US Probes Crypto Exchanges For Suspected Sanctions Violations Linked To Iran

bitcoinistPublished on 2026-02-04Last updated on 2026-02-04

Abstract

U.S. authorities are investigating whether cryptocurrency exchanges have enabled Iranian entities to bypass international sanctions, following a surge in crypto activity linked to Iran. Blockchain data indicates that transaction volumes reached an estimated $8–10 billion over the past year, with both government-linked actors and everyday users increasingly turning to digital assets. Analysts report record inflows into Iranian wallets, reaching $7.8 billion in 2025. The Treasury Department is examining if platforms facilitated sanctions evasion, including moving money offshore or accessing hard currency. Iran’s largest exchange, Nobitex, acknowledged some users transfer funds internationally but stated it employs monitoring systems to detect suspicious activity. Data also shows a gradual movement of assets out of Iranian exchanges, often into self-custodied wallets, rather than abrupt capital flight.

Crypto activity in Iran has expanded rapidly over the past year, drawing renewed attention from US authorities who are now examining whether certain digital asset platforms may have played a role in helping Iranian officials and state‐linked actors bypass international sanctions.

Rising Iran Crypto Volumes

According to a blockchain researcher cited by Reuters, cryptocurrency transaction volumes tied to Iran surged to an estimated range of $8 billion to $10 billion over the past year, as both government‐connected entities and everyday users increasingly turned to digital assets.

Estimates from blockchain analytics firms TRM Labs and Chainalysis show that crypto usage in Iran has grown steadily despite mounting restrictions on the country’s access to the global financial system.

TRM Labs estimates that crypto activity in Iran reached roughly $10 billion last year, compared with $11.4 billion in 2024. Chainalysis reported similar growth, saying wallets linked to Iran received a record $7.8 billion in 2025, up from $7.4 billion in 2024 and $3.17 billion in 2023.

US authorities are now investigating if crypto platforms, which weren’t mentioned in the report, have enabled sanctioned Iranian organizations to move money offshore, access hard cash, or pay for items in ways that circumvent sanctions.

Ari Redbord, global head of policy at TRM Labs, said the US Treasury is actively examining whether digital asset services were used to facilitate sanctions evasion. Redbord said he had direct knowledge of the Treasury Department’s concerns.

A Treasury spokesperson declined to comment directly on the investigation but pointed Reuters to a statement issued in September announcing new measures targeting so‐called “shadow banking” networks that support Iran, including those that officials say rely on cryptocurrencies to avoid sanctions.

What Blockchain Data Shows

Inside Iran, crypto adoption has spread widely among the public. Nobitex, the country’s largest cryptocurrency exchange, told Reuters that industry estimates suggest around 15 million Iranians have some level of exposure to digital assets.

The exchange said it has approximately 11 million customers, with most activity coming from retail users and smaller investors. According to Nobitex, many Iranians use crypto primarily as a way to store value amid the continued decline of the rial.

Data from analytics firm Nansen suggests that some Iranian users moved funds out of Nobitex during 2025. The firm said balances of major cryptocurrencies on the exchange fell sharply from a peak reached around the middle of the year.

Analyst Nicolai Sondergaard said the data indicates that digital assets in Iran have increasingly served as a gradual exit channel rather than a one‐time flight of capital. According to Nansen’s analysis, funds did not leave the crypto ecosystem entirely but instead moved steadily toward platforms outside the country throughout 2025.

Nobitex acknowledged that some customers may use digital assets to move funds internationally, but said it does not track the final destination or purpose of those transactions.

The exchange stated that it employs robust monitoring systems designed to detect potentially suspicious activity and protect user assets. It also said concerns about asset safety following the June hacking incident may have influenced user behavior.

In many cases, Nobitex explained, customers transferred assets to self‐custodied wallets rather than directly to overseas exchanges. The exchange said this approach allows users to secure their holdings temporarily while assessing risks and deciding whether to redeposit funds later.

The 1-D chart shows the drop in the total crypto market cap below $2.6 trillion. Source: TOTAL on TradingView.com

Featured image from OpenArt, chart from TradingView.com

Related Questions

QWhat is the estimated range of cryptocurrency transaction volumes tied to Iran over the past year, as cited in the article?

AThe estimated range is $8 billion to $10 billion.

QWhich two blockchain analytics firms provided data showing the growth of crypto usage in Iran?

ATRM Labs and Chainalysis.

QAccording to the article, what is the primary reason many Iranians use cryptocurrency, as stated by the Nobitex exchange?

AMany Iranians use crypto primarily as a way to store value amid the continued decline of the rial.

QWhat US government department is actively examining whether digital asset services were used to facilitate sanctions evasion, according to Ari Redbord of TRM Labs?

AThe US Treasury Department.

QWhat did data from analytics firm Nansen suggest about the movement of funds from the Nobitex exchange in 2025?

AThe data suggested that funds did not leave the crypto ecosystem entirely but moved steadily toward platforms outside the country throughout 2025, serving as a gradual exit channel.

