USDT usage at 35% in 2026 – What’s the key factor driving investors to stablecoins?

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-07-13Last updated on 2026-07-13

Abstract

Investor preference for stability over risk is driving increased usage of stablecoins, with Tether [USDT] projected to reach 35.1% usage by July 2026, up from 29.0% in 2021. This growth is fueled by their expanding real-world utility, particularly in cross-border payments and corporate treasury operations. Major payment firms like Visa, Mastercard, PayPal, and Stripe are integrating stablecoins into their infrastructure, supporting a surge in daily active addresses and a total market value nearing $312 billion. While institutional investors continue to favor stablecoins for efficient transactions over speculative assets like Bitcoin or Ethereum, the growing corporate adoption for practical settlement and payment use cases is strengthening blockchain's long-term foundation beyond mere cost savings.

Despite crypto adoption rising rapidly, investor sentiment is currently favoring stability over risk. The desire for a safe investment choice is increasingly evident, as evidenced by the increase in Tether [USDT] usage as the dominant form of currency throughout the entire market.

Seasonal data shows USDT usage at 35.1% by July 2026, outperforming 2021’s 29.0% in the same period.

Source: TradingView

It also stands well above 2024, during which usage remained in negative territory.

Cross-border payments drive stablecoin utility

That growing stablecoin preference is no longer reflecting caution alone. It is increasingly supporting real economic activity across blockchain networks.

As global payment firms expand stablecoin settlement, users are interacting with these assets far more frequently than in previous cycles.

That shift is clear in the amount of ERC-20 stablecoin activity, which has increased significantly. Active addresses have surged, hovering between 400,000 and 700,000 daily since 2025.

Source: CryptoQuant

Stablecoins are being increasingly utilized by enterprises to support their cross-border settlement processes and treasury operations. This expansion coincides with Visa, Mastercard, PayPal, and Stripe integrating stablecoins into cross-border payment infrastructure.

Meanwhile, the market has expanded to nearly $312 billion, reinforcing that demand now extends beyond crypto-native participants. If payment adoption accelerates, transaction utility could emerge as a primary growth driver.

As stablecoins gain wider acceptance in global payments, corporate adoption is beginning to strengthen blockchain’s long-term foundation.

The primary motivation for corporations to develop financial products utilizing stablecoins is no longer solely the cost savings associated with reducing settlement costs.

However, institutional investors have yet to rotate their investment into Bitcoin [BTC] or Ethereum [ETH]. This indicates continued preference by institutional investors for cost-efficient transactional outcomes versus speculative returns.

If sustained, corporates will play an increasingly pivotal role in blockchain adoption. This will be through delivering stability through real-world utility rather than cycle-driven speculation.


Final Summary

  • USDT’s demand increasingly reflects payment utility alongside defensive investor positioning.
  • Stablecoin adoption continues expanding as corporate integration strengthens blockchain’s long-term utility.

Related Questions

QAccording to the article, what percentage of the market is USDT usage projected to reach by July 2026, and how does this compare to 2021?

AUSDT usage is projected to reach 35.1% by July 2026. This outperforms the 29.0% usage in the same period in 2021.

QWhat is identified as a major real-world factor driving the increased utility and demand for stablecoins like USDT?

AThe major factor is their use in cross-border payments and settlements by enterprises, facilitated by integration from major payment firms like Visa, Mastercard, PayPal, and Stripe.

QWhat does the significant rise in daily active addresses for ERC-20 stablecoins (between 400,000 and 700,000 since 2025) indicate?

AIt indicates that users are interacting with stablecoin assets far more frequently than in previous cycles, reflecting growing real economic activity and utility on blockchain networks.

QWhat shift in corporate motivation for using stablecoins does the article describe?

AThe primary motivation is no longer solely cost savings from reduced settlement costs. It is increasingly about gaining stability through real-world utility and supporting treasury operations and payment infrastructure.

QBased on the article's 'Final Summary', what two key points summarize the current state and future of stablecoin adoption?

A1) USDT's demand increasingly reflects payment utility alongside defensive investor positioning. 2) Stablecoin adoption continues expanding as corporate integration strengthens blockchain's long-term utility.

