Wall Street Plunged into 'AI Phobia': An Indiscriminate Sell-off Is Spreading

marsbitPublished on 2026-02-11Last updated on 2026-02-11

Abstract

Wall Street is experiencing a widespread "AI panic," triggering indiscriminate sell-offs across sectors perceived as vulnerable to AI disruption. The fear intensified recently when a tax-strategy tool from startup Altruist Corp. caused sharp declines in shares of major wealth managers like Charles Schwab, Raymond James, and LPL Financial. This reflects a broader market shift from focusing on AI winners to hastily dumping stocks of companies—from small software firms to large financial services—deemed at risk of being replaced by AI-driven products. Similar sell-offs occurred earlier in software, insurance, and asset management after AI companies like Anthropic and Insurify launched new tools. While some investors see this as an overreaction, citing the slow pace of technological adoption historically, others warn that AI’s rapid advancement is fueling legitimate anxiety. High market valuations have made stocks particularly sensitive to any negative signals, amplifying the volatility. The key uncertainty remains how quickly and deeply AI will reshape industries, leaving the market in a state of cautious speculation.

Source: Jinshi Data

On Wall Street, growing fears about artificial intelligence are hammering the stocks of companies that could become its targets of disruption, from small software firms to large wealth management companies, none have been spared.

The latest round of selling erupted on Tuesday when a tax strategy tool launched by a little-known startup, Altruist Corp., caused shares of Charles Schwab Corp., Raymond James Financial Inc., and LPL Financial Holdings Inc. to fall by 7% or more.

This marked the steepest decline for some of these stocks since the market crash triggered by the trade war last April. But it is just the latest example of the "sell first, ask questions later" mentality—a mindset that is rapidly taking hold as the hundreds of billions of dollars poured into AI begin to translate into commercial products, sparking anxiety that AI could disrupt entire industries.

"Companies with any potential disruption risk are being sold off indiscriminately," said John Belton, a fund manager at Gabelli Funds.

Over the past few years, advancements in AI technology have been at the forefront of Wall Street, with tech stocks leading the gains. As this rally pushed stock prices to record highs, questions have persisted about whether this is a bubble about to burst or whether it will trigger a productivity boom that reshapes the American corporate landscape.

But since the beginning of last week, a series of AI product launches has triggered a noticeable market shift. Instead of focusing on picking winners, investors are quickly trying to avoid holding any company facing even the slightest risk of being replaced.

"I don't know what's going to happen next," said Will Rhind, CEO of Graniteshares Advisors.

"Last year's story was that we all believed in AI—but we were looking for applications, and as we keep discovering applications that seem increasingly powerful and persuasive, it is now leading to disruption."

For some time, the software industry has been troubled by concerns about AI. Last week, when a new tool from Anthropic PBC triggered sharp declines in stocks across industries such as software, financial services, asset management, and legal services, these worries began to shift more broadly to other sectors.

The same fears hit U.S. insurance broker stocks hard on Monday after the online insurance marketplace Insurify launched a new app using ChatGPT to compare auto insurance rates. On Tuesday, wealth management stocks became the next victim, as the product Hazel launched by Altruist—which helps financial advisors create personalized strategies for clients—dragged these stocks down.

Wealth management stocks plunge on AI risk concerns

Altruist CEO Jason Wenk said he himself was surprised by the scale of the stock market reaction, which wiped tens of billions of dollars from the market value of several investment firms. But he said it sends a strong signal about the competitive threat his company poses.

"People are beginning to realize—the architecture we used to build Hazel, it can replace any job in wealth management," he said in an interview. "Usually these jobs are done by entire teams. And now, AI can effectively do these jobs for just $100 a month."

AI companies like OpenAI and Anthropic have already made solid progress in the field of software engineering with products that help developers simplify and debug code processes, and are now entering other industries.

However, many questions remain about how this technology will be adopted. Take banking, for example, which has periodically faced challenges from electronic services and other technologies, but these have ultimately failed to undermine its dominance.

Gabelli fund manager Belton is one of the skeptics about how Wall Street has shifted from worrying about an AI bubble to fearing its imminent disruption of large parts of the economy.

"There will be winners and losers in every industry," Belton said. But he added: "A rule of thumb is that technological disruption often takes longer to materialize than expected."

This pullback may also reflect widespread anxiety about the sharp rise in stock prices over the past few years, driven by the AI spending boom and an unusually resilient U.S. economy. This has already pushed valuations too high and made investors more sensitive to concerns about a reversal.

"As long as they emit a signal that the market perceives as somewhat negative, the stock will fall 10%, which would never happen in a market that hasn't reached current trading levels," said Graniteshares' Rhind.

For Ross Gerber, CEO of Gerber Kawasaki, the anxiety about AI losers that has been hitting parts of the market over the past week is premature. He said it is still too early to say exactly what the impact will be.

"We can try to extrapolate how AI will change the world in five years, but we just don't know," he said. "The market is trying to judge this while we are still at the beginning of this infancy."

Related Questions

QWhat is the main reason behind the recent sell-off in Wall Street stocks, particularly affecting companies like Charles Schwab and Raymond James?

