The First Step to Becoming an On-Chain Bank: Polymarket Launches Native Stablecoin

marsbitPublished on 2026-04-07Last updated on 2026-04-07

Abstract

Polymarket, a leading prediction market platform, has announced a major upgrade involving the replacement of its current collateral, USDC.e, with its own native stablecoin, Polymarket USD (pegged 1:1 to USDC). This transition, expected within 2-3 weeks, is designed to be seamless for most users. The introduction of its own stablecoin allows Polymarket to consolidate user funds within its own ecosystem, transforming from merely facilitating trades to holding and managing the underlying capital. This shift enables the platform to potentially generate significant revenue from the yield on the reserve assets (USDC), estimated to be tens of millions annually from its current ~$400M in open interest. This moves its business model beyond transaction fees, which recently surpassed $1M daily, towards earning "interest" on deposited funds. Furthermore, controlling a large pool of stablecoins grants Polymarket greater leverage in its relationship with Circle (issuer of USDC) and could pave the way for future financial services. This strategic upgrade signifies Polymarket's evolution from a prediction market ("casino logic") into a more comprehensive financial entity with banking-like capabilities ("bank logic"), significantly deepening its competitive moat.

Original | Odaily Planet Daily (@OdailyChina)

Author | Golem (@web3_golem)

On April 6, Polymarket announced a major upgrade to the platform in the next 2 to 3 weeks, including upgrading both CTF and CLOB to V2, and replacing the platform collateral from USDC.e to the native stablecoin Polymarket USD.

According to the official introduction, Polymarket USD is 1:1 backed by USDC. For most users, the transition from USDC.e to Polymarket USD is seamless, with the frontend handling it automatically—users only need to confirm once. For advanced users and API-only traders, the transition process might be a bit more complex but still not difficult; they need to wrap their USDC or USDC.e into Polymarket USD through the wrap() function of the collateral access contract.

On the surface, it seems like Polymarket is just changing the trading collateral in the backend. As the platform grows, continuing to use USDC.e is indeed a potential risk. Back in February, Circle and Polymarket had already announced plans to migrate from bridged USDC.e to native USDC, and this is just a normal progression of that cooperation.

However, Polymarket did not choose to directly introduce native USDC to replace USDC.e; instead, it added an extra layer, aiming to pool USDC into its own fund pool. This layer is called Polymarket USD. Therefore, the emergence of Polymarket USD is definitely a "One more thing"(Odaily Note: "One more thing" is a classic tradition of Apple keynotes, now symbolizing a company's finale, industry-disrupting moves, etc.).

Polymarket Gains the Right to Mint Currency

The first layer of significance is that Polymarket can pool user funds.

Previously, the money users deposited into Polymarket would be converted into USDC.e. You can think of it as Polymarket being a huge trading venue—it only handles matching, pricing, and清算; the money flows through it, but the money itself does not belong to its system. Polymarket is not a treasury.

But that's about to change. When USDC.e is replaced with Polymarket USD, Polymarket can reach out to that money which was merely "passing through." As Polymarket officially stated, the daily user experience is unaffected, but the actual on-chain settlement path behind the scenes has been altered. This transformation is no less significant than an exchange transitioning from relying on third-party清算机构 to building its own清算 center.

Polymarket USD is 1:1 backed by USDC, meaning that in the future, for every Polymarket USD in the market, there will be a corresponding USDC in Polymarket's fund pool. Currently, every Yes/No share pair on Polymarket is backed by USDC.e. When players place bets or settle, USDC.e also moves on-chain. But after switching to Polymarket USD, although it will also flow on-chain with user operations, the USDC in Polymarket's fund pool won't move accordingly. Therefore, as long as users don't come to redeem, this money is essentially Polymarket's.

Polymarket has transformed from a use case for stablecoins to an entity that holds the on-chain minting right. Polymarket USD diverts user assets from the "open sea" to Polymarket's "internal lake." Once funds begin to pool, Polymarket is no longer just a prediction trading platform, and its business model no longer relies solely on trading fees, because it can start playing the oldest "money makes money" game in the financial markets.