Related Reads

Is the MicroStrategy Model Failing? Imitator Holding 30,000 Bitcoins Sees Pre-IPO Investors Backing Out

"The 'Bitcoin Treasury' model is facing a critical test. BSTR Holdings, a company founded by Adam Back and holding 30,021 Bitcoin, has called off its planned merger with SPAC Cantor Equity Partners I. The deal, which would have taken it public, fell apart as the attached private investment (PIPE) financing collapsed. This failure highlights a core vulnerability of the 'Bitcoin accumulation company' strategy popularized by MicroStrategy. The model relies on a key metric: mNAV, or the premium of a company's stock market value over the value of its Bitcoin holdings. This premium fuels a cycle where companies issue shares at a premium, use the cash to buy more Bitcoin, and theoretically increase the Bitcoin per share for investors. However, with Bitcoin's price down roughly 49% from its late-2024 peak, this premium has evaporated across the sector. Companies like American Bitcoin and Metaplanet are also under severe pressure. For BSTR, the lack of premium meant investors were unwilling to fund the original deal structure at the proposed terms. The companies are now renegotiating. The next SEC filing detailing any new agreement will be a crucial indicator. It will show if the model can be repriced for a low-premium environment by preserving Bitcoin holdings and investor commitments, or if it requires significantly diluting shareholders and scaling back ambitions. The outcome is a public stress test for the entire 'Bitcoin treasury' investment thesis."

marsbit14m ago

Is the MicroStrategy Model Failing? Imitator Holding 30,000 Bitcoins Sees Pre-IPO Investors Backing Out

marsbit14m ago

Want Another Bull Market? Bitcoin Needs Trillions in Fresh Capital Inflow

Title: Want Another Bull Run? Bitcoin Needs Trillions in New Capital Bitcoin has fallen 50% from its October 2025 high of $126k, now trading near $63,000. Recent on-chain reports reveal structural differences in this downturn compared to past cycles, extending beyond simple price charts. A key issue is declining capital efficiency. CryptoQuant analysis shows the capital required for price appreciation has surged dramatically. In 2011, $27 billion in net inflows drove a 55,436% gain. From 2018-2021, $36.5 billion fueled a ~2000% rise. This cycle, $69.7 billion in realized cap growth has yielded only a 689% increase. Today, an estimated $101 billion is needed to double the price, versus just $5 million in 2011. The report concludes that triggering a major bull run now likely requires over $1 trillion in new institutional capital, positioning Bitcoin as a core global asset class rather than relying on retail ETF flows. Meanwhile, supply is tightening. K33 Research notes long-term holder supply has hit a record 79% of circulating coins. Dormant bitcoin moving after 2+ years is at its lowest since 2012. Alphractal data confirms this trend, with ~830k BTC recently moving to long-term storage. This scarcity of tradable supply can amplify price moves from any new buying pressure but doesn't guarantee capital inflow. Profitability metrics signal a potential bottom. CryptoQuant's Net Realized Profit/Loss ratio has dropped to -0.35, a 43-month low matching levels seen during the 2022 FTX crash. Historically, such extremes preceded major bull markets in 2015 and 2019. The current price is only 16% above the network's realized price; historically, this has led to average gains of 41% in six months and 81% in one year. Bitcoin is testing key support near $60,000, with analysts noting a potential W-bottom pattern forming. Macro headwinds persist. U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs saw record monthly outflows of over $4.5 billion in June. Uncertainty around Federal Reserve policy under a potential new chair and mixed economic data add pressure. While European institutional infrastructure is slowly developing (e.g., German banks offering BTC services), this is a demand factor, not an immediate liquidity catalyst. In summary, the market shows signs of bottoming: sell-side pressure is largely exhausted, supply is scarce, and metrics are at historical extremes. However, for a significant bull run akin to past cycles, unprecedented institutional capital—likely exceeding $1 trillion—is required to overcome the new reality of drastically lower capital efficiency. The decisive variable of massive new institutional inflows remains absent.

