U.S. government confirms it did not sell Bitcoin seized from Samourai Wallet

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-01-16Last updated on 2026-01-16

Abstract

The U.S. government has not sold the Bitcoin seized from Samourai Wallet, according to a confirmation from the Department of Justice (DOJ). The statement refutes earlier claims that the assets were liquidated, which would have violated Executive Order 14233 requiring forfeited Bitcoin to be retained. The DOJ clarified that the Bitcoin remains on the government’s balance sheet as part of a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve. On-chain data from Arkham supports this, showing no significant outflows from known U.S. government wallets. The confusion stemmed from historical precedent where seized Bitcoin was auctioned, but current policy under the executive order mandates holding such assets. The U.S. government continues to hold over 328,000 BTC, valued at more than $31 billion.

The U.S. government has confirmed that it did not sell Bitcoin seized from Samourai Wallet. The confirmation addresses earlier claims that the assets had been liquidated in violation of federal policy governing forfeited digital assets.

U.S. DOJ clarification addresses liquidation claims

Patrick Witt, Executive Director of the President’s Council of Advisors for Digital Assets, said the Department of Justice [DOJ] has confirmed that the seized Bitcoin “have not been liquidated and will not be liquidated”.

He added that the assets will remain on the U.S. government’s balance sheet as part of the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve.

The clarification follows reports earlier this month suggesting that prosecutors in the Southern District of New York [SDNY] had sold Bitcoin forfeited by developers associated with Samourai Wallet.

The alleged sale potentially contradicts Executive Order 14233, which mandates that forfeited Bitcoin be retained rather than sold.

According to Witt, the DOJ confirmed that the forfeited digital assets remain in the U.S. government’s possession and comply with the executive order. The statement directly counters claims that the Bitcoin had already been liquidated following the Samourai plea agreement.

The DOJ has not publicly detailed operational handling of the assets beyond confirming they remain on the government’s balance sheet.

However, the confirmation removes uncertainty around whether the seizure resulted in market sales or contributed to recent Bitcoin price movements.

On-chain data aligns with U.S. government statement

Independent blockchain data from Arkham supports the U.S. DOJ’s position. Publicly tracked wallets associated with U.S. government holdings show no material reduction in Bitcoin balances consistent with a sale linked to the Samourai case.

As of mid-January, on-chain analytics indicate the U.S. government continues to hold more than 328,000 BTC, valued at over $31 billion, alongside smaller balances of ether and stablecoins. No abnormal outflows tied to the Samourai forfeiture have been observed.

Why the confusion emerged

Historically, the U.S. government has sold seized Bitcoin through public auctions, particularly in earlier cases such as Silk Road.

That precedent shaped market expectations and led to the assumption that newly forfeited Bitcoin would also be liquidated.

However, Executive Order 14233 represents a policy shift, requiring certain seized Bitcoin to be retained as a strategic asset rather than sold.

The Samourai case appears to fall under this updated framework, marking a departure from earlier forfeiture practices.

For now, the DOJ’s confirmation closes the question of whether Samourai-related Bitcoin entered the market.


Final Thoughts

  • The DOJ’s confirmation resolves claims that Samourai Wallet–related Bitcoin had been liquidated, reinforcing that the assets remain held under current federal policy.
  • The episode highlights how legacy expectations around seized Bitcoin sales continue to clash with the U.S. government’s evolving approach.

Related Questions

QWhat did the U.S. government confirm regarding the Bitcoin seized from Samourai Wallet?

AThe U.S. government confirmed that it did not sell the Bitcoin seized from Samourai Wallet and that the assets will remain on the government's balance sheet as part of the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve.

QWhich executive order mandates that forfeited Bitcoin be retained rather than sold?

AExecutive Order 14233 mandates that forfeited Bitcoin be retained rather than sold.

QHow much Bitcoin does the U.S. government currently hold according to on-chain analytics as of mid-January?

AAs of mid-January, the U.S. government holds more than 328,000 BTC, valued at over $31 billion.

QWhy did confusion emerge about the liquidation of the seized Bitcoin from Samourai Wallet?

AConfusion emerged because historically the U.S. government sold seized Bitcoin through public auctions, which shaped market expectations, but Executive Order 14233 represents a policy shift requiring certain Bitcoin to be retained as a strategic asset.

QWhat role did on-chain data from Arkham play in this situation?

AIndependent blockchain data from Arkham supported the U.S. DOJ's position by showing no material reduction in Bitcoin balances in publicly tracked wallets associated with U.S. government holdings, consistent with no sale linked to the Samourai case.

