U.K. Parliament opens stablecoin inquiry to review new regulations: Details

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-01-30Last updated on 2026-01-30

Abstract

The U.K. parliament has launched a stablecoin inquiry to review the sector's growth, risks, and regulatory proposals. The House of Lords committee will assess the impact on monetary control and the economy, as well as the global competitiveness of Sterling-backed stablecoins. The Bank of England's proposed rules include a 60/40 reserve model and caps on holdings. Critics argue these may make GBP stablecoins uncompetitive compared to U.S. regulations, which have no caps and allow interest earnings. Currently, Sterling stablecoins represent less than 1% of the market, which is dominated by the U.S. dollar. The inquiry seeks evidence until March 2026, aligning with the U.K.'s goal to finalize regulations by year-end.

The U.K. parliament has launched a stablecoin inquiry to assess the sector and the effectiveness of the proposed regulation.

In a statement on the 29th January, the House of Lords Financial Services Regulation Committee (FSRC) called for evidence on the sector’s growth and adoption projections.

The inquiry’s scope covers opportunities and risks of the sector’s growth. This will include the impact on monetary control and the broader U.K. economy.

In addition, the probe will examine the competitiveness of Sterling-backed stablecoins globally.

Sheila Valerie Noakes, the Baroness Noakes DBE and the Chair of the FSRC, added that the inquiry will also,

“Assess whether the Bank of England and FCA’s proposed regulatory frameworks provide measured and proportionate responses to these developments.”

U.K’s proposed stablecoin regulation

Evidenced and expert submissions covering the core questions of the inquiry will be run up to the 11th of March 2026. This fits well within the U.K.’s push to finalize rules for the sector by the end of this year.

In late 2025, the Bank of England (BoE) published proposed regulations for Sterling-backed stablecoins, stressing that issuers’ reserve assets will be backed on a 60/40 formula. Which meant 60% of the reserve assets will be able to have exposure to U.K. government short-term bonds to earn interest.

The rest of 40% of the reserves will be parked with the BoE and won’t earn interest. Additionally, the regulators proposed a cap of £20K per individual and £10 million per business to mitigate financial stability risks.

Worth pointing out that the caps appeared to be a measured response to address the concerns seen from traditional U.S banks that fear deposit flight to stablecoins may derail credit availability.

Critics of the proposed rules

However, crypto supporters such as Stani Kulechov, the founder of the DeFi platform Aave, have criticized the proposals. He argued that capping interest-earning potential and holdings would make Great British Pound (GBP) or Sterling-based stablecoins uncompetitive.

It remains uncertain whether key players will push for changes to the recent proposals. Some argue these rules should be adjusted to align more closely with U.S. regulations.

Unlike the current draft, U.S. rules do not cap users’ holdings. They also allow issuers to earn interest on reserve assets.

But most importantly, how to balance potential deposit flight from banks and keep the GBP-based stablecoin competitive.

At press time, the Sterling-based offerings ranked 10th and accounted for only $261K of the $306 billion in overall stablecoin supply – A less than 1% dominance.

The U.S. dollar led the market with 99% dominance, followed by the Euro.


Final Thoughts

  • The U.K. parliament has launched an inquiry to assess stablecoin growth, potential impact & whether proposed legislation addresses key risks and opportunities.
  • This is part of broader feedback sessions as the government races to finalize rules by the end of this year.

Related Questions

QWhat is the main purpose of the U.K. Parliament's stablecoin inquiry launched by the House of Lords Financial Services Regulation Committee?

AThe inquiry's main purpose is to assess the stablecoin sector's growth and adoption projections, examine the opportunities and risks of its growth (including the impact on monetary control and the broader U.K. economy), and evaluate whether the proposed regulatory frameworks from the Bank of England and FCA are measured and proportionate responses.

QWhat are the key details of the Bank of England's proposed 60/40 formula for Sterling-backed stablecoin reserves?

AThe proposed 60/40 formula requires that 60% of the reserve assets can be exposed to U.K. government short-term bonds to earn interest, while the remaining 40% must be held with the Bank of England and will not earn interest.

