Tom Lee: Ethereum Has Bottomed Out

深潮Published on 2025-12-11Last updated on 2025-12-11

Abstract

Tom Lee, Chairman of BitMine Immersion Technologies, believes Ethereum has bottomed after recently falling below $3,000. His company, the largest public Ethereum treasury, backed this view by purchasing 138,452 ETH worth approximately $460 million last week—its largest acquisition since October. BitMine now holds 3.2 million ETH, about 3.2% of the circulating supply, making it the second-largest crypto treasury company after MicroStrategy. Lee remains optimistic about Ethereum’s performance by year-end and is even more bullish on its long-term prospects over the next 10-15 years compared to Bitcoin. He argues that Wall Street’s growing adoption of Ethereum for tokenizing real-world assets—not just stablecoins but eventually all assets—positions it as the leading smart contract platform for the future of finance. This aligns with BlackRock executives’ recent comments that tokenization represents the next major evolution in market infrastructure. Ethereum currently hosts $12.1 billion in tokenized real-world assets, accounting for nearly 66% of the market.

Written by: Logan Hitchcock

Compiled by: Saoirse, Foresight News

Tom Lee, Chairman of BitMine. Image Credit: André Beganski/Decrypt

Key Points:

  • Tom Lee, Chairman of BitMine, believes Ethereum has bottomed out for the year.

  • Lee's company, the world's largest Ethereum treasury firm, increased its Ethereum holdings by $460 million last week, "putting its money where its mouth is."

  • Lee stated that Ethereum could still perform strongly before the end of the year; and over the next 10 to 15 years, he is more optimistic about Ethereum's development prospects compared to Bitcoin.

Tom Lee believes that the price of Ethereum, the second-largest cryptocurrency, has bottomed out after it recently fell below the $3,000 mark.

The Chairman of BitMine Immersion Technologies (who also serves as Chief Investment Officer of Fundstrat) stated that this Ethereum treasury company is currently proving its point with action by significantly increasing its Ethereum holdings at current price levels.

"BitMine believes the price of Ethereum has bottomed," Lee said in a video interview with Farokh Sarmad, President of Decrypt's parent company Dastan. "We are buying more than twice as much Ethereum now compared to two weeks ago."

The treasury company recently made a substantial addition to its holdings of the asset — purchasing 138,452 ETH last week, worth approximately $460 million.

This is BitMine's largest purchase since it acquired over 200,000 ETH in October, and the company aims to hold 5% of Ethereum's circulating supply.

As of Wednesday, BitMine holds approximately 3.864 million ETH, representing 3.2% of Ethereum's circulating supply, with a market value of $12.85 billion. Currently, the company is the largest publicly traded holder of Ethereum treasury reserves, and ranks second among all cryptocurrency treasury firms — behind only Strategy, which holds over $61 billion worth of Bitcoin.

Additionally, BitMine holds 193 BTC (worth approximately $18 million) and $1 billion in cash.

Although the prices of both Bitcoin and Ethereum have retreated from their all-time highs, Ethereum has led the recent rebound: it is up about 8% over the past 7 days and is currently trading at $3,376; meanwhile, Bitcoin's price has been largely flat over the past week, recently trading at $92,248.

The BitMine executive (BitMine stock ticker: BMNR) stated that he believes both assets could experience significant volatility before the end of the year.

Previously, Lee had predicted that Bitcoin could reach a high of $150,000 by the end of 2025; however, as Bitcoin's price remained below $100,000 in the final week of November, he softened his stance, saying Bitcoin "maybe" could still reach that target.

Regardless, Lee and BitMine are more optimistic about Ethereum's development over the next 10 to 15 years — especially as Wall Street has embraced this Layer-1 blockchain network and recognized its role in the future financial landscape.

"The reason we are bullish on Ethereum is that Wall Street is choosing its blockchain for future development," Lee said. "This trend started with stablecoins — an important 'aha moment' for Wall Street... but stablecoins are just tokenizing the dollar. Now, Wall Street wants to tokenize all assets, and they won't do that on Bitcoin — because they need a smart contract platform."

This view aligns with statements from BlackRock executives Larry Fink and Rob Goldstein last week, who said tokenization is the "next major evolution in market infrastructure."

