US Fed Moves to End ‘Reputation Risk’ Rule Amid Crypto Debanking Concerns

TheNewsCryptoPublished on 2026-02-24Last updated on 2026-02-24

Abstract

The US Federal Reserve is moving to codify a rule that would eliminate "reputation risk" as a factor in banking supervision, a practice blamed for widespread crypto debanking. Announced on February 23, the proposal seeks public feedback for two months. Fed Vice Chair Michelle Bowman stated that supervisors have been improperly pressuring banks to close accounts based on customers' political views, religious beliefs, or involvement in lawful but disfavored businesses like crypto, calling such discrimination unlawful. Senator Lummis and industry figures praised the move, viewing it as ending "Operation Chokepoint 2.0," a term describing alleged government efforts to cut off crypto firms from banking services.

The US Federal Reserve is looking for codifying a rule eliminating “reputation risk” from banking supervision, which some have condemned for a wave of crypto debanking in the past few years.

In the beginning, the Fed started making changes in June 2025 and publicised that it had directed its supervisors to stop pressuring banks to close client accounts over reputation risk, stating banks can only make decisions on clients based on financial risk management.

On February 23, the Fed announced through a press release that it is asking for feedback on a proposal to turn this into law. The Fed has given a two-month deadline for submitting comments.

Michelle Bowman, the vice chair for supervision, mentioned that we have heard troubling cases of debanking, where supervisors use concerns regarding reputation risk to pressure financial institutions to debank customers due to their political views, religious beliefs, or participation in disfavoured but lawful businesses.

She further went on, adding that discrimination via financial institutions on these bases is unlawful and doesn’t have a role in the Federal Reserve’s supervisory substructure. The same day, Lummis posted on X praising the move and added that it is not the Fed’s role to play both judge and jury for banking digital asset firms.

She wrote, “Happy to see this significant step to permanently eliminate ‘reputation risk’ from Fed policy and put Operation Chokepoint 2.0 to rest so America can be the digital asset capital of the world.”

Alex Thorn, the head of firmwide research of Galaxy Digital, also applauded the move, mentioning via X on Feb 23 that “chokepoint 2.0 rollback carries on.”

The term ‘Operation Chokepoint 2.0’ is used by a lot of members from the crypto industry to describe what they felt was a coordinated effort by the Joe Biden-guided US government and banking sector to prevent crypto companies from leveraging traditional banking services.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Crypto.com Secures Conditional OCC Approval to Launch National Trust Bank

TagsCryptoFEDUSA

Related Questions

QWhat is the US Federal Reserve proposing to eliminate from banking supervision?

AThe US Federal Reserve is proposing to eliminate 'reputation risk' from banking supervision.

QWhy has the 'reputation risk' rule been criticized in recent years?

AIt has been criticized for causing a wave of crypto debanking, where banks close accounts based on perceived reputation risk rather than financial risk.

QWhat did Vice Chair Michelle Bowman say about debanking practices?

AShe stated that supervisors have pressured financial institutions to debank customers due to political views, religious beliefs, or participation in disfavored but lawful businesses, calling such discrimination unlawful.

QWhat is 'Operation Chokepoint 2.0' as referred to by the crypto industry?

AIt is a term used by the crypto industry to describe a perceived coordinated effort by the US government and banking sector to prevent crypto companies from accessing traditional banking services.

QHow did Senator Lummis and Galaxy Digital's Alex Thorn react to the Fed's proposal?

ABoth praised the move, with Lummis calling it a step to make America the digital asset capital of the world, and Thorn noting the 'chokepoint 2.0 rollback' continues.

Related Reads

Upbit Rebalances 864B SHIB In Internal Wallet Move

South Korean cryptocurrency exchange Upbit moved a total of 864 billion SHIB (worth approximately $4 million) between its internal wallet addresses. The activity, involving transfers of 384 billion SHIB outbound and 480 billion SHIB inbound, occurred following a 36% SHIB price rally. On-chain data indicates this was a routine internal wallet rebalancing operation by the exchange, not a sell-off or liquidation event. The article cautions that while large on-chain transfers are highly visible, they require proper context and wallet labeling to interpret correctly. In this case, the movement between known Upbit addresses does not inherently signal a change in market supply or selling pressure for SHIB.

