The 'Trump Paradox' in the Midterm Elections: The Stronger He Is, the More Dangerous It Is for the GOP

marsbitPublished on 2026-05-21Last updated on 2026-05-21

Abstract

"The Trump Paradox: What's Good for Him Is Weighing Down His Party" This article examines the "Trump paradox": as former President Donald Trump's national approval declines, his grip on the Republican Party intensifies. However, his strategy of enforcing personal loyalty through primary challenges and endorsements risks harming the GOP's broader electoral prospects. Trump's recent victories in ousting critics like Representatives Thomas Massie and Bill Cassidy demonstrate his enduring command over the party's base. Yet, this focus on loyalty may alienate independent and moderate voters crucial for winning general elections. Furthermore, Trump's political weakness limits his ability to advance legislative priorities, creating tension with congressional Republicans. While solidifying his internal authority, Trump's influence may be pushing the party into a more difficult position for the upcoming midterms, where Democratic voters currently show higher enthusiasm. The article concludes that the GOP's greatest challenge may not be Democrats, but the narrowing electoral path shaped by Trump's dominance.

Original Title: The Trump paradox: What's good for him is weighing down his party

Original Author: the Washington Post

Translator: Peggy

Editor's Note: The political paradox surrounding Trump is becoming increasingly clear: while his approval rating among the national electorate continues to decline, his dominance within the Republican Party is growing ever stronger.

The core discussion of this article is not whether Trump can still influence the Republican Party, but rather how this influence is reshaping the party's electoral prospects. On one hand, he forces party candidates to pledge allegiance to him through endorsements, primary challenges, and political purges. On the other hand, this political vetting centered on personal loyalty may also weaken the Republican Party's competitiveness in the general election.

From Thomas Massie and Bill Cassidy, to the Indiana state senate and Texas Senate primaries, Trump's "politics of vengeance" continues to demonstrate his ability to mobilize the Republican grassroots. The problem, however, is that winning a party primary does not equate to winning a national election. For the GOP, the real risk is not that Trump cannot control the party, but that the deeper his control, the narrower the party's appeal may become among independent and moderate voters.

What is more noteworthy is that Trump's strength has not translated into effective legislative capabilities. On issues such as the gas tax, voting rights bills, immigration funding, and military action against Iran, there remains significant tension between him and congressional Republicans. This means that while Trump can force party members to declare their loyalty, he may not be able to make them bear the full political cost for his agenda.

Trump has built a party that is highly loyal to him. Even when his executive actions anger the broader public, Republicans still choose to follow him. This political structure, in turn, undermines his influence with voters beyond his base.

For the midterm elections, the biggest variable the Republican Party currently faces may not be the Democrats, but Trump himself. For Trump, victories in primaries are consolidating his authority within the party; but for the GOP, these victories may also be pushing it towards a more difficult general election to win.

The following is the original text:

U.S. President Donald Trump walks on the South Lawn of the White House after arriving on Marine One on Friday. (Eric Lee/Pool/The Washington Post)

President Donald Trump does not believe in the so-called "laws of political gravity."

Nationally, as his standing sinks—multiple polls show his approval rating near historic lows—he is tightening his grip on the Republican Party, jeopardizing the electoral prospects this fall of the party that now obeys his will through a series of unpopular, and at times brazen, actions.

The result: a president who is historically powerful in demanding political fealty within his party, yet whose frequent executive actions continue to alienate the broader public. This paradox leaves him increasingly unwilling, and less able, to work through Congress on issues that matter most to voters. And it is a cycle that Trump appears neither willing nor able to break.

On Tuesday, Trump claimed one of his most coveted trophies: Libertarian Republican Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.), an eight-term congressman who was one of Trump's most prominent GOP critics in the House and who led an effort to force the release of government files on the convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, was ousted. Trump initially opposed the move, changing his stance only after he realized he could not stop it.