AThe sell-off is primarily driven by growing fears that new AI products, such as Altruist Corp's tax strategy tool Hazel, could disrupt traditional business models in industries like wealth management, leading investors to indiscriminately dump stocks perceived as vulnerable to AI-driven disruption.

QHow did the launch of Altruist Corp's Hazel tool impact the stock prices of major financial firms?

AThe launch of Hazel caused significant stock price declines, with companies like Charles Schwab Corp., Raymond James Financial Inc., and LPL Financial Holdings Inc. falling by 7% or more, marking some of their worst drops since the market crash triggered by the trade war in April of last year.

QWhat shift in investor behavior is observed as AI products become commercially available?

AInvestors have shifted from focusing on picking AI winners to rapidly avoiding any companies that face even the slightest risk of being disrupted by AI, adopting a 'sell first, ask questions later' mentality.

QAccording to Jason Wenk, CEO of Altruist, why is AI seen as a threat to the wealth management industry?

AJason Wenk stated that AI tools like Hazel, built with advanced architectures, can replace various jobs in wealth management that are typically done by entire teams, performing these tasks effectively for as low as $100 per month.

QWhat skepticism do some experts, like John Belton of Gabelli Funds, express about the current AI-driven market disruption fears?

AJohn Belton expresses skepticism, noting that technological disruption often takes longer to materialize than expected, and while there will be winners and losers in every industry, the current panic may be premature given the early stage of AI adoption.

Related Reads

Vitalik: We Need to Create Sanctuaries, Not Fight AI

In a recent interview, Vitalik Buterin, founder of Ethereum, addresses the central anxiety of the AI era. He argues the primary risk isn't AI's intelligence, but human passivity—ceding decisions, privacy, and agency to centralized systems or "super AIs" for a sense of "disempowering safety." His solution is not to fight AI, but to build "sanctuary technologies." These are optional, non-totalizing spaces that protect users while preserving their sovereignty and privacy. Ethereum is presented as a prime example, offering a parallel financial system one can freely choose, not a fix for the old one. Reflecting on his journey from a 19-year-old on "autopilot" to an active "pilot," Vitalik notes the world reinvents itself every 5-10 years. To keep up, individuals must actively pilot their lives, not be passive passengers. He stresses that active learning vastly outperforms passive learning, even with equal time invested. His practical advice for builders and individuals in the AI age includes: periodically forcing oneself to do tasks manually to keep the mind engaged; prioritizing active learning and verification over outsourcing answers; building tools that help retain human agency; not outsourcing all strategic thinking to AI; and preserving serendipity through real-world interactions. Ultimately, Buterin redefines Ethereum/crypto's role: not to win against or fix the old world, but to provide a free, optional alternative. The core message is that as AI grows more powerful, the truly scarce resource will be proactive humans who retain their sovereignty, privacy, and capacity for independent thought. The era demands not less tool use, but more intentional and active use of technology.

链捕手1h ago

Vitalik: We Need to Create Sanctuaries, Not Fight AI

链捕手1h ago

Conversation with Patagon Founder: Revealing the Inside Story of Anthropic's Secondary Market

**Summary: Inside Anthropic's Massive, Opaque Secondary Market** In a revealing interview, Patagon founder Dio Casares pulls back the curtain on the booming, high-risk secondary market for shares in companies like Anthropic. This private market, fueled by companies staying private longer and massive funding rounds, is estimated to involve hundreds of billions of dollars. Casares distinguishes between two types of "secondary" trading: 1. **Company-approved SPV (Special Purpose Vehicle) sales:** Where new capital flows into the company, often facilitated by select private equity firms. Anthropic supports this to manage liquidity and pre-IPO selling pressure. 2. **The "gray" market:** Platforms like Hive and Forge that match buyers and sellers, often creating pricing confusion and competing with official funding rounds. These intermediaries are widely disliked by companies. The market structure is complex and fragmented, relying heavily on personal connections. Brokers connect buyers and sellers, often layering multiple SPVs to pool capital, with single transaction fees as high as 10%. Strikingly, some finance professionals earn more from this trading than from their primary investment roles. **Key risks highlighted include:** * **High Fraud Rates:** An estimated 10-20% of transactions involve fake stock certificates or sellers who take payment without having the shares. * **Complex, Risky Structures:** Nested SPVs, "forward contracts" on employee equity, and tokenized private equity create layers of opacity. This is exemplified by a recent incident where an xAI employee's shares were revoked after an espionage allegation, leaving buyers empty-handed. * **Post-IPO "Settlement Hell":** After an IPO, delays in distributing shares through multiple SPV layers and decisions by fund managers to hold onto shares could trigger years of lawsuits as downstream investors are locked out. **For small investors** holding positions through tokenized vehicles or layered SPVs, it's often impossible to verify the underlying asset. Casares advises caution: if the investment feels wrong, consider exiting. As the private market now surpasses IPO fundraising, this "wild west" ecosystem faces a looming reckoning. While it will likely professionalize, the post-IPO period for a company like Anthropic could unleash a wave of disputes, exposing the vulnerabilities built into this frenzied, largely unregulated marketplace.

marsbit3h ago

Conversation with Patagon Founder: Revealing the Inside Story of Anthropic's Secondary Market

marsbit3h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片