# Regulation Related Articles

HTX News Center provides the latest articles and in-depth analysis on "Regulation", covering market trends, project updates, tech developments, and regulatory policies in the crypto industry.

Will the Next Crypto Bull Run Start with On-Chain Trading of SpaceX?

This article presents a scenario-based forecast for the crypto industry from 2026 to 2029, arguing that the next major cycle will be driven not by technological narratives but by legal access to real-world assets. The author predicts that by mid-2026, pre-IPO perpetual contracts for top private companies like SpaceX, OpenAI, and Anthropic on platforms like Hyperliquid will become the primary gateway for accessing quality assets, as most crypto-native tokens fail to capture real value. The much-hyped AI x Crypto intersection largely fails except for prediction markets, which thrive on betting on AI model supremacy. By 2027, public blockchain foundations are forced to choose between catering to retail speculation or building compliant infrastructure for institutions, with many opting for the latter. Growth in stablecoins and tokenized private credit/equity hits a "triple ceiling" due to regulatory and political uncertainty rather than market demand. The pivotal shift is forecast for 2028. A major liquidation event in pre-IPO perpetuals exposes the structural flaw of synthetic markets lacking a real underlying asset anchor. In response, regulatory changes finally allow the public solicitation of private securities resales to verified accredited investors. This creates a legitimate secondary market for real company equity, which then becomes the core asset class of the new bull market, relegating synthetic perps to a niche role. By 2029, the industry becomes "boring" but foundational. Tokens without claims on real cash flows or assets cease trading. Stablecoin growth is steady but politically capped. Crypto infrastructure fades from view as it gets absorbed into traditional finance backends. The article's central thesis is that the key bottleneck for crypto's next phase is legal and regulatory channels for real asset ownership, not technology.

marsbit6h ago

Will the Next Crypto Bull Run Start with On-Chain Trading of SpaceX?

marsbit6h ago

Following US Ban on Fable 5, Zhipu AI's Stock Soars 47%

On June 15th, shares of Zhipu AI surged dramatically on the Hong Kong stock market, peaking at a 47.6% gain before closing 32.82% higher. This sharp increase was directly triggered by two recent industry events. On June 12th, Anthropic announced it was suspending global access to its latest flagship models, Claude Fable 5 and Claude Mythos 5, to comply with a U.S. government export control order. The next day, Zhipu AI announced it would open access to its latest open-source flagship model, GLM-5.2, under the permissive MIT license. The Anthropic incident highlighted a critical issue beyond raw model capability: the risk of sudden, unpredictable loss of access to advanced AI models, especially for developers and enterprises deeply integrated with them. This has shifted industry and market focus toward factors like stability, sustainable access, and controllability. Zhipu's move, promoting "frontier intelligence for all," positions its openly available model as a reliable and accessible alternative. The GLM-5.2 model emphasizes "Long Horizon Task" capabilities with a 1M context window, targeting complex, multi-step coding and engineering workflows where maintaining context is crucial. Analysts note this event exposes the risk of dependency on closed-source models subject to single jurisdictional controls, potentially accelerating a shift toward domestic base models and localized deployments. The market's reaction signals a new valuation dimension in AI: providers who can offer stable, long-term, and sustainably accessible AI capabilities are gaining strategic importance.

marsbit16h ago

Following US Ban on Fable 5, Zhipu AI's Stock Soars 47%

marsbit16h ago

SEC Proposes Repealing 20-Year Core Rule: The Biggest Barrier to Tokenized US Stocks Is Disappearing

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has voted to propose repealing Rule 611 of Regulation NMS, the "order protection rule" that has been a cornerstone of U.S. equity market structure since 2005. This move, while a story of traditional finance, represents a major potential policy shift for tokenized U.S. stocks, removing a key structural barrier. Rule 611 mandates that trading centers cannot execute trades at prices inferior to protected quotes displayed on other exchanges. This framework is fundamentally incompatible with Automated Market Makers (AMMs) used in decentralized finance (DeFi). AMMs execute trades along bonding curves with price slippage and cannot comply with the rule's real-time, price-by-price requirements, meaning any tokenized stock liquidity pool would be in violation. The proposed repeal would replace the prescriptive rule with a principles-based "best execution" obligation on broker-dealers. This allows brokers to route orders to on-chain liquidity pools like AMMs, fulfilling their duty through periodic review rather than per-trade enforcement. The proposal is backed by significant historical context. SEC Chair Atkins, who voted against Reg NMS in 2005 alongside Commissioner Glassman, is now acting on his decades-old dissent. They argued Rule 611 would distort markets and push liquidity into dark pools rather than improve transparency—a prediction validated by current SEC data showing nearly half of trading now occurs off-exchange. The SEC's proposal explicitly connects to the crypto industry, citing academic work that Rule 611 has prevented innovation like AMMs and atomic settlement in stock markets. The process has been deliberate, following public roundtables and comments. While tokenized securities face other regulatory hurdles, this repeal is seen as a critical first step in clearing the path for next-generation market structure innovation.