Massie was soundly defeated in the primary by a previously little-known political newcomer, former Navy SEAL Ed Garlean, who was personally selected by Trump and backed by tens of millions of dollars from Trump-aligned groups.

Massie's defeat came three days after Louisiana Republican Sen. Bill Cassidy also lost his race. Trump had called Cassidy "very disloyal." Five years ago, Cassidy voted to convict Trump in his second impeachment trial over the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol. Though the senator had spent years trying—often awkwardly—to repair the relationship, he ultimately failed even to make a runoff.

Earlier this month, Trump's "revenge tour" swept through Indiana, where Republican voters heeded his call to oust five of seven state senators who had refused Trump's demands to redraw the state's congressional maps. One race remains unresolved, with the latest vote count showing just a two-vote margin between the two candidates.

On Tuesday, Trump again flexed his political muscle: In the Texas Republican Senate primary runoff, he announced his support for Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton over incumbent Sen. John Cornyn. The move frustrated many Republicans on Capitol Hill, who view Cornyn as the stronger general-election candidate; if Paxton wins, the GOP may have to spend hundreds of millions of dollars to ensure its candidate prevails in the deep-red state, money that may be needed to support candidates elsewhere.

But as often is the case, Trump made clear that the decision was personal, not tactical or policy-driven. Cornyn has occasionally criticized Trump in the past, though he has worked hard recently to curry favor, even recently introducing legislation to name one of the country's longest highways after Trump.

It did not work. In a social media post endorsing Paxton, Trump wrote, "John Cornyn is a good guy, and I have worked well with him, but he was not supportive of me during my difficult times."

"I actually think MAGA has never been more united," Trump told reporters Tuesday. But if Republicans are to maintain control of Congress in the fall election, they will need to secure a significant share of other voters. And in Trump's view, the election is tied to his own political survival.

In January, he told a gathering of Republican House members, "You've got to win the midterms, because if we don't win the midterms, then it's going to be—I mean, they'll find a reason to impeach me. I'll be impeached."

But right now, the biggest drag on Republicans' ability to maintain their narrow House and Senate majorities is Trump himself. A New York Times/Siena poll released Monday is just the latest evidence: The public is deeply unhappy with his handling of the war in Iran and the cost of living, and even on immigration, his strongest issue, Trump trails by 15 points.

Among crucial independent voters, Trump's approval rating has sunk to 26 percent. Forty-seven percent of respondents said his policies have hurt them, up from 41 percent last fall. And perhaps the most alarming poll number for Republicans: Democratic voters are more enthusiastic about voting this year, leading by 11 points on the hypothetical question of which party they would support if the election were held today.

At the same time, even Republicans have been unnerved by some of Trump's recent attention-grabbing actions. These include his $100 billion lawsuit against the IRS this year over leaked tax returns, which he settled.

The settlement will create an $1.8 billion taxpayer-funded compensation fund for those who claim they have been persecuted by a "weaponized justice system" like Trump. Beneficiaries are likely to include some of those charged in connection with the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol, when Trump supporters tried to overturn his loss in the 2020 presidential election.

Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) told reporters Tuesday when asked about the fund, "I'm not a big fan."

Democrats were more blunt.

"The corruption has never been more naked, or more broad. But here is what is happening now: You write the checks, Trump and his cronies cash them. And the American taxpayer, already struggling with high prices, will pay the bill," said Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.) at a hearing featuring acting Attorney General Todd Branch.

Under the settlement, Trump and his sons are barred from personally receiving payments from the so-called "anti-weaponization" fund. But the IRS will also be "permanently barred and precluded" from collecting any unpaid taxes owed by Trump, his family members or his businesses that accrued before the settlement was reached.

And for all of Trump's strength on unilateral executive actions, his political weakness is also sapping his influence to get things done through the legislative branch. Much of his agenda is stalled in Congress.

Neither Thune nor House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) has embraced Trump's call for a gas tax holiday. The Senate has resisted his demands to end the filibuster, which Trump wants to use to pass his high-priority Save America Act, which includes a provision requiring people to prove their citizenship when registering to vote. Trump has called the bill necessary to secure elections, but opponents argue it would lead to voter suppression.