QWhat specific caps did U.K. regulators propose for stablecoin holdings, and what was the stated reason for these limits?

ARegulators proposed a cap of £20,000 per individual and £10 million per business. These caps are a measured response to mitigate financial stability risks, specifically addressing concerns from traditional banks about potential deposit flight to stablecoins derailing credit availability.

QAccording to critics like Stani Kulechov, why are the proposed U.K. stablecoin regulations problematic?

ACritics argue that capping the interest-earning potential and user holdings would make Great British Pound (GBP) or Sterling-based stablecoins uncompetitive, especially when compared to U.S. regulations which have no such caps and allow issuers to earn interest on reserve assets.

QWhat is the current market share of Sterling-based stablecoins compared to the dominant U.S. dollar, as mentioned in the article?

AAt the time of the article, Sterling-based stablecoins ranked 10th and accounted for only $261,000 of the total $306 billion stablecoin supply, representing a market dominance of less than 1%. The U.S. dollar led the market with 99% dominance, followed by the Euro.

Related Reads

The King of Blind Date Attire in Korea: How SK Hynix Made a Comeback Against Samsung?

In South Korea's dating scene, SK Hynix employees are now highly sought after, a status shift fueled by the company's astronomical profits and employee bonuses, projected to reach up to 6.1 million RMB per person by 2027. This marks a dramatic reversal for the long-time second-place player in memory semiconductors, which has now surpassed its rival Samsung in annual operating profit. The turnaround story began in 2008 when a struggling Hynix, emerging from bankruptcy restructuring, took a risky bet by agreeing to develop High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) with AMD. At the time, HBM had no clear market beyond high-end graphics cards and was a costly, complex technology. Major players like Samsung, pursuing its own HMC technology, declined. For Hynix, with only memory as its core business, it was a gamble born of necessity. The pivotal moment came in 2012 when SK Group Chairman Chey Tae-won acquired Hynix. Defying industry downturns, he invested heavily in R&D and fabrication, sustaining the HBM project through over a decade of commercial uncertainty and internal challenges. A key break occurred around 2016-2017 when Samsung faced production issues supplying HBM2 for Google's TPU, allowing SK Hynix to gain a crucial foothold in the data center market. The AI explosion post-ChatGPT in 2022 was the catalyst, turning HBM into a critical bottleneck for AI accelerators like NVIDIA's GPUs. By 2025, SK Hynix captured 62% of the global HBM market, leaving Samsung at 17%. For the first time, its annual operating profit exceeded Samsung's. Analysts point to the "innovator's dilemma" to explain Samsung's miss: its vast, successful business portfolio made it risk-averse, preventing an all-in bet on the initially niche HBM technology. In contrast, SK Hynix, as a challenger with its back against the wall, had no choice but to commit fully. The story highlights how Korea's chaebol system allows for ultra-long-term bets beyond quarterly pressures. However, SK Hynix's lead isn't guaranteed. Samsung is aggressively catching up on HBM4, and challenges like customer concentration (heavy reliance on NVIDIA) and technical hurdles in advanced packaging remain. The narrative underscores a market truth: the greatest alpha often comes from betting on uncertain, long-term directions others dismiss, much like HBM in 2008.

marsbit10m ago

The King of Blind Date Attire in Korea: How SK Hynix Made a Comeback Against Samsung?