marsbit19h ago

SEC Proposes Repealing 20-Year Core Rule: The Biggest Barrier to Tokenized US Stocks Is Disappearing

marsbit19h ago

Crypto 2029: The Ultimate Prediction of the Four-Year Cycle in the Encryption Industry

Crypto 2029: A Four-Year Cycle Forecast This analysis predicts key developments in the cryptocurrency industry from 2025 to 2029, arguing that the sector's evolution will be defined by legal and regulatory shifts, not just technology. By mid-2026, a market for perpetual futures contracts on private companies (like SpaceX) on platforms like Hyperliquid emerges as the primary venue for pricing premium assets, overshadowing speculative altcoins. The "AI + Crypto" narrative fades as AI companies operate successfully without blockchain. Meanwhile, a quiet institutional adoption of tokenized traditional assets (like money market funds) begins under new regulations like the CLARITY Act. In 2027, major public blockchain foundations pivot decisively to serve institutional clients, building compliance infrastructure. However, three sectors hit ceilings: private company perpetuals due to advertising restrictions, stablecoins due to political uncertainty ahead of the 2028 US election, and tokenization due to cautious scaling. The 2028 US election (assuming a Democratic win) reduces regulatory uncertainty. A major liquidation event in the private company perpetuals market exposes the flaw of synthetic derivatives lacking a legally enforceable underlying asset. In response, regulators ease rules, allowing the open marketing of secondary private equity shares to verified accredited investors. This creates a legal, direct market for assets previously only accessible via synthetic contracts. By 2029, a new bull market is driven by trading in real private equity shares of innovative companies (biotech, robotics, AI). Tokens without legal claims to real assets lose all liquidity. Stablecoin growth is steady but politically capped. Speculative crypto trading shrinks to a niche. Cryptocurrency's role as financial infrastructure becomes invisible and mundane, akin to back-end settlement systems. The three core questions are answered: Token value derives from legal claims to real assets. Frontier tech adopts crypto via private market trading channels. Crypto's integration into traditional finance becomes complete and unremarkable. The central, testable prediction is that by late 2028, legal pathways for mainstream investor access to private assets will have opened; if not, this entire forecast fails.

marsbit19h ago

Crypto 2029: The Ultimate Prediction of the Four-Year Cycle in the Encryption Industry

marsbit19h ago

The Rise of Prediction Markets: Why Is This Trillion-Dollar Industry Making U.S. Regulators 'Sit on Pins and Needles'?

The article, "The Rise of Prediction Markets: Why Is the Trillion-Dollar Trend Making US Regulators Uneasy?", explores the rapid growth of prediction markets and the regulatory pushback they face. It argues that platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi, where users trade contracts on real-world outcomes, create highly efficient information aggregates. Their monthly trading volume has surpassed $24 billion, with projections pointing toward a trillion-dollar annual market by 2030. A core example is the 2026 Iran conflict, where prediction market signals accurately foreshadowed the disruption of the Strait of Hormuz and an oil price spike hours before official announcements, outperforming traditional analysts. The piece contends US regulators' primary motivation is not public protection but self-preservation and control. It cites a court ruling against the CFTC, which found the agency's concerns over market manipulation "speculative" and lacking concrete evidence. At the state level, the driving force is framed as lost tax revenue from traditional gambling, not documented social harm. Citing economist Friedrich Hayek, the article concludes that prediction markets excel by crowdsourcing decentralized, "local knowledge" into a dynamic, continuous price signal, offering a real-time reality check against official narratives and static forecasts.

marsbit19h ago

The Rise of Prediction Markets: Why Is This Trillion-Dollar Industry Making U.S. Regulators 'Sit on Pins and Needles'?

marsbit19h ago

Crypto 2029: The Ultimate Forecast for the Four-Year Cycle of the Cryptocurrency Industry

