utility are becoming paramount.

marsbit13m ago

Circle's Stock Price Plunges 76%, Hong Kong Dollar Stablecoin Set to Launch Within Two Weeks

marsbit13m ago

Amidst Capital's Encirclement, Decentralization is the Sole Defense for Public Blockchains

In a landscape dominated by power and profit motives, the author argues that decentralization is not merely one desirable feature among many in blockchain design—it is the singular, non-negotiable defense against corporate and capital capture. The article adopts a Machiavellian, realist perspective on human institutions, positing that businesses will inevitably attempt to co-opt any valuable network to protect their profits and dominance. While external attacks like 51% forks are often discussed, the greater existential risk is internal capture—the gradual erosion of a protocol’s neutrality by vested interests, as seen historically with platforms like Visa and Google. The piece critiques permissioned chains, highly centralized “permissionless” layer-1s, and layer-2s without sufficient decentralization (e.g., single sequencers) as inherently vulnerable. These compromised systems, promoted by established financial players, are framed as delaying tactics to stifle truly open networks that threaten existing high-fee, inefficient business models. Real-world examples, such as closed enterprise consortiums that exclude competitors, illustrate how such systems cement oligopolies rather than foster innovation. The author concludes that while decentralized protocols like Ethereum are imperfect and costly to operate, they represent the only viable long-term equilibrium. In a market where value naturally flows to the most secure and neutral settlement layer, only maximally decentralized public blockchains can resist being subsumed by capital and powerful incumbents.

Foresight News24m ago

Amidst Capital's Encirclement, Decentralization is the Sole Defense for Public Blockchains

Foresight News24m ago

Who Decides the Rules of Bitcoin? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

Bitcoin's governance is once again at the center of a heated debate, this time ignited by BIP-110, the "Reduced Data Temporary Softfork." This proposal aims to curb non-monetary data (like inscriptions and Runes) by introducing seven new consensus-layer restrictions over a year, such as limiting new output scripts to 34 bytes and restoring the OP_RETURN cap to 83 bytes. The controversy stems from BIP-110's fundamental shift: it moves the battle against "spam" from node relay and miner policies to the consensus layer, rendering currently valid transactions invalid. Supporters, arguing that default policy governance has failed (highlighted by Bitcoin Core v30's relaxation of OP_RETURN limits), see this as necessary to protect node resources and Bitcoin's monetary focus. Opponents, led by figures like Michael Saylor and Adam Back, warn it dangerously centralizes governance. Saylor listed 110 reasons against it, criticizing its low 55% miner activation threshold and potential for chain splits. Back emphasized Bitcoin's "permissionless" ethos, arguing no single group should impose value judgments via consensus rules. Further complicating matters, technical critiques suggest BIP-110 may be technically circumventable, and a "BlockSlop" vulnerability in its upgrade path poses a consensus risk. The debate has drawn in diverse stakeholders: miners (with pools like Ocean signaling support and Foundry polling clients), node operators (like Bitcoin Knots), and new players like corporate treasury holder MicroStrategy (Saylor), whose market influence adds a novel dimension. Ultimately, BIP-110 acts as a governance stress test, exposing the unresolved question: who decides Bitcoin's rules? It pits the authority of miners, node operators, developers, and capital holders against each other, with each side claiming to defend Bitcoin's core principles of neutrality and security.

marsbit40m ago

Who Decides the Rules of Bitcoin? BIP-110 Ignites Governance Debate

marsbit40m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of SOL (SOL) are presented below.

活动图片