Ethereum is leading this trend: according to data from RWA.xyz, it hosts $12.1 billion in tokenized real-world assets (RWA), accounting for nearly 66% of the total distributed assets.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QAccording to Tom Lee, has Ethereum reached its bottom in price this year?

AYes, Tom Lee believes that the price of Ethereum has bottomed out for the year.

QWhat significant action did BitMine take recently to support its view on Ethereum?

ABitMine purchased an additional 138,452 ETH, worth approximately $460 million, last week, doubling its buying rate compared to two weeks prior.

QWhat is BitMine's long-term goal regarding its Ethereum holdings?

ABitMine aims to hold 5% of Ethereum's circulating supply.

QWhy does Tom Lee express a stronger long-term optimism for Ethereum over Bitcoin?

ALee is more optimistic about Ethereum because Wall Street is choosing its blockchain for future development, particularly for asset tokenization, which requires a smart contract platform that Bitcoin does not provide.

QHow much in tokenized real-world assets (RWA) does Ethereum currently host, according to the article?

AEthereum hosts $12.1 billion in tokenized real-world assets, representing nearly 66% of the total distributed asset share.

Related Reads

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

In mid-June, three seemingly independent industry events—the compliance-driven throttling of Fable 5, the open-sourcing of GLM-5.2, and the leaked release timeline for GPT-5.6—are pushing the global AI industry toward a watershed moment. These shifts signal a fundamental restructuring of the industry's underlying logic. First, **"usability" has substantially overtaken "advanced capabilities"** as the primary weight, pushing the global large language model (LLM) supply chain into a "dual-track" phase of controlled closed-source and local open-source coexistence. Second, **the competitive moats of closed-source giants are shifting**. Their technical focus is moving from "language intelligence" toward "spatial intelligence (world models)"—a domain heavily reliant on computing power. Third, faced with常态化 transnational compliance risks, **a "model-agnostic" decoupled design has become a survival necessity for application-layer developers to maintain business continuity.** The article details how Anthropic's Fable 5, despite its advanced engineering feats, was restricted for non-U.S. citizens within 72 hours of launch, highlighting how geopolitical compliance can instantly limit even the most advanced models. In response, the open-source camp, exemplified by Zhipu AI's MIT-licensed GLM-5.2, is gaining market share by offering stable performance improvements and significant cost advantages (up to 70% savings for enterprises), while achieving full adaptation with domestic semiconductor platforms. Meanwhile, closed-source leaders like OpenAI are pivoting. The anticipated GPT-5.6 reportedly shifts focus from language to spatial intelligence and world models, aiming to rebuild a generational gap in areas like 3D understanding, simulation, and industrial design that demand immense compute. The core conclusion is that the LLM supply chain's logic has changed. Enterprises must now evaluate infrastructure based on a composite of technical performance and policy compliance. For developers, complete reliance on a single closed-source API poses unacceptable risk. Implementing a truly model-agnostic architecture—enabling swift switches to compliant, locally deployable open-source alternatives—is no longer just good practice but a fundamental baseline for business continuity.

marsbit44m ago

GPT-5.6 Countdown: Abandon the Illusion of a Single API, Computational Iteration Can't Outpace a Single Page of Compliance

marsbit44m ago

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

The article discusses the ongoing "token subsidy war" among AI giants like OpenAI and Anthropic, questioning whether it's nearing its end. It reveals that current AI subscription prices are heavily subsidized, with some plans offering tokens at up to 70 times the actual cost to attract and retain heavy users, especially developers and enterprises. This strategy mirrors past internet-era subsidy battles, but with a key difference: AI tokens lack "lock-in" effects. Unlike ride-hailing or food delivery apps, users can easily switch between AI providers as APIs become standardized, making it difficult for companies to raise prices post-subsidy. The piece highlights a structural asymmetry in the competition. Giants like Google, with massive advertising revenue, can afford to subsidize tokens indefinitely, akin to using "tokens as a weapon." In contrast, venture-backed companies like OpenAI and Anthropic face pressure to become profitable, especially as they approach IPO. The article cites Google Ventures founder Bill Maris, who suggests Google could slash token prices by 80%, putting immense pressure on competitors. Two potential endgames are presented: the "internet service" model (subsidize, monopolize, then raise prices) and the "utility" model (tokens become a standardized, low-margin commodity like electricity). Given the low switching costs, the latter seems more likely. The competition may not have a single winner but could instead accelerate AI's evolution into a foundational, infrastructure-level technology, akin to a public utility. For now, users continue to benefit from heavily subsidized token costs.