Related Reads

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

**Summary: The Value Distribution of Stablecoins** The article argues that stablecoins are evolving from mere trading tools into broader channels for dollar access. It divides the stablecoin ecosystem into four layers to analyze how value is distributed: 1. **Issuance Layer:** Mints stablecoins, holds reserve assets, and captures the spread between reserve yield and user costs (e.g., Tether, Circle). This layer currently earns the largest profit margin. 2. **Infrastructure Layer:** Connects stablecoins to the traditional financial system, handling fiat on/off-ramps, banking integration, compliance (KYC/AML), and asset management (e.g., Bridge, BVNK). This is the "unglamorous" but critical work, building the essential bridges between crypto and real-world finance. 3. **Acquiring/Distribution Layer:** Integrates stablecoins into merchant systems, manages payment flows, and provides enterprise financial software (e.g., Stripe, Coinbase). They act as the access point for businesses. 4. **Application Layer:** The end-users and businesses that ultimately use stablecoins for payments, settlements, or as a store of value. They benefit from convenience but have little pricing power. The core thesis is that while the issuance layer currently dominates profits, the often-overlooked **infrastructure layer holds significant long-term potential**. The real challenge and barrier to mass adoption is not the on-chain transfer of stablecoins (which is simple), but the complex "last mile" integration into existing business workflows, banking systems, and regulatory frameworks across different countries. Companies in this layer are currently in a "land grab" phase, investing heavily to build networks, secure bank partnerships, and establish compliance pathways. While their position is currently pressured by the profitable issuers above and distribution platforms below, the article suggests that if stablecoins become a default financial rail for businesses, the infrastructure providers who have done the hard work of integration will ultimately gain strong pricing power and become entrenched, essential players.

marsbit5m ago

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

marsbit5m ago

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins The article argues that stablecoins are evolving from a mere trading tool into a broad "dollar channel." It analyzes the industry's value chain through four layers: 1. **Issuance Layer (e.g., Tether, Circle):** The top layer that mints stablecoins, holds reserve assets, and captures the thickest interest rate spread. 2. **Infrastructure Layer (e.g., Bridge, BVNK):** Connects stablecoins to the traditional financial system, handling critical but complex "dirty work" like fiat on/off-ramps, banking integration, compliance (KYC/AML), and cross-border settlement. 3. **Acquiring/Distribution Layer (e.g., Stripe, Coinbase):** Embeds stablecoins into merchant systems, manages payment flows, and integrates with enterprise software. 4. **Application Layer:** End-users and businesses that ultimately use stablecoins for payments, settlement, or storing value. The author posits that while the issuance layer currently captures the most profit, the most overlooked and potentially critical layer is infrastructure. The core challenge for stablecoin adoption isn't the on-chain transfer (which is simple), but bridging the gap between blockchain and the real-world financial system. This involves solving practical problems for businesses: fiat conversion, reconciliation, tax handling, and user onboarding. Infrastructure companies are currently in a difficult "land-grab" phase—building networks, securing banking relationships, and achieving compliance country-by-country. They face pressure from both the profitable issuance layer above and distribution platforms below. However, the author suggests this layer is building a crucial moat. Once stablecoins become a default business rail, the infrastructure players who have done the hard work of integration may gain significant, durable value and pricing power.

链捕手9m ago

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

链捕手9m ago

How to Do Research Well: Deliberately Practice the Real Skills That Matter

No one truly teaches you how to do research. You're often given a desk, a pre-selected problem, and vague instructions to "create something new." Consequently, many people reverse-engineer the job based on visible outputs—papers, posts, announcements—learning only how to *appear* like a researcher rather than how to *become* one. True research capability is built from stacking small, trainable skills, nearly all of which can be developed through deliberate practice. **Pick Your Own Problem:** Most researchers absorb problems from advisors or trends, lacking the underlying reasoning. Choosing a problem you genuinely care about, as John Schulman advises, leads to original work. Develop "taste" like a muscle: predict experiment outcomes, guess paper results from methods, and track which findings remain important over time. **Upgrade Your Inputs:** Relying on shared reading lists (arXiv hot lists, filtered group chats) leads to unoriginal conclusions. Undervalued old literature often holds crucial insights (e.g., MoE, LSTM, backpropagation). Richard Sutton's "The Bitter Lesson" or Claude Shannon's 1952 talk on creative thinking are more predictive than lengthy modern surveys. Breadth matters as much as depth: draw from neuroscience, mechanism design, hardware knowledge, and honest statistics. Read papers directly, especially appendices and limitations sections. **Write Everything Down:** As Paul Graham noted, writing exposes flaws in seemingly mature ideas. Writing is the cheapest defense against self-deception. Following Feynman's principle, Darwin programmatically wrote down facts contradicting his theory to combat memory bias. Maintain a detailed log of hypotheses, setups, predictions, results, and updated understandings. Reviewing past logs fosters essential humility.

marsbit2h ago

How to Do Research Well: Deliberately Practice the Real Skills That Matter

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片