Increasing Polymarket's Revenue Channels

The second layer of significance is the expansion of Polymarket's business.

The current business model of prediction markets is simple: charging transaction fees. After Polymarket adjusted its fee mechanism on March 30(Odaily Note: Expanding the taker fee scope to include Finance, Politics, Economics, Culture, Weather, and other market categories, in addition to the original Crypto and Sports categories), its daily fee income has exceeded $1 million.

Polymarket's Daily Fee Income

Although impressive, it's not enough to satisfy Polymarket's ambitions. Prediction markets are currently the most sought-after赛道, but the business model ceiling isn't very high, the project's moat is relatively单一 (regulatory approval), and user stickiness isn't exceptionally strong. In the current landscape where everyone is doing prediction markets, how can Polymarket ensure it won't be surpassed by competitors in the future?

The answer it gives now is: I don't just match trades; I can also put players' money to work.

From a business essence perspective, the most attractive aspect of stablecoins over the years has never been fast payments and transfers, but the低调 yet highly profitable money-printing machine behind them—reserve asset yield. In 2025, the vast majority of Circle's income still came from reserve income. Polymarket understood this model, hence it launched Polymarket USD.

According to Dune data, the value of open interest on the Polymarket platform has exceeded $400 million. If all this money is converted into Polymarket USD, Polymarket simply needs to deposit the underlying collateral USDC into Circle's institutional account or place it in a U.S. Treasury protocol. At a risk-free rate of 4%-5%, it could earn tens of millions of dollars in "interest tax" annually just by sitting back.

Defillama founder 0xngmi even directly stated that Polymarket user wallets hold approximately $1.25 billion. If they keep this interest income, at current rates, they would gain an additional $54 million in annual revenue. Polymarket could even participate in DeFi wealth management with higher APYs, turning the idle funds on the prediction platform into active leverage and returning the到期收益 to users, effectively providing a hedge for users.

Polymarket's Daily OI and Trading Volume Curve

Prediction markets naturally have two characteristics: fund滞留 and high-frequency reallocation driven by events. Users' money doesn't truly enter and exit instantly like in a casino; it's either already in positions or sitting in accounts waiting for the next event, the next odds change. This type of money is most suitable for financial reprocessing, and for users, there's also a beautiful excuse: improving capital efficiency.

Of course, Polymarket hasn't publicly stated yet that it will definitely engage in yield extraction or on-chain wealth management after launching the stablecoin. But this path is almost a natural next step. As long as the scale of Polymarket USD grows larger in the future, it naturally gains the space to manage yields, expand collateral, and create financial combinations within the platform.

Some time ago, the《CLARITY Act》faced resistance for potentially prohibiting crypto companies from offering interest on stablecoins to users. If the outcome of the dispute remains a prohibition, all the above演绎 of Polymarket USD's potential would come to naught. But on April 6, according to U.S. media reports, the core disagreement between the U.S. crypto industry and banking over stablecoin yield mechanisms may be nearing resolution. Although details have not been disclosed, overall expectations are optimistic, and the《CLARITY Act》may enter the deliberation stage in committee in late April.

So, don't think Polymarket is far from this.

Polymarket Gains USDC Distribution Rights

The launch of the stablecoin by Polymarket has a third layer of significance: gaining USDC distribution rights.

As of today, Polymarket is still a major distribution scenario within the USDC ecosystem. Circle provides native USDC, Polymarket distributes USDC, and both sides are harmonious. Polymarket is currently experiencing strong growth momentum. Undoubtedly, the amount of USDC reserves沉淀 within its platform will grow larger in the future, potentially even becoming a distribution channel as important as Coinbase. When that time truly comes, the relationship between Polymarket and Circle might also change.

A reality in the stablecoin world is that distribution rights are as important as issuance rights, which is why Coinbase can take away over half of Circle's reserve income. Therefore, in the future, when Polymarket becomes a significant distributor of USDC, it will inevitably also gain bargaining power and be entitled to a large share of the reserve income. Furthermore, when Polymarket USD matures sufficiently, it could even explore multi-collateral backed stablecoins, not just relying solely on USDC.