Title: Crypto 2029: The Ultimate Four-Year Cycle Prediction for the Encryption Industry This article outlines a detailed, stage-by-stage prediction for the crypto industry from the present to 2029, focusing on tangible shifts rather than abstract theory. Key predictions include: **2026 Mid-Year:** The market shifts focus from traditional tokens to synthetic perpetual contracts for private company shares (e.g., SpaceX on Hyperliquid), which become primary price discovery tools for pre-IPO assets. Most altcoins languish as the market seeks assets with real underlying value. **2026 Year-End:** The "AI + crypto" narrative fades as the AI industry itself does not require crypto infrastructure, except for prediction markets betting on model performance. Concurrently, a quiet institutional adoption of asset tokenization (e.g., money market funds) begins under new regulations like the CLARITY Act, creating a dual economy. **2027:** Major public blockchain foundations pivot decisively to serve institutional clients with compliance tools and enterprise sales, while quietly building infrastructure for a future wave of accredited retail investors. Three sectors hit growth ceilings: private perpetual contracts (due to legal restrictions on marketing), stablecoins (due to political uncertainty ahead of the 2028 US election), and tokenized assets (due to cautious institutional scaling). **2028:** Speculative trading diminishes as market efficiency drains liquidity. A major liquidation cascade in synthetic perpetual contracts exposes the flaw of lacking a legally enforceable underlying asset. In response, regulations are revised to allow marketing of private security secondary sales to accredited investors. This creates a legal, direct market for private company equity, absorbing much of the demand previously met by synthetic derivatives. **2029:** A new bull market emerges, driven not by tokens but by tradable equity in innovative private companies (biotech, robotics, AI). Tokens without legally enforceable claims to real assets lose all liquidity. Successful blockchains become invisible settlement infrastructure. Stablecoins grow steadily at a policy-capped rate. Speculation becomes a niche. Core Questions Answered: 1. **Token Value:** Determined solely by legally enforceable claims to real-world assets. 2. **Tech Adoption:** Achieved through blockchain-based primary/secondary markets for private equity, not through forcing tokens onto tech firms. 3. **Crypto as Infrastructure:** The transition happens silently; the technology becomes a mundane, unseen utility like traditional settlement systems. The entire thesis hinges on one testable variable: by late 2028, whether accredited retail investors gain legal, direct access to private asset markets. If not, the core premise—that legal frameworks, not technology, are the main bottleneck—fails.

Foresight News19h ago

Crypto 2029: The Ultimate Forecast for the Four-Year Cycle of the Cryptocurrency Industry

Foresight News19h ago

The Most Advanced Large Models Are Now Subject to Export Controls Like Enriched Uranium

In an unprecedented move mirroring the control of enriched uranium, the US Commerce Department has imposed an export control ban on Anthropic's advanced AI models, Fable 5 and Mythos 5, forcing their global shutdown. This marks the first time a purely digital entity—a set of neural network weights—has been subjected to such hardware-like strategic export restrictions, based not on physical scarcity but on its concentrated "capability density." The article draws a direct parallel to the historical control of nuclear technology, arguing that just as uranium ore becomes a controlled substance only when enriched to a critical threshold, AI capabilities become subject to regulation when compressed into a single, potent, and easily accessible interface. This "enriched AI" is seen as crossing a threshold where its aggregated power poses a potential threat. The author predicts three major consequences over the next decade. First, capability auditing will become institutionalized, with governments setting compliance checklists and thresholds for model power, triggering automatic export controls. Second, jurisdictional boundaries will blur as US export controls extend their reach globally, governing any user of American AI services regardless of location, forcing non-US entities to reconsider their AI supply chain dependencies. Third, a technological bifurcation will occur, splitting the AI landscape into a restricted, high-risk track of advanced US proprietary models and a more reliable track of open-source or locally developed alternatives, where guaranteed access may outweigh raw performance. The core crisis exposed is the lack of a legal property rights framework for AI "intelligence." While companies invest heavily in integrating these models into their production systems, legally they only purchase a service that can be revoked at any time, leaving them with no recourse for their sunk investments. The conclusion warns of a permanently fractured digital world where the most capable models may not be the most usable, and clear, unassailable ownership of technology will become paramount.

marsbit22h ago

The Most Advanced Large Models Are Now Subject to Export Controls Like Enriched Uranium

marsbit22h ago

活动图片