The DAO Returns After a Decade, Establishes a $220 Million Security Fund

marsbitPublished on 2026-02-02Last updated on 2026-02-02

Abstract

The DAO, the record-breaking 2016 Ethereum crowdfunding project that led to a major hack and the Ethereum Classic split, is making a symbolic return a decade later. Over 75,109 ETH (worth approximately $220 million) from the incident’s unresolved funds will be used to establish The DAO Security Fund. This fund, managed by a multisig group including key figures like Vitalik Buterin and Taylor Monahan, will focus entirely on enhancing Ethereum’s security. The majority of the ETH (around 69,420) will be staked to create a perpetual endowment, with staking yields and remaining assets funding security efforts such as smart contract audits, core protocol upgrades, and wallet safety improvements. While the initiative aims to turn a historic failure into long-term ecosystem protection, it remains controversial. Questions persist around the legitimacy of repurposing what some consider original token holders' assets and the degree of decentralization in the fund’s governance. Nonetheless, The DAO’s evolution reflects Ethereum’s maturation and the resilience of its community.

In the history of Ethereum's development, nothing is more iconic than the "The DAO" incident in 2016. It was not only the most astonishing crowdfunding project in Ethereum's history but also the protagonist of the hacker attack that led to the split of the Ethereum community and the birth of "Ethereum Classic (ETC)".

After a decade, this name that once nearly destroyed Ethereum—The DAO—is making a comeback in another form. It will launch "TheDAO Security Fund," transforming the remaining over 75,109 ETH (worth more than $220 million) from the incident into a long-term fund focused on Ethereum's security development.

Historical Retrospective: A Crowdfunding Myth That Led to an Ecosystem Crisis

Rewind to 2016. At that time, TheDAO set a crowdfunding record with $150 million in financing, attracting a staggering 14% of Ethereum's total supply.

The vision of this decentralized autonomous organization excited the entire crypto ecosystem, but it soon encountered a catastrophic attack. Hackers exploited a recursive call vulnerability in the smart contract to steal a large amount of funds, prompting the Ethereum community to make a highly controversial decision—implement a hard fork to recover the stolen assets. This move directly led to a split in the community's philosophy, giving birth to Ethereum Classic (ETC).

But fund recovery was never simple. Although the hard fork resolved the redemption of standard DAO tokens, it could not handle all edge cases. Thus, a group of veteran Ethereum community members voluntarily formed the "TheDAO Curator Multisig Wallet" to take on the responsibility of resolving these complex legacy issues.

TheDAO Security Fund Emerges

Griff Green, who served as TheDAO's community manager and is now a co-founder of Giveth, was one of the core members of the "TheDAO Curator Multisig Wallet" back then. According to the official announcement, as early as August 2016, these core administrators clearly stated an important plan: if the leftover funds from these edge cases remained unclaimed after January 31, 2017, they would be used to support Ethereum smart contract security development.

Then, these funds lay "dormant" for nearly a decade. Griff Green said in an interview with Unchained: "As of 2026, we have never touched these funds, and the rise in Ethereum's price has led to substantial appreciation. This is an extremely dramatic turn of events—the 'leftover funds' from back then are now worth far more than TheDAO's original $150 million crowdfunding total."

The DAO Fund's Goal: Safeguarding Ethereum Security

According to the official announcement, the funding sources for TheDAO Security Fund are mainly divided into two parts, totaling over 75,109 ETH (worth $220 million):

· Approximately 70,500 ETH in the ExtraBalance contract, which can still be claimed by eligible individuals.

· Approximately 4,600 ETH and some DAO tokens in TheDAO Curator Multisig, worth about $13.5 million, for which there are no clear claimants.

The operation and usage plan for TheDAO Security Fund's funds are clear and specific: 69,420 ETH allocated from the ExtraBalance contract will be staked, generating staking rewards to form a perpetual endowment fund, providing long-term financial support for Ethereum security development. The staking rewards will be combined with the 4,600 ETH from TheDAO Curator Multisig to jointly fund various Ethereum security-related projects. Simultaneously, the ExtraBalance withdrawal contract will retain a portion of ETH to ensure the rights of legitimate claimants are unaffected.

Regarding the scope of funding, TheDAO Security Fund's core objective is very specific—prioritizing the security of the entire Ethereum ecosystem, covering all dimensions of security development: from wallet user experience optimization and smart contract security audits, to emergency response for security incidents and security upgrades for the Ethereum core protocol, to security protection for Layer 2 networks and cross-chain bridge ecosystems. All work contributing to enhancing Ethereum's security level falls within the fund's funding scope.