This is also why I believe Polymarket USD is not an ordinary upgrade for Polymarket, but an identity update. Polymarket will evolve from "a platform collecting fees based on event volatility" to one that also兼具 "a platform organizing and清算 around the dollar".

The former is casino logic, while the latter is bank logic.

Polymarket's moat has thus gained another layer. It still maintains the beautiful narrative of information as the market and pricing facts early. But in terms of its business model, it is quietly moving itself to a more important position—no longer satisfied with being surface-level market traffic, no longer satisfied with仅仅 attracting users with odds, and no longer satisfied with continuing to cede the fattest part of the industry chain (asset reserve income) to others.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat is the primary reason Polymarket is introducing its native stablecoin, Polymarket USD?

APolymarket is introducing Polymarket USD to transition from using USDC.e as collateral to a native stablecoin that is 1:1 backed by USDC. This allows Polymarket to settle user funds within its own ecosystem, effectively enabling it to hold and potentially generate revenue from the underlying USDC reserves.

QHow does the introduction of Polymarket USD change the platform's business model beyond transaction fees?

ABeyond transaction fees, Polymarket USD enables Polymarket to generate revenue from the idle USDC reserves backing the stablecoin. By investing these reserves in low-risk assets like U.S. Treasury bonds or Circle's institutional accounts, Polymarket could earn significant interest income, estimated at tens of millions of dollars annually.

QWhat are the potential benefits for users in the transition to Polymarket USD, according to the article?

AFor most users, the transition to Polymarket USD is seamless and requires only a single confirmation on the front end. The change also opens the possibility for Polymarket to improve capital efficiency for users by leveraging idle funds for yield-generating activities, potentially offering returns that act as a hedge.

QHow does the article describe the strategic shift in Polymarket's role within the stablecoin ecosystem?

AThe article describes the shift as Polymarket evolving from a prediction market platform that relies on external stablecoins to one that controls the issuance and distribution of its own stablecoin. This grants Polymarket greater negotiating power with partners like Circle and positions it as a key distributor of USDC, similar to Coinbase.

QWhat regulatory consideration is mentioned regarding Polymarket's ability to generate yield from stablecoin reserves?

AThe article mentions the U.S. CLARITY Act, which initially proposed banning crypto companies from offering interest on stablecoin holdings. However, recent reports suggest that disagreements between crypto and banking sectors are nearing resolution, with expectations leaning towards allowing such practices, which would enable Polymarket to pursue yield generation.

Related Reads

Dialogue with Jia Hang | Looking Back at Two Decades of Chinese Payment Going Global

**Summary: A Conversation with Jia Hang on Two Decades of China's Payment Globalization** Jia Hang, a veteran with over twenty years in payments, reflects on China's attempts to build a global payment network through three key phases: UnionPay (card networks), Alipay+ (digital wallets), and now, stablecoins. His journey began at UnionPay International, aiming to establish China's card network abroad. While successful in following Chinese tourists ("where Chinese go, UnionPay goes"), it struggled to achieve true global scale. The core lesson: card networks like Visa/Mastercard's unassailable advantage isn't just technical standards, but their deeply entrenched **governance and profit-sharing models** that create powerful network effects. Competing as the "same species" is nearly impossible. At Ant Group, he led Alipay+, a strategy to bypass card networks by interconnecting local e-wallets worldwide. While innovative, it faced a similar ceiling. Mobile QR payments and card swipes were essentially **the same species competing for the same pie**, lacking a disruptive value proposition for users or a sustainable new incentive model to replace the card networks' established flywheel. Today, at Singapore's DCS, Jia focuses on stablecoin-based payments. He argues stablecoins represent a fundamental shift. They are not competing with Visa for consumer payments but challenging the **traditional banking and account system for value movement**. Products like "U Cards" (stablecoin-linked payment cards) are transitional, leveraging existing card networks for acceptance while building new rails. The real potential lies in stablecoins enabling seamless, low-cost global value transfer, potentially reorganizing the financial infrastructure around **accounts rather than cards**. Jia believes stablecoin adoption for local retail payments, cross-border transactions, and as high-yield savings vehicles is becoming irreversible. This could gradually reduce reliance on traditional fiat channels, especially in regions with weak currencies or capital controls. The quest for the "next global payment network" continues, now centered on whether stablecoins can successfully bridge Web2 and Web3, establish new governance, and create compelling user value beyond mere cost reduction.

