Treasury Urges Agreement Between Crypto Firms and Banks to Advance CLARITY Act

TheNewsCryptoPublished on 2026-02-10Last updated on 2026-02-10

Abstract

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent is urging crypto firms, banks, and lawmakers to compromise to advance the stalled Clarity Act. With the bill stuck in the Senate, he emphasized that waiting for a perfect law is unrealistic and risks U.S. innovation and global crypto leadership. This push comes ahead of a crucial White House meeting. A key debate centers on whether stablecoin companies should pay users interest. Banks fear this could drain deposits and weaken the traditional system, while crypto firms argue yield is essential for competition. Another contentious issue is crypto firms' limited access to the Federal Reserve's payment system. If no agreement is reached, lawmakers may delay the vote again, creating market uncertainty, despite former President Trump's goal of making the U.S. the "crypto capital of the world."

Scott Bessent, the Treasury Secretary, is pushing the crypto firm, banks, and lawmakers to stop fighting and find a compromise so that the Clarity Act can be moved forward. His statements have come right before the key White House meeting.

Right now, the bill has been stuck in the Senate, and crypto firms and banks met last week but failed to agree. So another meeting is scheduled today to try again. Bessent made it clear that waiting for the perfect law is not realistic, and it could create uncertainty and slow innovation in the U.S.

Scott Bessent’s reply to Brian Armstrong’s statement

Brian Armstrong, CEO of Coinbase, has argued that it may be better not to have a bill instead of passing the bill that creates the problem. Scott disagrees with his statements, and he believes that some regulations are better than none. He warned that a few groups refusing to compromise could prevent the U.S. from becoming a global crypto leader.

Key issue for the Debate

One of the most sensitive issues is whether the stablecoin companies pay users interest. Banks worry that if the stablecoins offer yield, then people would start moving money out of the bank deposit, and this could weaken the traditional banking system. On the other hand, crypto companies argue that yield helps them to compete, and users expect returns similar to those of savings products. Another topic is limited access for the crypto firms to the payment system run by the Federal Reserve. This created more tension between the crypto firms and banks.

Today’s meeting is so crucial and could decide whether the bill moves forward and how stablecoins will work in the U.S. with clearer operating rules for the companies. If no agreement is reached, then the lawmakers may delay the vote again. The analyst says that this would affect the market and create uncertainty. President Donald Trump has repeatedly said that he wants the nation to be the “crypto capital of the world.”

Highlighted Crypto News:

Telegram Moves Toward Built-In Crypto Payments With TON Pay Launch

TagsClarity ACTCrypto

Related Questions

QWhat is the main purpose of the Treasury Secretary's push for compromise between crypto firms and banks?

AThe Treasury Secretary is pushing for compromise to advance the CLARITY Act, which has been stuck in the Senate, to prevent uncertainty and avoid slowing innovation in the U.S. crypto sector.

QHow does Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent's view differ from Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong's regarding the proposed legislation?

AScott Bessent believes some regulation is better than none and warns that refusing to pass a bill could prevent the U.S. from becoming a global crypto leader, while Brian Armstrong argues it may be better to have no bill than to pass a problematic one.

QWhat is one key issue causing debate between banks and crypto companies regarding stablecoins?

AA key issue is whether stablecoin companies should pay users interest, with banks worrying this could draw deposits away from traditional banks and weaken the banking system, while crypto firms argue yield helps them compete and meet user expectations.

QWhy is the meeting mentioned in the article considered crucial?

AThe meeting is crucial because it could determine whether the CLARITY Act moves forward and establish clearer operating rules for stablecoins in the U.S.; failure to reach an agreement may lead to further delays in voting and create market uncertainty.

QWhat has been President Donald Trump's stated goal regarding cryptocurrency in the U.S.?

APresident Donald Trump has repeatedly stated that he wants the United States to become the 'crypto capital of the world.'

Related Reads

Conversation with Patagon Founder: Revealing the Inside Story of Anthropic's Secondary Market

**Summary: Inside Anthropic's Massive, Opaque Secondary Market** In a revealing interview, Patagon founder Dio Casares pulls back the curtain on the booming, high-risk secondary market for shares in companies like Anthropic. This private market, fueled by companies staying private longer and massive funding rounds, is estimated to involve hundreds of billions of dollars. Casares distinguishes between two types of "secondary" trading: 1. **Company-approved SPV (Special Purpose Vehicle) sales:** Where new capital flows into the company, often facilitated by select private equity firms. Anthropic supports this to manage liquidity and pre-IPO selling pressure. 2. **The "gray" market:** Platforms like Hive and Forge that match buyers and sellers, often creating pricing confusion and competing with official funding rounds. These intermediaries are widely disliked by companies. The market structure is complex and fragmented, relying heavily on personal connections. Brokers connect buyers and sellers, often layering multiple SPVs to pool capital, with single transaction fees as high as 10%. Strikingly, some finance professionals earn more from this trading than from their primary investment roles. **Key risks highlighted include:** * **High Fraud Rates:** An estimated 10-20% of transactions involve fake stock certificates or sellers who take payment without having the shares. * **Complex, Risky Structures:** Nested SPVs, "forward contracts" on employee equity, and tokenized private equity create layers of opacity. This is exemplified by a recent incident where an xAI employee's shares were revoked after an espionage allegation, leaving buyers empty-handed. * **Post-IPO "Settlement Hell":** After an IPO, delays in distributing shares through multiple SPV layers and decisions by fund managers to hold onto shares could trigger years of lawsuits as downstream investors are locked out. **For small investors** holding positions through tokenized vehicles or layered SPVs, it's often impossible to verify the underlying asset. Casares advises caution: if the investment feels wrong, consider exiting. As the private market now surpasses IPO fundraising, this "wild west" ecosystem faces a looming reckoning. While it will likely professionalize, the post-IPO period for a company like Anthropic could unleash a wave of disputes, exposing the vulnerabilities built into this frenzied, largely unregulated marketplace.

marsbit1h ago

Conversation with Patagon Founder: Revealing the Inside Story of Anthropic's Secondary Market

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures
活动图片