Additionally, the fund will rely on the optimization directions and opportunities in the current security landscape outlined by the Ethereum Foundation's Trillion Dollar Security initiative, combined with ongoing communication with ecosystem partners, to determine the specific scope and focus of each funding round.

In terms of the fund allocation mechanism, TheDAO Security Fund adheres to open, bottom-up governance principles. It will employ diverse methods such as quadratic funding, retroactive funding, and request for proposal (RFP)-based ranking votes to carry out funding work in rounds, allowing ecosystem participants to jointly participate in fund allocation decisions.

Currently, the fund has assembled a professional curator team to provide expert guidance and supervision for the fund's operation and funding decisions. Team members are all veteran practitioners and security experts in the crypto ecosystem: including Ethereum founder Vitalik Buterin, MetaMask security engineer Taylor Monahan, Zisk, Giveth co-founder Jordi Baylina, security expert pcaversaccio, ENS co-founder Alex Van de Sande, and Dappnode CEO Pol Lanski.

Summary

TheDAO Security Fund is not without controversy. Its core disputes still revolve around two main issues: first, the "legitimacy of the purpose" of using these leftover funds for a security fund, and second, the "degree of decentralization" of the fund's governance mechanism.

Should this huge asset be considered the "private property" of all original token holders, or has it already been deemed ownerless property to be used for the "public good"?

These controversies not only continue the philosophical divide within the Ethereum community sparked by the 2016 The DAO incident but also reflect the deep-seated contradictions in the current crypto ecosystem at the governance level—the balance between the ideal of decentralization and the efficiency of actual operations, as well as the compliance of asset disposal, remains a subject that the entire industry needs to continuously explore.

But setting aside the controversies, from the 2016 crowdfunding myth and ecosystem crisis to the 2026 security fund and ecosystem safeguarding, the decade-long cycle of The DAO is itself a microcosm of Ethereum's ecosystem development. It witnesses Ethereum's growth from immaturity to maturity and confirms the resilience and community strength of the crypto ecosystem.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat was the original purpose of The DAO in 2016 and what major event occurred?

AThe DAO was a decentralized autonomous organization launched in 2016 that raised a record $150 million in crowdfunding, attracting 14% of the total Ethereum supply. However, it suffered a catastrophic hack where attackers exploited a recursive call vulnerability in its smart contract, leading to a major theft of funds.

QHow is The DAO returning after ten years and what is the value of the new initiative?

AThe DAO is returning through the launch of 'The DAO Security Fund,' which repurposes over 75,109 ETH (worth more than $220 million) from the 2016 incident into a long-term fund dedicated to Ethereum security development.

QWhat are the two main sources of funding for The DAO Security Fund?

AThe funding comes from two sources: approximately 70,500 ETH from the ExtraBalance contract (which can still be claimed by eligible individuals) and about 4,600 ETH and some DAO tokens from The DAO Curator Multisig (valued around $13.5 million, with no clear claimants).

QHow will The DAO Security Fund allocate and use its resources to support Ethereum security?

AThe fund will stake 69,420 ETH from the ExtraBalance to generate yield for a perpetual endowment, while the staking rewards and the 4,600 ETH from the multisig will be used to fund Ethereum security projects. It will support areas like wallet UX, smart contract audits, emergency response, core protocol upgrades, and L2/cross-chain security.

QWho are some of the key members of the guardian team overseeing The DAO Security Fund?

AThe guardian team includes Ethereum founder Vitalik Buterin, MetaMask security engineer Taylor Monahan, Zisk, Giveth co-founder Jordi Baylina, security expert pcaversaccio, ENS co-founder Alex Van de Sande, and Dappnode CEO Pol Lanski.

Related Reads

Podcast Notes | Conversation with GSR Asset Management Head: To Determine if This Crypto Rally is Real, Just Watch the Lending Rates on Aave