marsbit22m ago

Dialogue with Jia Hang | Looking Back at Two Decades of Chinese Payment Going Global

marsbit22m ago

Circle's Stock Price Plunges 76%, Hong Kong Dollar Stablecoin Set to Launch Within Two Weeks

Circle's stock price has plunged approximately 76% from its 2023 peak, reflecting a major market revaluation. Despite this, Circle President Heath Tarbert emphasized the company's focus on long-term execution and its dominant position with USDC's $73 billion circulation across 34 blockchains. The competitive landscape is intensifying. A new consortium-backed stablecoin, Open USD, is attempting to challenge incumbents by sharing reserve yields with partners. More significantly, Visa's new stablecoin platform, initially supporting Open USD while also being compatible with USDC, could erode Circle's network effects. In response, Circle is expanding into real-world payments through partnerships like the one with Japan's JCB. Separately, Tether (USDT) faces a two-year compliance window under new U.S. regulations, requiring it to adjust its reserve composition away from assets like Bitcoin and loans towards cash and U.S. Treasuries. Meanwhile, in Hong Kong, Standard Chartered-backed fintech firm Dian Dian is poised to launch a licensed HKD-pegged stablecoin (HKDAP), moving the industry into a phase where the real test is integrating licensed stablecoins into actual payment flows and corporate treasury systems. The sharp decline in Circle's stock underscores a broader shift: the stablecoin market is moving from a winner-takes-all dynamic to a multi-player competitive arena where execution, compliance, and real-world utility are becoming paramount.

marsbit22m ago

Circle's Stock Price Plunges 76%, Hong Kong Dollar Stablecoin Set to Launch Within Two Weeks

marsbit22m ago

Amidst Capital's Encirclement, Decentralization is the Sole Defense for Public Blockchains

In a landscape dominated by power and profit motives, the author argues that decentralization is not merely one desirable feature among many in blockchain design—it is the singular, non-negotiable defense against corporate and capital capture. The article adopts a Machiavellian, realist perspective on human institutions, positing that businesses will inevitably attempt to co-opt any valuable network to protect their profits and dominance. While external attacks like 51% forks are often discussed, the greater existential risk is internal capture—the gradual erosion of a protocol’s neutrality by vested interests, as seen historically with platforms like Visa and Google. The piece critiques permissioned chains, highly centralized “permissionless” layer-1s, and layer-2s without sufficient decentralization (e.g., single sequencers) as inherently vulnerable. These compromised systems, promoted by established financial players, are framed as delaying tactics to stifle truly open networks that threaten existing high-fee, inefficient business models. Real-world examples, such as closed enterprise consortiums that exclude competitors, illustrate how such systems cement oligopolies rather than foster innovation. The author concludes that while decentralized protocols like Ethereum are imperfect and costly to operate, they represent the only viable long-term equilibrium. In a market where value naturally flows to the most secure and neutral settlement layer, only maximally decentralized public blockchains can resist being subsumed by capital and powerful incumbents.

Foresight News33m ago

Amidst Capital's Encirclement, Decentralization is the Sole Defense for Public Blockchains