bitcoinist11m ago

Upbit Rebalances 864B SHIB In Internal Wallet Move

bitcoinist11m ago

Can Generative Models Finally Be Trained End-to-End? The Core Is a For Loop

This article introduces a novel training paradigm for generative models called Explorative Modeling (XM), which enables true end-to-end training. Traditionally, powerful generative models like autoregressive and diffusion models are not trained end-to-end. They are trained to predict a single small step but require iterative multi-step sampling for inference. This "exposure bias" leads to error accumulation and limits performance. The core challenge XM addresses is "mode blurring." In generative tasks, a single input (e.g., "generate a dog") corresponds to many valid outputs (multiple modes). Standard training objectives like reconstruction loss force the model to average these modes, producing unrealistic, blurry outputs. To avoid this, existing models break generation into many small, almost deterministic steps, sacrificing end-to-end training. XM tackles this by restructuring the training loop itself. Its key insight is to amplify "generative expressivity." For each training input, instead of generating one sample, the model generates K candidate outputs. Only the candidate closest to the real data is used for computing the loss and updating the model via backpropagation. This simple "best-of-K" mechanism is implemented as a short for-loop. By exploring multiple possibilities, the model learns to distribute its guesses across different modes rather than collapsing to their uninformative average. The paper demonstrates that "exploration" acts as a new, powerful scaling axis. Gains from XM increase with model size, data scale, and compute. Experiments show improvements in FID scores for image generation and significant efficiency gains, sometimes outperforming larger models without exploration. When pushed to the limit, XM enables fully single-step, end-to-end generative models. In robotics tasks, an "Explorative Policy" matched the performance of a 100-step Diffusion Policy with a single forward pass, drastically improving inference speed. While the best-of-K concept is not entirely new, the authors' contribution lies in formally understanding it as a direct method to boost generative expressivity without fragmenting the generation process. This work suggests that as models scale, enhancing exploration during training may become crucial for overcoming fundamental performance bottlenecks.

marsbit11m ago

Can Generative Models Finally Be Trained End-to-End? The Core Is a For Loop

marsbit11m ago

A Maximum of 20 Submissions Per Person? DeepMind Researcher Satirically 'Petitions' Against ICLR's New Rule

The International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) 2027 has introduced a new submission rule limiting authors to a maximum of 20 papers per conference. This policy, announced due to a 68% surge in submissions for ICLR 2026 that strained the review system, aims to ensure fair and informative peer review. Google DeepMind researcher Dan Roy responded with a sarcastic petition on X, calling the 20-paper cap "absurd" and claiming it would slow AI progress. His post mockingly argued that AI agents can now produce incremental research and that large language models (LLMs) already handle all reviewing, so output should be maximized. This satire critiques the broader trend of AI's role in academia, referencing a 2025 study that found about 21% of ICLR 2026 reviews were likely fully AI-generated. Roy's underlying point questions whether simply capping submissions addresses the systemic issue of AI potentially flooding conferences with agent-written papers and AI-assisted reviews. The debate highlights tensions between managing submission volume and maintaining research quality as AI tools become pervasive.

marsbit15m ago

A Maximum of 20 Submissions Per Person? DeepMind Researcher Satirically 'Petitions' Against ICLR's New Rule

marsbit15m ago

Coldcard Vulnerability Leads to $89 Million Theft, Sparking Largest On-Chain Migration Since FTX Collapse

A security vulnerability in Coldcard hardware wallets led to the theft of 1,367.05 BTC (approx. $89 million) from 4,585 addresses, according to Galaxy Research. The flaw, caused by insufficient randomness in seed phrase generation for specific firmware versions, triggered a massive migration of funds as users moved assets to new, secure wallets. This event caused the largest on-chain movement of small Bitcoin transactions since the FTX collapse, distorting key market indicators like active addresses and exchange deposits, and significantly dampening market sentiment. The incident also highlighted challenges in cybersecurity investigations, as researchers reported that safety guardrails on mainstream U.S. AI models hindered the analysis of attack patterns, forcing them to use an open-source Chinese AI model for forensic work. This underscores a dilemma in balancing AI security restrictions with the need for rapid response in tracing stolen crypto assets.

marsbit1h ago

Coldcard Vulnerability Leads to $89 Million Theft, Sparking Largest On-Chain Migration Since FTX Collapse

marsbit1h ago

Annual Salary of Millions Competing for Electricians, Meta Rushes to Open Its Own Technical School

The AI boom is facing an unexpected bottleneck: a severe shortage of skilled construction workers and electricians. As tech giants like Meta, OpenAI, and Alphabet race to build massive data centers—such as OpenAI's $16 billion "Stargate" project—they are hitting a critical labor wall. The U.S. needs an estimated 130,000 more electricians, 240,000 construction workers, and 150,000 supervisors by 2030 for AI infrastructure alone, but tens of thousands of electrician jobs go unfilled each year. While AI companies offer high premiums, with electricians earning up to $280,000 annually, worker scarcity still causes massive losses—delays on a single project can cost $14.2 million per month. The complexity of building AI data centers, which require immense power (equivalent to powering hundreds of thousands of homes), sophisticated electrical systems, and advanced liquid cooling solutions, demands highly skilled technicians who are in short supply. To combat this, companies are investing heavily in training. Meta has committed $115 million to a free training school offering tuition, housing, and stipends, targeting 5,000 new workers. OpenAI is partnering with unions to secure skilled labor. These efforts are paying off, with a significant rise in Gen Z interest in trade schools over college. However, the power demands are staggering. AI data centers are driving a rapid surge in electricity consumption, projected to account for up to 12% of U.S. power use by 2028 and raising costs for consumers. Furthermore, the construction boom is project-based, leading to a potential future glut of trained workers once building peaks, which could depress wages industry-wide. The race for AI supremacy now depends as much on skilled hands as on advanced chips.

marsbit1h ago

Annual Salary of Millions Competing for Electricians, Meta Rushes to Open Its Own Technical School

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片