Another recent point of frustration for Trump: The Senate parliamentarian has refused to allow hundreds of millions of dollars for security costs for his deeply unpopular White House ballroom project to be tucked into an immigration enforcement funding bill under consideration.

For Trump, beyond the "golden halo" that comes with defeating incumbent Republicans, there may also be a shadow. These members will remain in office until January, and presumably will be less afraid of him.

On Tuesday, Cassidy, who just lost his primary, mounted one act of public defiance: For the first time, he voted to advance a resolution to stop Trump from continuing to order strikes against Iran.

"In Louisiana, I've heard from many, including supporters of President Trump, who are concerned about this war," Cassidy said in a statement.

In February, Massie told The Washington Post, "I have colleagues who are just waiting for their primary to be over before they start to develop a more independent voice."

For their own political survival, they may have to.

Original link

Related Questions

QWhat is the core argument of the article regarding Donald Trump's influence on the Republican Party?

AThe article argues that while Donald Trump has gained near-total dominance over the Republican Party, this influence paradoxically makes the party more vulnerable in general elections by alienating independent and moderate voters, thereby jeopardizing its electoral prospects.

QAccording to the article, how did Trump demonstrate his political strength within the GOP through primary elections?

ATrump demonstrated his strength by successfully endorsing and helping to defeat incumbent Republican critics in primaries, such as Representatives Thomas Massie and Bill Cassidy, several Indiana state senators, and by backing Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton over incumbent Senator John Cornyn.

QWhat is one key legislative area where Trump's agenda has stalled in Congress, as mentioned in the article?

AOne key area is his proposed 'Save America Act,' which includes a proof-of-citizenship requirement for voter registration. This bill has faced resistance in Congress, with opponents viewing it as voter suppression.

QWhat specific action by Trump, related to the IRS, caused concern even among some Republicans?

ATrump's settlement with the IRS, which created an $1.8 billion taxpayer-funded 'anti-weaponization' compensation fund potentially benefiting individuals charged in the January 6 Capitol attack, caused concern. Senate GOP leader John Thune stated he was 'not a fan' of the fund.

QWhat does the article suggest is the 'shadow' or potential downside for Trump after he defeats incumbent Republicans in primaries?

AThe article suggests that defeated incumbents, who will remain in office until January, may feel less beholden to Trump and could become more independent and vocal in their opposition to his agenda, as hinted by actions from Bill Cassidy and Thomas Massie.

Related Reads

A 'Overlooked' Market Event: Joint US-Japan-South Korea Intervention, Rare US Treasury Involvement, and Bessent's Quiet 'Market Rescue'?

Summary: The United States, Japan, and South Korea executed their largest coordinated foreign exchange intervention in nearly 30 years. The action targeted depreciation pressure on the Japanese yen and South Korean won. This move is seen as a significant effort by the US to stabilize the financial markets of its key allies and prevent the spillover of risks. Key details: * Japan reportedly intervened on July 30 using approximately 8.45 trillion yen (about $52.8 billion). South Korean authorities also intervened that day, selling dollars to support the won. * Notably, the US Treasury Department intervened directly in yen markets for the first time in roughly 30 years. The New York Fed, reportedly acting on behalf of the Treasury, sold euros to buy yen via Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley on July 31. Analysts view the use of the euro-yen pair as a way to alleviate yen pressure without adding selling pressure to the US dollar. * Prior to the action, the New York Fed conducted "rate checks" on both USD/JPY and EUR/JPY, a newer signaling tool that falls between verbal and physical intervention. The intervention is interpreted as going beyond traditional currency stabilization. Analysts, such as Michael Hartnett of Bank of America, suggest it resembles a "Price Keeping Operation" for the AI era. The core US objectives are perceived to be: 1. Preventing rapid yen depreciation from triggering a sharp rise in Japanese government bond yields. 2. Containing financial stress from spreading across Asian markets like South Korea and Japan. 3. Reducing the risk of disorderly capital flows impacting the US bond market. This coordinated action underscores the importance of Japan and South Korea as critical partners in the US semiconductor and AI supply chain. Stabilizing their financial markets is seen as vital to mitigating risks to the broader tech industry and the US market itself. The intervention coincides with market pressures, including the KOSDAQ index hitting a low since October 2022. While seen as a move to control volatility, some analysts caution it may not fundamentally reverse existing market trends.