Foresight News33m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

What is $BANK

Bank AI: A Revolutionary Step in the Future of Banking Introduction In an era marked by rapid advancements in technology, Bank AI stands at the intersection of artificial intelligence (AI) and banking services. This innovative project seeks to redefine the financial landscape, enhancing operational efficiency, security measures, and customer experiences through the power of AI. As we embark on this exploration of Bank AI, we will delve into what the project entails, its operational dynamics, its historical context, and significant milestones. What is Bank AI? At its core, Bank AI represents a transformative initiative aimed at integrating artificial intelligence into various banking operations. This project harnesses the capabilities of AI to automate processes, improve risk management protocols, and enhance customer interaction through personalised services. The primary objectives of Bank AI include: Automation of Banking Functions: By leveraging AI technologies, Bank AI aims to automate routine tasks, reducing the burden on human resources and enhancing efficiency. Enhanced Risk Management: The project utilises AI algorithms to predict and identify risks, thereby fortifying security measures against fraud and other threats. Personalisation of Banking Services: Bank AI focuses on offering tailored financial products and services by analysing customer data and behaviours. Improving Customer Experience: The implementation of AI-driven solutions, such as chatbots and virtual assistants, aims to provide users with more human-like interactions, revolutionising the way customers engage with banks. With these goals, Bank AI positions itself as a crucial player in rendering banking more efficient, secure, and user-centric. Who is the Creator of Bank AI? Details regarding the creator of Bank AI remain unknown. As such, no specific individual or organisation has been identified in the available information. The anonymity surrounding the project's inception raises questions but does not detract from its ambitious vision and objectives. Who are the Investors of Bank AI? Similar to the project's creator, specific information regarding the investors or supporting organisations of Bank AI has not been disclosed. Without this information, it is challenging to outline the financial backing and institutional support that might be propelling the project forward. Nevertheless, the importance of having a robust investment foundation is pivotal for sustaining development in such an innovative field. How Does Bank AI Work? Bank AI operates on several innovative fronts, focusing on unique factors that differentiate it from traditional banking frameworks. Below are key operational features: Automation: By applying machine learning algorithms, Bank AI automates various manual processes within banks. This results in reduced operational costs and allows human workers to redirect their efforts towards more strategic activities. Advanced Risk Management: The integration of AI into risk management practices equips banks with tools to accurately predict potential threats such as fraud, ensuring that customer information and assets remain secure. Tailored Financial Recommendations: Through continuous learning from customer interactions, the AI systems develop a nuanced understanding of user needs, enabling them to offer tailored advice on financial decisions. Enhanced Customer Interactions: Utilizing chatbots and virtual assistants powered by AI, Bank AI enables a more engaging customer experience, allowing users to have their queries resolved quickly, thus reducing wait times and improving satisfaction levels. Together, these operational features position Bank AI as a pioneer in the banking sector, establishing new benchmarks for service delivery and operational excellence. Timeline of Bank AI Understanding the trajectory of Bank AI requires a look at its historical context. Below is a timeline highlighting important milestones and developments: Early 2010s: The conceptualisation of AI integration into banking services began to gain attention as banking institutions recognised the potential benefits. 2018: A marked increase in the implementation of AI technologies occurred when banks started using AI tools like chatbots for basic customer service and risk management systems for improved security handling. 2023: The sophistication of AI continued to advance, with generative AI being introduced for more complex tasks such as document processing and real-time investment analysis. This year marked a significant leap in the capabilities afforded to banks by AI technology. 2024-Current Status: As of this year, Bank AI is on an upward trajectory, with ongoing research and developments poised to further enhance capabilities in banking operations. Continued exploration of AI applications hints at exciting developments yet to come. Key Points About Bank AI Integration of AI in Banking: Bank AI focuses on adopting artificial intelligence to streamline banking processes and improve user experiences. Automation and Risk Management Focus: The project strongly emphasises these areas, aiming to shift the burden of routine tasks while enhancing security frameworks through predictive analytics. Personalised Banking Solutions: By harnessing customer data, Bank AI enables tailored banking services that cater to individual user needs. Commitment to Development: Bank AI remains committed to ongoing research and development efforts, ensuring its adaptability and ongoing relevance as technology continues to evolve. Conclusion In summary, Bank AI exemplifies a crucial step forward in the banking industry, leveraging artificial intelligence to reshape operational paradigms, enhance security, and promote customer satisfaction. Despite gaps in information surrounding the creator and investors, the clear objectives and functional mechanisms of Bank AI provide a strong foundation for its ongoing evolution. As AI technology continues to advance and merge with the banking sector, Bank AI is well-positioned to significantly impact the future of financial services, enhancing the way we understand and interact with banking.

203 Total ViewsPublished 2024.04.06Updated 2024.12.03

What is $BANK

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BANK (BANK) are presented below.

活动图片