marsbit1h ago

Is the 'Token Subsidy War' Among AI Giants Almost Over?

marsbit1h ago

Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

"Beyond the Pitch: The Profit Game Around the World Cup" The FIFA World Cup transcends being a sporting spectacle, evolving into a massive global arena for speculation and profit-seeking. The 2026 tournament has amplified this dynamic, creating a multi-layered ecosystem of financial opportunism alongside the football. **Prediction markets** have surged into the mainstream. Platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi saw trading volumes for World Cup contracts soar, attracting new users with their financial trading model and high-profile, chain-based wealth stories that overshadow traditional sports betting in terms of growth and narrative. However, **traditional sportsbooks** remain the dominant force, leveraging established user habits, legal markets, and comprehensive product offerings to handle the vast majority of speculative wagers, with projections suggesting record-breaking betting volumes. Capital markets also react. **"Concept stocks"** in countries like South Korea and Japan experience volatile price swings based on team performance and anticipated fan spending on items like chicken, beer, and viewing parties, effectively becoming a stock market reflecting fan sentiment. The **ticket resale market** has become a sophisticated arena for arbitrage. Prices fluctuate wildly based on team draws and star power, with sellers sometimes listing tickets they don't yet own in a practice akin to short-selling, while FIFA's own "Right to Buy" tokens add another layer of speculative trading. **Collectibles and merchandise** offer another avenue. Panini sticker albums, with their inherent scarcity and nostalgic value, can become high-value collectibles. Limited-edition or locally themed jerseys command significant premiums on secondary markets, and even counterfeit vendors profit from fans' desire for affordable match-day identity. The **cryptocurrency** space has seen a frenzy of speculative, unauthorized World Cup-themed meme coins on chains like Solana. These tokens, often exploiting team names and player imagery, experience extreme pump-and-dump cycles, creating stories of massive gains for a few early entrants and steep losses for many others. Finally, an entire industry thrives on **providing information and tools** to other speculators. Developers create platforms like SeatSidekick to track ticket inventory and prices, while paid Telegram groups and subscriptions sell betting tips and predictions, monetizing the widespread desire for an informational edge. In essence, the World Cup has become a compressed, global laboratory for speculation. While the games determine champions on the field, a parallel, complex network of financial transactions—spanning prediction contracts, bets, stocks, tickets, collectibles, crypto, and information services—settles its own scores in the global market.

marsbit1h ago

Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

marsbit1h ago

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

This article explains the three primary methods for Codex to interact with a computer, each with distinct use cases, permission boundaries, and trust levels. **1. Computer Use:** This offers the broadest access, allowing Codex to visually control and interact with the graphical user interface of authorized macOS/Windows apps, system settings, and even iOS simulators. It's ideal for tasks lacking APIs or structured tools, such as operating legacy software or multi-app workflows. However, it's the slowest method and has the widest permission scope, requiring careful supervision for sensitive actions. **2. Chrome Extension:** This grants Codex access to the user's logged-in Chrome browser state, including cookies, profiles, and open tabs. It's best for tasks requiring user identity across websites like Gmail, LinkedIn, Salesforce, or internal dashboards. Its key advantage is multi-tab control for complex workflows. While more powerful for browser-based tasks than Computer Use, it carries higher sensitivity as actions are performed under the user's identity. **3. In-App Browser:** This is a browser isolated within the Codex thread, separate from the user's personal browsing data. It excels in web development and debugging scenarios—previewing local servers, testing responsive layouts, or annotating designs directly on the page. Its isolation is a strength for development but a limitation for tasks requiring login sessions. The core principle is to choose the narrowest, safest, and most structured interface for the task. Use plugins or MCPs first, resort to visual control (Computer Use) only for GUI-dependent tasks, employ the Chrome extension for identity-reliant browser work, and prefer the In-App Browser for isolated development. **Appshots** are clarified as a fourth, complementary tool for *inputting* context—capturing a screenshot of a window to point Codex to something—rather than a method for Codex to *act*. Together, this layered approach highlights a key to AI agent productization: not granting unlimited permissions, but constraining them within clear boundaries for specific tasks while preserving user oversight.

marsbit3h ago

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

marsbit3h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片