Foresight News17m ago

Want Another Bull Market? Bitcoin Needs Trillions in Fresh Capital Inflow

Foresight News17m ago

The Signal That Has Appeared Before Every BTC Bottom Since 2014, It Was Close This Time

A valuation model tracking Bitcoin for 12 years has been updated. The new model shows a current score of 24.3, placing BTC in the historical bottom 20% range. However, analysis reveals that since 2014, every Bitcoin bear market bottom has seen this score drop *below 20* for a sustained period before turning around. The current cycle's low so far was 21.5 on July 1st. The author explains the model was rebuilt to address a flaw in its historical baseline, making it a more accurate "map" of current value. Two interpretations are offered: either the historically definitive washout has not yet occurred, or this cycle's bottom will be shallower, as each cycle has been less volatile than the last. The author's action plan involves automated buying triggered at specific score levels. A purchase was made at the cycle's cheapest reading (21.5), with more capital allocated for a potential drop below 20. The strategy emphasizes following a pre-written plan over emotion. Additional market context is provided: Bitcoin reclaimed its 200-week moving average, the BTC/Gold ratio is at a 3-year low showing capital preference for gold, and Bitcoin dominance remains high at 59%, indicating no "altcoin season." The summary concludes by noting the model's inconvenient implication—the market looks less like a bottom now—and poses a question to readers: at what score would they deploy their final capital?

marsbit1h ago

The Signal That Has Appeared Before Every BTC Bottom Since 2014, It Was Close This Time

marsbit1h ago

Qingyan Jingzhun Raises Hundreds of Millions in Funding, with Investment from National Equipment Manufacturing Giants

Qingyan Precision, a provider of physical AI infrastructure, has secured billions of RMB in Series B financing. The investment round, led by prominent automotive industry funds and notably featuring the state-owned China National Machinery Industry Corp. (Sinomach) fund, underscores a strategic shift in the capital market towards companies with proven industrial application capabilities. The company positions itself as the "engineering foundation for physical AI," specializing in enabling embodied intelligence (like humanoid robots) to operate in complex, real-world industrial environments. Its core offering is the "TsingLoop" multi-modal data engineering pipeline, which captures and standardizes data from physical workspaces (like visual, force, and process parameters) to create reusable data assets. This system supports a "Robot-in-the-Loop" testing framework that validates robotic performance in digital twin simulations and real-world conditions before deployment. Qingyan Precision leverages over eight years of experience and a network of 2000+ industrial sensor nodes across sectors like automotive and mining. This provides a crucial "training ground" for embodied AI models. The founding team combines academic pedigree from Tsinghua University and Stanford with deep industry experience from leading robotics firms. The company's vision is to build "one foundation, one brain, and hundreds of vertical applications," using its data platform and industrial world model to deploy scalable physical intelligence across various industrial tasks.

marsbit1h ago

Qingyan Jingzhun Raises Hundreds of Millions in Funding, with Investment from National Equipment Manufacturing Giants

marsbit1h ago

Making a Fortune of $10.32 Million: The World Cup Money-Printing Tactic of a Polymarket Whale

**Earning $10.32 Million: A Polymarket Whale's World Cup Profit Strategy** While teams battle for the World Cup trophy, a hidden whale nicknamed "swisstony" has been quietly making a fortune on the prediction market Polymarket. This account, created around July 2025, boasts total profits of $18.62 million, with $10.33 million earned in the past month alone. With a 52.9% win rate, it has placed over 139,600 predictions, averaging about 380 trades per day—indicating it is likely a high-frequency quantitative bot. The account's signature "trash panda" aptly describes its strategy: sifting through vast market data and tiny price discrepancies to build wealth. Its current holdings are heavily concentrated on the France vs. Spain semi-final, including a roughly $160,000 bet against France. Analysis shows two core tactics driving its success: 1. **High-Volume "Anti-Favorite" Bets:** Placing large wagers (often $400k-$1M) against overvalued favorites like Germany or England, buying "No" shares at favorable prices when market-implied win probability is 46%-64%. It has recorded over 17 individual profits exceeding $1 million using this method. 2. **"Lottery-Ticket" Bets on Extreme Long Shots:** Allocating small amounts (thousands of dollars) to buy shares priced as low as 0.2¢-1.2¢ on outcomes deemed nearly impossible. While most of these bets lose, the occasional win—like those with payouts over 100x—generates significant profits (over $100,000 per hit) that boost overall returns without risking much capital. This dual approach combines consistent, large-scale profit from correcting major market mispricings with opportunistic, high-reward bets on extreme underdogs. The account exemplifies how systematic, high-frequency execution can amplify a small statistical edge into millions in profits on prediction markets.

Foresight News2h ago

Making a Fortune of $10.32 Million: The World Cup Money-Printing Tactic of a Polymarket Whale

Foresight News2h ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片