marsbit10m ago

Understanding Hash in One Article: The "Browser Miner" on Ethereum

Hash is an Ethereum-based ERC-20 token described as a "browser-minable post-quantum token." Its key features include enabling browser-based GPU mining without specialized hardware, a fixed supply cap of 21 million tokens, immutable and permissionless smart contracts with no team allocation or pre-mining, and an emphasis on post-quantum security using Keccak256 hashing. The mining mechanism is a simplified on-chain proof-of-work where miners solve unique challenges tied to their wallet address. Key design elements prevent answer theft, with epochs resetting every 100 blocks (~20 minutes) and a per-block minting limit. Emission follows a Bitcoin-like halving schedule every 100,000 mints, starting at 100 tokens per mint. Projections suggest all tokens could be mined within approximately 294 days if a target rate of one mint per minute is sustained. Hash emphasizes "post-quantum" security by leveraging hash-based primitives like Keccak256, which are considered more resistant to quantum attacks compared to elliptic-curve cryptography. While not a fully post-quantum asset, it aligns with Ethereum's broader post-quantum research narrative. The project completed its Genesis sale at $0.03 and began trading on Uniswap, with its price reaching around $0.19. The initial circulating supply is small, with 5% sold in Genesis and 5% allocated to liquidity. The majority (47.6% of total supply) is allocated to early-stage mining, leading to a front-loaded emission schedule. This structure, combined with low initial liquidity, makes Hash a high-volatility, high-risk project dependent on sustained miner participation and market demand to absorb new supply.

marsbit24m ago

Understanding Hash in One Article: The "Browser Miner" on Ethereum

marsbit24m ago

OpenAI's Largest Internal Wealth Creation: 600 People Cash Out a Total of $6.6 Billion, 75 Take Home the Maximum $30 Million Each

A Wall Street Journal report reveals OpenAI's unprecedented pre-IPO wealth creation. In a single employee stock sale last October, over 600 current and former employees sold shares, collectively cashing out approximately $6.6 billion. Due to high investor demand, the company tripled the individual sale cap to $30 million, with about 75 employees selling the maximum amount. This event represents the largest such transaction in tech industry history for a private company. OpenAI's valuation was $500 billion for this tender offer. Employees with over two years of tenure were eligible, allowing many post-ChatGPT hires their first liquidity event. The company's stock has reportedly grown over 100-fold in seven years. Following a restructuring, employees collectively hold about 26% of OpenAI. The scale of executive wealth is also staggering. In court testimony related to Elon Musk's lawsuit, President and co-founder Greg Brockman confirmed his OpenAI stake is worth around $30 billion. Analysis indicates about 165 current and former employees hold a combined ~$164.9 billion in equity, averaging nearly $1 billion per person in paper wealth. OpenAI's per-employee stock-based compensation is estimated to be 34 times the average of major tech firms before their IPOs. OpenAI continues its rapid ascent, closing a $122 billion funding round at an $852 billion valuation in March. With monthly revenue hitting $2 billion, over 900 million weekly ChatGPT users, and plans for a potential trillion-dollar IPO in late 2026, this wealth-creation engine shows no signs of stopping.

链捕手47m ago

OpenAI's Largest Internal Wealth Creation: 600 People Cash Out a Total of $6.6 Billion, 75 Take Home the Maximum $30 Million Each

链捕手47m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

How to Buy T

Welcome to HTX.com! We've made purchasing Threshold Network Token (T) simple and convenient. Follow our step-by-step guide to embark on your crypto journey.Step 1: Create Your HTX AccountUse your email or phone number to sign up for a free account on HTX. Experience a hassle-free registration journey and unlock all features.Get My AccountStep 2: Go to Buy Crypto and Choose Your Payment MethodCredit/Debit Card: Use your Visa or Mastercard to buy Threshold Network Token (T) instantly.Balance: Use funds from your HTX account balance to trade seamlessly.Third Parties: We've added popular payment methods such as Google Pay and Apple Pay to enhance convenience.P2P: Trade directly with other users on HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): We offer tailor-made services and competitive exchange rates for traders.Step 3: Store Your Threshold Network Token (T)After purchasing your Threshold Network Token (T), store it in your HTX account. Alternatively, you can send it elsewhere via blockchain transfer or use it to trade other cryptocurrencies.Step 4: Trade Threshold Network Token (T)Easily trade Threshold Network Token (T) on HTX's spot market. Simply access your account, select your trading pair, execute your trades, and monitor in real-time. We offer a user-friendly experience for both beginners and seasoned traders.

11.3k Total ViewsPublished 2024.03.29Updated 2025.03.21

How to Buy T

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of T (T) are presented below.

活动图片