Podcast Summary: Dialogue with GSR's Head of Asset Management: To Determine if This Crypto Rally is Real, Just Check Lending Rates on Aave Andy Baehr, Managing Director of Asset Management at GSR, discusses the current crypto market, characterizing it as stuck in a state of "ambivalence" with short-lived, unsustainable rallies. He outlines a simple framework: the market moves between "ambivalence" and "conviction" (sustained upward momentum). Currently, every rally resembles a single-stage rocket booster that quickly fizzles out. Baehr identifies three key signals to watch: 1) DeFi lending rates, 2) the potential passage of the CLARITY Act, and 3) the market forming a consensus on the "Fed hawkish peak." He emphasizes that the most immediate indicator for the sustainability of the recent CPI-triggered rally is the USDC borrowing rate on Aave, currently around 3.75%—close to U.S. Treasury yields. The absence of a credit spread indicates low leverage demand and a lack of market energy. He explains that a healthy, sustained rally requires layered buying pressure. Last year's rally progressed from an ETH short squeeze to crypto-native trader influx and finally to ETF inflows. Currently, this structure is missing. Other potential structural buyers like Digital Asset Treasury (DAT) companies are absent, and ETF flows have proven transient. Baehr notes that while small-cap crypto tokens outperformed large caps in Q2—a potential sign of capitation in major assets—capital is also flowing to more exciting opportunities like AI stocks and tech IPOs, leaving crypto sidelined. Regarding DeFi, he highlights that platforms like Aave provide a clear, real-time signal of leverage demand through their supply/demand-driven interest rates. A significant, sustained rate increase would signal genuine market conviction. He also observes the quiet emergence of fixed-income-like products and vaults in DeFi. On regulation, the probability of the CLARITY Act passing before the August 7th deadline has dropped linearly from 75% to below 40% on Polymarket. Baehr suggests its passage would be treated as a bullish surprise, a potent driver for price movement. However, political hurdles, including ethical clause debates and disclosures about the First Family's crypto profits, remain significant obstacles. Ultimately, the market awaits clarity on the Fed's terminal rate under Chair Warsh. Until the "Fed Solstice"—the point where the market collectively understands the peak of hawkish policy—sustained conviction will be difficult to achieve.

marsbit33m ago

Podcast Notes | Conversation with GSR Asset Management Head: To Determine if This Crypto Rally is Real, Just Watch the Lending Rates on Aave

marsbit33m ago

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Following the collapse of Huione Pay—dubbed the "Alipay of Southeast Asia"—seven months ago, the region's underground financial guarantee platform sector is undergoing a significant reshuffle. This power vacuum has been swiftly filled by emerging platforms such as XinBi, Tiger/Navigator, JinBei (renamed JinBo), Dali/Tiancheng, and FullyLight. These platforms, operating largely via Telegram and offering services like escrow for illicit transactions, have absorbed the vast user base and markets left behind by Huione. While positioning themselves as "trust intermediaries," their primary clientele consists of networks involved in online scams, money laundering, illegal gambling, and even human trafficking. For instance, the Tiger/Navigator platform explicitly provides "escrow" services for kidnapping-for-ransom operations ("强押车交易"). Data underscores the immense scale: Huione alone processed over $103 billion in cryptocurrency payments and facilitated over $31 billion through its escrow market before its downfall, linking it to Cambodia's notorious Prince Group. Since its collapse, competitors have seen explosive growth. For example, the XinBi platform has accumulated over $1.6 billion in total USDT revenue, while platforms like NewPay, OkPay (under Dali), and FullyLight Wallet collectively processed over $4.8 billion in USDT in a single year. This ecosystem thrives in regions like Cambodia and Myanmar, where regulatory gaps allow these platforms to act as critical financial infrastructure for sprawling cybercrime industries, from scam compounds to online casinos. The article concludes that the moniker "Southeast Asian Alipay" is a misnomer, obscuring the platforms' fundamental role in enabling serious criminal enterprises rather than representing legitimate financial innovation.

Odaily星球日报1h ago

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Odaily星球日报1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

How to Buy DAO

Welcome to HTX.com! We've made purchasing DAO Maker (DAO) simple and convenient. Follow our step-by-step guide to embark on your crypto journey.Step 1: Create Your HTX AccountUse your email or phone number to sign up for a free account on HTX. Experience a hassle-free registration journey and unlock all features.Get My AccountStep 2: Go to Buy Crypto and Choose Your Payment MethodCredit/Debit Card: Use your Visa or Mastercard to buy DAO Maker (DAO) instantly.Balance: Use funds from your HTX account balance to trade seamlessly.Third Parties: We've added popular payment methods such as Google Pay and Apple Pay to enhance convenience.P2P: Trade directly with other users on HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): We offer tailor-made services and competitive exchange rates for traders.Step 3: Store Your DAO Maker (DAO)After purchasing your DAO Maker (DAO), store it in your HTX account. Alternatively, you can send it elsewhere via blockchain transfer or use it to trade other cryptocurrencies.Step 4: Trade DAO Maker (DAO)Easily trade DAO Maker (DAO) on HTX's spot market. Simply access your account, select your trading pair, execute your trades, and monitor in real-time. We offer a user-friendly experience for both beginners and seasoned traders.

2.7k Total ViewsPublished 2024.03.29Updated 2026.06.02

How to Buy DAO

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of DAO (DAO) are presented below.

活动图片