Related Reads

In-Depth Report on the On-Chain Lending Market: When Off-Chain Credit Meets On-Chain Liquidation

The on-chain lending market has evolved from a peripheral DeFi niche into core financial infrastructure. As of early 2026, total value locked (TVL) in on-chain lending protocols has reached $64.3 billion, accounting for 53.54% of total DeFi TVL, making it the largest and most mature vertical within decentralized finance. Aave dominates the sector with approximately $32.9 billion in TVL, commanding nearly half of the market—a leadership position that is unlikely to be challenged in the foreseeable future. However, the path of on-chain lending forward is not without risk. Liquidation cascades, credit defaults, and cross-chain vulnerabilities remain systemic threats hanging over the industry. At the same time, a deeper structural transformation is underway: on-chain lending is shifting from a “leverage tool for crypto-native users” to a “compliant gateway for institutional capital”. The scale of RWA (Real World Asset) lending has surpassed $18.5 billion, with U.S. Treasuries and government securities increasingly serving as core collateral. Institutional capital inflows are reshaping both the user base and risk appetite of the sector. This report systematically analyzes the evolution of on-chain lending definitions, competitive dynamics, core risks, and future trends, providing a comprehensive industry outlook for investors and trade practitioners. Key findings suggest that the “one dominant player with several strong challengers” structure will persist in the short term, while fixed-rate lending, compliant collateral, and institutional credit underwriting will define the next phase of competition. For investors focused on DeFi infrastructure, three key opportunity tracks stand out, namely, the Aave ecosystem (Morpho, Spark), RWA lending protocols (Ondo, Maple) and fixed-rate innovation (Notional, Pendle).

HTX Learn32m ago

In-Depth Report on the On-Chain Lending Market: When Off-Chain Credit Meets On-Chain Liquidation

HTX Learn32m ago

Fu Peng's First Public Speech in 2026: What Exactly Are Crypto Assets? Why Did I Join the Crypto Asset Industry?

Fu Peng, a renowned macroeconomist and now Chief Economist at New火 Group, delivered his first public speech of 2026 at the Hong Kong Web3 Festival. He explained his perspective on crypto assets and why he joined the industry, framing it within the context of macroeconomic trends and financial evolution. Fu emphasized that crypto assets are transitioning from an early, belief-driven phase to a mature, institutionally integrated asset class. He drew parallels to the 1970s-80s, when technological advances (like computing) revolutionized traditional finance, leading to the rise of FICC (Fixed Income, Currencies, and Commodities). Similarly, current advancements in AI, data, and blockchain are reshaping finance, with crypto assets becoming part of a new "FICC + C" (C for Crypto) framework. He noted that institutional capital, including traditional hedge funds, avoided early crypto due to its speculative nature but are now engaging as regulatory clarity emerges (e.g., stablecoin laws, CFTC classifying crypto as a commodity). Fu predicted that 2025-2026 marks a turning point where crypto becomes a standardized, financially viable asset for diversified portfolios, akin to commodities or derivatives in traditional finance. Fu defined Bitcoin not as "digital gold" in a simplistic sense but as a value-preserving, financially tradable asset. He highlighted that crypto's future lies in regulated, institutional adoption, moving away from retail-dominated trading. His entry into crypto signals this maturation, where traditional finance integrates crypto into mainstream asset management.

marsbit1h ago

Fu Peng's First Public Speech in 2026: What Exactly Are Crypto Assets? Why Did I Join the Crypto Asset Industry?

marsbit1h ago

Justin Sun Sues Trump Family: What $75 Million Bought Was Only a Blacklist

Justin Sun, founder of Tron, has filed a lawsuit in federal court against World Liberty Financial (WLF), alleging he was made the "primary target of a fraudulent scheme" after investing $75 million. Sun claims the investment secured him an advisor title and WLFI tokens, which were later frozen by WLF, causing "hundreds of millions in losses." The dispute began in late 2024 when Sun's investment helped revive WLF's struggling token sale, which ultimately raised $550 million. Shortly after, the SEC dropped its lawsuit against Sun following Donald Trump's inauguration. However, relations soured when Sun refused WLF's demands for additional funding. In August 2025, WLF added a "blacklist" function to its smart contract, allowing it to unilaterally freeze tokens. Sun's holdings, worth approximately $107 million, were frozen, and he was threatened with token destruction. The lawsuit highlights WLF's structure, which directs 75% of token sale profits to the Trump family, who had earned $1 billion by December 2025. WLF's CEO is Zach Witkoff, son of U.S. Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff. The project faces scrutiny for opaque operations, including a controversial loan arrangement on the Dolomite platform, co-founded by a WLF advisor. Despite Sun's history with the SEC, the case underscores centralization risks within DeFi, as WLF controls governance and holds powers to freeze assets arbitrarily. Sun's tokens remain frozen as legal proceedings begin.

marsbit1h ago

Justin Sun Sues Trump Family: What $75 Million Bought Was Only a Blacklist

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片