marsbit4m ago

A 'Overlooked' Market Event: Joint US-Japan-South Korea Intervention, Rare US Treasury Involvement, and Bessent's Quiet 'Market Rescue'?

marsbit4m ago

Will the Federal Reserve Definitely Raise Interest Rates in September? How Will Cryptocurrencies and US Stocks Bear the Pressure?

In early August 2024, market expectations for a September Federal Reserve rate hike surged dramatically, from below 50% to over 80%, driven by renewed inflation concerns. This shift followed a contentious July FOMC meeting where a 9-3 vote to hold rates revealed a growing hawkish faction advocating for an immediate hike, citing prolonged above-target inflation. The key catalyst is escalating conflict near the Strait of Hormuz, which has pushed oil prices up approximately 20% in July, threatening to reignite inflation. The next critical data point is the July CPI report on August 12th; a hot reading could solidify hike expectations. For crypto assets, particularly Bitcoin, this represents near-term pressure. Bitcoin continues to exhibit high-beta, risk-on characteristics, making it sensitive to tightening liquidity and higher opportunity costs. However, historical precedent suggests that if a hike is perceived as the cycle's end rather than its start, the negative impact may be brief, with markets quickly pivoting to anticipate future rate cuts. U.S. stocks, especially crypto-linked equities like Coinbase and high-valuation tech stocks, face amplified volatility. Higher rates increase discount rates in valuation models, pressuring growth stocks. This coincides with a pivotal tech earnings season where investor focus has shifted from massive AI capital expenditures to demonstrable revenue and cash flow generation. Companies with negative cash flows and weak growth narratives could see severe pressure if a September hike materializes, as financing costs would rise. Key indicators to watch include oil prices, upcoming inflation data, and Fed commentary at events like the Jackson Hole symposium.

Odaily星球日报4m ago

Will the Federal Reserve Definitely Raise Interest Rates in September? How Will Cryptocurrencies and US Stocks Bear the Pressure?

Odaily星球日报4m ago

From South Korea to the United States: Blue-Collar Jobs Are Becoming Increasingly Popular, Thanks to AI

AI is reshaping the labor market's value proposition. The traditional four-year college degree is losing its appeal as a guaranteed career path, while skilled blue-collar trades like electricians, welders, and plumbers are experiencing historic demand and wage premiums. This shift is driven by dual pressures: AI's displacement of certain white-collar roles and a booming need for physical infrastructure and data center construction. Data confirms the trend. In the U.S., vocational school revenue surged, and a significant portion of recent layoffs are AI-related. Surveys show a majority of Gen Z adults plan to pursue blue-collar work, citing better job security against AI automation. Vocational education interest has exploded recently. Experts cite a psychological shift as younger generations seek tangible, AI-resistant careers and avoid high student debt. In many cases, salaries for skilled trades now match or exceed those requiring a bachelor's degree. In South Korea, semiconductor vocational high schools boast near-total employment, with graduates securing high-paying roles at companies like Samsung. The shortage is structural, exacerbated by a retiring baby boomer workforce and massive infrastructure projects. Companies like JPMorgan Chase, Meta, and Lowe's are investing heavily in training programs. However, overcoming historical stigma and a "perception gap" around trade careers remains a key challenge to closing the talent gap.

marsbit1h ago

From South Korea to the United States: Blue-Collar Jobs Are Becoming Increasingly Popular, Thanks to AI

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片